finding(changeset): the pending field-rows/option-description changeset still says the canonical field-level spelling is depends_on — false for this package, and it is release-notes input #15058

Description

@claude

Found while implementing #13916 (the fact-layer rewrite of the same sentence in packages/spec/src/data/field.zod.ts, PR #15055). Filed unassigned, out of scope there, and deliberately not touched by that PR.

The shape

.changeset/field-rows-and-option-description-declared.md is still pending (unreleased; it landed with PR #13669, merge commit 86e765a7). Its options[].description bullet ends:

Per the same inherited ruling, dependsOn is deliberately NOT declared — the canonical field-level depends_on already exists, and the widget-side spelling fix rides the objectui half.

That is the fourth copy of the sentence #13916 was filed about, and it is false about this package in the same way. Measured against the built schema at 9300bca5 (packages/spec/dist/data/index.js):

probeverdict
FieldSchema with dependsOn: ['country']ACCEPTED
FieldSchema with depends_on: ['country']REFUSED — unrecognized_keys, "Did you mean depends_ondependsOn?"
SelectOptionSchema with dependsOnREFUSED — unrecognized_keys
SelectOptionSchema with depends_onREFUSED — unrecognized_keys

depends_on is declared nowhere in @objectstack/spec. The spelling the sentence calls canonical is objectui's own BaseFieldMetadata.depends_on (packages/types/src/field-types.ts:128), a consumer-side type.

Why this is worth its own card

A changeset is the input to release notes, and release notes are compiled centrally at release time. This one has not shipped yet, so the correction costs one line now; after the release it is a docs-only PR against a release page (release pages are never edited from a code PR).

Why #13916's PR did not fix it in place

The bounded in-place exemption needs all four of its conditions, and the fourth fails: editing .changeset/** pulls in gate families outside that card's verification surface — dispatch-gates.mjs names check:objectui-changeset and check:pm-half-states as the families a .changeset/ path would match — and that card's PR is otherwise comment-text-only with a skip-changeset label. So: filed, not ridden.

Scope note for whoever takes it

The fix is the fact layer only, exactly as triage split it on #13916: say what is measured. The ruling layer — whether the option face should declare a cascade key at all — is not this card either; it lives with objectstack-ai/objectui#6153, and #14583 records a maintainer ruling dated 2026-09-02 on the field-level spelling half.

Refs: #13916 (the source-side card) · PR #15055 (its rewrite, and where the measurement table comes from) · #14583 · PR #13669 (where the sentence landed).


Generated by Claude Code

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      
      Skip to content

      finding(changeset): the pending field-rows/option-description changeset still says the canonical field-level spelling is depends_on — false for this package, and it is release-notes input #15058

      Description

      @claude

      Found while implementing #13916 (the fact-layer rewrite of the same sentence in packages/spec/src/data/field.zod.ts, PR #15055). Filed unassigned, out of scope there, and deliberately not touched by that PR.

      The shape

      .changeset/field-rows-and-option-description-declared.md is still pending (unreleased; it landed with PR #13669, merge commit 86e765a7). Its options[].description bullet ends:

      Per the same inherited ruling, dependsOn is deliberately NOT declared — the canonical field-level depends_on already exists, and the widget-side spelling fix rides the objectui half.

      That is the fourth copy of the sentence #13916 was filed about, and it is false about this package in the same way. Measured against the built schema at 9300bca5 (packages/spec/dist/data/index.js):

      probeverdict
      FieldSchema with dependsOn: ['country']ACCEPTED
      FieldSchema with depends_on: ['country']REFUSED — unrecognized_keys, "Did you mean depends_ondependsOn?"
      SelectOptionSchema with dependsOnREFUSED — unrecognized_keys
      SelectOptionSchema with depends_onREFUSED — unrecognized_keys

      depends_on is declared nowhere in @objectstack/spec. The spelling the sentence calls canonical is objectui's own BaseFieldMetadata.depends_on (packages/types/src/field-types.ts:128), a consumer-side type.

      Why this is worth its own card

      A changeset is the input to release notes, and release notes are compiled centrally at release time. This one has not shipped yet, so the correction costs one line now; after the release it is a docs-only PR against a release page (release pages are never edited from a code PR).

      Why #13916's PR did not fix it in place

      The bounded in-place exemption needs all four of its conditions, and the fourth fails: editing .changeset/** pulls in gate families outside that card's verification surface — dispatch-gates.mjs names check:objectui-changeset and check:pm-half-states as the families a .changeset/ path would match — and that card's PR is otherwise comment-text-only with a skip-changeset label. So: filed, not ridden.

      Scope note for whoever takes it

      The fix is the fact layer only, exactly as triage split it on #13916: say what is measured. The ruling layer — whether the option face should declare a cascade key at all — is not this card either; it lives with objectstack-ai/objectui#6153, and #14583 records a maintainer ruling dated 2026-09-02 on the field-level spelling half.

      Refs: #13916 (the source-side card) · PR #15055 (its rewrite, and where the measurement table comes from) · #14583 · PR #13669 (where the sentence landed).


      Generated by Claude Code

      Activity

      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        No labels
        No labels

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
          Skip to content

          finding(changeset): the pending field-rows/option-description changeset still says the canonical field-level spelling is depends_on — false for this package, and it is release-notes input #15058

          Description

          @claude

          Found while implementing #13916 (the fact-layer rewrite of the same sentence in packages/spec/src/data/field.zod.ts, PR #15055). Filed unassigned, out of scope there, and deliberately not touched by that PR.

          The shape

          .changeset/field-rows-and-option-description-declared.md is still pending (unreleased; it landed with PR #13669, merge commit 86e765a7). Its options[].description bullet ends:

          Per the same inherited ruling, dependsOn is deliberately NOT declared — the canonical field-level depends_on already exists, and the widget-side spelling fix rides the objectui half.

          That is the fourth copy of the sentence #13916 was filed about, and it is false about this package in the same way. Measured against the built schema at 9300bca5 (packages/spec/dist/data/index.js):

          probeverdict
          FieldSchema with dependsOn: ['country']ACCEPTED
          FieldSchema with depends_on: ['country']REFUSED — unrecognized_keys, "Did you mean depends_ondependsOn?"
          SelectOptionSchema with dependsOnREFUSED — unrecognized_keys
          SelectOptionSchema with depends_onREFUSED — unrecognized_keys

          depends_on is declared nowhere in @objectstack/spec. The spelling the sentence calls canonical is objectui's own BaseFieldMetadata.depends_on (packages/types/src/field-types.ts:128), a consumer-side type.

          Why this is worth its own card

          A changeset is the input to release notes, and release notes are compiled centrally at release time. This one has not shipped yet, so the correction costs one line now; after the release it is a docs-only PR against a release page (release pages are never edited from a code PR).

          Why #13916's PR did not fix it in place

          The bounded in-place exemption needs all four of its conditions, and the fourth fails: editing .changeset/** pulls in gate families outside that card's verification surface — dispatch-gates.mjs names check:objectui-changeset and check:pm-half-states as the families a .changeset/ path would match — and that card's PR is otherwise comment-text-only with a skip-changeset label. So: filed, not ridden.

          Scope note for whoever takes it

          The fix is the fact layer only, exactly as triage split it on #13916: say what is measured. The ruling layer — whether the option face should declare a cascade key at all — is not this card either; it lives with objectstack-ai/objectui#6153, and #14583 records a maintainer ruling dated 2026-09-02 on the field-level spelling half.

          Refs: #13916 (the source-side card) · PR #15055 (its rewrite, and where the measurement table comes from) · #14583 · PR #13669 (where the sentence landed).


          Generated by Claude Code

          Activity

          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            No labels
            No labels

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              finding(changeset): the pending field-rows/option-description changeset still says the canonical field-level spelling is depends_on — false for this package, and it is release-notes input #15058

              Description

              @claude

              Found while implementing #13916 (the fact-layer rewrite of the same sentence in packages/spec/src/data/field.zod.ts, PR #15055). Filed unassigned, out of scope there, and deliberately not touched by that PR.

              The shape

              .changeset/field-rows-and-option-description-declared.md is still pending (unreleased; it landed with PR #13669, merge commit 86e765a7). Its options[].description bullet ends:

              Per the same inherited ruling, dependsOn is deliberately NOT declared — the canonical field-level depends_on already exists, and the widget-side spelling fix rides the objectui half.

              That is the fourth copy of the sentence #13916 was filed about, and it is false about this package in the same way. Measured against the built schema at 9300bca5 (packages/spec/dist/data/index.js):

              probeverdict
              FieldSchema with dependsOn: ['country']ACCEPTED
              FieldSchema with depends_on: ['country']REFUSED — unrecognized_keys, "Did you mean depends_ondependsOn?"
              SelectOptionSchema with dependsOnREFUSED — unrecognized_keys
              SelectOptionSchema with depends_onREFUSED — unrecognized_keys

              depends_on is declared nowhere in @objectstack/spec. The spelling the sentence calls canonical is objectui's own BaseFieldMetadata.depends_on (packages/types/src/field-types.ts:128), a consumer-side type.

              Why this is worth its own card

              A changeset is the input to release notes, and release notes are compiled centrally at release time. This one has not shipped yet, so the correction costs one line now; after the release it is a docs-only PR against a release page (release pages are never edited from a code PR).

              Why #13916's PR did not fix it in place

              The bounded in-place exemption needs all four of its conditions, and the fourth fails: editing .changeset/** pulls in gate families outside that card's verification surface — dispatch-gates.mjs names check:objectui-changeset and check:pm-half-states as the families a .changeset/ path would match — and that card's PR is otherwise comment-text-only with a skip-changeset label. So: filed, not ridden.

              Scope note for whoever takes it

              The fix is the fact layer only, exactly as triage split it on #13916: say what is measured. The ruling layer — whether the option face should declare a cascade key at all — is not this card either; it lives with objectstack-ai/objectui#6153, and #14583 records a maintainer ruling dated 2026-09-02 on the field-level spelling half.

              Refs: #13916 (the source-side card) · PR #15055 (its rewrite, and where the measurement table comes from) · #14583 · PR #13669 (where the sentence landed).


              Generated by Claude Code

              Activity

              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                No labels
                No labels

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
                  Skip to content

                  finding(changeset): the pending field-rows/option-description changeset still says the canonical field-level spelling is depends_on — false for this package, and it is release-notes input #15058

                  Description

                  @claude

                  Found while implementing #13916 (the fact-layer rewrite of the same sentence in packages/spec/src/data/field.zod.ts, PR #15055). Filed unassigned, out of scope there, and deliberately not touched by that PR.

                  The shape

                  .changeset/field-rows-and-option-description-declared.md is still pending (unreleased; it landed with PR #13669, merge commit 86e765a7). Its options[].description bullet ends:

                  Per the same inherited ruling, dependsOn is deliberately NOT declared — the canonical field-level depends_on already exists, and the widget-side spelling fix rides the objectui half.

                  That is the fourth copy of the sentence #13916 was filed about, and it is false about this package in the same way. Measured against the built schema at 9300bca5 (packages/spec/dist/data/index.js):

                  probeverdict
                  FieldSchema with dependsOn: ['country']ACCEPTED
                  FieldSchema with depends_on: ['country']REFUSED — unrecognized_keys, "Did you mean depends_ondependsOn?"
                  SelectOptionSchema with dependsOnREFUSED — unrecognized_keys
                  SelectOptionSchema with depends_onREFUSED — unrecognized_keys

                  depends_on is declared nowhere in @objectstack/spec. The spelling the sentence calls canonical is objectui's own BaseFieldMetadata.depends_on (packages/types/src/field-types.ts:128), a consumer-side type.

                  Why this is worth its own card

                  A changeset is the input to release notes, and release notes are compiled centrally at release time. This one has not shipped yet, so the correction costs one line now; after the release it is a docs-only PR against a release page (release pages are never edited from a code PR).

                  Why #13916's PR did not fix it in place

                  The bounded in-place exemption needs all four of its conditions, and the fourth fails: editing .changeset/** pulls in gate families outside that card's verification surface — dispatch-gates.mjs names check:objectui-changeset and check:pm-half-states as the families a .changeset/ path would match — and that card's PR is otherwise comment-text-only with a skip-changeset label. So: filed, not ridden.

                  Scope note for whoever takes it

                  The fix is the fact layer only, exactly as triage split it on #13916: say what is measured. The ruling layer — whether the option face should declare a cascade key at all — is not this card either; it lives with objectstack-ai/objectui#6153, and #14583 records a maintainer ruling dated 2026-09-02 on the field-level spelling half.

                  Refs: #13916 (the source-side card) · PR #15055 (its rewrite, and where the measurement table comes from) · #14583 · PR #13669 (where the sentence landed).


                  Generated by Claude Code

                  Activity

                  Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Labels

                    No labels
                    No labels

                    Type

                    No type

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                      Skip to content

                      finding(changeset): the pending field-rows/option-description changeset still says the canonical field-level spelling is depends_on — false for this package, and it is release-notes input #15058

                      Description

                      @claude

                      Found while implementing #13916 (the fact-layer rewrite of the same sentence in packages/spec/src/data/field.zod.ts, PR #15055). Filed unassigned, out of scope there, and deliberately not touched by that PR.

                      The shape

                      .changeset/field-rows-and-option-description-declared.md is still pending (unreleased; it landed with PR #13669, merge commit 86e765a7). Its options[].description bullet ends:

                      Per the same inherited ruling, dependsOn is deliberately NOT declared — the canonical field-level depends_on already exists, and the widget-side spelling fix rides the objectui half.

                      That is the fourth copy of the sentence #13916 was filed about, and it is false about this package in the same way. Measured against the built schema at 9300bca5 (packages/spec/dist/data/index.js):

                      probeverdict
                      FieldSchema with dependsOn: ['country']ACCEPTED
                      FieldSchema with depends_on: ['country']REFUSED — unrecognized_keys, "Did you mean depends_ondependsOn?"
                      SelectOptionSchema with dependsOnREFUSED — unrecognized_keys
                      SelectOptionSchema with depends_onREFUSED — unrecognized_keys

                      depends_on is declared nowhere in @objectstack/spec. The spelling the sentence calls canonical is objectui's own BaseFieldMetadata.depends_on (packages/types/src/field-types.ts:128), a consumer-side type.

                      Why this is worth its own card

                      A changeset is the input to release notes, and release notes are compiled centrally at release time. This one has not shipped yet, so the correction costs one line now; after the release it is a docs-only PR against a release page (release pages are never edited from a code PR).

                      Why #13916's PR did not fix it in place

                      The bounded in-place exemption needs all four of its conditions, and the fourth fails: editing .changeset/** pulls in gate families outside that card's verification surface — dispatch-gates.mjs names check:objectui-changeset and check:pm-half-states as the families a .changeset/ path would match — and that card's PR is otherwise comment-text-only with a skip-changeset label. So: filed, not ridden.

                      Scope note for whoever takes it

                      The fix is the fact layer only, exactly as triage split it on #13916: say what is measured. The ruling layer — whether the option face should declare a cascade key at all — is not this card either; it lives with objectstack-ai/objectui#6153, and #14583 records a maintainer ruling dated 2026-09-02 on the field-level spelling half.

                      Refs: #13916 (the source-side card) · PR #15055 (its rewrite, and where the measurement table comes from) · #14583 · PR #13669 (where the sentence landed).


                      Generated by Claude Code

                      Activity

                      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Labels

                        No labels
                        No labels

                        Type

                        No type

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                          Skip to content

                          finding(changeset): the pending field-rows/option-description changeset still says the canonical field-level spelling is depends_on — false for this package, and it is release-notes input #15058

                          Description

                          @claude

                          Found while implementing #13916 (the fact-layer rewrite of the same sentence in packages/spec/src/data/field.zod.ts, PR #15055). Filed unassigned, out of scope there, and deliberately not touched by that PR.

                          The shape

                          .changeset/field-rows-and-option-description-declared.md is still pending (unreleased; it landed with PR #13669, merge commit 86e765a7). Its options[].description bullet ends:

                          Per the same inherited ruling, dependsOn is deliberately NOT declared — the canonical field-level depends_on already exists, and the widget-side spelling fix rides the objectui half.

                          That is the fourth copy of the sentence #13916 was filed about, and it is false about this package in the same way. Measured against the built schema at 9300bca5 (packages/spec/dist/data/index.js):

                          probeverdict
                          FieldSchema with dependsOn: ['country']ACCEPTED
                          FieldSchema with depends_on: ['country']REFUSED — unrecognized_keys, "Did you mean depends_ondependsOn?"
                          SelectOptionSchema with dependsOnREFUSED — unrecognized_keys
                          SelectOptionSchema with depends_onREFUSED — unrecognized_keys

                          depends_on is declared nowhere in @objectstack/spec. The spelling the sentence calls canonical is objectui's own BaseFieldMetadata.depends_on (packages/types/src/field-types.ts:128), a consumer-side type.

                          Why this is worth its own card

                          A changeset is the input to release notes, and release notes are compiled centrally at release time. This one has not shipped yet, so the correction costs one line now; after the release it is a docs-only PR against a release page (release pages are never edited from a code PR).

                          Why #13916's PR did not fix it in place

                          The bounded in-place exemption needs all four of its conditions, and the fourth fails: editing .changeset/** pulls in gate families outside that card's verification surface — dispatch-gates.mjs names check:objectui-changeset and check:pm-half-states as the families a .changeset/ path would match — and that card's PR is otherwise comment-text-only with a skip-changeset label. So: filed, not ridden.

                          Scope note for whoever takes it

                          The fix is the fact layer only, exactly as triage split it on #13916: say what is measured. The ruling layer — whether the option face should declare a cascade key at all — is not this card either; it lives with objectstack-ai/objectui#6153, and #14583 records a maintainer ruling dated 2026-09-02 on the field-level spelling half.

                          Refs: #13916 (the source-side card) · PR #15055 (its rewrite, and where the measurement table comes from) · #14583 · PR #13669 (where the sentence landed).


                          Generated by Claude Code

                          Activity

                          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Labels

                            No labels
                            No labels

                            Type

                            No type

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                              Skip to content

                              finding(changeset): the pending field-rows/option-description changeset still says the canonical field-level spelling is depends_on — false for this package, and it is release-notes input #15058

                              Description

                              @claude

                              Found while implementing #13916 (the fact-layer rewrite of the same sentence in packages/spec/src/data/field.zod.ts, PR #15055). Filed unassigned, out of scope there, and deliberately not touched by that PR.

                              The shape

                              .changeset/field-rows-and-option-description-declared.md is still pending (unreleased; it landed with PR #13669, merge commit 86e765a7). Its options[].description bullet ends:

                              Per the same inherited ruling, dependsOn is deliberately NOT declared — the canonical field-level depends_on already exists, and the widget-side spelling fix rides the objectui half.

                              That is the fourth copy of the sentence #13916 was filed about, and it is false about this package in the same way. Measured against the built schema at 9300bca5 (packages/spec/dist/data/index.js):

                              probeverdict
                              FieldSchema with dependsOn: ['country']ACCEPTED
                              FieldSchema with depends_on: ['country']REFUSED — unrecognized_keys, "Did you mean depends_ondependsOn?"
                              SelectOptionSchema with dependsOnREFUSED — unrecognized_keys
                              SelectOptionSchema with depends_onREFUSED — unrecognized_keys

                              depends_on is declared nowhere in @objectstack/spec. The spelling the sentence calls canonical is objectui's own BaseFieldMetadata.depends_on (packages/types/src/field-types.ts:128), a consumer-side type.

                              Why this is worth its own card

                              A changeset is the input to release notes, and release notes are compiled centrally at release time. This one has not shipped yet, so the correction costs one line now; after the release it is a docs-only PR against a release page (release pages are never edited from a code PR).

                              Why #13916's PR did not fix it in place

                              The bounded in-place exemption needs all four of its conditions, and the fourth fails: editing .changeset/** pulls in gate families outside that card's verification surface — dispatch-gates.mjs names check:objectui-changeset and check:pm-half-states as the families a .changeset/ path would match — and that card's PR is otherwise comment-text-only with a skip-changeset label. So: filed, not ridden.

                              Scope note for whoever takes it

                              The fix is the fact layer only, exactly as triage split it on #13916: say what is measured. The ruling layer — whether the option face should declare a cascade key at all — is not this card either; it lives with objectstack-ai/objectui#6153, and #14583 records a maintainer ruling dated 2026-09-02 on the field-level spelling half.

                              Refs: #13916 (the source-side card) · PR #15055 (its rewrite, and where the measurement table comes from) · #14583 · PR #13669 (where the sentence landed).


                              Generated by Claude Code

                              Activity

                              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Labels

                                No labels
                                No labels

                                Type

                                No type

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions