finding(examples): the showcase seed writes f_address.postal_code, a key the value contract does not declare — accepted-and-stripped by the spec, and the ZIP box renders empty #13388

Description

@claude

Filed unassigned by the objectui#6812 survey seat while counting stored address values. Recording, not choosingdomain:*, type and grading are triage's to produce.

Dedup before filing. Repo-scoped REST listing of the 356 open issues in this repo (PRs excluded) plus a local regex over title+body: zero hits for postal_code, postalCode, f_address, AddressValueSchema. A zero is not a reading on its own, so it was reverse-checked with a control that must hit — showcase.*seed|seed.*showcase returned six (#10663, #10454, #10342, #10224, #10085, #9788). The zero stands.

The fact

examples/app-showcase/src/data/seed/index.ts:343 seeds the field-zoo specimen's address as:

f_address: { street: '1 Main St', city: 'Seattle', state: 'WA', postal_code: '98101', country: 'US' }

postal_code is not a key of the value contract. AddressValueSchema (packages/spec/src/data/field-value.zod.ts) declares street / city / state / postalCode / country / countryCode / formatted — camelCase postalCode. Measured with the platform's own predicate, in one call:

valueSchemaFor({ type: 'address' }, 'stored').safeParse(seededValue)
=> success: true, data: { street: '1 Main St', city: 'Seattle', state: 'WA', country: 'US' }

⇒ the value is accepted and the postal code is silently dropped from the parse output: every member of AddressValueSchema is optional and it is a zod z.object, which strips unrecognized keys rather than refusing them. So this drift cannot surface as a value-shape violation — a stored-value scan will count it as clean.

The renderer half is where it becomes visible. @object-ui/fields reads the postal code through readPostalCode(addr), which is addr.postalCode ?? addr.zipCode (packages/fields/src/widgets/address-format.ts; zipCode is a read-only compatibility limb for data an older objectui build mis-wrote, objectstack#5143). Neither spelling matches postal_code, so the showcase specimen renders with an empty ZIP box — in the object whose whole job is to show what each field type looks like.

What is NOT claimed here

  • ⛔ No renderer change is proposed. postal_code is a third spelling of a key the contract already names once; adding a reader for it would be exactly the lenient consumer-side alias AGENTS.md #0.1 bans. The producer here is this repo's own seed.
  • ⛔ No claim about customer data. This is one seeded specimen in the example app; whether any deployment stores postal_code is not measurable from a development container.

Suggested first step

Fix the seed to the contract's spelling (postalCode). Worth a moment's triage thought on the wider question it exposes, which is a different card if it is one: an all-optional z.object value class cannot refuse a wrong key, so address is the one ADR-0104 structured class where a zero-violation count is close to unfalsifiable.

Related

  • objectui#6812 — the survey that measured this (the address population is 2 values, and this is one of them).
  • objectstack#5143 — the zipCode/postalCode round-trip fix in the widget, which named the same key and the same stripping behaviour.

Generated by Claude Code

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
     blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
    }
    } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
    })();
    (function(){
    try {
    var __m = "github.com";
    var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
    
    Skip to content

    finding(examples): the showcase seed writes f_address.postal_code, a key the value contract does not declare — accepted-and-stripped by the spec, and the ZIP box renders empty #13388

    Description

    @claude

    Filed unassigned by the objectui#6812 survey seat while counting stored address values. Recording, not choosingdomain:*, type and grading are triage's to produce.

    Dedup before filing. Repo-scoped REST listing of the 356 open issues in this repo (PRs excluded) plus a local regex over title+body: zero hits for postal_code, postalCode, f_address, AddressValueSchema. A zero is not a reading on its own, so it was reverse-checked with a control that must hit — showcase.*seed|seed.*showcase returned six (#10663, #10454, #10342, #10224, #10085, #9788). The zero stands.

    The fact

    examples/app-showcase/src/data/seed/index.ts:343 seeds the field-zoo specimen's address as:

    f_address: { street: '1 Main St', city: 'Seattle', state: 'WA', postal_code: '98101', country: 'US' }
    

    postal_code is not a key of the value contract. AddressValueSchema (packages/spec/src/data/field-value.zod.ts) declares street / city / state / postalCode / country / countryCode / formatted — camelCase postalCode. Measured with the platform's own predicate, in one call:

    valueSchemaFor({ type: 'address' }, 'stored').safeParse(seededValue)
    => success: true, data: { street: '1 Main St', city: 'Seattle', state: 'WA', country: 'US' }
    

    ⇒ the value is accepted and the postal code is silently dropped from the parse output: every member of AddressValueSchema is optional and it is a zod z.object, which strips unrecognized keys rather than refusing them. So this drift cannot surface as a value-shape violation — a stored-value scan will count it as clean.

    The renderer half is where it becomes visible. @object-ui/fields reads the postal code through readPostalCode(addr), which is addr.postalCode ?? addr.zipCode (packages/fields/src/widgets/address-format.ts; zipCode is a read-only compatibility limb for data an older objectui build mis-wrote, objectstack#5143). Neither spelling matches postal_code, so the showcase specimen renders with an empty ZIP box — in the object whose whole job is to show what each field type looks like.

    What is NOT claimed here

    • ⛔ No renderer change is proposed. postal_code is a third spelling of a key the contract already names once; adding a reader for it would be exactly the lenient consumer-side alias AGENTS.md #0.1 bans. The producer here is this repo's own seed.
    • ⛔ No claim about customer data. This is one seeded specimen in the example app; whether any deployment stores postal_code is not measurable from a development container.

    Suggested first step

    Fix the seed to the contract's spelling (postalCode). Worth a moment's triage thought on the wider question it exposes, which is a different card if it is one: an all-optional z.object value class cannot refuse a wrong key, so address is the one ADR-0104 structured class where a zero-violation count is close to unfalsifiable.

    Related

    • objectui#6812 — the survey that measured this (the address population is 2 values, and this is one of them).
    • objectstack#5143 — the zipCode/postalCode round-trip fix in the widget, which named the same key and the same stripping behaviour.

    Generated by Claude Code

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
      Skip to content

      finding(examples): the showcase seed writes f_address.postal_code, a key the value contract does not declare — accepted-and-stripped by the spec, and the ZIP box renders empty #13388

      Description

      @claude

      Filed unassigned by the objectui#6812 survey seat while counting stored address values. Recording, not choosingdomain:*, type and grading are triage's to produce.

      Dedup before filing. Repo-scoped REST listing of the 356 open issues in this repo (PRs excluded) plus a local regex over title+body: zero hits for postal_code, postalCode, f_address, AddressValueSchema. A zero is not a reading on its own, so it was reverse-checked with a control that must hit — showcase.*seed|seed.*showcase returned six (#10663, #10454, #10342, #10224, #10085, #9788). The zero stands.

      The fact

      examples/app-showcase/src/data/seed/index.ts:343 seeds the field-zoo specimen's address as:

      f_address: { street: '1 Main St', city: 'Seattle', state: 'WA', postal_code: '98101', country: 'US' }
      

      postal_code is not a key of the value contract. AddressValueSchema (packages/spec/src/data/field-value.zod.ts) declares street / city / state / postalCode / country / countryCode / formatted — camelCase postalCode. Measured with the platform's own predicate, in one call:

      valueSchemaFor({ type: 'address' }, 'stored').safeParse(seededValue)
      => success: true, data: { street: '1 Main St', city: 'Seattle', state: 'WA', country: 'US' }
      

      ⇒ the value is accepted and the postal code is silently dropped from the parse output: every member of AddressValueSchema is optional and it is a zod z.object, which strips unrecognized keys rather than refusing them. So this drift cannot surface as a value-shape violation — a stored-value scan will count it as clean.

      The renderer half is where it becomes visible. @object-ui/fields reads the postal code through readPostalCode(addr), which is addr.postalCode ?? addr.zipCode (packages/fields/src/widgets/address-format.ts; zipCode is a read-only compatibility limb for data an older objectui build mis-wrote, objectstack#5143). Neither spelling matches postal_code, so the showcase specimen renders with an empty ZIP box — in the object whose whole job is to show what each field type looks like.

      What is NOT claimed here

      • ⛔ No renderer change is proposed. postal_code is a third spelling of a key the contract already names once; adding a reader for it would be exactly the lenient consumer-side alias AGENTS.md #0.1 bans. The producer here is this repo's own seed.
      • ⛔ No claim about customer data. This is one seeded specimen in the example app; whether any deployment stores postal_code is not measurable from a development container.

      Suggested first step

      Fix the seed to the contract's spelling (postalCode). Worth a moment's triage thought on the wider question it exposes, which is a different card if it is one: an all-optional z.object value class cannot refuse a wrong key, so address is the one ADR-0104 structured class where a zero-violation count is close to unfalsifiable.

      Related

      • objectui#6812 — the survey that measured this (the address population is 2 values, and this is one of them).
      • objectstack#5143 — the zipCode/postalCode round-trip fix in the widget, which named the same key and the same stripping behaviour.

      Generated by Claude Code

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      Type

      No type

      Projects

      No projects

        Milestone

        No milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions

        , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
        Skip to content

        finding(examples): the showcase seed writes f_address.postal_code, a key the value contract does not declare — accepted-and-stripped by the spec, and the ZIP box renders empty #13388

        Description

        @claude

        Filed unassigned by the objectui#6812 survey seat while counting stored address values. Recording, not choosingdomain:*, type and grading are triage's to produce.

        Dedup before filing. Repo-scoped REST listing of the 356 open issues in this repo (PRs excluded) plus a local regex over title+body: zero hits for postal_code, postalCode, f_address, AddressValueSchema. A zero is not a reading on its own, so it was reverse-checked with a control that must hit — showcase.*seed|seed.*showcase returned six (#10663, #10454, #10342, #10224, #10085, #9788). The zero stands.

        The fact

        examples/app-showcase/src/data/seed/index.ts:343 seeds the field-zoo specimen's address as:

        f_address: { street: '1 Main St', city: 'Seattle', state: 'WA', postal_code: '98101', country: 'US' }
        

        postal_code is not a key of the value contract. AddressValueSchema (packages/spec/src/data/field-value.zod.ts) declares street / city / state / postalCode / country / countryCode / formatted — camelCase postalCode. Measured with the platform's own predicate, in one call:

        valueSchemaFor({ type: 'address' }, 'stored').safeParse(seededValue)
        => success: true, data: { street: '1 Main St', city: 'Seattle', state: 'WA', country: 'US' }
        

        ⇒ the value is accepted and the postal code is silently dropped from the parse output: every member of AddressValueSchema is optional and it is a zod z.object, which strips unrecognized keys rather than refusing them. So this drift cannot surface as a value-shape violation — a stored-value scan will count it as clean.

        The renderer half is where it becomes visible. @object-ui/fields reads the postal code through readPostalCode(addr), which is addr.postalCode ?? addr.zipCode (packages/fields/src/widgets/address-format.ts; zipCode is a read-only compatibility limb for data an older objectui build mis-wrote, objectstack#5143). Neither spelling matches postal_code, so the showcase specimen renders with an empty ZIP box — in the object whose whole job is to show what each field type looks like.

        What is NOT claimed here

        • ⛔ No renderer change is proposed. postal_code is a third spelling of a key the contract already names once; adding a reader for it would be exactly the lenient consumer-side alias AGENTS.md #0.1 bans. The producer here is this repo's own seed.
        • ⛔ No claim about customer data. This is one seeded specimen in the example app; whether any deployment stores postal_code is not measurable from a development container.

        Suggested first step

        Fix the seed to the contract's spelling (postalCode). Worth a moment's triage thought on the wider question it exposes, which is a different card if it is one: an all-optional z.object value class cannot refuse a wrong key, so address is the one ADR-0104 structured class where a zero-violation count is close to unfalsifiable.

        Related

        • objectui#6812 — the survey that measured this (the address population is 2 values, and this is one of them).
        • objectstack#5143 — the zipCode/postalCode round-trip fix in the widget, which named the same key and the same stripping behaviour.

        Generated by Claude Code

        Metadata

        Metadata

        Assignees

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
          Skip to content

          finding(examples): the showcase seed writes f_address.postal_code, a key the value contract does not declare — accepted-and-stripped by the spec, and the ZIP box renders empty #13388

          Description

          @claude

          Filed unassigned by the objectui#6812 survey seat while counting stored address values. Recording, not choosingdomain:*, type and grading are triage's to produce.

          Dedup before filing. Repo-scoped REST listing of the 356 open issues in this repo (PRs excluded) plus a local regex over title+body: zero hits for postal_code, postalCode, f_address, AddressValueSchema. A zero is not a reading on its own, so it was reverse-checked with a control that must hit — showcase.*seed|seed.*showcase returned six (#10663, #10454, #10342, #10224, #10085, #9788). The zero stands.

          The fact

          examples/app-showcase/src/data/seed/index.ts:343 seeds the field-zoo specimen's address as:

          f_address: { street: '1 Main St', city: 'Seattle', state: 'WA', postal_code: '98101', country: 'US' }
          

          postal_code is not a key of the value contract. AddressValueSchema (packages/spec/src/data/field-value.zod.ts) declares street / city / state / postalCode / country / countryCode / formatted — camelCase postalCode. Measured with the platform's own predicate, in one call:

          valueSchemaFor({ type: 'address' }, 'stored').safeParse(seededValue)
          => success: true, data: { street: '1 Main St', city: 'Seattle', state: 'WA', country: 'US' }
          

          ⇒ the value is accepted and the postal code is silently dropped from the parse output: every member of AddressValueSchema is optional and it is a zod z.object, which strips unrecognized keys rather than refusing them. So this drift cannot surface as a value-shape violation — a stored-value scan will count it as clean.

          The renderer half is where it becomes visible. @object-ui/fields reads the postal code through readPostalCode(addr), which is addr.postalCode ?? addr.zipCode (packages/fields/src/widgets/address-format.ts; zipCode is a read-only compatibility limb for data an older objectui build mis-wrote, objectstack#5143). Neither spelling matches postal_code, so the showcase specimen renders with an empty ZIP box — in the object whose whole job is to show what each field type looks like.

          What is NOT claimed here

          • ⛔ No renderer change is proposed. postal_code is a third spelling of a key the contract already names once; adding a reader for it would be exactly the lenient consumer-side alias AGENTS.md #0.1 bans. The producer here is this repo's own seed.
          • ⛔ No claim about customer data. This is one seeded specimen in the example app; whether any deployment stores postal_code is not measurable from a development container.

          Suggested first step

          Fix the seed to the contract's spelling (postalCode). Worth a moment's triage thought on the wider question it exposes, which is a different card if it is one: an all-optional z.object value class cannot refuse a wrong key, so address is the one ADR-0104 structured class where a zero-violation count is close to unfalsifiable.

          Related

          • objectui#6812 — the survey that measured this (the address population is 2 values, and this is one of them).
          • objectstack#5143 — the zipCode/postalCode round-trip fix in the widget, which named the same key and the same stripping behaviour.

          Generated by Claude Code

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          Type

          No type

          Projects

          No projects

            Milestone

            No milestone

            Relationships

            None yet

            Development

            No branches or pull requests

            Issue actions

            , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
            Skip to content

            finding(examples): the showcase seed writes f_address.postal_code, a key the value contract does not declare — accepted-and-stripped by the spec, and the ZIP box renders empty #13388

            Description

            @claude

            Filed unassigned by the objectui#6812 survey seat while counting stored address values. Recording, not choosingdomain:*, type and grading are triage's to produce.

            Dedup before filing. Repo-scoped REST listing of the 356 open issues in this repo (PRs excluded) plus a local regex over title+body: zero hits for postal_code, postalCode, f_address, AddressValueSchema. A zero is not a reading on its own, so it was reverse-checked with a control that must hit — showcase.*seed|seed.*showcase returned six (#10663, #10454, #10342, #10224, #10085, #9788). The zero stands.

            The fact

            examples/app-showcase/src/data/seed/index.ts:343 seeds the field-zoo specimen's address as:

            f_address: { street: '1 Main St', city: 'Seattle', state: 'WA', postal_code: '98101', country: 'US' }
            

            postal_code is not a key of the value contract. AddressValueSchema (packages/spec/src/data/field-value.zod.ts) declares street / city / state / postalCode / country / countryCode / formatted — camelCase postalCode. Measured with the platform's own predicate, in one call:

            valueSchemaFor({ type: 'address' }, 'stored').safeParse(seededValue)
            => success: true, data: { street: '1 Main St', city: 'Seattle', state: 'WA', country: 'US' }
            

            ⇒ the value is accepted and the postal code is silently dropped from the parse output: every member of AddressValueSchema is optional and it is a zod z.object, which strips unrecognized keys rather than refusing them. So this drift cannot surface as a value-shape violation — a stored-value scan will count it as clean.

            The renderer half is where it becomes visible. @object-ui/fields reads the postal code through readPostalCode(addr), which is addr.postalCode ?? addr.zipCode (packages/fields/src/widgets/address-format.ts; zipCode is a read-only compatibility limb for data an older objectui build mis-wrote, objectstack#5143). Neither spelling matches postal_code, so the showcase specimen renders with an empty ZIP box — in the object whose whole job is to show what each field type looks like.

            What is NOT claimed here

            • ⛔ No renderer change is proposed. postal_code is a third spelling of a key the contract already names once; adding a reader for it would be exactly the lenient consumer-side alias AGENTS.md #0.1 bans. The producer here is this repo's own seed.
            • ⛔ No claim about customer data. This is one seeded specimen in the example app; whether any deployment stores postal_code is not measurable from a development container.

            Suggested first step

            Fix the seed to the contract's spelling (postalCode). Worth a moment's triage thought on the wider question it exposes, which is a different card if it is one: an all-optional z.object value class cannot refuse a wrong key, so address is the one ADR-0104 structured class where a zero-violation count is close to unfalsifiable.

            Related

            • objectui#6812 — the survey that measured this (the address population is 2 values, and this is one of them).
            • objectstack#5143 — the zipCode/postalCode round-trip fix in the widget, which named the same key and the same stripping behaviour.

            Generated by Claude Code

            Metadata

            Metadata

            Assignees

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              finding(examples): the showcase seed writes f_address.postal_code, a key the value contract does not declare — accepted-and-stripped by the spec, and the ZIP box renders empty #13388

              Description

              @claude

              Filed unassigned by the objectui#6812 survey seat while counting stored address values. Recording, not choosingdomain:*, type and grading are triage's to produce.

              Dedup before filing. Repo-scoped REST listing of the 356 open issues in this repo (PRs excluded) plus a local regex over title+body: zero hits for postal_code, postalCode, f_address, AddressValueSchema. A zero is not a reading on its own, so it was reverse-checked with a control that must hit — showcase.*seed|seed.*showcase returned six (#10663, #10454, #10342, #10224, #10085, #9788). The zero stands.

              The fact

              examples/app-showcase/src/data/seed/index.ts:343 seeds the field-zoo specimen's address as:

              f_address: { street: '1 Main St', city: 'Seattle', state: 'WA', postal_code: '98101', country: 'US' }
              

              postal_code is not a key of the value contract. AddressValueSchema (packages/spec/src/data/field-value.zod.ts) declares street / city / state / postalCode / country / countryCode / formatted — camelCase postalCode. Measured with the platform's own predicate, in one call:

              valueSchemaFor({ type: 'address' }, 'stored').safeParse(seededValue)
              => success: true, data: { street: '1 Main St', city: 'Seattle', state: 'WA', country: 'US' }
              

              ⇒ the value is accepted and the postal code is silently dropped from the parse output: every member of AddressValueSchema is optional and it is a zod z.object, which strips unrecognized keys rather than refusing them. So this drift cannot surface as a value-shape violation — a stored-value scan will count it as clean.

              The renderer half is where it becomes visible. @object-ui/fields reads the postal code through readPostalCode(addr), which is addr.postalCode ?? addr.zipCode (packages/fields/src/widgets/address-format.ts; zipCode is a read-only compatibility limb for data an older objectui build mis-wrote, objectstack#5143). Neither spelling matches postal_code, so the showcase specimen renders with an empty ZIP box — in the object whose whole job is to show what each field type looks like.

              What is NOT claimed here

              • ⛔ No renderer change is proposed. postal_code is a third spelling of a key the contract already names once; adding a reader for it would be exactly the lenient consumer-side alias AGENTS.md #0.1 bans. The producer here is this repo's own seed.
              • ⛔ No claim about customer data. This is one seeded specimen in the example app; whether any deployment stores postal_code is not measurable from a development container.

              Suggested first step

              Fix the seed to the contract's spelling (postalCode). Worth a moment's triage thought on the wider question it exposes, which is a different card if it is one: an all-optional z.object value class cannot refuse a wrong key, so address is the one ADR-0104 structured class where a zero-violation count is close to unfalsifiable.

              Related

              • objectui#6812 — the survey that measured this (the address population is 2 values, and this is one of them).
              • objectstack#5143 — the zipCode/postalCode round-trip fix in the widget, which named the same key and the same stripping behaviour.

              Generated by Claude Code

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              Type

              No type

              Projects

              No projects

                Milestone

                No milestone

                Relationships

                None yet

                Development

                No branches or pull requests

                Issue actions

                , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                Skip to content

                finding(examples): the showcase seed writes f_address.postal_code, a key the value contract does not declare — accepted-and-stripped by the spec, and the ZIP box renders empty #13388

                Description

                @claude

                Filed unassigned by the objectui#6812 survey seat while counting stored address values. Recording, not choosingdomain:*, type and grading are triage's to produce.

                Dedup before filing. Repo-scoped REST listing of the 356 open issues in this repo (PRs excluded) plus a local regex over title+body: zero hits for postal_code, postalCode, f_address, AddressValueSchema. A zero is not a reading on its own, so it was reverse-checked with a control that must hit — showcase.*seed|seed.*showcase returned six (#10663, #10454, #10342, #10224, #10085, #9788). The zero stands.

                The fact

                examples/app-showcase/src/data/seed/index.ts:343 seeds the field-zoo specimen's address as:

                f_address: { street: '1 Main St', city: 'Seattle', state: 'WA', postal_code: '98101', country: 'US' }
                

                postal_code is not a key of the value contract. AddressValueSchema (packages/spec/src/data/field-value.zod.ts) declares street / city / state / postalCode / country / countryCode / formatted — camelCase postalCode. Measured with the platform's own predicate, in one call:

                valueSchemaFor({ type: 'address' }, 'stored').safeParse(seededValue)
                => success: true, data: { street: '1 Main St', city: 'Seattle', state: 'WA', country: 'US' }
                

                ⇒ the value is accepted and the postal code is silently dropped from the parse output: every member of AddressValueSchema is optional and it is a zod z.object, which strips unrecognized keys rather than refusing them. So this drift cannot surface as a value-shape violation — a stored-value scan will count it as clean.

                The renderer half is where it becomes visible. @object-ui/fields reads the postal code through readPostalCode(addr), which is addr.postalCode ?? addr.zipCode (packages/fields/src/widgets/address-format.ts; zipCode is a read-only compatibility limb for data an older objectui build mis-wrote, objectstack#5143). Neither spelling matches postal_code, so the showcase specimen renders with an empty ZIP box — in the object whose whole job is to show what each field type looks like.

                What is NOT claimed here

                • ⛔ No renderer change is proposed. postal_code is a third spelling of a key the contract already names once; adding a reader for it would be exactly the lenient consumer-side alias AGENTS.md #0.1 bans. The producer here is this repo's own seed.
                • ⛔ No claim about customer data. This is one seeded specimen in the example app; whether any deployment stores postal_code is not measurable from a development container.

                Suggested first step

                Fix the seed to the contract's spelling (postalCode). Worth a moment's triage thought on the wider question it exposes, which is a different card if it is one: an all-optional z.object value class cannot refuse a wrong key, so address is the one ADR-0104 structured class where a zero-violation count is close to unfalsifiable.

                Related

                • objectui#6812 — the survey that measured this (the address population is 2 values, and this is one of them).
                • objectstack#5143 — the zipCode/postalCode round-trip fix in the widget, which named the same key and the same stripping behaviour.

                Generated by Claude Code

                Metadata

                Metadata

                Assignees

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions