`AppContextSelectorSchema.persist` 的三个取值消费侧只兑现了一部分:`'none'` 照样写两处、`'session'` 与 `'query'` 无差别 —— enforce-or-remove 待裁(objectui#3500 拆出)

[claude]

由分诊座位按跨座位转移协议自 objectui#3500 拆出(contract-first:spec 面先行)。⛔ 未指派。

Part of objectstack-ai/objectui#3500

事实(消费方实测,objectui origin/main)

packages/spec/src/ui/app.zod.ts 的 AppContextSelectorSchema 声明 persist?: 'query' | 'session' | 'none'(默认 'query')。唯一消费方 objectui packages/app-shell/src/layout/ContextSelectors.tsx 对三个取值的实际区分是:

• :162 — if (sel.persist === 'none') continue; 只跳过「从 sessionStorage 重新施加」那一个 effect;
• setValue 无论取值如何,同时写 sessionStorage(objectui-ctx-${appName}-${sel.id})与 URL query 参数。

净结果:'none' 并没有「不持久化」(它照样写两处),'session' 与 'query' 之间没有任何行为差别。三值枚举里只有一值有部分效果。

为什么转到 spec 座位

这是 ADR-0049「声明了就得兑现」的 declared-but-unenforced 形状,两条出路的归属不同:

• enforce:objectui 按声明兑现三个取值('none' 两处都不写、'session' 只写 sessionStorage、'query' 只写 URL);spec 侧不变,单纯是消费侧补齐 —— 这一半可留在 objectui。
• remove:按 enforce-or-remove 把 persist 从 AppContextSelectorSchema 收掉 —— 移除一个已发布的可作者化键,属 packages/spec 单一所有者面,并牵动 ADR-0087 登记与生成物基线(spec-property-retirement playbook)。

选哪条是维护者的裁决(是否真有作者需要「不持久化 / 只在会话内持久化」的作用域选择器),故本单进决策箱而非直接入队。

PM 倾向(供裁决,不构成裁决)

倾向 enforce:三个取值的语义直白、消费侧改动小(一个函数内的三分支),且「作用域选择器要不要进 URL」对可分享链接是真实的作者诉求。若维护者判定无人需要,则走 remove,由 spec 座位按退役流程做,objectui 侧同批删消费代码。

前置依赖

objectui#3500 的第一半(URL 作用域键硬编码为 'package'、按 sel.id 派生 + Studio ?package= 迁移)与本单同文件(ContextSelectors.tsx),已在 objectui 队列。裁决落地时须与它串行,先后顺序由两边座位按落地时点定。

参考

• objectstack#5891 / PR docs(ui): 给 apps.mdx 补 contextSelectors / defaultAgent 两个作者面键 (#5891) #5984(发现来源,content/docs/ui/apps.mdx 已加「One scope per app today」警示 callout)
• objectui#3500(本单的来源与另一半)
• ADR-0049(enforce-or-remove)、ADR-0087(退役登记)

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

Ruling (maintainer, 2026-08-07): enforce, don't retire.

persist gets its three values honoured in the one consumer: 'none' writes neither sessionStorage nor the URL parameter, 'session' writes storage only, 'query' writes the URL only. Today 'none' merely skips re-application while still writing both, and 'session' and 'query' are indistinguishable. spec changes nothing.

The "zero-consumer declarations get deleted" precedent does not apply here — whether a scope selector lands in the URL directly determines whether a link is shareable, which is a real authoring need, not a speculative capability. Enforcing is S; retiring is M-L and would require answering the harder question of who wanted it. Default stays 'query', so only authors who explicitly asked for 'session' / 'none' see a change — which is what they asked for.

Routing: the change lands in objectui (ContextSelectors.tsx), so repo:objectui is applied. Serialize with the first half of objectui#3500 — same file.

Operator: PM session session_01GcjbQLUQKysMU9uXB34iyv; maintainer ruling 2026-08-07 (decision-inbox round 2). Veto window open — comment or reopen to overturn.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

Triage (routing repair): domain:spec removed; repo:objectui is the routing, and it is now the only one.

This issue carried a sibling-repo route and a lane label at the same time, so both the spec seat and the objectui seat could read it as theirs — the exact ambiguity the one-seat-per-issue bijection exists to prevent. It is the only open queue issue in the repo with that combination.

Which one goes is not a coin flip — the maintainer's 2026-08-07 ruling already decided it: enforce, don't retire, and in the ruling's own words "spec changes nothing" / "the change lands in objectui (ContextSelectors.tsx), so repo:objectui is applied." With the retire route closed, no part of the remaining work touches packages/spec, so the shared-contract rule that would have pinned it to the spec seat no longer applies. domain:spec is the stale half and is what gets dropped.

Unchanged: pm:queue, repo:objectui, target:v17, and the serialization note — the enforcement edit shares ContextSelectors.tsx with the first half of objectui#3500, so the two must land in order, coordinated between that card and this one rather than dispatched side by side.

本评论来自分诊座位 Routine(#5474 试点),不构成认领。

---

Generated by Claude Code