[finding] check-governed-merges 在浅克隆上不确定:同参两次调用,objectui 从「已审 12 条」翻成「未审」—— 窗口边界证明不稳定,且「为何未审」不打印 #13896

Closed as duplicate of#13836
Bug
Closed as duplicate of#13836
[finding] check-governed-merges 在浅克隆上不确定:同参两次调用,objectui 从「已审 12 条」翻成「未审」—— 窗口边界证明不稳定,且「为何未审」不打印#13896
Bug
Labels
domain:skillspriority:p2Medium: important, M3tooling

Description

@huangyiirene
huangyiirene
opened on Aug 31, 2026

总监席 2026-08-31 governed 审计(职责四)中实测,记录在案。⚠️ 更正申报:当日审计报告曾引用「finding #13836」,但该卡当时并未实际创建(报告先行、立卡遗漏,总监席自己的失误,与 #13792 记录的账本失真同类)—— 本卡即补立的真卡,台账以本卡号为准。

实测现象

同一命令、同参数、同 cwd,相隔约 15 分钟两次调用:

node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --since-ref objectstack=b7f645a8a3b9 --since-ref objectui=38a123cac0fa
  • 第一次:尾注「2 governed repo(s) unaudited (cloud, objectos)」,objectui 窗口已审,枚举 12 条 governed 合并;
  • 第二次:尾注「3 governed repo(s) unaudited (objectui, cloud, objectos)」,objectui 零枚举。

两次之间本地 objectui 树未被本席改动;锚点 38a123cac0fa 在第一次前已通过 git fetch --shallow-since=2026-08-27 解析(git cat-file -t = commit)。

假说(未验,⛔ 不作结论)

上游 main 在两次之间移动(该仓高频合并),脚本(或其内部 fetch)对新 tip 重估窗口时,浅克隆边界破坏了锚点到 tip 的连通性,边界证明 fail-closed ⇒ 整仓判 unaudited。fail-closed 方向本身正确(#4690:不得读作干净),但不确定性意味着每场召唤的审计职责可能因运行时机静默丢掉一个仓。

值得做的三件

  1. 根因两次输出翻转;
  2. 脚本对 unaudited 仓打印原因(哪个前置条件失败:锚不可达/边界不可证/无检出),现在只有结论没有诊断;
  3. 自测覆盖浅克隆路径(锚在浅边界之外、fetch 后 tip 移动两种形状)。

当日处置:采用边界成立那次的枚举,38 条归因经 MCP 补齐并获维护者全数认定(记录在总监席台账);本卡只管工具缺陷。

⛔ Filed unassigned — recording only. Refs: 座位贴 #12708(锚行与审计记录)。

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    domain:skillspriority:p2Medium: important, M3tooling

    Type

    Bug

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

      Skip to content
      [finding] check-governed-merges 在浅克隆上不确定:同参两次调用,objectui 从「已审 12 条」翻成「未审」—— 窗口边界证明不稳定,且「为何未审」不打印 #13896
      Closed as duplicate of#13836
      Bug
      Closed as duplicate of#13836
      [finding] check-governed-merges 在浅克隆上不确定:同参两次调用,objectui 从「已审 12 条」翻成「未审」—— 窗口边界证明不稳定,且「为何未审」不打印#13896
      Bug
      Labels
      domain:skillspriority:p2Medium: important, M3tooling
      Description
      @huangyiirene
      huangyiirene
      opened on Aug 31, 2026
      总监席 2026-08-31 governed 审计(职责四)中实测,记录在案。⚠️ 更正申报:当日审计报告曾引用「finding #13836」,但该卡当时并未实际创建(报告先行、立卡遗漏,总监席自己的失误,与 #13792 记录的账本失真同类)—— 本卡即补立的真卡,台账以本卡号为准。
      实测现象
      同一命令、同参数、同 cwd,相隔约 15 分钟两次调用:
      node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --since-ref objectstack=b7f645a8a3b9 --since-ref objectui=38a123cac0fa

      • 第一次:尾注「2 governed repo(s) unaudited (cloud, objectos)」,objectui 窗口已审,枚举 12 条 governed 合并;
      • 第二次:尾注「3 governed repo(s) unaudited (objectui, cloud, objectos)」,objectui 零枚举。
      两次之间本地 objectui 树未被本席改动;锚点 38a123cac0fa 在第一次前已通过 git fetch --shallow-since=2026-08-27 解析(git cat-file -t = commit)。
      假说(未验,⛔ 不作结论)
      上游 main 在两次之间移动(该仓高频合并),脚本(或其内部 fetch)对新 tip 重估窗口时,浅克隆边界破坏了锚点到 tip 的连通性,边界证明 fail-closed ⇒ 整仓判 unaudited。fail-closed 方向本身正确(#4690:不得读作干净),但不确定性意味着每场召唤的审计职责可能因运行时机静默丢掉一个仓。
      值得做的三件
      1. 根因两次输出翻转;
      2. 脚本对 unaudited 仓打印原因(哪个前置条件失败:锚不可达/边界不可证/无检出),现在只有结论没有诊断;
      3. 自测覆盖浅克隆路径(锚在浅边界之外、fetch 后 tip 移动两种形状)。
      当日处置:采用边界成立那次的枚举,38 条归因经 MCP 补齐并获维护者全数认定(记录在总监席台账);本卡只管工具缺陷。
      ⛔ Filed unassigned — recording only. Refs: 座位贴 #12708(锚行与审计记录)。
      Metadata
      Metadata
      Assignees
      No one assigned
        Labels
        domain:skillspriority:p2Medium: important, M3tooling
        Type
        Bug
        Projects
        No projects
          Milestone
          No milestone
          Relationships
          None yet
          Development
          No branches or pull requests
          Issue actions
          
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

          Skip to content
          [finding] check-governed-merges 在浅克隆上不确定:同参两次调用,objectui 从「已审 12 条」翻成「未审」—— 窗口边界证明不稳定,且「为何未审」不打印 #13896
          Closed as duplicate of#13836
          Bug
          Closed as duplicate of#13836
          [finding] check-governed-merges 在浅克隆上不确定:同参两次调用,objectui 从「已审 12 条」翻成「未审」—— 窗口边界证明不稳定,且「为何未审」不打印#13896
          Bug
          Labels
          domain:skillspriority:p2Medium: important, M3tooling
          Description
          @huangyiirene
          huangyiirene
          opened on Aug 31, 2026
          总监席 2026-08-31 governed 审计(职责四)中实测,记录在案。⚠️ 更正申报:当日审计报告曾引用「finding #13836」,但该卡当时并未实际创建(报告先行、立卡遗漏,总监席自己的失误,与 #13792 记录的账本失真同类)—— 本卡即补立的真卡,台账以本卡号为准。
          实测现象
          同一命令、同参数、同 cwd,相隔约 15 分钟两次调用:
          node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --since-ref objectstack=b7f645a8a3b9 --since-ref objectui=38a123cac0fa

          • 第一次:尾注「2 governed repo(s) unaudited (cloud, objectos)」,objectui 窗口已审,枚举 12 条 governed 合并;
          • 第二次:尾注「3 governed repo(s) unaudited (objectui, cloud, objectos)」,objectui 零枚举。
          两次之间本地 objectui 树未被本席改动;锚点 38a123cac0fa 在第一次前已通过 git fetch --shallow-since=2026-08-27 解析(git cat-file -t = commit)。
          假说(未验,⛔ 不作结论)
          上游 main 在两次之间移动(该仓高频合并),脚本(或其内部 fetch)对新 tip 重估窗口时,浅克隆边界破坏了锚点到 tip 的连通性,边界证明 fail-closed ⇒ 整仓判 unaudited。fail-closed 方向本身正确(#4690:不得读作干净),但不确定性意味着每场召唤的审计职责可能因运行时机静默丢掉一个仓。
          值得做的三件
          1. 根因两次输出翻转;
          2. 脚本对 unaudited 仓打印原因(哪个前置条件失败:锚不可达/边界不可证/无检出),现在只有结论没有诊断;
          3. 自测覆盖浅克隆路径(锚在浅边界之外、fetch 后 tip 移动两种形状)。
          当日处置:采用边界成立那次的枚举,38 条归因经 MCP 补齐并获维护者全数认定(记录在总监席台账);本卡只管工具缺陷。
          ⛔ Filed unassigned — recording only. Refs: 座位贴 #12708(锚行与审计记录)。
          Metadata
          Metadata
          Assignees
          No one assigned
            Labels
            domain:skillspriority:p2Medium: important, M3tooling
            Type
            Bug
            Projects
            No projects
              Milestone
              No milestone
              Relationships
              None yet
              Development
              No branches or pull requests
              Issue actions
              
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

              Skip to content
              [finding] check-governed-merges 在浅克隆上不确定:同参两次调用,objectui 从「已审 12 条」翻成「未审」—— 窗口边界证明不稳定,且「为何未审」不打印 #13896
              Closed as duplicate of#13836
              Bug
              Closed as duplicate of#13836
              [finding] check-governed-merges 在浅克隆上不确定:同参两次调用,objectui 从「已审 12 条」翻成「未审」—— 窗口边界证明不稳定,且「为何未审」不打印#13896
              Bug
              Labels
              domain:skillspriority:p2Medium: important, M3tooling
              Description
              @huangyiirene
              huangyiirene
              opened on Aug 31, 2026
              总监席 2026-08-31 governed 审计(职责四)中实测,记录在案。⚠️ 更正申报:当日审计报告曾引用「finding #13836」,但该卡当时并未实际创建(报告先行、立卡遗漏,总监席自己的失误,与 #13792 记录的账本失真同类)—— 本卡即补立的真卡,台账以本卡号为准。
              实测现象
              同一命令、同参数、同 cwd,相隔约 15 分钟两次调用:
              node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --since-ref objectstack=b7f645a8a3b9 --since-ref objectui=38a123cac0fa

              • 第一次:尾注「2 governed repo(s) unaudited (cloud, objectos)」,objectui 窗口已审,枚举 12 条 governed 合并;
              • 第二次:尾注「3 governed repo(s) unaudited (objectui, cloud, objectos)」,objectui 零枚举。
              两次之间本地 objectui 树未被本席改动;锚点 38a123cac0fa 在第一次前已通过 git fetch --shallow-since=2026-08-27 解析(git cat-file -t = commit)。
              假说(未验,⛔ 不作结论)
              上游 main 在两次之间移动(该仓高频合并),脚本(或其内部 fetch)对新 tip 重估窗口时,浅克隆边界破坏了锚点到 tip 的连通性,边界证明 fail-closed ⇒ 整仓判 unaudited。fail-closed 方向本身正确(#4690:不得读作干净),但不确定性意味着每场召唤的审计职责可能因运行时机静默丢掉一个仓。
              值得做的三件
              1. 根因两次输出翻转;
              2. 脚本对 unaudited 仓打印原因(哪个前置条件失败:锚不可达/边界不可证/无检出),现在只有结论没有诊断;
              3. 自测覆盖浅克隆路径(锚在浅边界之外、fetch 后 tip 移动两种形状)。
              当日处置:采用边界成立那次的枚举,38 条归因经 MCP 补齐并获维护者全数认定(记录在总监席台账);本卡只管工具缺陷。
              ⛔ Filed unassigned — recording only. Refs: 座位贴 #12708(锚行与审计记录)。
              Metadata
              Metadata
              Assignees
              No one assigned
                Labels
                domain:skillspriority:p2Medium: important, M3tooling
                Type
                Bug
                Projects
                No projects
                  Milestone
                  No milestone
                  Relationships
                  None yet
                  Development
                  No branches or pull requests
                  Issue actions
                  
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

                  Skip to content
                  [finding] check-governed-merges 在浅克隆上不确定:同参两次调用,objectui 从「已审 12 条」翻成「未审」—— 窗口边界证明不稳定,且「为何未审」不打印 #13896
                  Closed as duplicate of#13836
                  Bug
                  Closed as duplicate of#13836
                  [finding] check-governed-merges 在浅克隆上不确定:同参两次调用,objectui 从「已审 12 条」翻成「未审」—— 窗口边界证明不稳定,且「为何未审」不打印#13896
                  Bug
                  Labels
                  domain:skillspriority:p2Medium: important, M3tooling
                  Description
                  @huangyiirene
                  huangyiirene
                  opened on Aug 31, 2026
                  总监席 2026-08-31 governed 审计(职责四)中实测,记录在案。⚠️ 更正申报:当日审计报告曾引用「finding #13836」,但该卡当时并未实际创建(报告先行、立卡遗漏,总监席自己的失误,与 #13792 记录的账本失真同类)—— 本卡即补立的真卡,台账以本卡号为准。
                  实测现象
                  同一命令、同参数、同 cwd,相隔约 15 分钟两次调用:
                  node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --since-ref objectstack=b7f645a8a3b9 --since-ref objectui=38a123cac0fa

                  • 第一次:尾注「2 governed repo(s) unaudited (cloud, objectos)」,objectui 窗口已审,枚举 12 条 governed 合并;
                  • 第二次:尾注「3 governed repo(s) unaudited (objectui, cloud, objectos)」,objectui 零枚举。
                  两次之间本地 objectui 树未被本席改动;锚点 38a123cac0fa 在第一次前已通过 git fetch --shallow-since=2026-08-27 解析(git cat-file -t = commit)。
                  假说(未验,⛔ 不作结论)
                  上游 main 在两次之间移动(该仓高频合并),脚本(或其内部 fetch)对新 tip 重估窗口时,浅克隆边界破坏了锚点到 tip 的连通性,边界证明 fail-closed ⇒ 整仓判 unaudited。fail-closed 方向本身正确(#4690:不得读作干净),但不确定性意味着每场召唤的审计职责可能因运行时机静默丢掉一个仓。
                  值得做的三件
                  1. 根因两次输出翻转;
                  2. 脚本对 unaudited 仓打印原因(哪个前置条件失败:锚不可达/边界不可证/无检出),现在只有结论没有诊断;
                  3. 自测覆盖浅克隆路径(锚在浅边界之外、fetch 后 tip 移动两种形状)。
                  当日处置:采用边界成立那次的枚举,38 条归因经 MCP 补齐并获维护者全数认定(记录在总监席台账);本卡只管工具缺陷。
                  ⛔ Filed unassigned — recording only. Refs: 座位贴 #12708(锚行与审计记录)。
                  Metadata
                  Metadata
                  Assignees
                  No one assigned
                    Labels
                    domain:skillspriority:p2Medium: important, M3tooling
                    Type
                    Bug
                    Projects
                    No projects
                      Milestone
                      No milestone
                      Relationships
                      None yet
                      Development
                      No branches or pull requests
                      Issue actions
                      
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

                      Skip to content
                      [finding] check-governed-merges 在浅克隆上不确定:同参两次调用,objectui 从「已审 12 条」翻成「未审」—— 窗口边界证明不稳定,且「为何未审」不打印 #13896
                      Closed as duplicate of#13836
                      Bug
                      Closed as duplicate of#13836
                      [finding] check-governed-merges 在浅克隆上不确定:同参两次调用,objectui 从「已审 12 条」翻成「未审」—— 窗口边界证明不稳定,且「为何未审」不打印#13896
                      Bug
                      Labels
                      domain:skillspriority:p2Medium: important, M3tooling
                      Description
                      @huangyiirene
                      huangyiirene
                      opened on Aug 31, 2026
                      总监席 2026-08-31 governed 审计(职责四)中实测,记录在案。⚠️ 更正申报:当日审计报告曾引用「finding #13836」,但该卡当时并未实际创建(报告先行、立卡遗漏,总监席自己的失误,与 #13792 记录的账本失真同类)—— 本卡即补立的真卡,台账以本卡号为准。
                      实测现象
                      同一命令、同参数、同 cwd,相隔约 15 分钟两次调用:
                      node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --since-ref objectstack=b7f645a8a3b9 --since-ref objectui=38a123cac0fa

                      • 第一次:尾注「2 governed repo(s) unaudited (cloud, objectos)」,objectui 窗口已审,枚举 12 条 governed 合并;
                      • 第二次:尾注「3 governed repo(s) unaudited (objectui, cloud, objectos)」,objectui 零枚举。
                      两次之间本地 objectui 树未被本席改动;锚点 38a123cac0fa 在第一次前已通过 git fetch --shallow-since=2026-08-27 解析(git cat-file -t = commit)。
                      假说(未验,⛔ 不作结论)
                      上游 main 在两次之间移动(该仓高频合并),脚本(或其内部 fetch)对新 tip 重估窗口时,浅克隆边界破坏了锚点到 tip 的连通性,边界证明 fail-closed ⇒ 整仓判 unaudited。fail-closed 方向本身正确(#4690:不得读作干净),但不确定性意味着每场召唤的审计职责可能因运行时机静默丢掉一个仓。
                      值得做的三件
                      1. 根因两次输出翻转;
                      2. 脚本对 unaudited 仓打印原因(哪个前置条件失败:锚不可达/边界不可证/无检出),现在只有结论没有诊断;
                      3. 自测覆盖浅克隆路径(锚在浅边界之外、fetch 后 tip 移动两种形状)。
                      当日处置:采用边界成立那次的枚举,38 条归因经 MCP 补齐并获维护者全数认定(记录在总监席台账);本卡只管工具缺陷。
                      ⛔ Filed unassigned — recording only. Refs: 座位贴 #12708(锚行与审计记录)。
                      Metadata
                      Metadata
                      Assignees
                      No one assigned
                        Labels
                        domain:skillspriority:p2Medium: important, M3tooling
                        Type
                        Bug
                        Projects
                        No projects
                          Milestone
                          No milestone
                          Relationships
                          None yet
                          Development
                          No branches or pull requests
                          Issue actions
                          
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

                          Skip to content
                          [finding] check-governed-merges 在浅克隆上不确定:同参两次调用,objectui 从「已审 12 条」翻成「未审」—— 窗口边界证明不稳定,且「为何未审」不打印 #13896
                          Closed as duplicate of#13836
                          Bug
                          Closed as duplicate of#13836
                          [finding] check-governed-merges 在浅克隆上不确定:同参两次调用,objectui 从「已审 12 条」翻成「未审」—— 窗口边界证明不稳定,且「为何未审」不打印#13896
                          Bug
                          Labels
                          domain:skillspriority:p2Medium: important, M3tooling
                          Description
                          @huangyiirene
                          huangyiirene
                          opened on Aug 31, 2026
                          总监席 2026-08-31 governed 审计(职责四)中实测,记录在案。⚠️ 更正申报:当日审计报告曾引用「finding #13836」,但该卡当时并未实际创建(报告先行、立卡遗漏,总监席自己的失误,与 #13792 记录的账本失真同类)—— 本卡即补立的真卡,台账以本卡号为准。
                          实测现象
                          同一命令、同参数、同 cwd,相隔约 15 分钟两次调用:
                          node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --since-ref objectstack=b7f645a8a3b9 --since-ref objectui=38a123cac0fa

                          • 第一次:尾注「2 governed repo(s) unaudited (cloud, objectos)」,objectui 窗口已审,枚举 12 条 governed 合并;
                          • 第二次:尾注「3 governed repo(s) unaudited (objectui, cloud, objectos)」,objectui 零枚举。
                          两次之间本地 objectui 树未被本席改动;锚点 38a123cac0fa 在第一次前已通过 git fetch --shallow-since=2026-08-27 解析(git cat-file -t = commit)。
                          假说(未验,⛔ 不作结论)
                          上游 main 在两次之间移动(该仓高频合并),脚本(或其内部 fetch)对新 tip 重估窗口时,浅克隆边界破坏了锚点到 tip 的连通性,边界证明 fail-closed ⇒ 整仓判 unaudited。fail-closed 方向本身正确(#4690:不得读作干净),但不确定性意味着每场召唤的审计职责可能因运行时机静默丢掉一个仓。
                          值得做的三件
                          1. 根因两次输出翻转;
                          2. 脚本对 unaudited 仓打印原因(哪个前置条件失败:锚不可达/边界不可证/无检出),现在只有结论没有诊断;
                          3. 自测覆盖浅克隆路径(锚在浅边界之外、fetch 后 tip 移动两种形状)。
                          当日处置:采用边界成立那次的枚举,38 条归因经 MCP 补齐并获维护者全数认定(记录在总监席台账);本卡只管工具缺陷。
                          ⛔ Filed unassigned — recording only. Refs: 座位贴 #12708(锚行与审计记录)。
                          Metadata
                          Metadata
                          Assignees
                          No one assigned
                            Labels
                            domain:skillspriority:p2Medium: important, M3tooling
                            Type
                            Bug
                            Projects
                            No projects
                              Milestone
                              No milestone
                              Relationships
                              None yet
                              Development
                              No branches or pull requests
                              Issue actions
                              
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

                              Skip to content
                              [finding] check-governed-merges 在浅克隆上不确定:同参两次调用,objectui 从「已审 12 条」翻成「未审」—— 窗口边界证明不稳定,且「为何未审」不打印 #13896
                              Closed as duplicate of#13836
                              Bug
                              Closed as duplicate of#13836
                              [finding] check-governed-merges 在浅克隆上不确定:同参两次调用,objectui 从「已审 12 条」翻成「未审」—— 窗口边界证明不稳定,且「为何未审」不打印#13896
                              Bug
                              Labels
                              domain:skillspriority:p2Medium: important, M3tooling
                              Description
                              @huangyiirene
                              huangyiirene
                              opened on Aug 31, 2026
                              总监席 2026-08-31 governed 审计(职责四)中实测,记录在案。⚠️ 更正申报:当日审计报告曾引用「finding #13836」,但该卡当时并未实际创建(报告先行、立卡遗漏,总监席自己的失误,与 #13792 记录的账本失真同类)—— 本卡即补立的真卡,台账以本卡号为准。
                              实测现象
                              同一命令、同参数、同 cwd,相隔约 15 分钟两次调用:
                              node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --since-ref objectstack=b7f645a8a3b9 --since-ref objectui=38a123cac0fa

                              • 第一次:尾注「2 governed repo(s) unaudited (cloud, objectos)」,objectui 窗口已审,枚举 12 条 governed 合并;
                              • 第二次:尾注「3 governed repo(s) unaudited (objectui, cloud, objectos)」,objectui 零枚举。
                              两次之间本地 objectui 树未被本席改动;锚点 38a123cac0fa 在第一次前已通过 git fetch --shallow-since=2026-08-27 解析(git cat-file -t = commit)。
                              假说(未验,⛔ 不作结论)
                              上游 main 在两次之间移动(该仓高频合并),脚本(或其内部 fetch)对新 tip 重估窗口时,浅克隆边界破坏了锚点到 tip 的连通性,边界证明 fail-closed ⇒ 整仓判 unaudited。fail-closed 方向本身正确(#4690:不得读作干净),但不确定性意味着每场召唤的审计职责可能因运行时机静默丢掉一个仓。
                              值得做的三件
                              1. 根因两次输出翻转;
                              2. 脚本对 unaudited 仓打印原因(哪个前置条件失败:锚不可达/边界不可证/无检出),现在只有结论没有诊断;
                              3. 自测覆盖浅克隆路径(锚在浅边界之外、fetch 后 tip 移动两种形状)。
                              当日处置:采用边界成立那次的枚举,38 条归因经 MCP 补齐并获维护者全数认定(记录在总监席台账);本卡只管工具缺陷。
                              ⛔ Filed unassigned — recording only. Refs: 座位贴 #12708(锚行与审计记录)。
                              Metadata
                              Metadata
                              Assignees
                              No one assigned
                                Labels
                                domain:skillspriority:p2Medium: important, M3tooling
                                Type
                                Bug
                                Projects
                                No projects
                                  Milestone
                                  No milestone
                                  Relationships
                                  None yet
                                  Development
                                  No branches or pull requests
                                  Issue actions