Summary
A DatasetDimension whose field is a dotted relationship path gets no select-option resolution at all: the chart plots the raw stored values (education, finance, manufacturing). The same underlying field, reached as a local dimension on the object that owns it, resolves to its option labels (Education, Finance, Manufacturing).
Both render side by side on one dashboard, so the inconsistency is visible without leaving the screen.
Evidence
@objectstack/* 17.0.0-rc.1, fresh database, admin user. One dashboard (executive_dashboard), two widgets, both grouping on crm_account.industry:
Widget A — joined dimension → raw values
{id: 'revenue_by_industry',type: 'donut',dataset: 'opportunity_metrics',dimensions: ['account_industry'],values: ['total_amount']}where the dataset declares
{name: 'account_industry',label: 'Account Industry',field: 'crm_account.industry',type: 'string'}renders its legend as:
education finance healthcare manufacturing software technology
Widget B — local dimension → option labels
{id: 'accounts_by_industry',type: 'table',dataset: 'account_metrics',dimensions: ['industry'],values: ['annual_revenue_sum','account_count']}where the dataset declares
{name: 'industry',label: 'Industry',field: 'industry',type: 'string'}renders its rows as:
Education Energy & Utilities Finance Healthcare Logistics Manufacturing Software / SaaS Technology
Same field, same dashboard, same request. The only difference is field: 'crm_account.industry' vs field: 'industry'.
The option values on crm_account.industry are education / finance / … with labels Education / Finance / …, so widget A's output is exactly the stored column, unresolved.
Mechanism
The label resolver appears to look the select options up on the dataset's own object. For a dotted field, the options live on the related object (crm_account), the lookup misses, and the renderer falls through to the stored value. Nothing errors, so the widget just quietly displays database enum values to end users.
DatasetDimension has no key to help here — its whole surface is { name, label, field, type, dateGranularity } and type has no select member — so the dataset cannot declare "this dotted path is a picklist, resolve it against crm_account".
Why this is not a duplicate of #5076
#5076 is about analytics surfaces resolving option labels and then not applying the i18n bundle — the label is found, it is just the English one. That is widget B's behaviour.
This issue is the layer below: for a joined dimension the label is never resolved at all. Fixing #5076 alone would leave widget A still printing education, because there is no label in hand to translate.
Impact
Raw enum values reach end users on a dashboard. On a non-English deployment it is worse than English — education is neither the user's language nor a word they have ever seen in the UI, since every form and list shows the translated label.
Suggested fix
When a dimension's field is a dotted path, resolve the select options against the target object of the relationship rather than the dataset's base object, then apply the same option-label (and, per #5076, i18n bundle) resolution the local-dimension path already uses.
Related
Filed from a downstream app (hotcrm-heimao), tracked there as issue #69.
Summary
A
DatasetDimensionwhosefieldis a dotted relationship path gets no select-option resolution at all: the chart plots the raw stored values (education,finance,manufacturing). The same underlying field, reached as a local dimension on the object that owns it, resolves to its option labels (Education,Finance,Manufacturing).Both render side by side on one dashboard, so the inconsistency is visible without leaving the screen.
Evidence
@objectstack/*17.0.0-rc.1, fresh database, admin user. One dashboard (executive_dashboard), two widgets, both grouping oncrm_account.industry:Widget A — joined dimension → raw values
where the dataset declares
renders its legend as:
Widget B — local dimension → option labels
where the dataset declares
renders its rows as:
Same field, same dashboard, same request. The only difference is
field: 'crm_account.industry'vsfield: 'industry'.The option values on
crm_account.industryareeducation/finance/ … with labelsEducation/Finance/ …, so widget A's output is exactly the stored column, unresolved.Mechanism
The label resolver appears to look the select options up on the dataset's own object. For a dotted
field, the options live on the related object (crm_account), the lookup misses, and the renderer falls through to the stored value. Nothing errors, so the widget just quietly displays database enum values to end users.DatasetDimensionhas no key to help here — its whole surface is{ name, label, field, type, dateGranularity }andtypehas noselectmember — so the dataset cannot declare "this dotted path is a picklist, resolve it againstcrm_account".Why this is not a duplicate of #5076
#5076 is about analytics surfaces resolving option labels and then not applying the i18n bundle — the label is found, it is just the English one. That is widget B's behaviour.
This issue is the layer below: for a joined dimension the label is never resolved at all. Fixing #5076 alone would leave widget A still printing
education, because there is no label in hand to translate.Impact
Raw enum values reach end users on a dashboard. On a non-English deployment it is worse than English —
educationis neither the user's language nor a word they have ever seen in the UI, since every form and list shows the translated label.Suggested fix
When a dimension's
fieldis a dotted path, resolve the select options against the target object of the relationship rather than the dataset's base object, then apply the same option-label (and, per #5076, i18n bundle) resolution the local-dimension path already uses.Related
nameas the axis title, ignoring the measure'slabel— the same measure on a dashboard chart resolves correctly #5141 — report charts drop the dataset measure'slabel.resolveViewLabelreads two fields the served view document does not have #4854 — view / report / dataset labels have no live translation path.Filed from a downstream app (
hotcrm-heimao), tracked there as issue #69.