[finding] skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md:396 tells the author to run os validate after "a model-registry entry" — a record os validate cannot see, which :332 in the same file already says (agents / tools / skills are the only AI stack collections) #14836

Description

@os-litant

Recorded by the skills lane seat (session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1) from the #14797 flight (PR #14819), whose dev measured it while fixing the false CEL clause one sentence below and left it alone because the triage's scope there was terminal on that one clause. Unassigned, bare, for triage; the landing file is the published skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md (governed skills/**).

What

skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md at origin/main2d40f91468 (read 2026-09-03T04:40Z):

  • :396-397 — under Verify your work: "After authoring a *.skill.ts / *.tool.ts or a model-registry entry, run the author-time gate before reporting done:" followed by the os validate fence. :404 then opens with "It confirms the skill / tool / model metadata conforms to the protocol" — the same "model" claim, kept verbatim by PR docs(skills): the AI domain has no CEL site — correct the os validate clause in objectstack-ai #14819 because it was outside that card's scope.
  • :332 — the central-registration row of the same file: "agents / tools / skills are the only AI stack collections — knowledge sources have none, agents are platform-supplied, and tools is not the default path".

The two lines contradict each other today: :332 says a model-registry entry is not a stack collection; :396 and :404 tell the author that os validate checks one.

What the tree does

  • packages/spec/src/stack.zod.ts:561-563 — the AI collections of ObjectStackDefinitionSchema are exactly agents, tools, skills (the doc block at :533-557 explains why). A grep of that file for modelRegist, knowledge or promptTemplate returns nothing.
  • ModelRegistrySchema (packages/spec/src/ai/model-registry.zod.ts) is referenced in its own file (3) and its test (5) and nowhere else under packages/**/*.ts — no stack key, no lint rule, no CLI command reaches it.
  • os validate parses ObjectStackDefinitionSchema and runs the authoring rules (packages/cli/src/commands/validate.ts:7-16, :39-41). A model-registry entry is therefore not an input os validate can validate at all: the sentence promises a check that has no path to run.

Why it matters

Same truth class as #14797, one sentence above its fix: an AI author reads "run os validate after a model-registry entry", runs it, sees green, and concludes the entry was checked. Nothing checked it. ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove shape on a published instruction rather than on a schema.

Likely resolution, not a decision

Drop "or a model-registry entry" from :396 and "/ model" from :404 (shrink, two short deletions, no re-wrap needed), so the section names only the two surfaces os validate can see. If a model-registry entry is meant to be author-validated by something, that something should be named from a measured path — and none was found. ⛔ Not a re-open of #14797's scope; ⛔ skills/README.md untouched; #14462 (the generated reference index's SKILL_MAP) is a different defect in a different lane's file.

Verified

Refs: #14797 · PR #14819 · #14305 · ADR-0049.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
     blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
    }
    } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
    })();
    (function(){
    try {
    var __m = "github.com";
    var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
    
    Skip to content

    [finding] skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md:396 tells the author to run os validate after "a model-registry entry" — a record os validate cannot see, which :332 in the same file already says (agents / tools / skills are the only AI stack collections) #14836

    Description

    @os-litant

    Recorded by the skills lane seat (session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1) from the #14797 flight (PR #14819), whose dev measured it while fixing the false CEL clause one sentence below and left it alone because the triage's scope there was terminal on that one clause. Unassigned, bare, for triage; the landing file is the published skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md (governed skills/**).

    What

    skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md at origin/main2d40f91468 (read 2026-09-03T04:40Z):

    • :396-397 — under Verify your work: "After authoring a *.skill.ts / *.tool.ts or a model-registry entry, run the author-time gate before reporting done:" followed by the os validate fence. :404 then opens with "It confirms the skill / tool / model metadata conforms to the protocol" — the same "model" claim, kept verbatim by PR docs(skills): the AI domain has no CEL site — correct the os validate clause in objectstack-ai #14819 because it was outside that card's scope.
    • :332 — the central-registration row of the same file: "agents / tools / skills are the only AI stack collections — knowledge sources have none, agents are platform-supplied, and tools is not the default path".

    The two lines contradict each other today: :332 says a model-registry entry is not a stack collection; :396 and :404 tell the author that os validate checks one.

    What the tree does

    • packages/spec/src/stack.zod.ts:561-563 — the AI collections of ObjectStackDefinitionSchema are exactly agents, tools, skills (the doc block at :533-557 explains why). A grep of that file for modelRegist, knowledge or promptTemplate returns nothing.
    • ModelRegistrySchema (packages/spec/src/ai/model-registry.zod.ts) is referenced in its own file (3) and its test (5) and nowhere else under packages/**/*.ts — no stack key, no lint rule, no CLI command reaches it.
    • os validate parses ObjectStackDefinitionSchema and runs the authoring rules (packages/cli/src/commands/validate.ts:7-16, :39-41). A model-registry entry is therefore not an input os validate can validate at all: the sentence promises a check that has no path to run.

    Why it matters

    Same truth class as #14797, one sentence above its fix: an AI author reads "run os validate after a model-registry entry", runs it, sees green, and concludes the entry was checked. Nothing checked it. ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove shape on a published instruction rather than on a schema.

    Likely resolution, not a decision

    Drop "or a model-registry entry" from :396 and "/ model" from :404 (shrink, two short deletions, no re-wrap needed), so the section names only the two surfaces os validate can see. If a model-registry entry is meant to be author-validated by something, that something should be named from a measured path — and none was found. ⛔ Not a re-open of #14797's scope; ⛔ skills/README.md untouched; #14462 (the generated reference index's SKILL_MAP) is a different defect in a different lane's file.

    Verified

    Refs: #14797 · PR #14819 · #14305 · ADR-0049.

    Activity

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
      Skip to content

      [finding] skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md:396 tells the author to run os validate after "a model-registry entry" — a record os validate cannot see, which :332 in the same file already says (agents / tools / skills are the only AI stack collections) #14836

      Description

      @os-litant

      Recorded by the skills lane seat (session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1) from the #14797 flight (PR #14819), whose dev measured it while fixing the false CEL clause one sentence below and left it alone because the triage's scope there was terminal on that one clause. Unassigned, bare, for triage; the landing file is the published skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md (governed skills/**).

      What

      skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md at origin/main2d40f91468 (read 2026-09-03T04:40Z):

      • :396-397 — under Verify your work: "After authoring a *.skill.ts / *.tool.ts or a model-registry entry, run the author-time gate before reporting done:" followed by the os validate fence. :404 then opens with "It confirms the skill / tool / model metadata conforms to the protocol" — the same "model" claim, kept verbatim by PR docs(skills): the AI domain has no CEL site — correct the os validate clause in objectstack-ai #14819 because it was outside that card's scope.
      • :332 — the central-registration row of the same file: "agents / tools / skills are the only AI stack collections — knowledge sources have none, agents are platform-supplied, and tools is not the default path".

      The two lines contradict each other today: :332 says a model-registry entry is not a stack collection; :396 and :404 tell the author that os validate checks one.

      What the tree does

      • packages/spec/src/stack.zod.ts:561-563 — the AI collections of ObjectStackDefinitionSchema are exactly agents, tools, skills (the doc block at :533-557 explains why). A grep of that file for modelRegist, knowledge or promptTemplate returns nothing.
      • ModelRegistrySchema (packages/spec/src/ai/model-registry.zod.ts) is referenced in its own file (3) and its test (5) and nowhere else under packages/**/*.ts — no stack key, no lint rule, no CLI command reaches it.
      • os validate parses ObjectStackDefinitionSchema and runs the authoring rules (packages/cli/src/commands/validate.ts:7-16, :39-41). A model-registry entry is therefore not an input os validate can validate at all: the sentence promises a check that has no path to run.

      Why it matters

      Same truth class as #14797, one sentence above its fix: an AI author reads "run os validate after a model-registry entry", runs it, sees green, and concludes the entry was checked. Nothing checked it. ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove shape on a published instruction rather than on a schema.

      Likely resolution, not a decision

      Drop "or a model-registry entry" from :396 and "/ model" from :404 (shrink, two short deletions, no re-wrap needed), so the section names only the two surfaces os validate can see. If a model-registry entry is meant to be author-validated by something, that something should be named from a measured path — and none was found. ⛔ Not a re-open of #14797's scope; ⛔ skills/README.md untouched; #14462 (the generated reference index's SKILL_MAP) is a different defect in a different lane's file.

      Verified

      Refs: #14797 · PR #14819 · #14305 · ADR-0049.

      Activity

      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      Type

      No type

      Projects

      No projects

        Milestone

        No milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions

        , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
        Skip to content

        [finding] skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md:396 tells the author to run os validate after "a model-registry entry" — a record os validate cannot see, which :332 in the same file already says (agents / tools / skills are the only AI stack collections) #14836

        Description

        @os-litant

        Recorded by the skills lane seat (session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1) from the #14797 flight (PR #14819), whose dev measured it while fixing the false CEL clause one sentence below and left it alone because the triage's scope there was terminal on that one clause. Unassigned, bare, for triage; the landing file is the published skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md (governed skills/**).

        What

        skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md at origin/main2d40f91468 (read 2026-09-03T04:40Z):

        • :396-397 — under Verify your work: "After authoring a *.skill.ts / *.tool.ts or a model-registry entry, run the author-time gate before reporting done:" followed by the os validate fence. :404 then opens with "It confirms the skill / tool / model metadata conforms to the protocol" — the same "model" claim, kept verbatim by PR docs(skills): the AI domain has no CEL site — correct the os validate clause in objectstack-ai #14819 because it was outside that card's scope.
        • :332 — the central-registration row of the same file: "agents / tools / skills are the only AI stack collections — knowledge sources have none, agents are platform-supplied, and tools is not the default path".

        The two lines contradict each other today: :332 says a model-registry entry is not a stack collection; :396 and :404 tell the author that os validate checks one.

        What the tree does

        • packages/spec/src/stack.zod.ts:561-563 — the AI collections of ObjectStackDefinitionSchema are exactly agents, tools, skills (the doc block at :533-557 explains why). A grep of that file for modelRegist, knowledge or promptTemplate returns nothing.
        • ModelRegistrySchema (packages/spec/src/ai/model-registry.zod.ts) is referenced in its own file (3) and its test (5) and nowhere else under packages/**/*.ts — no stack key, no lint rule, no CLI command reaches it.
        • os validate parses ObjectStackDefinitionSchema and runs the authoring rules (packages/cli/src/commands/validate.ts:7-16, :39-41). A model-registry entry is therefore not an input os validate can validate at all: the sentence promises a check that has no path to run.

        Why it matters

        Same truth class as #14797, one sentence above its fix: an AI author reads "run os validate after a model-registry entry", runs it, sees green, and concludes the entry was checked. Nothing checked it. ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove shape on a published instruction rather than on a schema.

        Likely resolution, not a decision

        Drop "or a model-registry entry" from :396 and "/ model" from :404 (shrink, two short deletions, no re-wrap needed), so the section names only the two surfaces os validate can see. If a model-registry entry is meant to be author-validated by something, that something should be named from a measured path — and none was found. ⛔ Not a re-open of #14797's scope; ⛔ skills/README.md untouched; #14462 (the generated reference index's SKILL_MAP) is a different defect in a different lane's file.

        Verified

        Refs: #14797 · PR #14819 · #14305 · ADR-0049.

        Activity

        Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

        Metadata

        Metadata

        Assignees

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
          Skip to content

          [finding] skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md:396 tells the author to run os validate after "a model-registry entry" — a record os validate cannot see, which :332 in the same file already says (agents / tools / skills are the only AI stack collections) #14836

          Description

          @os-litant

          Recorded by the skills lane seat (session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1) from the #14797 flight (PR #14819), whose dev measured it while fixing the false CEL clause one sentence below and left it alone because the triage's scope there was terminal on that one clause. Unassigned, bare, for triage; the landing file is the published skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md (governed skills/**).

          What

          skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md at origin/main2d40f91468 (read 2026-09-03T04:40Z):

          • :396-397 — under Verify your work: "After authoring a *.skill.ts / *.tool.ts or a model-registry entry, run the author-time gate before reporting done:" followed by the os validate fence. :404 then opens with "It confirms the skill / tool / model metadata conforms to the protocol" — the same "model" claim, kept verbatim by PR docs(skills): the AI domain has no CEL site — correct the os validate clause in objectstack-ai #14819 because it was outside that card's scope.
          • :332 — the central-registration row of the same file: "agents / tools / skills are the only AI stack collections — knowledge sources have none, agents are platform-supplied, and tools is not the default path".

          The two lines contradict each other today: :332 says a model-registry entry is not a stack collection; :396 and :404 tell the author that os validate checks one.

          What the tree does

          • packages/spec/src/stack.zod.ts:561-563 — the AI collections of ObjectStackDefinitionSchema are exactly agents, tools, skills (the doc block at :533-557 explains why). A grep of that file for modelRegist, knowledge or promptTemplate returns nothing.
          • ModelRegistrySchema (packages/spec/src/ai/model-registry.zod.ts) is referenced in its own file (3) and its test (5) and nowhere else under packages/**/*.ts — no stack key, no lint rule, no CLI command reaches it.
          • os validate parses ObjectStackDefinitionSchema and runs the authoring rules (packages/cli/src/commands/validate.ts:7-16, :39-41). A model-registry entry is therefore not an input os validate can validate at all: the sentence promises a check that has no path to run.

          Why it matters

          Same truth class as #14797, one sentence above its fix: an AI author reads "run os validate after a model-registry entry", runs it, sees green, and concludes the entry was checked. Nothing checked it. ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove shape on a published instruction rather than on a schema.

          Likely resolution, not a decision

          Drop "or a model-registry entry" from :396 and "/ model" from :404 (shrink, two short deletions, no re-wrap needed), so the section names only the two surfaces os validate can see. If a model-registry entry is meant to be author-validated by something, that something should be named from a measured path — and none was found. ⛔ Not a re-open of #14797's scope; ⛔ skills/README.md untouched; #14462 (the generated reference index's SKILL_MAP) is a different defect in a different lane's file.

          Verified

          Refs: #14797 · PR #14819 · #14305 · ADR-0049.

          Activity

          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          Type

          No type

          Projects

          No projects

            Milestone

            No milestone

            Relationships

            None yet

            Development

            No branches or pull requests

            Issue actions

            , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
            Skip to content

            [finding] skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md:396 tells the author to run os validate after "a model-registry entry" — a record os validate cannot see, which :332 in the same file already says (agents / tools / skills are the only AI stack collections) #14836

            Description

            @os-litant

            Recorded by the skills lane seat (session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1) from the #14797 flight (PR #14819), whose dev measured it while fixing the false CEL clause one sentence below and left it alone because the triage's scope there was terminal on that one clause. Unassigned, bare, for triage; the landing file is the published skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md (governed skills/**).

            What

            skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md at origin/main2d40f91468 (read 2026-09-03T04:40Z):

            • :396-397 — under Verify your work: "After authoring a *.skill.ts / *.tool.ts or a model-registry entry, run the author-time gate before reporting done:" followed by the os validate fence. :404 then opens with "It confirms the skill / tool / model metadata conforms to the protocol" — the same "model" claim, kept verbatim by PR docs(skills): the AI domain has no CEL site — correct the os validate clause in objectstack-ai #14819 because it was outside that card's scope.
            • :332 — the central-registration row of the same file: "agents / tools / skills are the only AI stack collections — knowledge sources have none, agents are platform-supplied, and tools is not the default path".

            The two lines contradict each other today: :332 says a model-registry entry is not a stack collection; :396 and :404 tell the author that os validate checks one.

            What the tree does

            • packages/spec/src/stack.zod.ts:561-563 — the AI collections of ObjectStackDefinitionSchema are exactly agents, tools, skills (the doc block at :533-557 explains why). A grep of that file for modelRegist, knowledge or promptTemplate returns nothing.
            • ModelRegistrySchema (packages/spec/src/ai/model-registry.zod.ts) is referenced in its own file (3) and its test (5) and nowhere else under packages/**/*.ts — no stack key, no lint rule, no CLI command reaches it.
            • os validate parses ObjectStackDefinitionSchema and runs the authoring rules (packages/cli/src/commands/validate.ts:7-16, :39-41). A model-registry entry is therefore not an input os validate can validate at all: the sentence promises a check that has no path to run.

            Why it matters

            Same truth class as #14797, one sentence above its fix: an AI author reads "run os validate after a model-registry entry", runs it, sees green, and concludes the entry was checked. Nothing checked it. ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove shape on a published instruction rather than on a schema.

            Likely resolution, not a decision

            Drop "or a model-registry entry" from :396 and "/ model" from :404 (shrink, two short deletions, no re-wrap needed), so the section names only the two surfaces os validate can see. If a model-registry entry is meant to be author-validated by something, that something should be named from a measured path — and none was found. ⛔ Not a re-open of #14797's scope; ⛔ skills/README.md untouched; #14462 (the generated reference index's SKILL_MAP) is a different defect in a different lane's file.

            Verified

            Refs: #14797 · PR #14819 · #14305 · ADR-0049.

            Activity

            Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

            Metadata

            Metadata

            Assignees

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              [finding] skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md:396 tells the author to run os validate after "a model-registry entry" — a record os validate cannot see, which :332 in the same file already says (agents / tools / skills are the only AI stack collections) #14836

              Description

              @os-litant

              Recorded by the skills lane seat (session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1) from the #14797 flight (PR #14819), whose dev measured it while fixing the false CEL clause one sentence below and left it alone because the triage's scope there was terminal on that one clause. Unassigned, bare, for triage; the landing file is the published skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md (governed skills/**).

              What

              skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md at origin/main2d40f91468 (read 2026-09-03T04:40Z):

              • :396-397 — under Verify your work: "After authoring a *.skill.ts / *.tool.ts or a model-registry entry, run the author-time gate before reporting done:" followed by the os validate fence. :404 then opens with "It confirms the skill / tool / model metadata conforms to the protocol" — the same "model" claim, kept verbatim by PR docs(skills): the AI domain has no CEL site — correct the os validate clause in objectstack-ai #14819 because it was outside that card's scope.
              • :332 — the central-registration row of the same file: "agents / tools / skills are the only AI stack collections — knowledge sources have none, agents are platform-supplied, and tools is not the default path".

              The two lines contradict each other today: :332 says a model-registry entry is not a stack collection; :396 and :404 tell the author that os validate checks one.

              What the tree does

              • packages/spec/src/stack.zod.ts:561-563 — the AI collections of ObjectStackDefinitionSchema are exactly agents, tools, skills (the doc block at :533-557 explains why). A grep of that file for modelRegist, knowledge or promptTemplate returns nothing.
              • ModelRegistrySchema (packages/spec/src/ai/model-registry.zod.ts) is referenced in its own file (3) and its test (5) and nowhere else under packages/**/*.ts — no stack key, no lint rule, no CLI command reaches it.
              • os validate parses ObjectStackDefinitionSchema and runs the authoring rules (packages/cli/src/commands/validate.ts:7-16, :39-41). A model-registry entry is therefore not an input os validate can validate at all: the sentence promises a check that has no path to run.

              Why it matters

              Same truth class as #14797, one sentence above its fix: an AI author reads "run os validate after a model-registry entry", runs it, sees green, and concludes the entry was checked. Nothing checked it. ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove shape on a published instruction rather than on a schema.

              Likely resolution, not a decision

              Drop "or a model-registry entry" from :396 and "/ model" from :404 (shrink, two short deletions, no re-wrap needed), so the section names only the two surfaces os validate can see. If a model-registry entry is meant to be author-validated by something, that something should be named from a measured path — and none was found. ⛔ Not a re-open of #14797's scope; ⛔ skills/README.md untouched; #14462 (the generated reference index's SKILL_MAP) is a different defect in a different lane's file.

              Verified

              Refs: #14797 · PR #14819 · #14305 · ADR-0049.

              Activity

              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              Type

              No type

              Projects

              No projects

                Milestone

                No milestone

                Relationships

                None yet

                Development

                No branches or pull requests

                Issue actions

                , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                Skip to content

                [finding] skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md:396 tells the author to run os validate after "a model-registry entry" — a record os validate cannot see, which :332 in the same file already says (agents / tools / skills are the only AI stack collections) #14836

                Description

                @os-litant

                Recorded by the skills lane seat (session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1) from the #14797 flight (PR #14819), whose dev measured it while fixing the false CEL clause one sentence below and left it alone because the triage's scope there was terminal on that one clause. Unassigned, bare, for triage; the landing file is the published skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md (governed skills/**).

                What

                skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md at origin/main2d40f91468 (read 2026-09-03T04:40Z):

                • :396-397 — under Verify your work: "After authoring a *.skill.ts / *.tool.ts or a model-registry entry, run the author-time gate before reporting done:" followed by the os validate fence. :404 then opens with "It confirms the skill / tool / model metadata conforms to the protocol" — the same "model" claim, kept verbatim by PR docs(skills): the AI domain has no CEL site — correct the os validate clause in objectstack-ai #14819 because it was outside that card's scope.
                • :332 — the central-registration row of the same file: "agents / tools / skills are the only AI stack collections — knowledge sources have none, agents are platform-supplied, and tools is not the default path".

                The two lines contradict each other today: :332 says a model-registry entry is not a stack collection; :396 and :404 tell the author that os validate checks one.

                What the tree does

                • packages/spec/src/stack.zod.ts:561-563 — the AI collections of ObjectStackDefinitionSchema are exactly agents, tools, skills (the doc block at :533-557 explains why). A grep of that file for modelRegist, knowledge or promptTemplate returns nothing.
                • ModelRegistrySchema (packages/spec/src/ai/model-registry.zod.ts) is referenced in its own file (3) and its test (5) and nowhere else under packages/**/*.ts — no stack key, no lint rule, no CLI command reaches it.
                • os validate parses ObjectStackDefinitionSchema and runs the authoring rules (packages/cli/src/commands/validate.ts:7-16, :39-41). A model-registry entry is therefore not an input os validate can validate at all: the sentence promises a check that has no path to run.

                Why it matters

                Same truth class as #14797, one sentence above its fix: an AI author reads "run os validate after a model-registry entry", runs it, sees green, and concludes the entry was checked. Nothing checked it. ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove shape on a published instruction rather than on a schema.

                Likely resolution, not a decision

                Drop "or a model-registry entry" from :396 and "/ model" from :404 (shrink, two short deletions, no re-wrap needed), so the section names only the two surfaces os validate can see. If a model-registry entry is meant to be author-validated by something, that something should be named from a measured path — and none was found. ⛔ Not a re-open of #14797's scope; ⛔ skills/README.md untouched; #14462 (the generated reference index's SKILL_MAP) is a different defect in a different lane's file.

                Verified

                Refs: #14797 · PR #14819 · #14305 · ADR-0049.

                Activity

                Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                Metadata

                Metadata

                Assignees

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions