skills: encode the maintainer's axis-weighting ruling into the four-axis decision framework — long-term soundness carries the highest weight, at least 50% #14030

Description

@os-sam

Maintainer ruling, 2026-09-01, PM chat channel (director seat decision batch, on the #13331 presentation), verbatim:

四维分析中,长期合理应该权重最高,至少50%

What to encode

The four-axis decision framework (single source: pm-dispatch SKILL.md 「升级与决策」, serialized as the 四棱 card block; details in references/decision-analysis.md) currently treats the four axes as co-equal inputs with a tie-break order (2026-08-27 「分歧推荐序按拉动定向」). This ruling adds an explicit weighting: 项目长远合理性 (long-term soundness) carries the highest weight — at least 50% — when axes conflict. Recommendations must lead with the long-term reading, and the other three axes together cannot outvote it.

Boundaries

  • This composes with, not replaces, the 2026-08-27 tie-break ruling and the standing human-floor items (安全/权限边界、破坏性难逆动作恒在人工地板 — unchanged).
  • Frame-sync discipline applies: the four-axis framework has check:skill-frame-sync-managed copies — all copies move together in one PR.
  • Skills lane owns the edit; the landing PR is governed (.claude/**) — draft-only, human merge. Mind the SKILL.md line ratchet: prefer landing the weighting in references/decision-analysis.md (outside the ratchet) with the main file unchanged if it fits no ratchet budget.

Filed by the director seat, session session_015adLit3ZYASJiXwxKG78Wi. Routing/grading is triage's.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      
      Skip to content

      skills: encode the maintainer's axis-weighting ruling into the four-axis decision framework — long-term soundness carries the highest weight, at least 50% #14030

      Description

      @os-sam

      Maintainer ruling, 2026-09-01, PM chat channel (director seat decision batch, on the #13331 presentation), verbatim:

      四维分析中,长期合理应该权重最高,至少50%

      What to encode

      The four-axis decision framework (single source: pm-dispatch SKILL.md 「升级与决策」, serialized as the 四棱 card block; details in references/decision-analysis.md) currently treats the four axes as co-equal inputs with a tie-break order (2026-08-27 「分歧推荐序按拉动定向」). This ruling adds an explicit weighting: 项目长远合理性 (long-term soundness) carries the highest weight — at least 50% — when axes conflict. Recommendations must lead with the long-term reading, and the other three axes together cannot outvote it.

      Boundaries

      • This composes with, not replaces, the 2026-08-27 tie-break ruling and the standing human-floor items (安全/权限边界、破坏性难逆动作恒在人工地板 — unchanged).
      • Frame-sync discipline applies: the four-axis framework has check:skill-frame-sync-managed copies — all copies move together in one PR.
      • Skills lane owns the edit; the landing PR is governed (.claude/**) — draft-only, human merge. Mind the SKILL.md line ratchet: prefer landing the weighting in references/decision-analysis.md (outside the ratchet) with the main file unchanged if it fits no ratchet budget.

      Filed by the director seat, session session_015adLit3ZYASJiXwxKG78Wi. Routing/grading is triage's.

      Activity

      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
          Skip to content

          skills: encode the maintainer's axis-weighting ruling into the four-axis decision framework — long-term soundness carries the highest weight, at least 50% #14030

          Description

          @os-sam

          Maintainer ruling, 2026-09-01, PM chat channel (director seat decision batch, on the #13331 presentation), verbatim:

          四维分析中,长期合理应该权重最高,至少50%

          What to encode

          The four-axis decision framework (single source: pm-dispatch SKILL.md 「升级与决策」, serialized as the 四棱 card block; details in references/decision-analysis.md) currently treats the four axes as co-equal inputs with a tie-break order (2026-08-27 「分歧推荐序按拉动定向」). This ruling adds an explicit weighting: 项目长远合理性 (long-term soundness) carries the highest weight — at least 50% — when axes conflict. Recommendations must lead with the long-term reading, and the other three axes together cannot outvote it.

          Boundaries

          • This composes with, not replaces, the 2026-08-27 tie-break ruling and the standing human-floor items (安全/权限边界、破坏性难逆动作恒在人工地板 — unchanged).
          • Frame-sync discipline applies: the four-axis framework has check:skill-frame-sync-managed copies — all copies move together in one PR.
          • Skills lane owns the edit; the landing PR is governed (.claude/**) — draft-only, human merge. Mind the SKILL.md line ratchet: prefer landing the weighting in references/decision-analysis.md (outside the ratchet) with the main file unchanged if it fits no ratchet budget.

          Filed by the director seat, session session_015adLit3ZYASJiXwxKG78Wi. Routing/grading is triage's.

          Activity

          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              skills: encode the maintainer's axis-weighting ruling into the four-axis decision framework — long-term soundness carries the highest weight, at least 50% #14030

              Description

              @os-sam

              Maintainer ruling, 2026-09-01, PM chat channel (director seat decision batch, on the #13331 presentation), verbatim:

              四维分析中,长期合理应该权重最高,至少50%

              What to encode

              The four-axis decision framework (single source: pm-dispatch SKILL.md 「升级与决策」, serialized as the 四棱 card block; details in references/decision-analysis.md) currently treats the four axes as co-equal inputs with a tie-break order (2026-08-27 「分歧推荐序按拉动定向」). This ruling adds an explicit weighting: 项目长远合理性 (long-term soundness) carries the highest weight — at least 50% — when axes conflict. Recommendations must lead with the long-term reading, and the other three axes together cannot outvote it.

              Boundaries

              • This composes with, not replaces, the 2026-08-27 tie-break ruling and the standing human-floor items (安全/权限边界、破坏性难逆动作恒在人工地板 — unchanged).
              • Frame-sync discipline applies: the four-axis framework has check:skill-frame-sync-managed copies — all copies move together in one PR.
              • Skills lane owns the edit; the landing PR is governed (.claude/**) — draft-only, human merge. Mind the SKILL.md line ratchet: prefer landing the weighting in references/decision-analysis.md (outside the ratchet) with the main file unchanged if it fits no ratchet budget.

              Filed by the director seat, session session_015adLit3ZYASJiXwxKG78Wi. Routing/grading is triage's.

              Activity

              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
                  Skip to content

                  skills: encode the maintainer's axis-weighting ruling into the four-axis decision framework — long-term soundness carries the highest weight, at least 50% #14030

                  Description

                  @os-sam

                  Maintainer ruling, 2026-09-01, PM chat channel (director seat decision batch, on the #13331 presentation), verbatim:

                  四维分析中,长期合理应该权重最高,至少50%

                  What to encode

                  The four-axis decision framework (single source: pm-dispatch SKILL.md 「升级与决策」, serialized as the 四棱 card block; details in references/decision-analysis.md) currently treats the four axes as co-equal inputs with a tie-break order (2026-08-27 「分歧推荐序按拉动定向」). This ruling adds an explicit weighting: 项目长远合理性 (long-term soundness) carries the highest weight — at least 50% — when axes conflict. Recommendations must lead with the long-term reading, and the other three axes together cannot outvote it.

                  Boundaries

                  • This composes with, not replaces, the 2026-08-27 tie-break ruling and the standing human-floor items (安全/权限边界、破坏性难逆动作恒在人工地板 — unchanged).
                  • Frame-sync discipline applies: the four-axis framework has check:skill-frame-sync-managed copies — all copies move together in one PR.
                  • Skills lane owns the edit; the landing PR is governed (.claude/**) — draft-only, human merge. Mind the SKILL.md line ratchet: prefer landing the weighting in references/decision-analysis.md (outside the ratchet) with the main file unchanged if it fits no ratchet budget.

                  Filed by the director seat, session session_015adLit3ZYASJiXwxKG78Wi. Routing/grading is triage's.

                  Activity

                  Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Labels

                    Type

                    No type

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                      Skip to content

                      skills: encode the maintainer's axis-weighting ruling into the four-axis decision framework — long-term soundness carries the highest weight, at least 50% #14030

                      Description

                      @os-sam

                      Maintainer ruling, 2026-09-01, PM chat channel (director seat decision batch, on the #13331 presentation), verbatim:

                      四维分析中,长期合理应该权重最高,至少50%

                      What to encode

                      The four-axis decision framework (single source: pm-dispatch SKILL.md 「升级与决策」, serialized as the 四棱 card block; details in references/decision-analysis.md) currently treats the four axes as co-equal inputs with a tie-break order (2026-08-27 「分歧推荐序按拉动定向」). This ruling adds an explicit weighting: 项目长远合理性 (long-term soundness) carries the highest weight — at least 50% — when axes conflict. Recommendations must lead with the long-term reading, and the other three axes together cannot outvote it.

                      Boundaries

                      • This composes with, not replaces, the 2026-08-27 tie-break ruling and the standing human-floor items (安全/权限边界、破坏性难逆动作恒在人工地板 — unchanged).
                      • Frame-sync discipline applies: the four-axis framework has check:skill-frame-sync-managed copies — all copies move together in one PR.
                      • Skills lane owns the edit; the landing PR is governed (.claude/**) — draft-only, human merge. Mind the SKILL.md line ratchet: prefer landing the weighting in references/decision-analysis.md (outside the ratchet) with the main file unchanged if it fits no ratchet budget.

                      Filed by the director seat, session session_015adLit3ZYASJiXwxKG78Wi. Routing/grading is triage's.

                      Activity

                      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Labels

                        Type

                        No type

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                          Skip to content

                          skills: encode the maintainer's axis-weighting ruling into the four-axis decision framework — long-term soundness carries the highest weight, at least 50% #14030

                          Description

                          @os-sam

                          Maintainer ruling, 2026-09-01, PM chat channel (director seat decision batch, on the #13331 presentation), verbatim:

                          四维分析中,长期合理应该权重最高,至少50%

                          What to encode

                          The four-axis decision framework (single source: pm-dispatch SKILL.md 「升级与决策」, serialized as the 四棱 card block; details in references/decision-analysis.md) currently treats the four axes as co-equal inputs with a tie-break order (2026-08-27 「分歧推荐序按拉动定向」). This ruling adds an explicit weighting: 项目长远合理性 (long-term soundness) carries the highest weight — at least 50% — when axes conflict. Recommendations must lead with the long-term reading, and the other three axes together cannot outvote it.

                          Boundaries

                          • This composes with, not replaces, the 2026-08-27 tie-break ruling and the standing human-floor items (安全/权限边界、破坏性难逆动作恒在人工地板 — unchanged).
                          • Frame-sync discipline applies: the four-axis framework has check:skill-frame-sync-managed copies — all copies move together in one PR.
                          • Skills lane owns the edit; the landing PR is governed (.claude/**) — draft-only, human merge. Mind the SKILL.md line ratchet: prefer landing the weighting in references/decision-analysis.md (outside the ratchet) with the main file unchanged if it fits no ratchet budget.

                          Filed by the director seat, session session_015adLit3ZYASJiXwxKG78Wi. Routing/grading is triage's.

                          Activity

                          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Labels

                            Type

                            No type

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                              Skip to content

                              skills: encode the maintainer's axis-weighting ruling into the four-axis decision framework — long-term soundness carries the highest weight, at least 50% #14030

                              Description

                              @os-sam

                              Maintainer ruling, 2026-09-01, PM chat channel (director seat decision batch, on the #13331 presentation), verbatim:

                              四维分析中,长期合理应该权重最高,至少50%

                              What to encode

                              The four-axis decision framework (single source: pm-dispatch SKILL.md 「升级与决策」, serialized as the 四棱 card block; details in references/decision-analysis.md) currently treats the four axes as co-equal inputs with a tie-break order (2026-08-27 「分歧推荐序按拉动定向」). This ruling adds an explicit weighting: 项目长远合理性 (long-term soundness) carries the highest weight — at least 50% — when axes conflict. Recommendations must lead with the long-term reading, and the other three axes together cannot outvote it.

                              Boundaries

                              • This composes with, not replaces, the 2026-08-27 tie-break ruling and the standing human-floor items (安全/权限边界、破坏性难逆动作恒在人工地板 — unchanged).
                              • Frame-sync discipline applies: the four-axis framework has check:skill-frame-sync-managed copies — all copies move together in one PR.
                              • Skills lane owns the edit; the landing PR is governed (.claude/**) — draft-only, human merge. Mind the SKILL.md line ratchet: prefer landing the weighting in references/decision-analysis.md (outside the ratchet) with the main file unchanged if it fits no ratchet budget.

                              Filed by the director seat, session session_015adLit3ZYASJiXwxKG78Wi. Routing/grading is triage's.

                              Activity

                              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Labels

                                Type

                                No type

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions