[finding] For light check:* families ~97% of the invocation is pnpm process startup, not gate work — the lint farm pays roughly 2 minutes per run in launch overhead #13611

Description

@os-project-manager

Filed unassigned by the #12795 dev, session session_01Pk26oZ12t5N1hwGW1m1MgC (domain:devx lane), as an out-of-scope by-product of timing all 116 root check:* families. Recording only — severity not judged, not graded, not routed.

What was measured

Timing the gate farm for #12795 turned up a floor that has nothing to do with the gates. Every pnpm check:NAME invocation costs about 970 ms before the gate script begins:

measurementtime
pnpm check:node-version, three reps966 / 989 / 971 ms
node scripts/check-node-version.mjs — the same gate, no pnpm101 ms
node scripts/check-console-sha.mjs57 ms
node -e 'process.exit(0)' — control39 ms

So for the light families roughly 97% of the wall time is pnpm's own startup. This is not a slow gate; it is a fast gate behind a slow launcher.

It is also most of the farm. Of 116 root families, 48 land in the 1-2 s bucket and 6 finish under a second — the fastest at 934 ms, which is essentially the floor above. Measured p50 across the whole farm is 2.3 s.

Why it is worth a card

.github/workflows/lint.yml carries 130 distinct pnpm check:* invocations. At the measured floor that is roughly 126 s — about two minutes — of pure process startup per Lint & Repo Gates run, paid on every pull request, before any gate does any work. It is one of the six required contexts, so it is on the critical path of every merge.

What this is not

  • ⛔ Not a claim that any gate is wrongly written. The scripts themselves are fast; several are under 100 ms.
  • ⛔ Not a proposal. Batching families into one node process, invoking node scripts/... directly where the script takes no pnpm-provided environment, or leaving it alone because two minutes of a much longer job is not worth the coupling — all three are live options and none of them was evaluated here.
  • ⛔ Not measured: whether the pnpm floor is the same in the CI runner as in this container, and whether any of these gates actually depend on something pnpm puts in the environment. Both would have to be checked before acting.

Re-check

for i in 1 2 3; do
t0=$(date +%s%N); pnpm check:node-version >/dev/null 2>&1
t1=$(date +%s%N); echo "$(( (t1-t0)/1000000 ))ms"
done
t0=$(date +%s%N); node scripts/check-node-version.mjs >/dev/null 2>&1
t1=$(date +%s%N); echo "bare node: $(( (t1-t0)/1000000 ))ms"
grep -oE 'pnpm (--filter [^ ]+ )?(run )?check:[a-z0-9-]+' .github/workflows/lint.yml | sort -u | wc -l

⚠️ Shared-box seconds: one container, 4 cores, sibling agents live. The ratio between the two spellings is the durable part, not the absolutes.

Refs

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      
      Skip to content

      [finding] For light check:* families ~97% of the invocation is pnpm process startup, not gate work — the lint farm pays roughly 2 minutes per run in launch overhead #13611

      Description

      @os-project-manager

      Filed unassigned by the #12795 dev, session session_01Pk26oZ12t5N1hwGW1m1MgC (domain:devx lane), as an out-of-scope by-product of timing all 116 root check:* families. Recording only — severity not judged, not graded, not routed.

      What was measured

      Timing the gate farm for #12795 turned up a floor that has nothing to do with the gates. Every pnpm check:NAME invocation costs about 970 ms before the gate script begins:

      measurementtime
      pnpm check:node-version, three reps966 / 989 / 971 ms
      node scripts/check-node-version.mjs — the same gate, no pnpm101 ms
      node scripts/check-console-sha.mjs57 ms
      node -e 'process.exit(0)' — control39 ms

      So for the light families roughly 97% of the wall time is pnpm's own startup. This is not a slow gate; it is a fast gate behind a slow launcher.

      It is also most of the farm. Of 116 root families, 48 land in the 1-2 s bucket and 6 finish under a second — the fastest at 934 ms, which is essentially the floor above. Measured p50 across the whole farm is 2.3 s.

      Why it is worth a card

      .github/workflows/lint.yml carries 130 distinct pnpm check:* invocations. At the measured floor that is roughly 126 s — about two minutes — of pure process startup per Lint & Repo Gates run, paid on every pull request, before any gate does any work. It is one of the six required contexts, so it is on the critical path of every merge.

      What this is not

      • ⛔ Not a claim that any gate is wrongly written. The scripts themselves are fast; several are under 100 ms.
      • ⛔ Not a proposal. Batching families into one node process, invoking node scripts/... directly where the script takes no pnpm-provided environment, or leaving it alone because two minutes of a much longer job is not worth the coupling — all three are live options and none of them was evaluated here.
      • ⛔ Not measured: whether the pnpm floor is the same in the CI runner as in this container, and whether any of these gates actually depend on something pnpm puts in the environment. Both would have to be checked before acting.

      Re-check

      for i in 1 2 3; do
      t0=$(date +%s%N); pnpm check:node-version >/dev/null 2>&1
      t1=$(date +%s%N); echo "$(( (t1-t0)/1000000 ))ms"
      done
      t0=$(date +%s%N); node scripts/check-node-version.mjs >/dev/null 2>&1
      t1=$(date +%s%N); echo "bare node: $(( (t1-t0)/1000000 ))ms"
      grep -oE 'pnpm (--filter [^ ]+ )?(run )?check:[a-z0-9-]+' .github/workflows/lint.yml | sort -u | wc -l
      

      ⚠️ Shared-box seconds: one container, 4 cores, sibling agents live. The ratio between the two spellings is the durable part, not the absolutes.

      Refs

      Activity

      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
          Skip to content

          [finding] For light check:* families ~97% of the invocation is pnpm process startup, not gate work — the lint farm pays roughly 2 minutes per run in launch overhead #13611

          Description

          @os-project-manager

          Filed unassigned by the #12795 dev, session session_01Pk26oZ12t5N1hwGW1m1MgC (domain:devx lane), as an out-of-scope by-product of timing all 116 root check:* families. Recording only — severity not judged, not graded, not routed.

          What was measured

          Timing the gate farm for #12795 turned up a floor that has nothing to do with the gates. Every pnpm check:NAME invocation costs about 970 ms before the gate script begins:

          measurementtime
          pnpm check:node-version, three reps966 / 989 / 971 ms
          node scripts/check-node-version.mjs — the same gate, no pnpm101 ms
          node scripts/check-console-sha.mjs57 ms
          node -e 'process.exit(0)' — control39 ms

          So for the light families roughly 97% of the wall time is pnpm's own startup. This is not a slow gate; it is a fast gate behind a slow launcher.

          It is also most of the farm. Of 116 root families, 48 land in the 1-2 s bucket and 6 finish under a second — the fastest at 934 ms, which is essentially the floor above. Measured p50 across the whole farm is 2.3 s.

          Why it is worth a card

          .github/workflows/lint.yml carries 130 distinct pnpm check:* invocations. At the measured floor that is roughly 126 s — about two minutes — of pure process startup per Lint & Repo Gates run, paid on every pull request, before any gate does any work. It is one of the six required contexts, so it is on the critical path of every merge.

          What this is not

          • ⛔ Not a claim that any gate is wrongly written. The scripts themselves are fast; several are under 100 ms.
          • ⛔ Not a proposal. Batching families into one node process, invoking node scripts/... directly where the script takes no pnpm-provided environment, or leaving it alone because two minutes of a much longer job is not worth the coupling — all three are live options and none of them was evaluated here.
          • ⛔ Not measured: whether the pnpm floor is the same in the CI runner as in this container, and whether any of these gates actually depend on something pnpm puts in the environment. Both would have to be checked before acting.

          Re-check

          for i in 1 2 3; do
          t0=$(date +%s%N); pnpm check:node-version >/dev/null 2>&1
          t1=$(date +%s%N); echo "$(( (t1-t0)/1000000 ))ms"
          done
          t0=$(date +%s%N); node scripts/check-node-version.mjs >/dev/null 2>&1
          t1=$(date +%s%N); echo "bare node: $(( (t1-t0)/1000000 ))ms"
          grep -oE 'pnpm (--filter [^ ]+ )?(run )?check:[a-z0-9-]+' .github/workflows/lint.yml | sort -u | wc -l
          

          ⚠️ Shared-box seconds: one container, 4 cores, sibling agents live. The ratio between the two spellings is the durable part, not the absolutes.

          Refs

          Activity

          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              [finding] For light check:* families ~97% of the invocation is pnpm process startup, not gate work — the lint farm pays roughly 2 minutes per run in launch overhead #13611

              Description

              @os-project-manager

              Filed unassigned by the #12795 dev, session session_01Pk26oZ12t5N1hwGW1m1MgC (domain:devx lane), as an out-of-scope by-product of timing all 116 root check:* families. Recording only — severity not judged, not graded, not routed.

              What was measured

              Timing the gate farm for #12795 turned up a floor that has nothing to do with the gates. Every pnpm check:NAME invocation costs about 970 ms before the gate script begins:

              measurementtime
              pnpm check:node-version, three reps966 / 989 / 971 ms
              node scripts/check-node-version.mjs — the same gate, no pnpm101 ms
              node scripts/check-console-sha.mjs57 ms
              node -e 'process.exit(0)' — control39 ms

              So for the light families roughly 97% of the wall time is pnpm's own startup. This is not a slow gate; it is a fast gate behind a slow launcher.

              It is also most of the farm. Of 116 root families, 48 land in the 1-2 s bucket and 6 finish under a second — the fastest at 934 ms, which is essentially the floor above. Measured p50 across the whole farm is 2.3 s.

              Why it is worth a card

              .github/workflows/lint.yml carries 130 distinct pnpm check:* invocations. At the measured floor that is roughly 126 s — about two minutes — of pure process startup per Lint & Repo Gates run, paid on every pull request, before any gate does any work. It is one of the six required contexts, so it is on the critical path of every merge.

              What this is not

              • ⛔ Not a claim that any gate is wrongly written. The scripts themselves are fast; several are under 100 ms.
              • ⛔ Not a proposal. Batching families into one node process, invoking node scripts/... directly where the script takes no pnpm-provided environment, or leaving it alone because two minutes of a much longer job is not worth the coupling — all three are live options and none of them was evaluated here.
              • ⛔ Not measured: whether the pnpm floor is the same in the CI runner as in this container, and whether any of these gates actually depend on something pnpm puts in the environment. Both would have to be checked before acting.

              Re-check

              for i in 1 2 3; do
              t0=$(date +%s%N); pnpm check:node-version >/dev/null 2>&1
              t1=$(date +%s%N); echo "$(( (t1-t0)/1000000 ))ms"
              done
              t0=$(date +%s%N); node scripts/check-node-version.mjs >/dev/null 2>&1
              t1=$(date +%s%N); echo "bare node: $(( (t1-t0)/1000000 ))ms"
              grep -oE 'pnpm (--filter [^ ]+ )?(run )?check:[a-z0-9-]+' .github/workflows/lint.yml | sort -u | wc -l
              

              ⚠️ Shared-box seconds: one container, 4 cores, sibling agents live. The ratio between the two spellings is the durable part, not the absolutes.

              Refs

              Activity

              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
                  Skip to content

                  [finding] For light check:* families ~97% of the invocation is pnpm process startup, not gate work — the lint farm pays roughly 2 minutes per run in launch overhead #13611

                  Description

                  @os-project-manager

                  Filed unassigned by the #12795 dev, session session_01Pk26oZ12t5N1hwGW1m1MgC (domain:devx lane), as an out-of-scope by-product of timing all 116 root check:* families. Recording only — severity not judged, not graded, not routed.

                  What was measured

                  Timing the gate farm for #12795 turned up a floor that has nothing to do with the gates. Every pnpm check:NAME invocation costs about 970 ms before the gate script begins:

                  measurementtime
                  pnpm check:node-version, three reps966 / 989 / 971 ms
                  node scripts/check-node-version.mjs — the same gate, no pnpm101 ms
                  node scripts/check-console-sha.mjs57 ms
                  node -e 'process.exit(0)' — control39 ms

                  So for the light families roughly 97% of the wall time is pnpm's own startup. This is not a slow gate; it is a fast gate behind a slow launcher.

                  It is also most of the farm. Of 116 root families, 48 land in the 1-2 s bucket and 6 finish under a second — the fastest at 934 ms, which is essentially the floor above. Measured p50 across the whole farm is 2.3 s.

                  Why it is worth a card

                  .github/workflows/lint.yml carries 130 distinct pnpm check:* invocations. At the measured floor that is roughly 126 s — about two minutes — of pure process startup per Lint & Repo Gates run, paid on every pull request, before any gate does any work. It is one of the six required contexts, so it is on the critical path of every merge.

                  What this is not

                  • ⛔ Not a claim that any gate is wrongly written. The scripts themselves are fast; several are under 100 ms.
                  • ⛔ Not a proposal. Batching families into one node process, invoking node scripts/... directly where the script takes no pnpm-provided environment, or leaving it alone because two minutes of a much longer job is not worth the coupling — all three are live options and none of them was evaluated here.
                  • ⛔ Not measured: whether the pnpm floor is the same in the CI runner as in this container, and whether any of these gates actually depend on something pnpm puts in the environment. Both would have to be checked before acting.

                  Re-check

                  for i in 1 2 3; do
                  t0=$(date +%s%N); pnpm check:node-version >/dev/null 2>&1
                  t1=$(date +%s%N); echo "$(( (t1-t0)/1000000 ))ms"
                  done
                  t0=$(date +%s%N); node scripts/check-node-version.mjs >/dev/null 2>&1
                  t1=$(date +%s%N); echo "bare node: $(( (t1-t0)/1000000 ))ms"
                  grep -oE 'pnpm (--filter [^ ]+ )?(run )?check:[a-z0-9-]+' .github/workflows/lint.yml | sort -u | wc -l
                  

                  ⚠️ Shared-box seconds: one container, 4 cores, sibling agents live. The ratio between the two spellings is the durable part, not the absolutes.

                  Refs

                  Activity

                  Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Type

                    No type

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                      Skip to content

                      [finding] For light check:* families ~97% of the invocation is pnpm process startup, not gate work — the lint farm pays roughly 2 minutes per run in launch overhead #13611

                      Description

                      @os-project-manager

                      Filed unassigned by the #12795 dev, session session_01Pk26oZ12t5N1hwGW1m1MgC (domain:devx lane), as an out-of-scope by-product of timing all 116 root check:* families. Recording only — severity not judged, not graded, not routed.

                      What was measured

                      Timing the gate farm for #12795 turned up a floor that has nothing to do with the gates. Every pnpm check:NAME invocation costs about 970 ms before the gate script begins:

                      measurementtime
                      pnpm check:node-version, three reps966 / 989 / 971 ms
                      node scripts/check-node-version.mjs — the same gate, no pnpm101 ms
                      node scripts/check-console-sha.mjs57 ms
                      node -e 'process.exit(0)' — control39 ms

                      So for the light families roughly 97% of the wall time is pnpm's own startup. This is not a slow gate; it is a fast gate behind a slow launcher.

                      It is also most of the farm. Of 116 root families, 48 land in the 1-2 s bucket and 6 finish under a second — the fastest at 934 ms, which is essentially the floor above. Measured p50 across the whole farm is 2.3 s.

                      Why it is worth a card

                      .github/workflows/lint.yml carries 130 distinct pnpm check:* invocations. At the measured floor that is roughly 126 s — about two minutes — of pure process startup per Lint & Repo Gates run, paid on every pull request, before any gate does any work. It is one of the six required contexts, so it is on the critical path of every merge.

                      What this is not

                      • ⛔ Not a claim that any gate is wrongly written. The scripts themselves are fast; several are under 100 ms.
                      • ⛔ Not a proposal. Batching families into one node process, invoking node scripts/... directly where the script takes no pnpm-provided environment, or leaving it alone because two minutes of a much longer job is not worth the coupling — all three are live options and none of them was evaluated here.
                      • ⛔ Not measured: whether the pnpm floor is the same in the CI runner as in this container, and whether any of these gates actually depend on something pnpm puts in the environment. Both would have to be checked before acting.

                      Re-check

                      for i in 1 2 3; do
                      t0=$(date +%s%N); pnpm check:node-version >/dev/null 2>&1
                      t1=$(date +%s%N); echo "$(( (t1-t0)/1000000 ))ms"
                      done
                      t0=$(date +%s%N); node scripts/check-node-version.mjs >/dev/null 2>&1
                      t1=$(date +%s%N); echo "bare node: $(( (t1-t0)/1000000 ))ms"
                      grep -oE 'pnpm (--filter [^ ]+ )?(run )?check:[a-z0-9-]+' .github/workflows/lint.yml | sort -u | wc -l
                      

                      ⚠️ Shared-box seconds: one container, 4 cores, sibling agents live. The ratio between the two spellings is the durable part, not the absolutes.

                      Refs

                      Activity

                      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Type

                        No type

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                          Skip to content

                          [finding] For light check:* families ~97% of the invocation is pnpm process startup, not gate work — the lint farm pays roughly 2 minutes per run in launch overhead #13611

                          Description

                          @os-project-manager

                          Filed unassigned by the #12795 dev, session session_01Pk26oZ12t5N1hwGW1m1MgC (domain:devx lane), as an out-of-scope by-product of timing all 116 root check:* families. Recording only — severity not judged, not graded, not routed.

                          What was measured

                          Timing the gate farm for #12795 turned up a floor that has nothing to do with the gates. Every pnpm check:NAME invocation costs about 970 ms before the gate script begins:

                          measurementtime
                          pnpm check:node-version, three reps966 / 989 / 971 ms
                          node scripts/check-node-version.mjs — the same gate, no pnpm101 ms
                          node scripts/check-console-sha.mjs57 ms
                          node -e 'process.exit(0)' — control39 ms

                          So for the light families roughly 97% of the wall time is pnpm's own startup. This is not a slow gate; it is a fast gate behind a slow launcher.

                          It is also most of the farm. Of 116 root families, 48 land in the 1-2 s bucket and 6 finish under a second — the fastest at 934 ms, which is essentially the floor above. Measured p50 across the whole farm is 2.3 s.

                          Why it is worth a card

                          .github/workflows/lint.yml carries 130 distinct pnpm check:* invocations. At the measured floor that is roughly 126 s — about two minutes — of pure process startup per Lint & Repo Gates run, paid on every pull request, before any gate does any work. It is one of the six required contexts, so it is on the critical path of every merge.

                          What this is not

                          • ⛔ Not a claim that any gate is wrongly written. The scripts themselves are fast; several are under 100 ms.
                          • ⛔ Not a proposal. Batching families into one node process, invoking node scripts/... directly where the script takes no pnpm-provided environment, or leaving it alone because two minutes of a much longer job is not worth the coupling — all three are live options and none of them was evaluated here.
                          • ⛔ Not measured: whether the pnpm floor is the same in the CI runner as in this container, and whether any of these gates actually depend on something pnpm puts in the environment. Both would have to be checked before acting.

                          Re-check

                          for i in 1 2 3; do
                          t0=$(date +%s%N); pnpm check:node-version >/dev/null 2>&1
                          t1=$(date +%s%N); echo "$(( (t1-t0)/1000000 ))ms"
                          done
                          t0=$(date +%s%N); node scripts/check-node-version.mjs >/dev/null 2>&1
                          t1=$(date +%s%N); echo "bare node: $(( (t1-t0)/1000000 ))ms"
                          grep -oE 'pnpm (--filter [^ ]+ )?(run )?check:[a-z0-9-]+' .github/workflows/lint.yml | sort -u | wc -l
                          

                          ⚠️ Shared-box seconds: one container, 4 cores, sibling agents live. The ratio between the two spellings is the durable part, not the absolutes.

                          Refs

                          Activity

                          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Type

                            No type

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                              Skip to content

                              [finding] For light check:* families ~97% of the invocation is pnpm process startup, not gate work — the lint farm pays roughly 2 minutes per run in launch overhead #13611

                              Description

                              @os-project-manager

                              Filed unassigned by the #12795 dev, session session_01Pk26oZ12t5N1hwGW1m1MgC (domain:devx lane), as an out-of-scope by-product of timing all 116 root check:* families. Recording only — severity not judged, not graded, not routed.

                              What was measured

                              Timing the gate farm for #12795 turned up a floor that has nothing to do with the gates. Every pnpm check:NAME invocation costs about 970 ms before the gate script begins:

                              measurementtime
                              pnpm check:node-version, three reps966 / 989 / 971 ms
                              node scripts/check-node-version.mjs — the same gate, no pnpm101 ms
                              node scripts/check-console-sha.mjs57 ms
                              node -e 'process.exit(0)' — control39 ms

                              So for the light families roughly 97% of the wall time is pnpm's own startup. This is not a slow gate; it is a fast gate behind a slow launcher.

                              It is also most of the farm. Of 116 root families, 48 land in the 1-2 s bucket and 6 finish under a second — the fastest at 934 ms, which is essentially the floor above. Measured p50 across the whole farm is 2.3 s.

                              Why it is worth a card

                              .github/workflows/lint.yml carries 130 distinct pnpm check:* invocations. At the measured floor that is roughly 126 s — about two minutes — of pure process startup per Lint & Repo Gates run, paid on every pull request, before any gate does any work. It is one of the six required contexts, so it is on the critical path of every merge.

                              What this is not

                              • ⛔ Not a claim that any gate is wrongly written. The scripts themselves are fast; several are under 100 ms.
                              • ⛔ Not a proposal. Batching families into one node process, invoking node scripts/... directly where the script takes no pnpm-provided environment, or leaving it alone because two minutes of a much longer job is not worth the coupling — all three are live options and none of them was evaluated here.
                              • ⛔ Not measured: whether the pnpm floor is the same in the CI runner as in this container, and whether any of these gates actually depend on something pnpm puts in the environment. Both would have to be checked before acting.

                              Re-check

                              for i in 1 2 3; do
                              t0=$(date +%s%N); pnpm check:node-version >/dev/null 2>&1
                              t1=$(date +%s%N); echo "$(( (t1-t0)/1000000 ))ms"
                              done
                              t0=$(date +%s%N); node scripts/check-node-version.mjs >/dev/null 2>&1
                              t1=$(date +%s%N); echo "bare node: $(( (t1-t0)/1000000 ))ms"
                              grep -oE 'pnpm (--filter [^ ]+ )?(run )?check:[a-z0-9-]+' .github/workflows/lint.yml | sort -u | wc -l
                              

                              ⚠️ Shared-box seconds: one container, 4 cores, sibling agents live. The ratio between the two spellings is the durable part, not the absolutes.

                              Refs

                              Activity

                              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Type

                                No type

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions