16 changes: 16 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/rest-duplicate-record-arm-field-restored.md
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
---
'@objectstack/rest': patch
---

Restore the `field` key and the curated conflict sentence on the 409 body for an insert refused by a unique constraint

Since the ObjectQL engine began answering a driver's unique violation with its own `DUPLICATE_RECORD` envelope (`status: 409`, `object`, `field`, the driver error on `cause`), `POST /api/v1/data/:object` let that envelope leave `classifyDataError` through the generic declared-status passthrough: still 409, but with `code: 'DUPLICATE_RECORD'`, no `field`, and the engine's own sentence in `error`. The `isUniqueViolationError` arm that names the conflicting column (`field: 'email'`, "A record with this email already exists") was no longer reached for an insert conflict. Measured with the real engine and real drivers: on `driver-sqlite-wasm` the `field` key disappeared from every conflict on a single-column index; on `driver-memory` the sentence changed.

A dedicated arm for the engine's envelope now sits with the other structured 409s (`DELETE_RESTRICTED`, `CONCURRENT_UPDATE`), ahead of the passthrough:

- `code` stays `UNIQUE_VIOLATION` — the code every client branching on this conflict already reads.
- `field` is restored whenever the dialect determinably named the column (SQLite, Postgres); composite keys and index-naming dialects (MySQL) carry no `field` key, exactly as before.
- `error` is the curated end-user sentence again; the engine's own sentence rides on `developerMessage`, the same split the `DELETE_RESTRICTED` body uses.
- The body still quotes nothing the driver said — no offending value, no statement, no index name — including on `driver-memory`, whose raw refusal used to echo the offending values as JSON through the passthrough.

`patch`: a restoration of the shipped body's keys and wording; the wire `code` and the status are unchanged. The arm fires for the engine's envelope only; a plugin or sandbox body that throws the registered `DUPLICATE_RECORD` itself keeps the answer it gets today.
78 changes: 78 additions & 0 deletions packages/rest/src/error-response.ts
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -698,6 +698,84 @@ function classifyDataError(error: any, object?: string): { status: number; body:
},
};
}
// [#14389] The engine's insert-conflict envelope → 409 `UNIQUE_VIOLATION`,
// with the structured `field` restored.
//
// Since #14095 `engine.insert` answers a driver's unique violation with the
// `DuplicateRecordError` envelope — `code: 'DUPLICATE_RECORD'`, `status:
// 409`, `object`, `field` when the dialect determinably named a column,
// the driver error whole on `cause`. It DECLARES a status, so it reached
// the declared-status passthrough below first and left through it: status
// right, `field` gone, and the platform's own sentence in `error`, while
// the `isUniqueViolationError` arm further down — holding the curated
// end-user wording and the `field` key since #7821 — was never reached
// for an insert conflict any more. Surfaced FIRST, beside the two
// structured 409s above, for the same reason they are: the structured
// field must survive the generic catch-alls.
//
// **The wire `code` stays `UNIQUE_VIOLATION`** (triage ruling on the card,
// 2026-09-02: the answer that changes nothing for clients — every consumer
// branching on this conflict today reads `UNIQUE_VIOLATION`, and renaming
// a wire code under existing consumers is a published-contract change,
// not a door's call). **No `declaredCode` beside it.** `DUPLICATE_RECORD`
// is a `StandardErrorCode` member, and `ApiErrorSchema.declaredCode`
// (`packages/spec/src/api/contract.zod.ts`, with its docblock) together
// with ADR-0112's "presence means demotion" amendment define the field as
// the demoted spelling of an UNREGISTERED code — absent when the
// producer's code IS a vocabulary member. So the field stays ABSENT here
// (contract review on the card, 2026-09-02), and the engine's spelling
// stays in-process exactly as every dialect code (`SQLITE_CONSTRAINT_UNIQUE`,
// `23505`, `ER_DUP_ENTRY`) always has at the `isUniqueViolationError` arm
// below. ADR-0112's 2026-08-29 scope correction declares the hand-written
// `declaredCode` emission population to be exactly one site; this arm is
// not a second. Pinned in `rest-duplicate-record-arm.test.ts`: §0 (both
// codes parse as `ErrorCode` — the reason) and §1 (`not.toHaveProperty`).
//
// **Two sentences — the `DELETE_RESTRICTED` split above.** `error` is the
// curated end-user sentence the #6250/#7821 arm has always produced: fixed
// text plus, at most, the bare column identifier the ENGINE resolved
// through `uniqueViolationColumn` (`field` is read off the envelope, not
// re-derived — the envelope is the contract). `developerMessage` is the
// engine's own sentence (`message`): it names the object and the column
// and carries no value. The envelope's own `developerMessage` is
// deliberately NOT relayed — it addresses the in-process caller of
// `engine.insert` ("attached as `cause`", "branch on `code ===
// 'DUPLICATE_RECORD'`"), and neither holds on this wire.
//
// **The body echoes nothing the driver said.** `cause` never reaches the
// wire and the sentence is fixed text. This matters most for
// `driver-memory`, whose raw refusal declares `status: 409` itself and so
// ALREADY took the passthrough before #14095 — with a message quoting the
// offending values as JSON. The envelope removed that; this arm keeps it
// removed.
//
// ⚠️ Gated on the ENVELOPE — name AND code — not on the code alone as the
// two siblings above are, and the difference is load-bearing: they relay
// `error.message`, this arm REPLACES it. A hook that deliberately throws
// the registered `DUPLICATE_RECORD` from a sandbox body is a different
// producer speaking a member of the vocabulary; it keeps the answer the
// sandbox unwrap door gives it today (its own sentence, its own code —
// `rest-thrown-code-vocabulary.test.ts` §2) rather than having its
// sentence swapped for this one and the QuickJS debug wrapper shipped as
// `developerMessage`.
if (error?.code === 'DUPLICATE_RECORD' && error?.name === 'DuplicateRecordError') {
const field = typeof error?.field === 'string' && error.field.length > 0 ? error.field : undefined;
const refused = typeof error?.object === 'string' && error.object.length > 0 ? error.object : object;
return {
status: 409,
body: {
error: field
? `A record with this ${field} already exists`
: 'A record with this value already exists',
code: 'UNIQUE_VIOLATION',
...(typeof error?.message === 'string' && error.message.length > 0
? { developerMessage: error.message }
: {}),
...(field ? { field } : {}),
...(refused ? { object: refused } : {}),
},
};
}
// A declared datasource that is refused by the host policy, or failed to
// connect under OS_ALLOW_DRIVER_CONNECT_FAILURE → 503 (framework#3828).
// Handled before the catch-alls because nothing about the REQUEST is wrong:
Expand Down
Loading
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content
16 changes: 16 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/rest-duplicate-record-arm-field-restored.md
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
---
'@objectstack/rest': patch
---

Restore the `field` key and the curated conflict sentence on the 409 body for an insert refused by a unique constraint

Since the ObjectQL engine began answering a driver's unique violation with its own `DUPLICATE_RECORD` envelope (`status: 409`, `object`, `field`, the driver error on `cause`), `POST /api/v1/data/:object` let that envelope leave `classifyDataError` through the generic declared-status passthrough: still 409, but with `code: 'DUPLICATE_RECORD'`, no `field`, and the engine's own sentence in `error`. The `isUniqueViolationError` arm that names the conflicting column (`field: 'email'`, "A record with this email already exists") was no longer reached for an insert conflict. Measured with the real engine and real drivers: on `driver-sqlite-wasm` the `field` key disappeared from every conflict on a single-column index; on `driver-memory` the sentence changed.

A dedicated arm for the engine's envelope now sits with the other structured 409s (`DELETE_RESTRICTED`, `CONCURRENT_UPDATE`), ahead of the passthrough:

- `code` stays `UNIQUE_VIOLATION` — the code every client branching on this conflict already reads.
- `field` is restored whenever the dialect determinably named the column (SQLite, Postgres); composite keys and index-naming dialects (MySQL) carry no `field` key, exactly as before.
- `error` is the curated end-user sentence again; the engine's own sentence rides on `developerMessage`, the same split the `DELETE_RESTRICTED` body uses.
- The body still quotes nothing the driver said — no offending value, no statement, no index name — including on `driver-memory`, whose raw refusal used to echo the offending values as JSON through the passthrough.

`patch`: a restoration of the shipped body's keys and wording; the wire `code` and the status are unchanged. The arm fires for the engine's envelope only; a plugin or sandbox body that throws the registered `DUPLICATE_RECORD` itself keeps the answer it gets today.
78 changes: 78 additions & 0 deletions packages/rest/src/error-response.ts
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -698,6 +698,84 @@ function classifyDataError(error: any, object?: string): { status: number; body:
},
};
}
// [#14389] The engine's insert-conflict envelope → 409 `UNIQUE_VIOLATION`,
// with the structured `field` restored.
//
// Since #14095 `engine.insert` answers a driver's unique violation with the
// `DuplicateRecordError` envelope — `code: 'DUPLICATE_RECORD'`, `status:
// 409`, `object`, `field` when the dialect determinably named a column,
// the driver error whole on `cause`. It DECLARES a status, so it reached
// the declared-status passthrough below first and left through it: status
// right, `field` gone, and the platform's own sentence in `error`, while
// the `isUniqueViolationError` arm further down — holding the curated
// end-user wording and the `field` key since #7821 — was never reached
// for an insert conflict any more. Surfaced FIRST, beside the two
// structured 409s above, for the same reason they are: the structured
// field must survive the generic catch-alls.
//
// **The wire `code` stays `UNIQUE_VIOLATION`** (triage ruling on the card,
// 2026-09-02: the answer that changes nothing for clients — every consumer
// branching on this conflict today reads `UNIQUE_VIOLATION`, and renaming
// a wire code under existing consumers is a published-contract change,
// not a door's call). **No `declaredCode` beside it.** `DUPLICATE_RECORD`
// is a `StandardErrorCode` member, and `ApiErrorSchema.declaredCode`
// (`packages/spec/src/api/contract.zod.ts`, with its docblock) together
// with ADR-0112's "presence means demotion" amendment define the field as
// the demoted spelling of an UNREGISTERED code — absent when the
// producer's code IS a vocabulary member. So the field stays ABSENT here
// (contract review on the card, 2026-09-02), and the engine's spelling
// stays in-process exactly as every dialect code (`SQLITE_CONSTRAINT_UNIQUE`,
// `23505`, `ER_DUP_ENTRY`) always has at the `isUniqueViolationError` arm
// below. ADR-0112's 2026-08-29 scope correction declares the hand-written
// `declaredCode` emission population to be exactly one site; this arm is
// not a second. Pinned in `rest-duplicate-record-arm.test.ts`: §0 (both
// codes parse as `ErrorCode` — the reason) and §1 (`not.toHaveProperty`).
//
// **Two sentences — the `DELETE_RESTRICTED` split above.** `error` is the
// curated end-user sentence the #6250/#7821 arm has always produced: fixed
// text plus, at most, the bare column identifier the ENGINE resolved
// through `uniqueViolationColumn` (`field` is read off the envelope, not
// re-derived — the envelope is the contract). `developerMessage` is the
// engine's own sentence (`message`): it names the object and the column
// and carries no value. The envelope's own `developerMessage` is
// deliberately NOT relayed — it addresses the in-process caller of
// `engine.insert` ("attached as `cause`", "branch on `code ===
// 'DUPLICATE_RECORD'`"), and neither holds on this wire.
//
// **The body echoes nothing the driver said.** `cause` never reaches the
// wire and the sentence is fixed text. This matters most for
// `driver-memory`, whose raw refusal declares `status: 409` itself and so
// ALREADY took the passthrough before #14095 — with a message quoting the
// offending values as JSON. The envelope removed that; this arm keeps it
// removed.
//
// ⚠️ Gated on the ENVELOPE — name AND code — not on the code alone as the
// two siblings above are, and the difference is load-bearing: they relay
// `error.message`, this arm REPLACES it. A hook that deliberately throws
// the registered `DUPLICATE_RECORD` from a sandbox body is a different
// producer speaking a member of the vocabulary; it keeps the answer the
// sandbox unwrap door gives it today (its own sentence, its own code —
// `rest-thrown-code-vocabulary.test.ts` §2) rather than having its
// sentence swapped for this one and the QuickJS debug wrapper shipped as
// `developerMessage`.
if (error?.code === 'DUPLICATE_RECORD' && error?.name === 'DuplicateRecordError') {
const field = typeof error?.field === 'string' && error.field.length > 0 ? error.field : undefined;
const refused = typeof error?.object === 'string' && error.object.length > 0 ? error.object : object;
return {
status: 409,
body: {
error: field
? `A record with this ${field} already exists`
: 'A record with this value already exists',
code: 'UNIQUE_VIOLATION',
...(typeof error?.message === 'string' && error.message.length > 0
? { developerMessage: error.message }
: {}),
...(field ? { field } : {}),
...(refused ? { object: refused } : {}),
},
};
}
// A declared datasource that is refused by the host policy, or failed to
// connect under OS_ALLOW_DRIVER_CONNECT_FAILURE → 503 (framework#3828).
// Handled before the catch-alls because nothing about the REQUEST is wrong:
Expand Down
Loading
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
16 changes: 16 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/rest-duplicate-record-arm-field-restored.md
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
---
'@objectstack/rest': patch
---

Restore the `field` key and the curated conflict sentence on the 409 body for an insert refused by a unique constraint

Since the ObjectQL engine began answering a driver's unique violation with its own `DUPLICATE_RECORD` envelope (`status: 409`, `object`, `field`, the driver error on `cause`), `POST /api/v1/data/:object` let that envelope leave `classifyDataError` through the generic declared-status passthrough: still 409, but with `code: 'DUPLICATE_RECORD'`, no `field`, and the engine's own sentence in `error`. The `isUniqueViolationError` arm that names the conflicting column (`field: 'email'`, "A record with this email already exists") was no longer reached for an insert conflict. Measured with the real engine and real drivers: on `driver-sqlite-wasm` the `field` key disappeared from every conflict on a single-column index; on `driver-memory` the sentence changed.

A dedicated arm for the engine's envelope now sits with the other structured 409s (`DELETE_RESTRICTED`, `CONCURRENT_UPDATE`), ahead of the passthrough:

- `code` stays `UNIQUE_VIOLATION` — the code every client branching on this conflict already reads.
- `field` is restored whenever the dialect determinably named the column (SQLite, Postgres); composite keys and index-naming dialects (MySQL) carry no `field` key, exactly as before.
- `error` is the curated end-user sentence again; the engine's own sentence rides on `developerMessage`, the same split the `DELETE_RESTRICTED` body uses.
- The body still quotes nothing the driver said — no offending value, no statement, no index name — including on `driver-memory`, whose raw refusal used to echo the offending values as JSON through the passthrough.

`patch`: a restoration of the shipped body's keys and wording; the wire `code` and the status are unchanged. The arm fires for the engine's envelope only; a plugin or sandbox body that throws the registered `DUPLICATE_RECORD` itself keeps the answer it gets today.
78 changes: 78 additions & 0 deletions packages/rest/src/error-response.ts
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -698,6 +698,84 @@ function classifyDataError(error: any, object?: string): { status: number; body:
},
};
}
// [#14389] The engine's insert-conflict envelope → 409 `UNIQUE_VIOLATION`,
// with the structured `field` restored.
//
// Since #14095 `engine.insert` answers a driver's unique violation with the
// `DuplicateRecordError` envelope — `code: 'DUPLICATE_RECORD'`, `status:
// 409`, `object`, `field` when the dialect determinably named a column,
// the driver error whole on `cause`. It DECLARES a status, so it reached
// the declared-status passthrough below first and left through it: status
// right, `field` gone, and the platform's own sentence in `error`, while
// the `isUniqueViolationError` arm further down — holding the curated
// end-user wording and the `field` key since #7821 — was never reached
// for an insert conflict any more. Surfaced FIRST, beside the two
// structured 409s above, for the same reason they are: the structured
// field must survive the generic catch-alls.
//
// **The wire `code` stays `UNIQUE_VIOLATION`** (triage ruling on the card,
// 2026-09-02: the answer that changes nothing for clients — every consumer
// branching on this conflict today reads `UNIQUE_VIOLATION`, and renaming
// a wire code under existing consumers is a published-contract change,
// not a door's call). **No `declaredCode` beside it.** `DUPLICATE_RECORD`
// is a `StandardErrorCode` member, and `ApiErrorSchema.declaredCode`
// (`packages/spec/src/api/contract.zod.ts`, with its docblock) together
// with ADR-0112's "presence means demotion" amendment define the field as
// the demoted spelling of an UNREGISTERED code — absent when the
// producer's code IS a vocabulary member. So the field stays ABSENT here
// (contract review on the card, 2026-09-02), and the engine's spelling
// stays in-process exactly as every dialect code (`SQLITE_CONSTRAINT_UNIQUE`,
// `23505`, `ER_DUP_ENTRY`) always has at the `isUniqueViolationError` arm
// below. ADR-0112's 2026-08-29 scope correction declares the hand-written
// `declaredCode` emission population to be exactly one site; this arm is
// not a second. Pinned in `rest-duplicate-record-arm.test.ts`: §0 (both
// codes parse as `ErrorCode` — the reason) and §1 (`not.toHaveProperty`).
//
// **Two sentences — the `DELETE_RESTRICTED` split above.** `error` is the
// curated end-user sentence the #6250/#7821 arm has always produced: fixed
// text plus, at most, the bare column identifier the ENGINE resolved
// through `uniqueViolationColumn` (`field` is read off the envelope, not
// re-derived — the envelope is the contract). `developerMessage` is the
// engine's own sentence (`message`): it names the object and the column
// and carries no value. The envelope's own `developerMessage` is
// deliberately NOT relayed — it addresses the in-process caller of
// `engine.insert` ("attached as `cause`", "branch on `code ===
// 'DUPLICATE_RECORD'`"), and neither holds on this wire.
//
// **The body echoes nothing the driver said.** `cause` never reaches the
// wire and the sentence is fixed text. This matters most for
// `driver-memory`, whose raw refusal declares `status: 409` itself and so
// ALREADY took the passthrough before #14095 — with a message quoting the
// offending values as JSON. The envelope removed that; this arm keeps it
// removed.
//
// ⚠️ Gated on the ENVELOPE — name AND code — not on the code alone as the
// two siblings above are, and the difference is load-bearing: they relay
// `error.message`, this arm REPLACES it. A hook that deliberately throws
// the registered `DUPLICATE_RECORD` from a sandbox body is a different
// producer speaking a member of the vocabulary; it keeps the answer the
// sandbox unwrap door gives it today (its own sentence, its own code —
// `rest-thrown-code-vocabulary.test.ts` §2) rather than having its
// sentence swapped for this one and the QuickJS debug wrapper shipped as
// `developerMessage`.
if (error?.code === 'DUPLICATE_RECORD' && error?.name === 'DuplicateRecordError') {
const field = typeof error?.field === 'string' && error.field.length > 0 ? error.field : undefined;
const refused = typeof error?.object === 'string' && error.object.length > 0 ? error.object : object;
return {
status: 409,
body: {
error: field
? `A record with this ${field} already exists`
: 'A record with this value already exists',
code: 'UNIQUE_VIOLATION',
...(typeof error?.message === 'string' && error.message.length > 0
? { developerMessage: error.message }
: {}),
...(field ? { field } : {}),
...(refused ? { object: refused } : {}),
},
};
}
// A declared datasource that is refused by the host policy, or failed to
// connect under OS_ALLOW_DRIVER_CONNECT_FAILURE → 503 (framework#3828).
// Handled before the catch-alls because nothing about the REQUEST is wrong:
Expand Down
Loading
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
16 changes: 16 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/rest-duplicate-record-arm-field-restored.md
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
---
'@objectstack/rest': patch
---

Restore the `field` key and the curated conflict sentence on the 409 body for an insert refused by a unique constraint

Since the ObjectQL engine began answering a driver's unique violation with its own `DUPLICATE_RECORD` envelope (`status: 409`, `object`, `field`, the driver error on `cause`), `POST /api/v1/data/:object` let that envelope leave `classifyDataError` through the generic declared-status passthrough: still 409, but with `code: 'DUPLICATE_RECORD'`, no `field`, and the engine's own sentence in `error`. The `isUniqueViolationError` arm that names the conflicting column (`field: 'email'`, "A record with this email already exists") was no longer reached for an insert conflict. Measured with the real engine and real drivers: on `driver-sqlite-wasm` the `field` key disappeared from every conflict on a single-column index; on `driver-memory` the sentence changed.

A dedicated arm for the engine's envelope now sits with the other structured 409s (`DELETE_RESTRICTED`, `CONCURRENT_UPDATE`), ahead of the passthrough:

- `code` stays `UNIQUE_VIOLATION` — the code every client branching on this conflict already reads.
- `field` is restored whenever the dialect determinably named the column (SQLite, Postgres); composite keys and index-naming dialects (MySQL) carry no `field` key, exactly as before.
- `error` is the curated end-user sentence again; the engine's own sentence rides on `developerMessage`, the same split the `DELETE_RESTRICTED` body uses.
- The body still quotes nothing the driver said — no offending value, no statement, no index name — including on `driver-memory`, whose raw refusal used to echo the offending values as JSON through the passthrough.

`patch`: a restoration of the shipped body's keys and wording; the wire `code` and the status are unchanged. The arm fires for the engine's envelope only; a plugin or sandbox body that throws the registered `DUPLICATE_RECORD` itself keeps the answer it gets today.
78 changes: 78 additions & 0 deletions packages/rest/src/error-response.ts
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -698,6 +698,84 @@ function classifyDataError(error: any, object?: string): { status: number; body:
},
};
}
// [#14389] The engine's insert-conflict envelope → 409 `UNIQUE_VIOLATION`,
// with the structured `field` restored.
//
// Since #14095 `engine.insert` answers a driver's unique violation with the
// `DuplicateRecordError` envelope — `code: 'DUPLICATE_RECORD'`, `status:
// 409`, `object`, `field` when the dialect determinably named a column,
// the driver error whole on `cause`. It DECLARES a status, so it reached
// the declared-status passthrough below first and left through it: status
// right, `field` gone, and the platform's own sentence in `error`, while
// the `isUniqueViolationError` arm further down — holding the curated
// end-user wording and the `field` key since #7821 — was never reached
// for an insert conflict any more. Surfaced FIRST, beside the two
// structured 409s above, for the same reason they are: the structured
// field must survive the generic catch-alls.
//
// **The wire `code` stays `UNIQUE_VIOLATION`** (triage ruling on the card,
// 2026-09-02: the answer that changes nothing for clients — every consumer
// branching on this conflict today reads `UNIQUE_VIOLATION`, and renaming
// a wire code under existing consumers is a published-contract change,
// not a door's call). **No `declaredCode` beside it.** `DUPLICATE_RECORD`
// is a `StandardErrorCode` member, and `ApiErrorSchema.declaredCode`
// (`packages/spec/src/api/contract.zod.ts`, with its docblock) together
// with ADR-0112's "presence means demotion" amendment define the field as
// the demoted spelling of an UNREGISTERED code — absent when the
// producer's code IS a vocabulary member. So the field stays ABSENT here
// (contract review on the card, 2026-09-02), and the engine's spelling
// stays in-process exactly as every dialect code (`SQLITE_CONSTRAINT_UNIQUE`,
// `23505`, `ER_DUP_ENTRY`) always has at the `isUniqueViolationError` arm
// below. ADR-0112's 2026-08-29 scope correction declares the hand-written
// `declaredCode` emission population to be exactly one site; this arm is
// not a second. Pinned in `rest-duplicate-record-arm.test.ts`: §0 (both
// codes parse as `ErrorCode` — the reason) and §1 (`not.toHaveProperty`).
//
// **Two sentences — the `DELETE_RESTRICTED` split above.** `error` is the
// curated end-user sentence the #6250/#7821 arm has always produced: fixed
// text plus, at most, the bare column identifier the ENGINE resolved
// through `uniqueViolationColumn` (`field` is read off the envelope, not
// re-derived — the envelope is the contract). `developerMessage` is the
// engine's own sentence (`message`): it names the object and the column
// and carries no value. The envelope's own `developerMessage` is
// deliberately NOT relayed — it addresses the in-process caller of
// `engine.insert` ("attached as `cause`", "branch on `code ===
// 'DUPLICATE_RECORD'`"), and neither holds on this wire.
//
// **The body echoes nothing the driver said.** `cause` never reaches the
// wire and the sentence is fixed text. This matters most for
// `driver-memory`, whose raw refusal declares `status: 409` itself and so
// ALREADY took the passthrough before #14095 — with a message quoting the
// offending values as JSON. The envelope removed that; this arm keeps it
// removed.
//
// ⚠️ Gated on the ENVELOPE — name AND code — not on the code alone as the
// two siblings above are, and the difference is load-bearing: they relay
// `error.message`, this arm REPLACES it. A hook that deliberately throws
// the registered `DUPLICATE_RECORD` from a sandbox body is a different
// producer speaking a member of the vocabulary; it keeps the answer the
// sandbox unwrap door gives it today (its own sentence, its own code —
// `rest-thrown-code-vocabulary.test.ts` §2) rather than having its
// sentence swapped for this one and the QuickJS debug wrapper shipped as
// `developerMessage`.
if (error?.code === 'DUPLICATE_RECORD' && error?.name === 'DuplicateRecordError') {
const field = typeof error?.field === 'string' && error.field.length > 0 ? error.field : undefined;
const refused = typeof error?.object === 'string' && error.object.length > 0 ? error.object : object;
return {
status: 409,
body: {
error: field
? `A record with this ${field} already exists`
: 'A record with this value already exists',
code: 'UNIQUE_VIOLATION',
...(typeof error?.message === 'string' && error.message.length > 0
? { developerMessage: error.message }
: {}),
...(field ? { field } : {}),
...(refused ? { object: refused } : {}),
},
};
}
// A declared datasource that is refused by the host policy, or failed to
// connect under OS_ALLOW_DRIVER_CONNECT_FAILURE → 503 (framework#3828).
// Handled before the catch-alls because nothing about the REQUEST is wrong:
Expand Down
Loading
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content
16 changes: 16 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/rest-duplicate-record-arm-field-restored.md
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
---
'@objectstack/rest': patch
---

Restore the `field` key and the curated conflict sentence on the 409 body for an insert refused by a unique constraint

Since the ObjectQL engine began answering a driver's unique violation with its own `DUPLICATE_RECORD` envelope (`status: 409`, `object`, `field`, the driver error on `cause`), `POST /api/v1/data/:object` let that envelope leave `classifyDataError` through the generic declared-status passthrough: still 409, but with `code: 'DUPLICATE_RECORD'`, no `field`, and the engine's own sentence in `error`. The `isUniqueViolationError` arm that names the conflicting column (`field: 'email'`, "A record with this email already exists") was no longer reached for an insert conflict. Measured with the real engine and real drivers: on `driver-sqlite-wasm` the `field` key disappeared from every conflict on a single-column index; on `driver-memory` the sentence changed.

A dedicated arm for the engine's envelope now sits with the other structured 409s (`DELETE_RESTRICTED`, `CONCURRENT_UPDATE`), ahead of the passthrough:

- `code` stays `UNIQUE_VIOLATION` — the code every client branching on this conflict already reads.
- `field` is restored whenever the dialect determinably named the column (SQLite, Postgres); composite keys and index-naming dialects (MySQL) carry no `field` key, exactly as before.
- `error` is the curated end-user sentence again; the engine's own sentence rides on `developerMessage`, the same split the `DELETE_RESTRICTED` body uses.
- The body still quotes nothing the driver said — no offending value, no statement, no index name — including on `driver-memory`, whose raw refusal used to echo the offending values as JSON through the passthrough.

`patch`: a restoration of the shipped body's keys and wording; the wire `code` and the status are unchanged. The arm fires for the engine's envelope only; a plugin or sandbox body that throws the registered `DUPLICATE_RECORD` itself keeps the answer it gets today.
78 changes: 78 additions & 0 deletions packages/rest/src/error-response.ts
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -698,6 +698,84 @@ function classifyDataError(error: any, object?: string): { status: number; body:
},
};
}
// [#14389] The engine's insert-conflict envelope → 409 `UNIQUE_VIOLATION`,
// with the structured `field` restored.
//
// Since #14095 `engine.insert` answers a driver's unique violation with the
// `DuplicateRecordError` envelope — `code: 'DUPLICATE_RECORD'`, `status:
// 409`, `object`, `field` when the dialect determinably named a column,
// the driver error whole on `cause`. It DECLARES a status, so it reached
// the declared-status passthrough below first and left through it: status
// right, `field` gone, and the platform's own sentence in `error`, while
// the `isUniqueViolationError` arm further down — holding the curated
// end-user wording and the `field` key since #7821 — was never reached
// for an insert conflict any more. Surfaced FIRST, beside the two
// structured 409s above, for the same reason they are: the structured
// field must survive the generic catch-alls.
//
// **The wire `code` stays `UNIQUE_VIOLATION`** (triage ruling on the card,
// 2026-09-02: the answer that changes nothing for clients — every consumer
// branching on this conflict today reads `UNIQUE_VIOLATION`, and renaming
// a wire code under existing consumers is a published-contract change,
// not a door's call). **No `declaredCode` beside it.** `DUPLICATE_RECORD`
// is a `StandardErrorCode` member, and `ApiErrorSchema.declaredCode`
// (`packages/spec/src/api/contract.zod.ts`, with its docblock) together
// with ADR-0112's "presence means demotion" amendment define the field as
// the demoted spelling of an UNREGISTERED code — absent when the
// producer's code IS a vocabulary member. So the field stays ABSENT here
// (contract review on the card, 2026-09-02), and the engine's spelling
// stays in-process exactly as every dialect code (`SQLITE_CONSTRAINT_UNIQUE`,
// `23505`, `ER_DUP_ENTRY`) always has at the `isUniqueViolationError` arm
// below. ADR-0112's 2026-08-29 scope correction declares the hand-written
// `declaredCode` emission population to be exactly one site; this arm is
// not a second. Pinned in `rest-duplicate-record-arm.test.ts`: §0 (both
// codes parse as `ErrorCode` — the reason) and §1 (`not.toHaveProperty`).
//
// **Two sentences — the `DELETE_RESTRICTED` split above.** `error` is the
// curated end-user sentence the #6250/#7821 arm has always produced: fixed
// text plus, at most, the bare column identifier the ENGINE resolved
// through `uniqueViolationColumn` (`field` is read off the envelope, not
// re-derived — the envelope is the contract). `developerMessage` is the
// engine's own sentence (`message`): it names the object and the column
// and carries no value. The envelope's own `developerMessage` is
// deliberately NOT relayed — it addresses the in-process caller of
// `engine.insert` ("attached as `cause`", "branch on `code ===
// 'DUPLICATE_RECORD'`"), and neither holds on this wire.
//
// **The body echoes nothing the driver said.** `cause` never reaches the
// wire and the sentence is fixed text. This matters most for
// `driver-memory`, whose raw refusal declares `status: 409` itself and so
// ALREADY took the passthrough before #14095 — with a message quoting the
// offending values as JSON. The envelope removed that; this arm keeps it
// removed.
//
// ⚠️ Gated on the ENVELOPE — name AND code — not on the code alone as the
// two siblings above are, and the difference is load-bearing: they relay
// `error.message`, this arm REPLACES it. A hook that deliberately throws
// the registered `DUPLICATE_RECORD` from a sandbox body is a different
// producer speaking a member of the vocabulary; it keeps the answer the
// sandbox unwrap door gives it today (its own sentence, its own code —
// `rest-thrown-code-vocabulary.test.ts` §2) rather than having its
// sentence swapped for this one and the QuickJS debug wrapper shipped as
// `developerMessage`.
if (error?.code === 'DUPLICATE_RECORD' && error?.name === 'DuplicateRecordError') {
const field = typeof error?.field === 'string' && error.field.length > 0 ? error.field : undefined;
const refused = typeof error?.object === 'string' && error.object.length > 0 ? error.object : object;
return {
status: 409,
body: {
error: field
? `A record with this ${field} already exists`
: 'A record with this value already exists',
code: 'UNIQUE_VIOLATION',
...(typeof error?.message === 'string' && error.message.length > 0
? { developerMessage: error.message }
: {}),
...(field ? { field } : {}),
...(refused ? { object: refused } : {}),
},
};
}
// A declared datasource that is refused by the host policy, or failed to
// connect under OS_ALLOW_DRIVER_CONNECT_FAILURE → 503 (framework#3828).
// Handled before the catch-alls because nothing about the REQUEST is wrong:
Expand Down
Loading
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
16 changes: 16 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/rest-duplicate-record-arm-field-restored.md
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
---
'@objectstack/rest': patch
---

Restore the `field` key and the curated conflict sentence on the 409 body for an insert refused by a unique constraint

Since the ObjectQL engine began answering a driver's unique violation with its own `DUPLICATE_RECORD` envelope (`status: 409`, `object`, `field`, the driver error on `cause`), `POST /api/v1/data/:object` let that envelope leave `classifyDataError` through the generic declared-status passthrough: still 409, but with `code: 'DUPLICATE_RECORD'`, no `field`, and the engine's own sentence in `error`. The `isUniqueViolationError` arm that names the conflicting column (`field: 'email'`, "A record with this email already exists") was no longer reached for an insert conflict. Measured with the real engine and real drivers: on `driver-sqlite-wasm` the `field` key disappeared from every conflict on a single-column index; on `driver-memory` the sentence changed.

A dedicated arm for the engine's envelope now sits with the other structured 409s (`DELETE_RESTRICTED`, `CONCURRENT_UPDATE`), ahead of the passthrough:

- `code` stays `UNIQUE_VIOLATION` — the code every client branching on this conflict already reads.
- `field` is restored whenever the dialect determinably named the column (SQLite, Postgres); composite keys and index-naming dialects (MySQL) carry no `field` key, exactly as before.
- `error` is the curated end-user sentence again; the engine's own sentence rides on `developerMessage`, the same split the `DELETE_RESTRICTED` body uses.
- The body still quotes nothing the driver said — no offending value, no statement, no index name — including on `driver-memory`, whose raw refusal used to echo the offending values as JSON through the passthrough.

`patch`: a restoration of the shipped body's keys and wording; the wire `code` and the status are unchanged. The arm fires for the engine's envelope only; a plugin or sandbox body that throws the registered `DUPLICATE_RECORD` itself keeps the answer it gets today.
78 changes: 78 additions & 0 deletions packages/rest/src/error-response.ts
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -698,6 +698,84 @@ function classifyDataError(error: any, object?: string): { status: number; body:
},
};
}
// [#14389] The engine's insert-conflict envelope → 409 `UNIQUE_VIOLATION`,
// with the structured `field` restored.
//
// Since #14095 `engine.insert` answers a driver's unique violation with the
// `DuplicateRecordError` envelope — `code: 'DUPLICATE_RECORD'`, `status:
// 409`, `object`, `field` when the dialect determinably named a column,
// the driver error whole on `cause`. It DECLARES a status, so it reached
// the declared-status passthrough below first and left through it: status
// right, `field` gone, and the platform's own sentence in `error`, while
// the `isUniqueViolationError` arm further down — holding the curated
// end-user wording and the `field` key since #7821 — was never reached
// for an insert conflict any more. Surfaced FIRST, beside the two
// structured 409s above, for the same reason they are: the structured
// field must survive the generic catch-alls.
//
// **The wire `code` stays `UNIQUE_VIOLATION`** (triage ruling on the card,
// 2026-09-02: the answer that changes nothing for clients — every consumer
// branching on this conflict today reads `UNIQUE_VIOLATION`, and renaming
// a wire code under existing consumers is a published-contract change,
// not a door's call). **No `declaredCode` beside it.** `DUPLICATE_RECORD`
// is a `StandardErrorCode` member, and `ApiErrorSchema.declaredCode`
// (`packages/spec/src/api/contract.zod.ts`, with its docblock) together
// with ADR-0112's "presence means demotion" amendment define the field as
// the demoted spelling of an UNREGISTERED code — absent when the
// producer's code IS a vocabulary member. So the field stays ABSENT here
// (contract review on the card, 2026-09-02), and the engine's spelling
// stays in-process exactly as every dialect code (`SQLITE_CONSTRAINT_UNIQUE`,
// `23505`, `ER_DUP_ENTRY`) always has at the `isUniqueViolationError` arm
// below. ADR-0112's 2026-08-29 scope correction declares the hand-written
// `declaredCode` emission population to be exactly one site; this arm is
// not a second. Pinned in `rest-duplicate-record-arm.test.ts`: §0 (both
// codes parse as `ErrorCode` — the reason) and §1 (`not.toHaveProperty`).
//
// **Two sentences — the `DELETE_RESTRICTED` split above.** `error` is the
// curated end-user sentence the #6250/#7821 arm has always produced: fixed
// text plus, at most, the bare column identifier the ENGINE resolved
// through `uniqueViolationColumn` (`field` is read off the envelope, not
// re-derived — the envelope is the contract). `developerMessage` is the
// engine's own sentence (`message`): it names the object and the column
// and carries no value. The envelope's own `developerMessage` is
// deliberately NOT relayed — it addresses the in-process caller of
// `engine.insert` ("attached as `cause`", "branch on `code ===
// 'DUPLICATE_RECORD'`"), and neither holds on this wire.
//
// **The body echoes nothing the driver said.** `cause` never reaches the
// wire and the sentence is fixed text. This matters most for
// `driver-memory`, whose raw refusal declares `status: 409` itself and so
// ALREADY took the passthrough before #14095 — with a message quoting the
// offending values as JSON. The envelope removed that; this arm keeps it
// removed.
//
// ⚠️ Gated on the ENVELOPE — name AND code — not on the code alone as the
// two siblings above are, and the difference is load-bearing: they relay
// `error.message`, this arm REPLACES it. A hook that deliberately throws
// the registered `DUPLICATE_RECORD` from a sandbox body is a different
// producer speaking a member of the vocabulary; it keeps the answer the
// sandbox unwrap door gives it today (its own sentence, its own code —
// `rest-thrown-code-vocabulary.test.ts` §2) rather than having its
// sentence swapped for this one and the QuickJS debug wrapper shipped as
// `developerMessage`.
if (error?.code === 'DUPLICATE_RECORD' && error?.name === 'DuplicateRecordError') {
const field = typeof error?.field === 'string' && error.field.length > 0 ? error.field : undefined;
const refused = typeof error?.object === 'string' && error.object.length > 0 ? error.object : object;
return {
status: 409,
body: {
error: field
? `A record with this ${field} already exists`
: 'A record with this value already exists',
code: 'UNIQUE_VIOLATION',
...(typeof error?.message === 'string' && error.message.length > 0
? { developerMessage: error.message }
: {}),
...(field ? { field } : {}),
...(refused ? { object: refused } : {}),
},
};
}
// A declared datasource that is refused by the host policy, or failed to
// connect under OS_ALLOW_DRIVER_CONNECT_FAILURE → 503 (framework#3828).
// Handled before the catch-alls because nothing about the REQUEST is wrong:
Expand Down
Loading
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
16 changes: 16 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/rest-duplicate-record-arm-field-restored.md
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
---
'@objectstack/rest': patch
---

Restore the `field` key and the curated conflict sentence on the 409 body for an insert refused by a unique constraint

Since the ObjectQL engine began answering a driver's unique violation with its own `DUPLICATE_RECORD` envelope (`status: 409`, `object`, `field`, the driver error on `cause`), `POST /api/v1/data/:object` let that envelope leave `classifyDataError` through the generic declared-status passthrough: still 409, but with `code: 'DUPLICATE_RECORD'`, no `field`, and the engine's own sentence in `error`. The `isUniqueViolationError` arm that names the conflicting column (`field: 'email'`, "A record with this email already exists") was no longer reached for an insert conflict. Measured with the real engine and real drivers: on `driver-sqlite-wasm` the `field` key disappeared from every conflict on a single-column index; on `driver-memory` the sentence changed.

A dedicated arm for the engine's envelope now sits with the other structured 409s (`DELETE_RESTRICTED`, `CONCURRENT_UPDATE`), ahead of the passthrough:

- `code` stays `UNIQUE_VIOLATION` — the code every client branching on this conflict already reads.
- `field` is restored whenever the dialect determinably named the column (SQLite, Postgres); composite keys and index-naming dialects (MySQL) carry no `field` key, exactly as before.
- `error` is the curated end-user sentence again; the engine's own sentence rides on `developerMessage`, the same split the `DELETE_RESTRICTED` body uses.
- The body still quotes nothing the driver said — no offending value, no statement, no index name — including on `driver-memory`, whose raw refusal used to echo the offending values as JSON through the passthrough.

`patch`: a restoration of the shipped body's keys and wording; the wire `code` and the status are unchanged. The arm fires for the engine's envelope only; a plugin or sandbox body that throws the registered `DUPLICATE_RECORD` itself keeps the answer it gets today.
78 changes: 78 additions & 0 deletions packages/rest/src/error-response.ts
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -698,6 +698,84 @@ function classifyDataError(error: any, object?: string): { status: number; body:
},
};
}
// [#14389] The engine's insert-conflict envelope → 409 `UNIQUE_VIOLATION`,
// with the structured `field` restored.
//
// Since #14095 `engine.insert` answers a driver's unique violation with the
// `DuplicateRecordError` envelope — `code: 'DUPLICATE_RECORD'`, `status:
// 409`, `object`, `field` when the dialect determinably named a column,
// the driver error whole on `cause`. It DECLARES a status, so it reached
// the declared-status passthrough below first and left through it: status
// right, `field` gone, and the platform's own sentence in `error`, while
// the `isUniqueViolationError` arm further down — holding the curated
// end-user wording and the `field` key since #7821 — was never reached
// for an insert conflict any more. Surfaced FIRST, beside the two
// structured 409s above, for the same reason they are: the structured
// field must survive the generic catch-alls.
//
// **The wire `code` stays `UNIQUE_VIOLATION`** (triage ruling on the card,
// 2026-09-02: the answer that changes nothing for clients — every consumer
// branching on this conflict today reads `UNIQUE_VIOLATION`, and renaming
// a wire code under existing consumers is a published-contract change,
// not a door's call). **No `declaredCode` beside it.** `DUPLICATE_RECORD`
// is a `StandardErrorCode` member, and `ApiErrorSchema.declaredCode`
// (`packages/spec/src/api/contract.zod.ts`, with its docblock) together
// with ADR-0112's "presence means demotion" amendment define the field as
// the demoted spelling of an UNREGISTERED code — absent when the
// producer's code IS a vocabulary member. So the field stays ABSENT here
// (contract review on the card, 2026-09-02), and the engine's spelling
// stays in-process exactly as every dialect code (`SQLITE_CONSTRAINT_UNIQUE`,
// `23505`, `ER_DUP_ENTRY`) always has at the `isUniqueViolationError` arm
// below. ADR-0112's 2026-08-29 scope correction declares the hand-written
// `declaredCode` emission population to be exactly one site; this arm is
// not a second. Pinned in `rest-duplicate-record-arm.test.ts`: §0 (both
// codes parse as `ErrorCode` — the reason) and §1 (`not.toHaveProperty`).
//
// **Two sentences — the `DELETE_RESTRICTED` split above.** `error` is the
// curated end-user sentence the #6250/#7821 arm has always produced: fixed
// text plus, at most, the bare column identifier the ENGINE resolved
// through `uniqueViolationColumn` (`field` is read off the envelope, not
// re-derived — the envelope is the contract). `developerMessage` is the
// engine's own sentence (`message`): it names the object and the column
// and carries no value. The envelope's own `developerMessage` is
// deliberately NOT relayed — it addresses the in-process caller of
// `engine.insert` ("attached as `cause`", "branch on `code ===
// 'DUPLICATE_RECORD'`"), and neither holds on this wire.
//
// **The body echoes nothing the driver said.** `cause` never reaches the
// wire and the sentence is fixed text. This matters most for
// `driver-memory`, whose raw refusal declares `status: 409` itself and so
// ALREADY took the passthrough before #14095 — with a message quoting the
// offending values as JSON. The envelope removed that; this arm keeps it
// removed.
//
// ⚠️ Gated on the ENVELOPE — name AND code — not on the code alone as the
// two siblings above are, and the difference is load-bearing: they relay
// `error.message`, this arm REPLACES it. A hook that deliberately throws
// the registered `DUPLICATE_RECORD` from a sandbox body is a different
// producer speaking a member of the vocabulary; it keeps the answer the
// sandbox unwrap door gives it today (its own sentence, its own code —
// `rest-thrown-code-vocabulary.test.ts` §2) rather than having its
// sentence swapped for this one and the QuickJS debug wrapper shipped as
// `developerMessage`.
if (error?.code === 'DUPLICATE_RECORD' && error?.name === 'DuplicateRecordError') {
const field = typeof error?.field === 'string' && error.field.length > 0 ? error.field : undefined;
const refused = typeof error?.object === 'string' && error.object.length > 0 ? error.object : object;
return {
status: 409,
body: {
error: field
? `A record with this ${field} already exists`
: 'A record with this value already exists',
code: 'UNIQUE_VIOLATION',
...(typeof error?.message === 'string' && error.message.length > 0
? { developerMessage: error.message }
: {}),
...(field ? { field } : {}),
...(refused ? { object: refused } : {}),
},
};
}
// A declared datasource that is refused by the host policy, or failed to
// connect under OS_ALLOW_DRIVER_CONNECT_FAILURE → 503 (framework#3828).
// Handled before the catch-alls because nothing about the REQUEST is wrong:
Expand Down
Loading
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content
16 changes: 16 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/rest-duplicate-record-arm-field-restored.md
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
---
'@objectstack/rest': patch
---

Restore the `field` key and the curated conflict sentence on the 409 body for an insert refused by a unique constraint

Since the ObjectQL engine began answering a driver's unique violation with its own `DUPLICATE_RECORD` envelope (`status: 409`, `object`, `field`, the driver error on `cause`), `POST /api/v1/data/:object` let that envelope leave `classifyDataError` through the generic declared-status passthrough: still 409, but with `code: 'DUPLICATE_RECORD'`, no `field`, and the engine's own sentence in `error`. The `isUniqueViolationError` arm that names the conflicting column (`field: 'email'`, "A record with this email already exists") was no longer reached for an insert conflict. Measured with the real engine and real drivers: on `driver-sqlite-wasm` the `field` key disappeared from every conflict on a single-column index; on `driver-memory` the sentence changed.

A dedicated arm for the engine's envelope now sits with the other structured 409s (`DELETE_RESTRICTED`, `CONCURRENT_UPDATE`), ahead of the passthrough:

- `code` stays `UNIQUE_VIOLATION` — the code every client branching on this conflict already reads.
- `field` is restored whenever the dialect determinably named the column (SQLite, Postgres); composite keys and index-naming dialects (MySQL) carry no `field` key, exactly as before.
- `error` is the curated end-user sentence again; the engine's own sentence rides on `developerMessage`, the same split the `DELETE_RESTRICTED` body uses.
- The body still quotes nothing the driver said — no offending value, no statement, no index name — including on `driver-memory`, whose raw refusal used to echo the offending values as JSON through the passthrough.

`patch`: a restoration of the shipped body's keys and wording; the wire `code` and the status are unchanged. The arm fires for the engine's envelope only; a plugin or sandbox body that throws the registered `DUPLICATE_RECORD` itself keeps the answer it gets today.
78 changes: 78 additions & 0 deletions packages/rest/src/error-response.ts
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -698,6 +698,84 @@ function classifyDataError(error: any, object?: string): { status: number; body:
},
};
}
// [#14389] The engine's insert-conflict envelope → 409 `UNIQUE_VIOLATION`,
// with the structured `field` restored.
//
// Since #14095 `engine.insert` answers a driver's unique violation with the
// `DuplicateRecordError` envelope — `code: 'DUPLICATE_RECORD'`, `status:
// 409`, `object`, `field` when the dialect determinably named a column,
// the driver error whole on `cause`. It DECLARES a status, so it reached
// the declared-status passthrough below first and left through it: status
// right, `field` gone, and the platform's own sentence in `error`, while
// the `isUniqueViolationError` arm further down — holding the curated
// end-user wording and the `field` key since #7821 — was never reached
// for an insert conflict any more. Surfaced FIRST, beside the two
// structured 409s above, for the same reason they are: the structured
// field must survive the generic catch-alls.
//
// **The wire `code` stays `UNIQUE_VIOLATION`** (triage ruling on the card,
// 2026-09-02: the answer that changes nothing for clients — every consumer
// branching on this conflict today reads `UNIQUE_VIOLATION`, and renaming
// a wire code under existing consumers is a published-contract change,
// not a door's call). **No `declaredCode` beside it.** `DUPLICATE_RECORD`
// is a `StandardErrorCode` member, and `ApiErrorSchema.declaredCode`
// (`packages/spec/src/api/contract.zod.ts`, with its docblock) together
// with ADR-0112's "presence means demotion" amendment define the field as
// the demoted spelling of an UNREGISTERED code — absent when the
// producer's code IS a vocabulary member. So the field stays ABSENT here
// (contract review on the card, 2026-09-02), and the engine's spelling
// stays in-process exactly as every dialect code (`SQLITE_CONSTRAINT_UNIQUE`,
// `23505`, `ER_DUP_ENTRY`) always has at the `isUniqueViolationError` arm
// below. ADR-0112's 2026-08-29 scope correction declares the hand-written
// `declaredCode` emission population to be exactly one site; this arm is
// not a second. Pinned in `rest-duplicate-record-arm.test.ts`: §0 (both
// codes parse as `ErrorCode` — the reason) and §1 (`not.toHaveProperty`).
//
// **Two sentences — the `DELETE_RESTRICTED` split above.** `error` is the
// curated end-user sentence the #6250/#7821 arm has always produced: fixed
// text plus, at most, the bare column identifier the ENGINE resolved
// through `uniqueViolationColumn` (`field` is read off the envelope, not
// re-derived — the envelope is the contract). `developerMessage` is the
// engine's own sentence (`message`): it names the object and the column
// and carries no value. The envelope's own `developerMessage` is
// deliberately NOT relayed — it addresses the in-process caller of
// `engine.insert` ("attached as `cause`", "branch on `code ===
// 'DUPLICATE_RECORD'`"), and neither holds on this wire.
//
// **The body echoes nothing the driver said.** `cause` never reaches the
// wire and the sentence is fixed text. This matters most for
// `driver-memory`, whose raw refusal declares `status: 409` itself and so
// ALREADY took the passthrough before #14095 — with a message quoting the
// offending values as JSON. The envelope removed that; this arm keeps it
// removed.
//
// ⚠️ Gated on the ENVELOPE — name AND code — not on the code alone as the
// two siblings above are, and the difference is load-bearing: they relay
// `error.message`, this arm REPLACES it. A hook that deliberately throws
// the registered `DUPLICATE_RECORD` from a sandbox body is a different
// producer speaking a member of the vocabulary; it keeps the answer the
// sandbox unwrap door gives it today (its own sentence, its own code —
// `rest-thrown-code-vocabulary.test.ts` §2) rather than having its
// sentence swapped for this one and the QuickJS debug wrapper shipped as
// `developerMessage`.
if (error?.code === 'DUPLICATE_RECORD' && error?.name === 'DuplicateRecordError') {
const field = typeof error?.field === 'string' && error.field.length > 0 ? error.field : undefined;
const refused = typeof error?.object === 'string' && error.object.length > 0 ? error.object : object;
return {
status: 409,
body: {
error: field
? `A record with this ${field} already exists`
: 'A record with this value already exists',
code: 'UNIQUE_VIOLATION',
...(typeof error?.message === 'string' && error.message.length > 0
? { developerMessage: error.message }
: {}),
...(field ? { field } : {}),
...(refused ? { object: refused } : {}),
},
};
}
// A declared datasource that is refused by the host policy, or failed to
// connect under OS_ALLOW_DRIVER_CONNECT_FAILURE → 503 (framework#3828).
// Handled before the catch-alls because nothing about the REQUEST is wrong:
Expand Down
Loading
Loading