[finding] Plugin.type is typed string on a published surface — the eight-value set is enforced by prose only, though packages/core already depends on spec #13925

Description

@claude

Recorded while fixing #13762 (the Plugin.type TSDoc under-enumeration). Out of that card's scope — filed for triage, no assignee.

The observation

Plugin.type in packages/core/src/types.ts is declared type?: string. Nothing type-checks a plugin author against the eight values the platform actually accepts, so the TSDoc comment beside it carries the entire enumeration on its own. That is exactly why the comment drifting was worth a card: prose was doing a type's job.

While verifying that assumption for #13762 I measured something the card did not claim:

  • There is no PluginType alias and no typeof CORE_PLUGIN_TYPES derived type anywhere in packages/**. The enumeration exists only as the Zod enum in packages/spec/src/kernel/plugin.zod.ts and as prose.
  • packages/core already declares @objectstack/spec as a workspace:* dependency. So a type-level narrowing is reachable today without adding a dependency edge.

Sketch of the shape, not a proposal to land as-is:

importtype{CORE_PLUGIN_TYPES}from'@objectstack/spec';typePluginType='standard'|(typeofCORE_PLUGIN_TYPES)[number];
type?: PluginType;

Why it needs a decision rather than a patch

This narrows a published type on @objectstack/core. Anything today assigning a computed or third-party string to Plugin.type stops compiling, so it is an accept/reject change on a public surface, not a cleanup — it needs the contract-review path and a deliberate call on whether plugin type is a closed set for external authors or an open one the runtime merely recognises some members of.

It is also worth weighing against #13678, which would close the same drift class mechanically with a gate. These are alternative remedies for one defect, and the type-level one is narrower but stronger: it makes the wrong value unwritable rather than detectable. Whether the platform wants type closed is the real question, and it is a maintainer call.

How it was settled

Read against the implementation on origin/main at 5c34b7e26b: the type?: string declaration in packages/core/src/types.ts, a repo-wide search for a PluginType-shaped alias returning nothing, and packages/core/package.json showing the existing @objectstack/spec dependency.

Generated by Claude Code


Generated by Claude Code

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
     blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
    }
    } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
    })();
    (function(){
    try {
    var __m = "github.com";
    var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
    
    Skip to content

    [finding] Plugin.type is typed string on a published surface — the eight-value set is enforced by prose only, though packages/core already depends on spec #13925

    Description

    @claude

    Recorded while fixing #13762 (the Plugin.type TSDoc under-enumeration). Out of that card's scope — filed for triage, no assignee.

    The observation

    Plugin.type in packages/core/src/types.ts is declared type?: string. Nothing type-checks a plugin author against the eight values the platform actually accepts, so the TSDoc comment beside it carries the entire enumeration on its own. That is exactly why the comment drifting was worth a card: prose was doing a type's job.

    While verifying that assumption for #13762 I measured something the card did not claim:

    • There is no PluginType alias and no typeof CORE_PLUGIN_TYPES derived type anywhere in packages/**. The enumeration exists only as the Zod enum in packages/spec/src/kernel/plugin.zod.ts and as prose.
    • packages/core already declares @objectstack/spec as a workspace:* dependency. So a type-level narrowing is reachable today without adding a dependency edge.

    Sketch of the shape, not a proposal to land as-is:

    importtype{CORE_PLUGIN_TYPES}from'@objectstack/spec';typePluginType='standard'|(typeofCORE_PLUGIN_TYPES)[number];
    type?: PluginType;

    Why it needs a decision rather than a patch

    This narrows a published type on @objectstack/core. Anything today assigning a computed or third-party string to Plugin.type stops compiling, so it is an accept/reject change on a public surface, not a cleanup — it needs the contract-review path and a deliberate call on whether plugin type is a closed set for external authors or an open one the runtime merely recognises some members of.

    It is also worth weighing against #13678, which would close the same drift class mechanically with a gate. These are alternative remedies for one defect, and the type-level one is narrower but stronger: it makes the wrong value unwritable rather than detectable. Whether the platform wants type closed is the real question, and it is a maintainer call.

    How it was settled

    Read against the implementation on origin/main at 5c34b7e26b: the type?: string declaration in packages/core/src/types.ts, a repo-wide search for a PluginType-shaped alias returning nothing, and packages/core/package.json showing the existing @objectstack/spec dependency.

    Generated by Claude Code


    Generated by Claude Code

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    Type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
      Skip to content

      [finding] Plugin.type is typed string on a published surface — the eight-value set is enforced by prose only, though packages/core already depends on spec #13925

      Description

      @claude

      Recorded while fixing #13762 (the Plugin.type TSDoc under-enumeration). Out of that card's scope — filed for triage, no assignee.

      The observation

      Plugin.type in packages/core/src/types.ts is declared type?: string. Nothing type-checks a plugin author against the eight values the platform actually accepts, so the TSDoc comment beside it carries the entire enumeration on its own. That is exactly why the comment drifting was worth a card: prose was doing a type's job.

      While verifying that assumption for #13762 I measured something the card did not claim:

      • There is no PluginType alias and no typeof CORE_PLUGIN_TYPES derived type anywhere in packages/**. The enumeration exists only as the Zod enum in packages/spec/src/kernel/plugin.zod.ts and as prose.
      • packages/core already declares @objectstack/spec as a workspace:* dependency. So a type-level narrowing is reachable today without adding a dependency edge.

      Sketch of the shape, not a proposal to land as-is:

      importtype{CORE_PLUGIN_TYPES}from'@objectstack/spec';typePluginType='standard'|(typeofCORE_PLUGIN_TYPES)[number];
      type?: PluginType;

      Why it needs a decision rather than a patch

      This narrows a published type on @objectstack/core. Anything today assigning a computed or third-party string to Plugin.type stops compiling, so it is an accept/reject change on a public surface, not a cleanup — it needs the contract-review path and a deliberate call on whether plugin type is a closed set for external authors or an open one the runtime merely recognises some members of.

      It is also worth weighing against #13678, which would close the same drift class mechanically with a gate. These are alternative remedies for one defect, and the type-level one is narrower but stronger: it makes the wrong value unwritable rather than detectable. Whether the platform wants type closed is the real question, and it is a maintainer call.

      How it was settled

      Read against the implementation on origin/main at 5c34b7e26b: the type?: string declaration in packages/core/src/types.ts, a repo-wide search for a PluginType-shaped alias returning nothing, and packages/core/package.json showing the existing @objectstack/spec dependency.

      Generated by Claude Code


      Generated by Claude Code

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      Type

      Projects

      No projects

        Milestone

        No milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions

        , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
        Skip to content

        [finding] Plugin.type is typed string on a published surface — the eight-value set is enforced by prose only, though packages/core already depends on spec #13925

        Description

        @claude

        Recorded while fixing #13762 (the Plugin.type TSDoc under-enumeration). Out of that card's scope — filed for triage, no assignee.

        The observation

        Plugin.type in packages/core/src/types.ts is declared type?: string. Nothing type-checks a plugin author against the eight values the platform actually accepts, so the TSDoc comment beside it carries the entire enumeration on its own. That is exactly why the comment drifting was worth a card: prose was doing a type's job.

        While verifying that assumption for #13762 I measured something the card did not claim:

        • There is no PluginType alias and no typeof CORE_PLUGIN_TYPES derived type anywhere in packages/**. The enumeration exists only as the Zod enum in packages/spec/src/kernel/plugin.zod.ts and as prose.
        • packages/core already declares @objectstack/spec as a workspace:* dependency. So a type-level narrowing is reachable today without adding a dependency edge.

        Sketch of the shape, not a proposal to land as-is:

        importtype{CORE_PLUGIN_TYPES}from'@objectstack/spec';typePluginType='standard'|(typeofCORE_PLUGIN_TYPES)[number];
        type?: PluginType;

        Why it needs a decision rather than a patch

        This narrows a published type on @objectstack/core. Anything today assigning a computed or third-party string to Plugin.type stops compiling, so it is an accept/reject change on a public surface, not a cleanup — it needs the contract-review path and a deliberate call on whether plugin type is a closed set for external authors or an open one the runtime merely recognises some members of.

        It is also worth weighing against #13678, which would close the same drift class mechanically with a gate. These are alternative remedies for one defect, and the type-level one is narrower but stronger: it makes the wrong value unwritable rather than detectable. Whether the platform wants type closed is the real question, and it is a maintainer call.

        How it was settled

        Read against the implementation on origin/main at 5c34b7e26b: the type?: string declaration in packages/core/src/types.ts, a repo-wide search for a PluginType-shaped alias returning nothing, and packages/core/package.json showing the existing @objectstack/spec dependency.

        Generated by Claude Code


        Generated by Claude Code

        Metadata

        Metadata

        Assignees

        Type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
          Skip to content

          [finding] Plugin.type is typed string on a published surface — the eight-value set is enforced by prose only, though packages/core already depends on spec #13925

          Description

          @claude

          Recorded while fixing #13762 (the Plugin.type TSDoc under-enumeration). Out of that card's scope — filed for triage, no assignee.

          The observation

          Plugin.type in packages/core/src/types.ts is declared type?: string. Nothing type-checks a plugin author against the eight values the platform actually accepts, so the TSDoc comment beside it carries the entire enumeration on its own. That is exactly why the comment drifting was worth a card: prose was doing a type's job.

          While verifying that assumption for #13762 I measured something the card did not claim:

          • There is no PluginType alias and no typeof CORE_PLUGIN_TYPES derived type anywhere in packages/**. The enumeration exists only as the Zod enum in packages/spec/src/kernel/plugin.zod.ts and as prose.
          • packages/core already declares @objectstack/spec as a workspace:* dependency. So a type-level narrowing is reachable today without adding a dependency edge.

          Sketch of the shape, not a proposal to land as-is:

          importtype{CORE_PLUGIN_TYPES}from'@objectstack/spec';typePluginType='standard'|(typeofCORE_PLUGIN_TYPES)[number];
          type?: PluginType;

          Why it needs a decision rather than a patch

          This narrows a published type on @objectstack/core. Anything today assigning a computed or third-party string to Plugin.type stops compiling, so it is an accept/reject change on a public surface, not a cleanup — it needs the contract-review path and a deliberate call on whether plugin type is a closed set for external authors or an open one the runtime merely recognises some members of.

          It is also worth weighing against #13678, which would close the same drift class mechanically with a gate. These are alternative remedies for one defect, and the type-level one is narrower but stronger: it makes the wrong value unwritable rather than detectable. Whether the platform wants type closed is the real question, and it is a maintainer call.

          How it was settled

          Read against the implementation on origin/main at 5c34b7e26b: the type?: string declaration in packages/core/src/types.ts, a repo-wide search for a PluginType-shaped alias returning nothing, and packages/core/package.json showing the existing @objectstack/spec dependency.

          Generated by Claude Code


          Generated by Claude Code

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          Type

          Projects

          No projects

            Milestone

            No milestone

            Relationships

            None yet

            Development

            No branches or pull requests

            Issue actions

            , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
            Skip to content

            [finding] Plugin.type is typed string on a published surface — the eight-value set is enforced by prose only, though packages/core already depends on spec #13925

            Description

            @claude

            Recorded while fixing #13762 (the Plugin.type TSDoc under-enumeration). Out of that card's scope — filed for triage, no assignee.

            The observation

            Plugin.type in packages/core/src/types.ts is declared type?: string. Nothing type-checks a plugin author against the eight values the platform actually accepts, so the TSDoc comment beside it carries the entire enumeration on its own. That is exactly why the comment drifting was worth a card: prose was doing a type's job.

            While verifying that assumption for #13762 I measured something the card did not claim:

            • There is no PluginType alias and no typeof CORE_PLUGIN_TYPES derived type anywhere in packages/**. The enumeration exists only as the Zod enum in packages/spec/src/kernel/plugin.zod.ts and as prose.
            • packages/core already declares @objectstack/spec as a workspace:* dependency. So a type-level narrowing is reachable today without adding a dependency edge.

            Sketch of the shape, not a proposal to land as-is:

            importtype{CORE_PLUGIN_TYPES}from'@objectstack/spec';typePluginType='standard'|(typeofCORE_PLUGIN_TYPES)[number];
            type?: PluginType;

            Why it needs a decision rather than a patch

            This narrows a published type on @objectstack/core. Anything today assigning a computed or third-party string to Plugin.type stops compiling, so it is an accept/reject change on a public surface, not a cleanup — it needs the contract-review path and a deliberate call on whether plugin type is a closed set for external authors or an open one the runtime merely recognises some members of.

            It is also worth weighing against #13678, which would close the same drift class mechanically with a gate. These are alternative remedies for one defect, and the type-level one is narrower but stronger: it makes the wrong value unwritable rather than detectable. Whether the platform wants type closed is the real question, and it is a maintainer call.

            How it was settled

            Read against the implementation on origin/main at 5c34b7e26b: the type?: string declaration in packages/core/src/types.ts, a repo-wide search for a PluginType-shaped alias returning nothing, and packages/core/package.json showing the existing @objectstack/spec dependency.

            Generated by Claude Code


            Generated by Claude Code

            Metadata

            Metadata

            Assignees

            Type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              [finding] Plugin.type is typed string on a published surface — the eight-value set is enforced by prose only, though packages/core already depends on spec #13925

              Description

              @claude

              Recorded while fixing #13762 (the Plugin.type TSDoc under-enumeration). Out of that card's scope — filed for triage, no assignee.

              The observation

              Plugin.type in packages/core/src/types.ts is declared type?: string. Nothing type-checks a plugin author against the eight values the platform actually accepts, so the TSDoc comment beside it carries the entire enumeration on its own. That is exactly why the comment drifting was worth a card: prose was doing a type's job.

              While verifying that assumption for #13762 I measured something the card did not claim:

              • There is no PluginType alias and no typeof CORE_PLUGIN_TYPES derived type anywhere in packages/**. The enumeration exists only as the Zod enum in packages/spec/src/kernel/plugin.zod.ts and as prose.
              • packages/core already declares @objectstack/spec as a workspace:* dependency. So a type-level narrowing is reachable today without adding a dependency edge.

              Sketch of the shape, not a proposal to land as-is:

              importtype{CORE_PLUGIN_TYPES}from'@objectstack/spec';typePluginType='standard'|(typeofCORE_PLUGIN_TYPES)[number];
              type?: PluginType;

              Why it needs a decision rather than a patch

              This narrows a published type on @objectstack/core. Anything today assigning a computed or third-party string to Plugin.type stops compiling, so it is an accept/reject change on a public surface, not a cleanup — it needs the contract-review path and a deliberate call on whether plugin type is a closed set for external authors or an open one the runtime merely recognises some members of.

              It is also worth weighing against #13678, which would close the same drift class mechanically with a gate. These are alternative remedies for one defect, and the type-level one is narrower but stronger: it makes the wrong value unwritable rather than detectable. Whether the platform wants type closed is the real question, and it is a maintainer call.

              How it was settled

              Read against the implementation on origin/main at 5c34b7e26b: the type?: string declaration in packages/core/src/types.ts, a repo-wide search for a PluginType-shaped alias returning nothing, and packages/core/package.json showing the existing @objectstack/spec dependency.

              Generated by Claude Code


              Generated by Claude Code

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              Type

              Projects

              No projects

                Milestone

                No milestone

                Relationships

                None yet

                Development

                No branches or pull requests

                Issue actions

                , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                Skip to content

                [finding] Plugin.type is typed string on a published surface — the eight-value set is enforced by prose only, though packages/core already depends on spec #13925

                Description

                @claude

                Recorded while fixing #13762 (the Plugin.type TSDoc under-enumeration). Out of that card's scope — filed for triage, no assignee.

                The observation

                Plugin.type in packages/core/src/types.ts is declared type?: string. Nothing type-checks a plugin author against the eight values the platform actually accepts, so the TSDoc comment beside it carries the entire enumeration on its own. That is exactly why the comment drifting was worth a card: prose was doing a type's job.

                While verifying that assumption for #13762 I measured something the card did not claim:

                • There is no PluginType alias and no typeof CORE_PLUGIN_TYPES derived type anywhere in packages/**. The enumeration exists only as the Zod enum in packages/spec/src/kernel/plugin.zod.ts and as prose.
                • packages/core already declares @objectstack/spec as a workspace:* dependency. So a type-level narrowing is reachable today without adding a dependency edge.

                Sketch of the shape, not a proposal to land as-is:

                importtype{CORE_PLUGIN_TYPES}from'@objectstack/spec';typePluginType='standard'|(typeofCORE_PLUGIN_TYPES)[number];
                type?: PluginType;

                Why it needs a decision rather than a patch

                This narrows a published type on @objectstack/core. Anything today assigning a computed or third-party string to Plugin.type stops compiling, so it is an accept/reject change on a public surface, not a cleanup — it needs the contract-review path and a deliberate call on whether plugin type is a closed set for external authors or an open one the runtime merely recognises some members of.

                It is also worth weighing against #13678, which would close the same drift class mechanically with a gate. These are alternative remedies for one defect, and the type-level one is narrower but stronger: it makes the wrong value unwritable rather than detectable. Whether the platform wants type closed is the real question, and it is a maintainer call.

                How it was settled

                Read against the implementation on origin/main at 5c34b7e26b: the type?: string declaration in packages/core/src/types.ts, a repo-wide search for a PluginType-shaped alias returning nothing, and packages/core/package.json showing the existing @objectstack/spec dependency.

                Generated by Claude Code


                Generated by Claude Code

                Metadata

                Metadata

                Assignees

                Type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions