flows: lint a loop body with a fallible node and no containment, and a try_catch without catch; document loop { try_catch } as the per-iteration containment spelling (B-branch items 1–2 of #13681) #14394

Description

@claude

Part of #13681 — the B-branch's lint and docs limbs, filed into the domain:devx queue by the domain:spec seat (session session_01GDA48PuRFrHyRfdkBz8m21) under the cross-seat path the retriage comment on that card prescribes (comment 5479171811: the lint limb is handed to its lane by a proper card, never privately). The visibility half (item 3, the run-summary contract) stays on #13681 and is in flight in the spec lane; this card does not depend on it — the lint rules and the docs spelling are authoring-time facts measured on origin/main today.

Reader: the domain:devx execution seat, at its next selection pass (this card is a plain pm:queue candidate; triage adds domain:* and type).

Ruling of record (do not re-decide)

Maintainer 2026-08-31, director decision batch #18, verbatim 「其他同意」 on the conditional ruling (issue comment 5478768627); branch selected by measurement (comment 5478879587): B — no new key (⛔ no loop.config.onIterationError), because loop { body: [ try_catch { try, catch } ] } measured as real per-iteration containment on the real AutomationEngine (5 elements, third fails, 5/5 iterations, elements 4–5 processed, run completes; measurement comment 5478851960).

Deliverables (from comment 5478879587 §B, items 1–2, and the retriage's three standing prohibitions in comment 5479171811)

  1. Lint rule A — loop without containment: a loop whose body region contains a fallible node (any node that can return success: false or throw — at minimum every builtin action node, notify, connector_action, record writes) and no try_catch enclosing it ⇒ an authoring-time warning that names the loop node, the fallible node, and the prescribed spelling. Lands in packages/lint under the flow lint family.
  2. Lint rule B — the near-miss shape, first target not an extra: a try_catch node whose catch region is absent gives zero containment and dies exactly like an unwrapped node (measured). Name it at authoring time; the fix text is the minimal catch spelling below.
  3. Docs: write loop { try_catch { … } } into the flow docs as the orthography for per-iteration containment, carrying the measured minimal catch spelling verbatim (do not re-derive): catch cannot be empty — the region's nodes is .min(1), so catch: {} and catch: { nodes: [] } are both refused; the shortest usable catch is one bare assignment node with no config; edges may be omitted; errorVariable may be omitted.
  4. Both lint rules ship with the positive control (a fixture that trips each rule) and the negative control (the documented spelling passes clean), and the docs example must type-check under check:skill-examples / check:yaml-examples where applicable.

Acceptance (executable)

  • pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint exec vitest run <the flow-lint test file> shows: the unwrapped-loop fixture → warning naming the loop and the node; the try_catch-without-catch fixture → warning; the documented loop { try_catch { try, catch: [assignment] } } fixture → no finding.
  • content/docs/automation/flows.mdx (or the page the devx seat judges canonical) documents the spelling with the minimal catch form above, and the example parses under FlowSchema.

Out of scope here


Generated by Claude Code

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
     blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
    }
    } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
    })();
    (function(){
    try {
    var __m = "github.com";
    var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
    
    Skip to content

    flows: lint a loop body with a fallible node and no containment, and a try_catch without catch; document loop { try_catch } as the per-iteration containment spelling (B-branch items 1–2 of #13681) #14394

    Description

    @claude

    Part of #13681 — the B-branch's lint and docs limbs, filed into the domain:devx queue by the domain:spec seat (session session_01GDA48PuRFrHyRfdkBz8m21) under the cross-seat path the retriage comment on that card prescribes (comment 5479171811: the lint limb is handed to its lane by a proper card, never privately). The visibility half (item 3, the run-summary contract) stays on #13681 and is in flight in the spec lane; this card does not depend on it — the lint rules and the docs spelling are authoring-time facts measured on origin/main today.

    Reader: the domain:devx execution seat, at its next selection pass (this card is a plain pm:queue candidate; triage adds domain:* and type).

    Ruling of record (do not re-decide)

    Maintainer 2026-08-31, director decision batch #18, verbatim 「其他同意」 on the conditional ruling (issue comment 5478768627); branch selected by measurement (comment 5478879587): B — no new key (⛔ no loop.config.onIterationError), because loop { body: [ try_catch { try, catch } ] } measured as real per-iteration containment on the real AutomationEngine (5 elements, third fails, 5/5 iterations, elements 4–5 processed, run completes; measurement comment 5478851960).

    Deliverables (from comment 5478879587 §B, items 1–2, and the retriage's three standing prohibitions in comment 5479171811)

    1. Lint rule A — loop without containment: a loop whose body region contains a fallible node (any node that can return success: false or throw — at minimum every builtin action node, notify, connector_action, record writes) and no try_catch enclosing it ⇒ an authoring-time warning that names the loop node, the fallible node, and the prescribed spelling. Lands in packages/lint under the flow lint family.
    2. Lint rule B — the near-miss shape, first target not an extra: a try_catch node whose catch region is absent gives zero containment and dies exactly like an unwrapped node (measured). Name it at authoring time; the fix text is the minimal catch spelling below.
    3. Docs: write loop { try_catch { … } } into the flow docs as the orthography for per-iteration containment, carrying the measured minimal catch spelling verbatim (do not re-derive): catch cannot be empty — the region's nodes is .min(1), so catch: {} and catch: { nodes: [] } are both refused; the shortest usable catch is one bare assignment node with no config; edges may be omitted; errorVariable may be omitted.
    4. Both lint rules ship with the positive control (a fixture that trips each rule) and the negative control (the documented spelling passes clean), and the docs example must type-check under check:skill-examples / check:yaml-examples where applicable.

    Acceptance (executable)

    • pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint exec vitest run <the flow-lint test file> shows: the unwrapped-loop fixture → warning naming the loop and the node; the try_catch-without-catch fixture → warning; the documented loop { try_catch { try, catch: [assignment] } } fixture → no finding.
    • content/docs/automation/flows.mdx (or the page the devx seat judges canonical) documents the spelling with the minimal catch form above, and the example parses under FlowSchema.

    Out of scope here


    Generated by Claude Code

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
      Skip to content

      flows: lint a loop body with a fallible node and no containment, and a try_catch without catch; document loop { try_catch } as the per-iteration containment spelling (B-branch items 1–2 of #13681) #14394

      Description

      @claude

      Part of #13681 — the B-branch's lint and docs limbs, filed into the domain:devx queue by the domain:spec seat (session session_01GDA48PuRFrHyRfdkBz8m21) under the cross-seat path the retriage comment on that card prescribes (comment 5479171811: the lint limb is handed to its lane by a proper card, never privately). The visibility half (item 3, the run-summary contract) stays on #13681 and is in flight in the spec lane; this card does not depend on it — the lint rules and the docs spelling are authoring-time facts measured on origin/main today.

      Reader: the domain:devx execution seat, at its next selection pass (this card is a plain pm:queue candidate; triage adds domain:* and type).

      Ruling of record (do not re-decide)

      Maintainer 2026-08-31, director decision batch #18, verbatim 「其他同意」 on the conditional ruling (issue comment 5478768627); branch selected by measurement (comment 5478879587): B — no new key (⛔ no loop.config.onIterationError), because loop { body: [ try_catch { try, catch } ] } measured as real per-iteration containment on the real AutomationEngine (5 elements, third fails, 5/5 iterations, elements 4–5 processed, run completes; measurement comment 5478851960).

      Deliverables (from comment 5478879587 §B, items 1–2, and the retriage's three standing prohibitions in comment 5479171811)

      1. Lint rule A — loop without containment: a loop whose body region contains a fallible node (any node that can return success: false or throw — at minimum every builtin action node, notify, connector_action, record writes) and no try_catch enclosing it ⇒ an authoring-time warning that names the loop node, the fallible node, and the prescribed spelling. Lands in packages/lint under the flow lint family.
      2. Lint rule B — the near-miss shape, first target not an extra: a try_catch node whose catch region is absent gives zero containment and dies exactly like an unwrapped node (measured). Name it at authoring time; the fix text is the minimal catch spelling below.
      3. Docs: write loop { try_catch { … } } into the flow docs as the orthography for per-iteration containment, carrying the measured minimal catch spelling verbatim (do not re-derive): catch cannot be empty — the region's nodes is .min(1), so catch: {} and catch: { nodes: [] } are both refused; the shortest usable catch is one bare assignment node with no config; edges may be omitted; errorVariable may be omitted.
      4. Both lint rules ship with the positive control (a fixture that trips each rule) and the negative control (the documented spelling passes clean), and the docs example must type-check under check:skill-examples / check:yaml-examples where applicable.

      Acceptance (executable)

      • pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint exec vitest run <the flow-lint test file> shows: the unwrapped-loop fixture → warning naming the loop and the node; the try_catch-without-catch fixture → warning; the documented loop { try_catch { try, catch: [assignment] } } fixture → no finding.
      • content/docs/automation/flows.mdx (or the page the devx seat judges canonical) documents the spelling with the minimal catch form above, and the example parses under FlowSchema.

      Out of scope here


      Generated by Claude Code

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      Type

      No type

      Projects

      No projects

        Milestone

        No milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions

        , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
        Skip to content

        flows: lint a loop body with a fallible node and no containment, and a try_catch without catch; document loop { try_catch } as the per-iteration containment spelling (B-branch items 1–2 of #13681) #14394

        Description

        @claude

        Part of #13681 — the B-branch's lint and docs limbs, filed into the domain:devx queue by the domain:spec seat (session session_01GDA48PuRFrHyRfdkBz8m21) under the cross-seat path the retriage comment on that card prescribes (comment 5479171811: the lint limb is handed to its lane by a proper card, never privately). The visibility half (item 3, the run-summary contract) stays on #13681 and is in flight in the spec lane; this card does not depend on it — the lint rules and the docs spelling are authoring-time facts measured on origin/main today.

        Reader: the domain:devx execution seat, at its next selection pass (this card is a plain pm:queue candidate; triage adds domain:* and type).

        Ruling of record (do not re-decide)

        Maintainer 2026-08-31, director decision batch #18, verbatim 「其他同意」 on the conditional ruling (issue comment 5478768627); branch selected by measurement (comment 5478879587): B — no new key (⛔ no loop.config.onIterationError), because loop { body: [ try_catch { try, catch } ] } measured as real per-iteration containment on the real AutomationEngine (5 elements, third fails, 5/5 iterations, elements 4–5 processed, run completes; measurement comment 5478851960).

        Deliverables (from comment 5478879587 §B, items 1–2, and the retriage's three standing prohibitions in comment 5479171811)

        1. Lint rule A — loop without containment: a loop whose body region contains a fallible node (any node that can return success: false or throw — at minimum every builtin action node, notify, connector_action, record writes) and no try_catch enclosing it ⇒ an authoring-time warning that names the loop node, the fallible node, and the prescribed spelling. Lands in packages/lint under the flow lint family.
        2. Lint rule B — the near-miss shape, first target not an extra: a try_catch node whose catch region is absent gives zero containment and dies exactly like an unwrapped node (measured). Name it at authoring time; the fix text is the minimal catch spelling below.
        3. Docs: write loop { try_catch { … } } into the flow docs as the orthography for per-iteration containment, carrying the measured minimal catch spelling verbatim (do not re-derive): catch cannot be empty — the region's nodes is .min(1), so catch: {} and catch: { nodes: [] } are both refused; the shortest usable catch is one bare assignment node with no config; edges may be omitted; errorVariable may be omitted.
        4. Both lint rules ship with the positive control (a fixture that trips each rule) and the negative control (the documented spelling passes clean), and the docs example must type-check under check:skill-examples / check:yaml-examples where applicable.

        Acceptance (executable)

        • pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint exec vitest run <the flow-lint test file> shows: the unwrapped-loop fixture → warning naming the loop and the node; the try_catch-without-catch fixture → warning; the documented loop { try_catch { try, catch: [assignment] } } fixture → no finding.
        • content/docs/automation/flows.mdx (or the page the devx seat judges canonical) documents the spelling with the minimal catch form above, and the example parses under FlowSchema.

        Out of scope here


        Generated by Claude Code

        Metadata

        Metadata

        Assignees

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
          Skip to content

          flows: lint a loop body with a fallible node and no containment, and a try_catch without catch; document loop { try_catch } as the per-iteration containment spelling (B-branch items 1–2 of #13681) #14394

          Description

          @claude

          Part of #13681 — the B-branch's lint and docs limbs, filed into the domain:devx queue by the domain:spec seat (session session_01GDA48PuRFrHyRfdkBz8m21) under the cross-seat path the retriage comment on that card prescribes (comment 5479171811: the lint limb is handed to its lane by a proper card, never privately). The visibility half (item 3, the run-summary contract) stays on #13681 and is in flight in the spec lane; this card does not depend on it — the lint rules and the docs spelling are authoring-time facts measured on origin/main today.

          Reader: the domain:devx execution seat, at its next selection pass (this card is a plain pm:queue candidate; triage adds domain:* and type).

          Ruling of record (do not re-decide)

          Maintainer 2026-08-31, director decision batch #18, verbatim 「其他同意」 on the conditional ruling (issue comment 5478768627); branch selected by measurement (comment 5478879587): B — no new key (⛔ no loop.config.onIterationError), because loop { body: [ try_catch { try, catch } ] } measured as real per-iteration containment on the real AutomationEngine (5 elements, third fails, 5/5 iterations, elements 4–5 processed, run completes; measurement comment 5478851960).

          Deliverables (from comment 5478879587 §B, items 1–2, and the retriage's three standing prohibitions in comment 5479171811)

          1. Lint rule A — loop without containment: a loop whose body region contains a fallible node (any node that can return success: false or throw — at minimum every builtin action node, notify, connector_action, record writes) and no try_catch enclosing it ⇒ an authoring-time warning that names the loop node, the fallible node, and the prescribed spelling. Lands in packages/lint under the flow lint family.
          2. Lint rule B — the near-miss shape, first target not an extra: a try_catch node whose catch region is absent gives zero containment and dies exactly like an unwrapped node (measured). Name it at authoring time; the fix text is the minimal catch spelling below.
          3. Docs: write loop { try_catch { … } } into the flow docs as the orthography for per-iteration containment, carrying the measured minimal catch spelling verbatim (do not re-derive): catch cannot be empty — the region's nodes is .min(1), so catch: {} and catch: { nodes: [] } are both refused; the shortest usable catch is one bare assignment node with no config; edges may be omitted; errorVariable may be omitted.
          4. Both lint rules ship with the positive control (a fixture that trips each rule) and the negative control (the documented spelling passes clean), and the docs example must type-check under check:skill-examples / check:yaml-examples where applicable.

          Acceptance (executable)

          • pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint exec vitest run <the flow-lint test file> shows: the unwrapped-loop fixture → warning naming the loop and the node; the try_catch-without-catch fixture → warning; the documented loop { try_catch { try, catch: [assignment] } } fixture → no finding.
          • content/docs/automation/flows.mdx (or the page the devx seat judges canonical) documents the spelling with the minimal catch form above, and the example parses under FlowSchema.

          Out of scope here


          Generated by Claude Code

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          Type

          No type

          Projects

          No projects

            Milestone

            No milestone

            Relationships

            None yet

            Development

            No branches or pull requests

            Issue actions

            , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
            Skip to content

            flows: lint a loop body with a fallible node and no containment, and a try_catch without catch; document loop { try_catch } as the per-iteration containment spelling (B-branch items 1–2 of #13681) #14394

            Description

            @claude

            Part of #13681 — the B-branch's lint and docs limbs, filed into the domain:devx queue by the domain:spec seat (session session_01GDA48PuRFrHyRfdkBz8m21) under the cross-seat path the retriage comment on that card prescribes (comment 5479171811: the lint limb is handed to its lane by a proper card, never privately). The visibility half (item 3, the run-summary contract) stays on #13681 and is in flight in the spec lane; this card does not depend on it — the lint rules and the docs spelling are authoring-time facts measured on origin/main today.

            Reader: the domain:devx execution seat, at its next selection pass (this card is a plain pm:queue candidate; triage adds domain:* and type).

            Ruling of record (do not re-decide)

            Maintainer 2026-08-31, director decision batch #18, verbatim 「其他同意」 on the conditional ruling (issue comment 5478768627); branch selected by measurement (comment 5478879587): B — no new key (⛔ no loop.config.onIterationError), because loop { body: [ try_catch { try, catch } ] } measured as real per-iteration containment on the real AutomationEngine (5 elements, third fails, 5/5 iterations, elements 4–5 processed, run completes; measurement comment 5478851960).

            Deliverables (from comment 5478879587 §B, items 1–2, and the retriage's three standing prohibitions in comment 5479171811)

            1. Lint rule A — loop without containment: a loop whose body region contains a fallible node (any node that can return success: false or throw — at minimum every builtin action node, notify, connector_action, record writes) and no try_catch enclosing it ⇒ an authoring-time warning that names the loop node, the fallible node, and the prescribed spelling. Lands in packages/lint under the flow lint family.
            2. Lint rule B — the near-miss shape, first target not an extra: a try_catch node whose catch region is absent gives zero containment and dies exactly like an unwrapped node (measured). Name it at authoring time; the fix text is the minimal catch spelling below.
            3. Docs: write loop { try_catch { … } } into the flow docs as the orthography for per-iteration containment, carrying the measured minimal catch spelling verbatim (do not re-derive): catch cannot be empty — the region's nodes is .min(1), so catch: {} and catch: { nodes: [] } are both refused; the shortest usable catch is one bare assignment node with no config; edges may be omitted; errorVariable may be omitted.
            4. Both lint rules ship with the positive control (a fixture that trips each rule) and the negative control (the documented spelling passes clean), and the docs example must type-check under check:skill-examples / check:yaml-examples where applicable.

            Acceptance (executable)

            • pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint exec vitest run <the flow-lint test file> shows: the unwrapped-loop fixture → warning naming the loop and the node; the try_catch-without-catch fixture → warning; the documented loop { try_catch { try, catch: [assignment] } } fixture → no finding.
            • content/docs/automation/flows.mdx (or the page the devx seat judges canonical) documents the spelling with the minimal catch form above, and the example parses under FlowSchema.

            Out of scope here


            Generated by Claude Code

            Metadata

            Metadata

            Assignees

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              flows: lint a loop body with a fallible node and no containment, and a try_catch without catch; document loop { try_catch } as the per-iteration containment spelling (B-branch items 1–2 of #13681) #14394

              Description

              @claude

              Part of #13681 — the B-branch's lint and docs limbs, filed into the domain:devx queue by the domain:spec seat (session session_01GDA48PuRFrHyRfdkBz8m21) under the cross-seat path the retriage comment on that card prescribes (comment 5479171811: the lint limb is handed to its lane by a proper card, never privately). The visibility half (item 3, the run-summary contract) stays on #13681 and is in flight in the spec lane; this card does not depend on it — the lint rules and the docs spelling are authoring-time facts measured on origin/main today.

              Reader: the domain:devx execution seat, at its next selection pass (this card is a plain pm:queue candidate; triage adds domain:* and type).

              Ruling of record (do not re-decide)

              Maintainer 2026-08-31, director decision batch #18, verbatim 「其他同意」 on the conditional ruling (issue comment 5478768627); branch selected by measurement (comment 5478879587): B — no new key (⛔ no loop.config.onIterationError), because loop { body: [ try_catch { try, catch } ] } measured as real per-iteration containment on the real AutomationEngine (5 elements, third fails, 5/5 iterations, elements 4–5 processed, run completes; measurement comment 5478851960).

              Deliverables (from comment 5478879587 §B, items 1–2, and the retriage's three standing prohibitions in comment 5479171811)

              1. Lint rule A — loop without containment: a loop whose body region contains a fallible node (any node that can return success: false or throw — at minimum every builtin action node, notify, connector_action, record writes) and no try_catch enclosing it ⇒ an authoring-time warning that names the loop node, the fallible node, and the prescribed spelling. Lands in packages/lint under the flow lint family.
              2. Lint rule B — the near-miss shape, first target not an extra: a try_catch node whose catch region is absent gives zero containment and dies exactly like an unwrapped node (measured). Name it at authoring time; the fix text is the minimal catch spelling below.
              3. Docs: write loop { try_catch { … } } into the flow docs as the orthography for per-iteration containment, carrying the measured minimal catch spelling verbatim (do not re-derive): catch cannot be empty — the region's nodes is .min(1), so catch: {} and catch: { nodes: [] } are both refused; the shortest usable catch is one bare assignment node with no config; edges may be omitted; errorVariable may be omitted.
              4. Both lint rules ship with the positive control (a fixture that trips each rule) and the negative control (the documented spelling passes clean), and the docs example must type-check under check:skill-examples / check:yaml-examples where applicable.

              Acceptance (executable)

              • pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint exec vitest run <the flow-lint test file> shows: the unwrapped-loop fixture → warning naming the loop and the node; the try_catch-without-catch fixture → warning; the documented loop { try_catch { try, catch: [assignment] } } fixture → no finding.
              • content/docs/automation/flows.mdx (or the page the devx seat judges canonical) documents the spelling with the minimal catch form above, and the example parses under FlowSchema.

              Out of scope here


              Generated by Claude Code

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              Type

              No type

              Projects

              No projects

                Milestone

                No milestone

                Relationships

                None yet

                Development

                No branches or pull requests

                Issue actions

                , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                Skip to content

                flows: lint a loop body with a fallible node and no containment, and a try_catch without catch; document loop { try_catch } as the per-iteration containment spelling (B-branch items 1–2 of #13681) #14394

                Description

                @claude

                Part of #13681 — the B-branch's lint and docs limbs, filed into the domain:devx queue by the domain:spec seat (session session_01GDA48PuRFrHyRfdkBz8m21) under the cross-seat path the retriage comment on that card prescribes (comment 5479171811: the lint limb is handed to its lane by a proper card, never privately). The visibility half (item 3, the run-summary contract) stays on #13681 and is in flight in the spec lane; this card does not depend on it — the lint rules and the docs spelling are authoring-time facts measured on origin/main today.

                Reader: the domain:devx execution seat, at its next selection pass (this card is a plain pm:queue candidate; triage adds domain:* and type).

                Ruling of record (do not re-decide)

                Maintainer 2026-08-31, director decision batch #18, verbatim 「其他同意」 on the conditional ruling (issue comment 5478768627); branch selected by measurement (comment 5478879587): B — no new key (⛔ no loop.config.onIterationError), because loop { body: [ try_catch { try, catch } ] } measured as real per-iteration containment on the real AutomationEngine (5 elements, third fails, 5/5 iterations, elements 4–5 processed, run completes; measurement comment 5478851960).

                Deliverables (from comment 5478879587 §B, items 1–2, and the retriage's three standing prohibitions in comment 5479171811)

                1. Lint rule A — loop without containment: a loop whose body region contains a fallible node (any node that can return success: false or throw — at minimum every builtin action node, notify, connector_action, record writes) and no try_catch enclosing it ⇒ an authoring-time warning that names the loop node, the fallible node, and the prescribed spelling. Lands in packages/lint under the flow lint family.
                2. Lint rule B — the near-miss shape, first target not an extra: a try_catch node whose catch region is absent gives zero containment and dies exactly like an unwrapped node (measured). Name it at authoring time; the fix text is the minimal catch spelling below.
                3. Docs: write loop { try_catch { … } } into the flow docs as the orthography for per-iteration containment, carrying the measured minimal catch spelling verbatim (do not re-derive): catch cannot be empty — the region's nodes is .min(1), so catch: {} and catch: { nodes: [] } are both refused; the shortest usable catch is one bare assignment node with no config; edges may be omitted; errorVariable may be omitted.
                4. Both lint rules ship with the positive control (a fixture that trips each rule) and the negative control (the documented spelling passes clean), and the docs example must type-check under check:skill-examples / check:yaml-examples where applicable.

                Acceptance (executable)

                • pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint exec vitest run <the flow-lint test file> shows: the unwrapped-loop fixture → warning naming the loop and the node; the try_catch-without-catch fixture → warning; the documented loop { try_catch { try, catch: [assignment] } } fixture → no finding.
                • content/docs/automation/flows.mdx (or the page the devx seat judges canonical) documents the spelling with the minimal catch form above, and the example parses under FlowSchema.

                Out of scope here


                Generated by Claude Code

                Metadata

                Metadata

                Assignees

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions