lanes: every seat's patrol judgment set gains "read the anchor's own-lane rows first" — six lane job descriptions, one line each

[os-warren]

Maintainer ruling (2026-08-19, PM chat): 「同意你的建议」—— 批准 devx 事故复盘两条提议之二(之一是 H16 dirty 谓词,独立卡)。事故出处:两张卡的 PR 已合并、卡挂 pm:dispatched 达 18h/2h —— H8 早已覆盖、锚 #9857 上机器早已看见,但席位每枪巡检不读锚,人没看见。同类病根维护者此前已点过:「你自己定的工作方式你也会忘」—— 规则必须活在决策点,不靠个人自觉。

Scope — .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/{engine,services,cli,devx,skills,spec}.md(治理面,人合;六文件各有棘轮 ceiling)

每个车道岗位说明的常设承诺(或对应节)加一行,六文件同一措辞,大意:每枪巡检的第一判据是读锚 #9857 本道相关行(H 行点到本道的卡/PR/座位贴),逐行认领或处置,再做其余判据;锚行未处置不得开新派发。(准确措辞由 dev 依各文件现有语域定,六处一致。)

行数付账 —— 本卡的真正约束

六文件 ceiling 均钉在落地行数(headroom 0,shrink-only)。每文件 +1 行必须由同文件内真去重支付,⛔ 禁 re-wrap 凑数;每处砍点在报告中逐行审计幸存之家。若某文件确无可去重,如实上报该文件净超,由维护者在合并时裁(治理面本就人合)。

验收

• pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet 全树绿(六 ceiling 不动);governed-prose / frame-sync 按派生集跑。
• 治理面终态:draft PR + review request os-zhuang(2026-08-19 新机制),⛔ 永不翻 ready/入队/挂 auto-merge,人合。
• 模型档:clause ① fable-mandatory(references 含在内,--tier 派生)。

Graded pm:queue, S(skills 座,own-lane,session ae0d8bd1-5667-5f58-8ff8-fa22ec154325)。热文件:lanes/*.md 空闲;与在飞 #9976(SKILL.md 本体)不同文件,可并发。

[os-warren]

Claim: session ae0d8bd1-5667-5f58-8ff8-fa22ec154325 · branch claude/issue-9981-lanes-read-anchor

折叠检查:references/lanes/*.md 空闲;与在飞 #9976(SKILL.md 本体)同治理树不同文件,可并发。模型档:clause ① fable-mandatory(references 含在内)。治理面终态:draft + review request os-zhuang,人合。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-warren]

{
 "issue": 9981,
 "status": "done",
 "branch": "claude/issue-9981-lanes-read-anchor",
 "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/9988",
 "premise_still_valid": true,
 "summary": "All six lane job descriptions gain one identically-worded first bullet in 常设承诺: 每轮巡检第一判据 = read the half-state patrol anchor's own-lane H rows (cards/PRs/seat post), claim/act per row before other judgments; unhandled anchor rows block new dispatches. The anchor is named as 半状态巡查锚 + half-state-patrol.yml (its ANCHOR_ISSUE names the pinned issue) instead of a literal issue number because check:pm-skill-id-lint mechanically rejects 3+-digit IDs across the whole pm-dispatch surface, lanes included — the card's literal anchor-number phrasing would have turned that gate red. Each +1 line paid by genuine dedup in the same file; ceilings map untouched; draft PR, review requested from os-zhuang, human-merge-only.",
 "line_counts": {
 "engine.md": { "before": 41, "after": 41, "ceiling": 41 },
 "services.md": { "before": 31, "after": 31, "ceiling": 31 },
 "cli.md": { "before": 37, "after": 36, "ceiling": 37 },
 "devx.md": { "before": 38, "after": 38, "ceiling": 38 },
 "skills.md": { "before": 36, "after": 36, "ceiling": 36 },
 "spec.md": { "before": 44, "after": 44, "ceiling": 44 }
 },
 "added_line_exact_wording": "- **每轮巡检第一判据**:先读半状态巡查锚(`half-state-patrol.yml` 置顶 issue)点名本道卡/PR/座位贴的 H 行,逐行认领或处置,再做其余判据;锚行未处置 ⛔ 不开新派发。",
 "payment_audit": [
 "engine.md: cut header parentheticals (范围/常设承诺/席内判断) and (当前 PM、继承台账、热文件串行队) plus 三车道…而成 filler — survivors: the file's own three section headings (same file); seat-post-protocol.md four-segment enumeration 当前 PM | 继承台账 | 热文件串行队 | 说明; SKILL.md 域车道表 engine row carries the merger ruling verbatim, and the three merged lane names stay in the header.",
 "services.md: cut (2026-08-19 并入) from the 身份侧 bullet — literal duplication of the same file's header 本车道 2026-08-19 并入原 identity 车道的四个插件, and of SKILL.md 域车道表 services row.",
 "cli.md: cut the git ls-remote gh-readonly-queue command and the 入队瞬间滞后 caveat — both survive verbatim in platform-readings.md 队列成员资格与 auto-merge (the lag as 队列满载时 PR 已入队而分支尚未建出); replaced by a pointer, keeping cli-only detail (entry-name shape, parent-sha queue order, ref 出队后滞留). Net -2 then +1, headroom 1.",
 "devx.md: cut two clauses of the 边界 bullet — SUBJECT 是 governed 面本身的门禁/审计除外(归 skills) and 与 spec 相交的三面按「是否围着 spec 契约转」切分 — both survive verbatim in SKILL.md 域车道表 devx row; compressed to one pointer (SUBJECT 例外与 spec 三面切分在 SKILL.md 域车道表).",
 "skills.md: cut 判定命令 node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --test 带路径 from the 范围 bullet — survivors: same file's 常设承诺 bullet (flip/arm 前跑 check-governed-merges --test, now carrying the 带路径 detail) and SKILL.md 域车道表 skills row + tools index naming the full path.",
 "spec.md: cut (那是状态,不是岗位说明) — restates the same file's header 现值状态恒在座位贴,⛔ 不迁入本文件 and seat-post-protocol.md 范围与常设承诺是岗位说明,版本化在 lanes/; plus grammar particle 的 for width. No re-wrap without a named removal in any file."
 ],
 "tests": "All at 41e742528 (final commit; no later pushes). dispatch-gates.mjs (no args) derived 6 families, exit codes captured before any pipe. check:pm-skill-ratchet EXIT=0, verdict lines: lanes/engine.md is 41 lines (ceiling 41; headroom 0); services 31/31; cli 36/37 headroom 1; devx 38/38; skills 36/36; spec 44/44. check:pm-skill-id-lint EXIT=0: 15 file(s) clean (pattern /#[0-9]{3,}/g). check:doc-authoring EXIT=0: 377 files clean. check:pm-governed-merges EXIT=0: 77 assertions. check:skill-frame-sync EXIT=0: 4 copies structurally isomorphic across 3 files. check:doc-formula-expressions EXIT=0: 22 record-scoped formula example(s) across 402 files / 1413 TS blocks judged clean (first run failed on unbuilt @objectstack/formula dist — fresh-worktree artifact, green after building the lint dependency closure). Reverse verification, direction predicted in writing: +1 line to skills.md at ceiling => ratchet red naming the file (EXIT=1: lanes/skills.md is 37 lines; the ratchet ceiling is 36); restored byte-identical from committed state (sha256 f54ab092...9723 equal before/after), green again EXIT=0.",
 "labels_read_back": "pull_request_read get on PR 9988 after write: [documentation, skip-changeset] — union write survived alongside the bot's documentation label. (issue_read get_labels refuses PR numbers, as the dispatch warned.)",
 "files_changed": [
 ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/engine.md",
 ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/services.md",
 ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/cli.md",
 ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/devx.md",
 ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/skills.md",
 ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/spec.md"
 ],
 "open_questions": [
 {
 "question": "The card's 大意 says the anchor is named by its issue number, but check:pm-skill-id-lint mechanically rejects any 3+-digit #ID across the pm-dispatch surface including lanes/. I resolved the conflict in favor of the gate by naming the anchor structurally (半状态巡查锚 + half-state-patrol.yml, whose ANCHOR_ISSUE constant carries the number). Acceptable, or should the id-lint gain a waiver for live coordination anchors?",
 "options": ["A Keep structural naming — the workflow file is the stable dereference and the gate stays untouched", "B Add an id-lint allowlist entry for the anchor number — makes the lane line one hop shorter but weakens a mechanical gate for a number that can change if the anchor is ever re-pinned"],
 "recommendation": "A, because the gate's ruling (issue-ID dereference costs more than it returns) is exactly why the anchor number should live in one machine-read constant, not six prose files."
 },
 {
 "question": "The added line is one 160-display-column physical line against the files' ~80-column wrap convention — deliberate, because the ratchet counts physical lines and the card budgets exactly +1 per file. Wrap it to two lines at merge time only if a second paid cut per file is rulable.",
 "options": ["A Keep the single long line (as landed)", "B Wrap to two lines and pay one more dedup line per file"],
 "recommendation": "A; the budget math is the card's own constraint and the line is a bullet, not flowed prose."
 }
 ],
 "out_of_scope_findings": []
}

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-warren]

ACCEPT — PR #9988 复核通过(治理面:PR 保持 draft、review request os-zhuang 已挂、等维护者合并)。

复核记录(session ae0d8bd1-5667-5f58-8ff8-fa22ec154325,契约复审档 fable):

• 亲取 diff:六文件 常设承诺 首条同一措辞逐字一致 ✓;每文件 +1 由真去重支付,砍点逐条核过幸存之家(engine 头部压缩→节标题/座位贴协议自身;services「并入」括号→同文件头部;cli 队列读法→platform-readings 同条目;devx SUBJECT/spec 切分→SKILL.md 域车道表;skills「带路径」→下移至 flip/arm 承诺行,细节反而更靠近使用点;spec 括号→自身头部)—— 无 re-wrap,cli 净余 1 行 ✓。CEILINGS 映射未动 ✓。
• Open question ① 裁 A(结构化命名锚,不写字面 issue 号):id-lint 的裁决理由(issue 号解引用成本高于回报)恰好论证了锚号应活在 ANCHOR_ISSUE 一处机器常量里而不是六份散文里 —— 与卡意图零冲突,偏差接受。
• Open question ② 裁 A(单物理行):棘轮数物理行,卡的预算就是 +1;换行要再付六刀,不值。维护者合并时可见,如有异议人合即否。
• 反向验证(skills.md 顶 ceiling +1 → 棘轮红点名;恢复 sha256 逐字节一致)✓;id-lint / frame-sync / governed-merges 自测判定行逐字 ✓。

落地后:六车道任何新上任 PM 从岗位说明第一条继承「先读锚」—— devx 事故「机器看见、人没看见」的那半正式闭环。

---

Generated by Claude Code