SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES contains 4 members not in the FieldType enum — more dead vocabulary in search-fields.ts #13716

Description

@os-warren

Found while fixing #13695 (which dropped the dead 'status' member from SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES). Adding a [#13695] pin asserting SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES ⊆ FieldType surfaced the same class of ghost elsewhere in the same file, wider in scope, so it is filed separately rather than folded into that fix.

Measured (executed, not read) on packages/spec/src/data/search-fields.ts against FieldType.options (49 members):

SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): ["object","grid","geometry","encrypted"]
SEARCHABLE_TEXTUAL_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): []
SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): [] (post #13695 fix)
SEARCH_VIRTUAL_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): []

SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES declares 'object', 'grid', 'geometry', 'encrypted' as field types that the $search auto-default must never admit — but none of the four is a member of the current 49-value FieldType enum (packages/spec/src/data/field.zod.ts), so each entry can never match a real field's type and is functionally inert (autoDefaultFields in search-fields.ts never sees a field whose type equals any of them).

This is larger in scope than the SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES fix:

  • Unlike 'status', all four names read as plausible field-type names (geometry reads like a sibling of the real location type; encrypted reads like a sibling of the real secret type), so this may be renamed legacy vocabulary rather than pure dead code — worth checking git history / blame before just deleting, in case a rename left the old name behind here without updating this set.
  • SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES is documented in the file as "redundant BY CONSTRUCTION" against the positive allow-lists (the auto-default rejects anything not in SEARCHABLE_TEXTUAL_TYPES/SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES anyway) — but the file's own comment there states the guard's value is "the DIRECTION the two vocabularies resolve in should that disjointness ever break" and calls out exactly these four ghost names' semantic weight (secret, password, encrypted, vector are named as the ones where fail-open would leak a masked/heavy column). A ghost member here does not affect the auto-default's live behaviour today, but it does mean the "fail-closed tiebreak" comment is asserting a safety property for names that cannot currently occur.

Scope for whoever picks this up: confirm whether each of the four is (a) simple dead vocabulary to drop, or (b) a stale spelling for a real FieldType (e.g. geometrylocation, encryptedsecret) that should be corrected instead of removed — then either drop the dead members or fix the spelling, and extend the [#13695] pin in search-fields.test.ts to cover SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES too once it's clean.

Generated by Claude Code

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
     blocks
    (function() {
    function addCopyButtons() {
    document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
    if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
    codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
    var btn = document.createElement('button');
    btn.textContent = 'Copy';
    btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
    btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
    btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
    btn.onclick = function() {
    navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
    btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
    setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
    });
    };
    codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
    codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
    });
    }
    addCopyButtons();
    // Re-run on dynamic content
    var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
    observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
    })();
    }
    } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
    })();
    (function(){
    try {
    var __m = "github.com";
    var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
    
    Skip to content

    SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES contains 4 members not in the FieldType enum — more dead vocabulary in search-fields.ts #13716

    Description

    @os-warren

    Found while fixing #13695 (which dropped the dead 'status' member from SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES). Adding a [#13695] pin asserting SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES ⊆ FieldType surfaced the same class of ghost elsewhere in the same file, wider in scope, so it is filed separately rather than folded into that fix.

    Measured (executed, not read) on packages/spec/src/data/search-fields.ts against FieldType.options (49 members):

    SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): ["object","grid","geometry","encrypted"]
    SEARCHABLE_TEXTUAL_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): []
    SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): [] (post #13695 fix)
    SEARCH_VIRTUAL_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): []
    

    SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES declares 'object', 'grid', 'geometry', 'encrypted' as field types that the $search auto-default must never admit — but none of the four is a member of the current 49-value FieldType enum (packages/spec/src/data/field.zod.ts), so each entry can never match a real field's type and is functionally inert (autoDefaultFields in search-fields.ts never sees a field whose type equals any of them).

    This is larger in scope than the SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES fix:

    • Unlike 'status', all four names read as plausible field-type names (geometry reads like a sibling of the real location type; encrypted reads like a sibling of the real secret type), so this may be renamed legacy vocabulary rather than pure dead code — worth checking git history / blame before just deleting, in case a rename left the old name behind here without updating this set.
    • SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES is documented in the file as "redundant BY CONSTRUCTION" against the positive allow-lists (the auto-default rejects anything not in SEARCHABLE_TEXTUAL_TYPES/SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES anyway) — but the file's own comment there states the guard's value is "the DIRECTION the two vocabularies resolve in should that disjointness ever break" and calls out exactly these four ghost names' semantic weight (secret, password, encrypted, vector are named as the ones where fail-open would leak a masked/heavy column). A ghost member here does not affect the auto-default's live behaviour today, but it does mean the "fail-closed tiebreak" comment is asserting a safety property for names that cannot currently occur.

    Scope for whoever picks this up: confirm whether each of the four is (a) simple dead vocabulary to drop, or (b) a stale spelling for a real FieldType (e.g. geometrylocation, encryptedsecret) that should be corrected instead of removed — then either drop the dead members or fix the spelling, and extend the [#13695] pin in search-fields.test.ts to cover SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES too once it's clean.

    Generated by Claude Code

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    Type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
      Skip to content

      SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES contains 4 members not in the FieldType enum — more dead vocabulary in search-fields.ts #13716

      Description

      @os-warren

      Found while fixing #13695 (which dropped the dead 'status' member from SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES). Adding a [#13695] pin asserting SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES ⊆ FieldType surfaced the same class of ghost elsewhere in the same file, wider in scope, so it is filed separately rather than folded into that fix.

      Measured (executed, not read) on packages/spec/src/data/search-fields.ts against FieldType.options (49 members):

      SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): ["object","grid","geometry","encrypted"]
      SEARCHABLE_TEXTUAL_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): []
      SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): [] (post #13695 fix)
      SEARCH_VIRTUAL_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): []
      

      SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES declares 'object', 'grid', 'geometry', 'encrypted' as field types that the $search auto-default must never admit — but none of the four is a member of the current 49-value FieldType enum (packages/spec/src/data/field.zod.ts), so each entry can never match a real field's type and is functionally inert (autoDefaultFields in search-fields.ts never sees a field whose type equals any of them).

      This is larger in scope than the SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES fix:

      • Unlike 'status', all four names read as plausible field-type names (geometry reads like a sibling of the real location type; encrypted reads like a sibling of the real secret type), so this may be renamed legacy vocabulary rather than pure dead code — worth checking git history / blame before just deleting, in case a rename left the old name behind here without updating this set.
      • SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES is documented in the file as "redundant BY CONSTRUCTION" against the positive allow-lists (the auto-default rejects anything not in SEARCHABLE_TEXTUAL_TYPES/SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES anyway) — but the file's own comment there states the guard's value is "the DIRECTION the two vocabularies resolve in should that disjointness ever break" and calls out exactly these four ghost names' semantic weight (secret, password, encrypted, vector are named as the ones where fail-open would leak a masked/heavy column). A ghost member here does not affect the auto-default's live behaviour today, but it does mean the "fail-closed tiebreak" comment is asserting a safety property for names that cannot currently occur.

      Scope for whoever picks this up: confirm whether each of the four is (a) simple dead vocabulary to drop, or (b) a stale spelling for a real FieldType (e.g. geometrylocation, encryptedsecret) that should be corrected instead of removed — then either drop the dead members or fix the spelling, and extend the [#13695] pin in search-fields.test.ts to cover SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES too once it's clean.

      Generated by Claude Code

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      Type

      Projects

      No projects

        Milestone

        No milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions

        , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
        Skip to content

        SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES contains 4 members not in the FieldType enum — more dead vocabulary in search-fields.ts #13716

        Description

        @os-warren

        Found while fixing #13695 (which dropped the dead 'status' member from SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES). Adding a [#13695] pin asserting SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES ⊆ FieldType surfaced the same class of ghost elsewhere in the same file, wider in scope, so it is filed separately rather than folded into that fix.

        Measured (executed, not read) on packages/spec/src/data/search-fields.ts against FieldType.options (49 members):

        SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): ["object","grid","geometry","encrypted"]
        SEARCHABLE_TEXTUAL_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): []
        SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): [] (post #13695 fix)
        SEARCH_VIRTUAL_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): []
        

        SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES declares 'object', 'grid', 'geometry', 'encrypted' as field types that the $search auto-default must never admit — but none of the four is a member of the current 49-value FieldType enum (packages/spec/src/data/field.zod.ts), so each entry can never match a real field's type and is functionally inert (autoDefaultFields in search-fields.ts never sees a field whose type equals any of them).

        This is larger in scope than the SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES fix:

        • Unlike 'status', all four names read as plausible field-type names (geometry reads like a sibling of the real location type; encrypted reads like a sibling of the real secret type), so this may be renamed legacy vocabulary rather than pure dead code — worth checking git history / blame before just deleting, in case a rename left the old name behind here without updating this set.
        • SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES is documented in the file as "redundant BY CONSTRUCTION" against the positive allow-lists (the auto-default rejects anything not in SEARCHABLE_TEXTUAL_TYPES/SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES anyway) — but the file's own comment there states the guard's value is "the DIRECTION the two vocabularies resolve in should that disjointness ever break" and calls out exactly these four ghost names' semantic weight (secret, password, encrypted, vector are named as the ones where fail-open would leak a masked/heavy column). A ghost member here does not affect the auto-default's live behaviour today, but it does mean the "fail-closed tiebreak" comment is asserting a safety property for names that cannot currently occur.

        Scope for whoever picks this up: confirm whether each of the four is (a) simple dead vocabulary to drop, or (b) a stale spelling for a real FieldType (e.g. geometrylocation, encryptedsecret) that should be corrected instead of removed — then either drop the dead members or fix the spelling, and extend the [#13695] pin in search-fields.test.ts to cover SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES too once it's clean.

        Generated by Claude Code

        Metadata

        Metadata

        Assignees

        Type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
          Skip to content

          SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES contains 4 members not in the FieldType enum — more dead vocabulary in search-fields.ts #13716

          Description

          @os-warren

          Found while fixing #13695 (which dropped the dead 'status' member from SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES). Adding a [#13695] pin asserting SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES ⊆ FieldType surfaced the same class of ghost elsewhere in the same file, wider in scope, so it is filed separately rather than folded into that fix.

          Measured (executed, not read) on packages/spec/src/data/search-fields.ts against FieldType.options (49 members):

          SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): ["object","grid","geometry","encrypted"]
          SEARCHABLE_TEXTUAL_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): []
          SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): [] (post #13695 fix)
          SEARCH_VIRTUAL_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): []
          

          SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES declares 'object', 'grid', 'geometry', 'encrypted' as field types that the $search auto-default must never admit — but none of the four is a member of the current 49-value FieldType enum (packages/spec/src/data/field.zod.ts), so each entry can never match a real field's type and is functionally inert (autoDefaultFields in search-fields.ts never sees a field whose type equals any of them).

          This is larger in scope than the SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES fix:

          • Unlike 'status', all four names read as plausible field-type names (geometry reads like a sibling of the real location type; encrypted reads like a sibling of the real secret type), so this may be renamed legacy vocabulary rather than pure dead code — worth checking git history / blame before just deleting, in case a rename left the old name behind here without updating this set.
          • SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES is documented in the file as "redundant BY CONSTRUCTION" against the positive allow-lists (the auto-default rejects anything not in SEARCHABLE_TEXTUAL_TYPES/SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES anyway) — but the file's own comment there states the guard's value is "the DIRECTION the two vocabularies resolve in should that disjointness ever break" and calls out exactly these four ghost names' semantic weight (secret, password, encrypted, vector are named as the ones where fail-open would leak a masked/heavy column). A ghost member here does not affect the auto-default's live behaviour today, but it does mean the "fail-closed tiebreak" comment is asserting a safety property for names that cannot currently occur.

          Scope for whoever picks this up: confirm whether each of the four is (a) simple dead vocabulary to drop, or (b) a stale spelling for a real FieldType (e.g. geometrylocation, encryptedsecret) that should be corrected instead of removed — then either drop the dead members or fix the spelling, and extend the [#13695] pin in search-fields.test.ts to cover SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES too once it's clean.

          Generated by Claude Code

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          Type

          Projects

          No projects

            Milestone

            No milestone

            Relationships

            None yet

            Development

            No branches or pull requests

            Issue actions

            , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
            Skip to content

            SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES contains 4 members not in the FieldType enum — more dead vocabulary in search-fields.ts #13716

            Description

            @os-warren

            Found while fixing #13695 (which dropped the dead 'status' member from SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES). Adding a [#13695] pin asserting SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES ⊆ FieldType surfaced the same class of ghost elsewhere in the same file, wider in scope, so it is filed separately rather than folded into that fix.

            Measured (executed, not read) on packages/spec/src/data/search-fields.ts against FieldType.options (49 members):

            SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): ["object","grid","geometry","encrypted"]
            SEARCHABLE_TEXTUAL_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): []
            SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): [] (post #13695 fix)
            SEARCH_VIRTUAL_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): []
            

            SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES declares 'object', 'grid', 'geometry', 'encrypted' as field types that the $search auto-default must never admit — but none of the four is a member of the current 49-value FieldType enum (packages/spec/src/data/field.zod.ts), so each entry can never match a real field's type and is functionally inert (autoDefaultFields in search-fields.ts never sees a field whose type equals any of them).

            This is larger in scope than the SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES fix:

            • Unlike 'status', all four names read as plausible field-type names (geometry reads like a sibling of the real location type; encrypted reads like a sibling of the real secret type), so this may be renamed legacy vocabulary rather than pure dead code — worth checking git history / blame before just deleting, in case a rename left the old name behind here without updating this set.
            • SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES is documented in the file as "redundant BY CONSTRUCTION" against the positive allow-lists (the auto-default rejects anything not in SEARCHABLE_TEXTUAL_TYPES/SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES anyway) — but the file's own comment there states the guard's value is "the DIRECTION the two vocabularies resolve in should that disjointness ever break" and calls out exactly these four ghost names' semantic weight (secret, password, encrypted, vector are named as the ones where fail-open would leak a masked/heavy column). A ghost member here does not affect the auto-default's live behaviour today, but it does mean the "fail-closed tiebreak" comment is asserting a safety property for names that cannot currently occur.

            Scope for whoever picks this up: confirm whether each of the four is (a) simple dead vocabulary to drop, or (b) a stale spelling for a real FieldType (e.g. geometrylocation, encryptedsecret) that should be corrected instead of removed — then either drop the dead members or fix the spelling, and extend the [#13695] pin in search-fields.test.ts to cover SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES too once it's clean.

            Generated by Claude Code

            Metadata

            Metadata

            Assignees

            Type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES contains 4 members not in the FieldType enum — more dead vocabulary in search-fields.ts #13716

              Description

              @os-warren

              Found while fixing #13695 (which dropped the dead 'status' member from SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES). Adding a [#13695] pin asserting SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES ⊆ FieldType surfaced the same class of ghost elsewhere in the same file, wider in scope, so it is filed separately rather than folded into that fix.

              Measured (executed, not read) on packages/spec/src/data/search-fields.ts against FieldType.options (49 members):

              SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): ["object","grid","geometry","encrypted"]
              SEARCHABLE_TEXTUAL_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): []
              SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): [] (post #13695 fix)
              SEARCH_VIRTUAL_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): []
              

              SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES declares 'object', 'grid', 'geometry', 'encrypted' as field types that the $search auto-default must never admit — but none of the four is a member of the current 49-value FieldType enum (packages/spec/src/data/field.zod.ts), so each entry can never match a real field's type and is functionally inert (autoDefaultFields in search-fields.ts never sees a field whose type equals any of them).

              This is larger in scope than the SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES fix:

              • Unlike 'status', all four names read as plausible field-type names (geometry reads like a sibling of the real location type; encrypted reads like a sibling of the real secret type), so this may be renamed legacy vocabulary rather than pure dead code — worth checking git history / blame before just deleting, in case a rename left the old name behind here without updating this set.
              • SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES is documented in the file as "redundant BY CONSTRUCTION" against the positive allow-lists (the auto-default rejects anything not in SEARCHABLE_TEXTUAL_TYPES/SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES anyway) — but the file's own comment there states the guard's value is "the DIRECTION the two vocabularies resolve in should that disjointness ever break" and calls out exactly these four ghost names' semantic weight (secret, password, encrypted, vector are named as the ones where fail-open would leak a masked/heavy column). A ghost member here does not affect the auto-default's live behaviour today, but it does mean the "fail-closed tiebreak" comment is asserting a safety property for names that cannot currently occur.

              Scope for whoever picks this up: confirm whether each of the four is (a) simple dead vocabulary to drop, or (b) a stale spelling for a real FieldType (e.g. geometrylocation, encryptedsecret) that should be corrected instead of removed — then either drop the dead members or fix the spelling, and extend the [#13695] pin in search-fields.test.ts to cover SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES too once it's clean.

              Generated by Claude Code

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              Type

              Projects

              No projects

                Milestone

                No milestone

                Relationships

                None yet

                Development

                No branches or pull requests

                Issue actions

                , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                Skip to content

                SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES contains 4 members not in the FieldType enum — more dead vocabulary in search-fields.ts #13716

                Description

                @os-warren

                Found while fixing #13695 (which dropped the dead 'status' member from SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES). Adding a [#13695] pin asserting SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES ⊆ FieldType surfaced the same class of ghost elsewhere in the same file, wider in scope, so it is filed separately rather than folded into that fix.

                Measured (executed, not read) on packages/spec/src/data/search-fields.ts against FieldType.options (49 members):

                SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): ["object","grid","geometry","encrypted"]
                SEARCHABLE_TEXTUAL_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): []
                SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): [] (post #13695 fix)
                SEARCH_VIRTUAL_TYPES -> ghost members (not in FieldType): []
                

                SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES declares 'object', 'grid', 'geometry', 'encrypted' as field types that the $search auto-default must never admit — but none of the four is a member of the current 49-value FieldType enum (packages/spec/src/data/field.zod.ts), so each entry can never match a real field's type and is functionally inert (autoDefaultFields in search-fields.ts never sees a field whose type equals any of them).

                This is larger in scope than the SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES fix:

                • Unlike 'status', all four names read as plausible field-type names (geometry reads like a sibling of the real location type; encrypted reads like a sibling of the real secret type), so this may be renamed legacy vocabulary rather than pure dead code — worth checking git history / blame before just deleting, in case a rename left the old name behind here without updating this set.
                • SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES is documented in the file as "redundant BY CONSTRUCTION" against the positive allow-lists (the auto-default rejects anything not in SEARCHABLE_TEXTUAL_TYPES/SEARCHABLE_ENUM_TYPES anyway) — but the file's own comment there states the guard's value is "the DIRECTION the two vocabularies resolve in should that disjointness ever break" and calls out exactly these four ghost names' semantic weight (secret, password, encrypted, vector are named as the ones where fail-open would leak a masked/heavy column). A ghost member here does not affect the auto-default's live behaviour today, but it does mean the "fail-closed tiebreak" comment is asserting a safety property for names that cannot currently occur.

                Scope for whoever picks this up: confirm whether each of the four is (a) simple dead vocabulary to drop, or (b) a stale spelling for a real FieldType (e.g. geometrylocation, encryptedsecret) that should be corrected instead of removed — then either drop the dead members or fix the spelling, and extend the [#13695] pin in search-fields.test.ts to cover SEARCH_AUTO_EXCLUDED_TYPES too once it's clean.

                Generated by Claude Code

                Metadata

                Metadata

                Assignees

                Type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions