docs: four pages enumerating the flow refusal codes still omit FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID after #13371 #13720

Description

@claude

Found by the #11995 enumeration-drift history sweep (measurement card); filed here because it is a concrete, still-live docs defect independent of that card's pre-ruled decision.

PR #13371 (b6d3d76b5, 2026-08-30) widened the refusal-code union in packages/runtime/src/flow-dispatch-status.ts:

- export type FlowRefusalCode = 'FLOW_DISABLED' | 'FLOW_NO_START_NODE' | 'FLOW_FAILED';
+ export type FlowRefusalCode = 'FLOW_DISABLED' | 'FLOW_NO_START_NODE' | 'FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID' | 'FLOW_FAILED';

It correctly updated content/docs/automation/flows.mdx, content/docs/api/client-sdk.mdx and content/docs/permissions/system-context.mdx. Four further pages enumerate the same union and were not updated — each still lists exactly the three pre-widening codes at 90578117f:

pagelineenumeratesmissing
content/docs/api/declarative-endpoints.mdx103FLOW_DISABLED, FLOW_NO_START_NODE, FLOW_FAILEDFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID
content/docs/api/plugin-endpoints.mdx51same threeFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID
content/docs/protocol/kernel/http-protocol.mdx1228same threeFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID
content/docs/ui/actions.mdx349same threeFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID

Repo-wide, only the two pages the PR touched name FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID today:

$ grep -rl FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID content/docs --include=*.mdx | grep -v /references/
content/docs/automation/flows.mdx
content/docs/api/client-sdk.mdx

Each of the four rows documents the trigger-refusal status contract ("404 unknown flow, 409 FLOW_DISABLED, 422 FLOW_NO_START_NODE, 400 FLOW_FAILED"), so each currently tells a reader the enumeration is complete when it is not. The new code answers 422 and is never-dispatched / non-retryable, per #11504 and the #10025 ruling.

docs-drift did not flag any of them (its run on #13371 listed two release-owned pages only) — that blindness is #11995's subject and is NOT what this issue asks to change. This issue is only the four page edits.

content/docs/releases/** is not involved.


Generated by Claude Code

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

Type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
     blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
    }
    } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
    })();
    (function(){
    try {
    var __m = "github.com";
    var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
    
    Skip to content

    docs: four pages enumerating the flow refusal codes still omit FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID after #13371 #13720

    Description

    @claude

    Found by the #11995 enumeration-drift history sweep (measurement card); filed here because it is a concrete, still-live docs defect independent of that card's pre-ruled decision.

    PR #13371 (b6d3d76b5, 2026-08-30) widened the refusal-code union in packages/runtime/src/flow-dispatch-status.ts:

    - export type FlowRefusalCode = 'FLOW_DISABLED' | 'FLOW_NO_START_NODE' | 'FLOW_FAILED';
    + export type FlowRefusalCode = 'FLOW_DISABLED' | 'FLOW_NO_START_NODE' | 'FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID' | 'FLOW_FAILED';
    

    It correctly updated content/docs/automation/flows.mdx, content/docs/api/client-sdk.mdx and content/docs/permissions/system-context.mdx. Four further pages enumerate the same union and were not updated — each still lists exactly the three pre-widening codes at 90578117f:

    pagelineenumeratesmissing
    content/docs/api/declarative-endpoints.mdx103FLOW_DISABLED, FLOW_NO_START_NODE, FLOW_FAILEDFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID
    content/docs/api/plugin-endpoints.mdx51same threeFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID
    content/docs/protocol/kernel/http-protocol.mdx1228same threeFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID
    content/docs/ui/actions.mdx349same threeFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID

    Repo-wide, only the two pages the PR touched name FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID today:

    $ grep -rl FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID content/docs --include=*.mdx | grep -v /references/
    content/docs/automation/flows.mdx
    content/docs/api/client-sdk.mdx
    

    Each of the four rows documents the trigger-refusal status contract ("404 unknown flow, 409 FLOW_DISABLED, 422 FLOW_NO_START_NODE, 400 FLOW_FAILED"), so each currently tells a reader the enumeration is complete when it is not. The new code answers 422 and is never-dispatched / non-retryable, per #11504 and the #10025 ruling.

    docs-drift did not flag any of them (its run on #13371 listed two release-owned pages only) — that blindness is #11995's subject and is NOT what this issue asks to change. This issue is only the four page edits.

    content/docs/releases/** is not involved.


    Generated by Claude Code

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Labels

    Type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
      Skip to content

      docs: four pages enumerating the flow refusal codes still omit FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID after #13371 #13720

      Description

      @claude

      Found by the #11995 enumeration-drift history sweep (measurement card); filed here because it is a concrete, still-live docs defect independent of that card's pre-ruled decision.

      PR #13371 (b6d3d76b5, 2026-08-30) widened the refusal-code union in packages/runtime/src/flow-dispatch-status.ts:

      - export type FlowRefusalCode = 'FLOW_DISABLED' | 'FLOW_NO_START_NODE' | 'FLOW_FAILED';
      + export type FlowRefusalCode = 'FLOW_DISABLED' | 'FLOW_NO_START_NODE' | 'FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID' | 'FLOW_FAILED';
      

      It correctly updated content/docs/automation/flows.mdx, content/docs/api/client-sdk.mdx and content/docs/permissions/system-context.mdx. Four further pages enumerate the same union and were not updated — each still lists exactly the three pre-widening codes at 90578117f:

      pagelineenumeratesmissing
      content/docs/api/declarative-endpoints.mdx103FLOW_DISABLED, FLOW_NO_START_NODE, FLOW_FAILEDFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID
      content/docs/api/plugin-endpoints.mdx51same threeFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID
      content/docs/protocol/kernel/http-protocol.mdx1228same threeFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID
      content/docs/ui/actions.mdx349same threeFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID

      Repo-wide, only the two pages the PR touched name FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID today:

      $ grep -rl FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID content/docs --include=*.mdx | grep -v /references/
      content/docs/automation/flows.mdx
      content/docs/api/client-sdk.mdx
      

      Each of the four rows documents the trigger-refusal status contract ("404 unknown flow, 409 FLOW_DISABLED, 422 FLOW_NO_START_NODE, 400 FLOW_FAILED"), so each currently tells a reader the enumeration is complete when it is not. The new code answers 422 and is never-dispatched / non-retryable, per #11504 and the #10025 ruling.

      docs-drift did not flag any of them (its run on #13371 listed two release-owned pages only) — that blindness is #11995's subject and is NOT what this issue asks to change. This issue is only the four page edits.

      content/docs/releases/** is not involved.


      Generated by Claude Code

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Labels

      Type

      Projects

      No projects

        Milestone

        No milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions

        , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
        Skip to content

        docs: four pages enumerating the flow refusal codes still omit FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID after #13371 #13720

        Description

        @claude

        Found by the #11995 enumeration-drift history sweep (measurement card); filed here because it is a concrete, still-live docs defect independent of that card's pre-ruled decision.

        PR #13371 (b6d3d76b5, 2026-08-30) widened the refusal-code union in packages/runtime/src/flow-dispatch-status.ts:

        - export type FlowRefusalCode = 'FLOW_DISABLED' | 'FLOW_NO_START_NODE' | 'FLOW_FAILED';
        + export type FlowRefusalCode = 'FLOW_DISABLED' | 'FLOW_NO_START_NODE' | 'FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID' | 'FLOW_FAILED';
        

        It correctly updated content/docs/automation/flows.mdx, content/docs/api/client-sdk.mdx and content/docs/permissions/system-context.mdx. Four further pages enumerate the same union and were not updated — each still lists exactly the three pre-widening codes at 90578117f:

        pagelineenumeratesmissing
        content/docs/api/declarative-endpoints.mdx103FLOW_DISABLED, FLOW_NO_START_NODE, FLOW_FAILEDFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID
        content/docs/api/plugin-endpoints.mdx51same threeFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID
        content/docs/protocol/kernel/http-protocol.mdx1228same threeFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID
        content/docs/ui/actions.mdx349same threeFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID

        Repo-wide, only the two pages the PR touched name FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID today:

        $ grep -rl FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID content/docs --include=*.mdx | grep -v /references/
        content/docs/automation/flows.mdx
        content/docs/api/client-sdk.mdx
        

        Each of the four rows documents the trigger-refusal status contract ("404 unknown flow, 409 FLOW_DISABLED, 422 FLOW_NO_START_NODE, 400 FLOW_FAILED"), so each currently tells a reader the enumeration is complete when it is not. The new code answers 422 and is never-dispatched / non-retryable, per #11504 and the #10025 ruling.

        docs-drift did not flag any of them (its run on #13371 listed two release-owned pages only) — that blindness is #11995's subject and is NOT what this issue asks to change. This issue is only the four page edits.

        content/docs/releases/** is not involved.


        Generated by Claude Code

        Metadata

        Metadata

        Labels

        Type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
          Skip to content

          docs: four pages enumerating the flow refusal codes still omit FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID after #13371 #13720

          Description

          @claude

          Found by the #11995 enumeration-drift history sweep (measurement card); filed here because it is a concrete, still-live docs defect independent of that card's pre-ruled decision.

          PR #13371 (b6d3d76b5, 2026-08-30) widened the refusal-code union in packages/runtime/src/flow-dispatch-status.ts:

          - export type FlowRefusalCode = 'FLOW_DISABLED' | 'FLOW_NO_START_NODE' | 'FLOW_FAILED';
          + export type FlowRefusalCode = 'FLOW_DISABLED' | 'FLOW_NO_START_NODE' | 'FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID' | 'FLOW_FAILED';
          

          It correctly updated content/docs/automation/flows.mdx, content/docs/api/client-sdk.mdx and content/docs/permissions/system-context.mdx. Four further pages enumerate the same union and were not updated — each still lists exactly the three pre-widening codes at 90578117f:

          pagelineenumeratesmissing
          content/docs/api/declarative-endpoints.mdx103FLOW_DISABLED, FLOW_NO_START_NODE, FLOW_FAILEDFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID
          content/docs/api/plugin-endpoints.mdx51same threeFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID
          content/docs/protocol/kernel/http-protocol.mdx1228same threeFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID
          content/docs/ui/actions.mdx349same threeFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID

          Repo-wide, only the two pages the PR touched name FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID today:

          $ grep -rl FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID content/docs --include=*.mdx | grep -v /references/
          content/docs/automation/flows.mdx
          content/docs/api/client-sdk.mdx
          

          Each of the four rows documents the trigger-refusal status contract ("404 unknown flow, 409 FLOW_DISABLED, 422 FLOW_NO_START_NODE, 400 FLOW_FAILED"), so each currently tells a reader the enumeration is complete when it is not. The new code answers 422 and is never-dispatched / non-retryable, per #11504 and the #10025 ruling.

          docs-drift did not flag any of them (its run on #13371 listed two release-owned pages only) — that blindness is #11995's subject and is NOT what this issue asks to change. This issue is only the four page edits.

          content/docs/releases/** is not involved.


          Generated by Claude Code

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Labels

          Type

          Projects

          No projects

            Milestone

            No milestone

            Relationships

            None yet

            Development

            No branches or pull requests

            Issue actions

            , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
            Skip to content

            docs: four pages enumerating the flow refusal codes still omit FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID after #13371 #13720

            Description

            @claude

            Found by the #11995 enumeration-drift history sweep (measurement card); filed here because it is a concrete, still-live docs defect independent of that card's pre-ruled decision.

            PR #13371 (b6d3d76b5, 2026-08-30) widened the refusal-code union in packages/runtime/src/flow-dispatch-status.ts:

            - export type FlowRefusalCode = 'FLOW_DISABLED' | 'FLOW_NO_START_NODE' | 'FLOW_FAILED';
            + export type FlowRefusalCode = 'FLOW_DISABLED' | 'FLOW_NO_START_NODE' | 'FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID' | 'FLOW_FAILED';
            

            It correctly updated content/docs/automation/flows.mdx, content/docs/api/client-sdk.mdx and content/docs/permissions/system-context.mdx. Four further pages enumerate the same union and were not updated — each still lists exactly the three pre-widening codes at 90578117f:

            pagelineenumeratesmissing
            content/docs/api/declarative-endpoints.mdx103FLOW_DISABLED, FLOW_NO_START_NODE, FLOW_FAILEDFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID
            content/docs/api/plugin-endpoints.mdx51same threeFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID
            content/docs/protocol/kernel/http-protocol.mdx1228same threeFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID
            content/docs/ui/actions.mdx349same threeFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID

            Repo-wide, only the two pages the PR touched name FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID today:

            $ grep -rl FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID content/docs --include=*.mdx | grep -v /references/
            content/docs/automation/flows.mdx
            content/docs/api/client-sdk.mdx
            

            Each of the four rows documents the trigger-refusal status contract ("404 unknown flow, 409 FLOW_DISABLED, 422 FLOW_NO_START_NODE, 400 FLOW_FAILED"), so each currently tells a reader the enumeration is complete when it is not. The new code answers 422 and is never-dispatched / non-retryable, per #11504 and the #10025 ruling.

            docs-drift did not flag any of them (its run on #13371 listed two release-owned pages only) — that blindness is #11995's subject and is NOT what this issue asks to change. This issue is only the four page edits.

            content/docs/releases/** is not involved.


            Generated by Claude Code

            Metadata

            Metadata

            Labels

            Type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              docs: four pages enumerating the flow refusal codes still omit FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID after #13371 #13720

              Description

              @claude

              Found by the #11995 enumeration-drift history sweep (measurement card); filed here because it is a concrete, still-live docs defect independent of that card's pre-ruled decision.

              PR #13371 (b6d3d76b5, 2026-08-30) widened the refusal-code union in packages/runtime/src/flow-dispatch-status.ts:

              - export type FlowRefusalCode = 'FLOW_DISABLED' | 'FLOW_NO_START_NODE' | 'FLOW_FAILED';
              + export type FlowRefusalCode = 'FLOW_DISABLED' | 'FLOW_NO_START_NODE' | 'FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID' | 'FLOW_FAILED';
              

              It correctly updated content/docs/automation/flows.mdx, content/docs/api/client-sdk.mdx and content/docs/permissions/system-context.mdx. Four further pages enumerate the same union and were not updated — each still lists exactly the three pre-widening codes at 90578117f:

              pagelineenumeratesmissing
              content/docs/api/declarative-endpoints.mdx103FLOW_DISABLED, FLOW_NO_START_NODE, FLOW_FAILEDFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID
              content/docs/api/plugin-endpoints.mdx51same threeFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID
              content/docs/protocol/kernel/http-protocol.mdx1228same threeFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID
              content/docs/ui/actions.mdx349same threeFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID

              Repo-wide, only the two pages the PR touched name FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID today:

              $ grep -rl FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID content/docs --include=*.mdx | grep -v /references/
              content/docs/automation/flows.mdx
              content/docs/api/client-sdk.mdx
              

              Each of the four rows documents the trigger-refusal status contract ("404 unknown flow, 409 FLOW_DISABLED, 422 FLOW_NO_START_NODE, 400 FLOW_FAILED"), so each currently tells a reader the enumeration is complete when it is not. The new code answers 422 and is never-dispatched / non-retryable, per #11504 and the #10025 ruling.

              docs-drift did not flag any of them (its run on #13371 listed two release-owned pages only) — that blindness is #11995's subject and is NOT what this issue asks to change. This issue is only the four page edits.

              content/docs/releases/** is not involved.


              Generated by Claude Code

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Labels

              Type

              Projects

              No projects

                Milestone

                No milestone

                Relationships

                None yet

                Development

                No branches or pull requests

                Issue actions

                , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                Skip to content

                docs: four pages enumerating the flow refusal codes still omit FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID after #13371 #13720

                Description

                @claude

                Found by the #11995 enumeration-drift history sweep (measurement card); filed here because it is a concrete, still-live docs defect independent of that card's pre-ruled decision.

                PR #13371 (b6d3d76b5, 2026-08-30) widened the refusal-code union in packages/runtime/src/flow-dispatch-status.ts:

                - export type FlowRefusalCode = 'FLOW_DISABLED' | 'FLOW_NO_START_NODE' | 'FLOW_FAILED';
                + export type FlowRefusalCode = 'FLOW_DISABLED' | 'FLOW_NO_START_NODE' | 'FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID' | 'FLOW_FAILED';
                

                It correctly updated content/docs/automation/flows.mdx, content/docs/api/client-sdk.mdx and content/docs/permissions/system-context.mdx. Four further pages enumerate the same union and were not updated — each still lists exactly the three pre-widening codes at 90578117f:

                pagelineenumeratesmissing
                content/docs/api/declarative-endpoints.mdx103FLOW_DISABLED, FLOW_NO_START_NODE, FLOW_FAILEDFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID
                content/docs/api/plugin-endpoints.mdx51same threeFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID
                content/docs/protocol/kernel/http-protocol.mdx1228same threeFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID
                content/docs/ui/actions.mdx349same threeFLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID

                Repo-wide, only the two pages the PR touched name FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID today:

                $ grep -rl FLOW_INPUT_SCHEMA_INVALID content/docs --include=*.mdx | grep -v /references/
                content/docs/automation/flows.mdx
                content/docs/api/client-sdk.mdx
                

                Each of the four rows documents the trigger-refusal status contract ("404 unknown flow, 409 FLOW_DISABLED, 422 FLOW_NO_START_NODE, 400 FLOW_FAILED"), so each currently tells a reader the enumeration is complete when it is not. The new code answers 422 and is never-dispatched / non-retryable, per #11504 and the #10025 ruling.

                docs-drift did not flag any of them (its run on #13371 listed two release-owned pages only) — that blindness is #11995's subject and is NOT what this issue asks to change. This issue is only the four page edits.

                content/docs/releases/** is not involved.


                Generated by Claude Code

                Metadata

                Metadata

                Labels

                Type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions