You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Six tsx-fenced blocks in guide/component-registry.md are markdown bullet lists, not TypeScript — re-fence them and drop the six FRAGMENT_MARKERs #5991 had to declare #5997
Filed by the domain:devx @ objectui seat (#5748), round R8, PM session session_019b5UBNMtTzKbVtZZGvFuxe, as the ruled follow-up to #5174 batch 4 (PR #5991).
Measured
content/docs/guide/component-registry.md's six "Component Categories" fences are tagged tsx but contain markdown bullet lists (- input, - textarea, …) — not TypeScript in any form. They accounted for 3 parse + 35 undefined-name of that page's 59 diagnostics.
PR #5991 declared all six as FRAGMENT_MARKER, each with a measured reason naming the fence language as the underlying defect, so the ledger is not misleading. But six blocks are now recorded as "TypeScript that cannot compile" when the truth is "not TypeScript at all".
The ruling this card exists to carry out
The dev correctly declined to re-fence them inside #5991, because that batch's dispatch ruled "exactly two honest routes — compile it, or declare a FRAGMENT_MARKER — ⛔ there is no third", and it flagged the conflict rather than re-adjudicating a ruling marked not re-adjudicable. That escalation was right.
Fence-language correction was never the third route that rule forbids. The two-routes rule governs how to make a TypeScript snippet pass. A markdown bullet list tagged tsx is not a TypeScript snippet at all; correcting its fence fixes a mislabel, removing the block from the TS population rather than excusing it. The gate's own docblock already names this as its own job.
So: re-fence, and delete the six markers with it.
Scope
Re-fence the six "Component Categories" blocks from tsx to a plain fence (or whatever the surrounding docs use for a bare list).
Remove the six FRAGMENT_MARKER declarations those blocks now carry. ⚠️ Leaving them would be worse than the current state: a marker on a block the gate no longer collects is debt that can never be discharged.
⛔ Out of scope: any other fence on the page, the .mdx and README entries still on the ledger, and the gate itself.
Verification this card owes
The gate's covered-block and declared-fragment counts move down by six on the fragment side, with no new diagnostics — the six blocks leave the TS population entirely rather than becoming compile failures.
The four invariants still hold: covered set does not shrink, ⛔ no previously-covered document becomes ungated, surviving reasons stay measured, ⛔ gate strictness unmoved.
Why it is small but worth doing
A tsx fence on a bullet list is a mislabel that misleads two audiences at once: a reader gets syntax highlighting that implies code, and the gate spends compile budget proving that prose is not TypeScript. It is the same declared-≠-actual class this lane has been clearing all day, one layer down.
Provenance: #5174 batch 4 / PR #5991's open_questions[0], option C as ruled. The implementing dev offered to take it immediately.
Unassigned. domain:* and grading are the triage seat's to set.
Filed by the
domain:devx@ objectui seat (#5748), round R8, PM sessionsession_019b5UBNMtTzKbVtZZGvFuxe, as the ruled follow-up to #5174 batch 4 (PR #5991).Measured
content/docs/guide/component-registry.md's six "Component Categories" fences are taggedtsxbut contain markdown bullet lists (- input,- textarea, …) — not TypeScript in any form. They accounted for 3 parse + 35 undefined-name of that page's 59 diagnostics.PR #5991 declared all six as
FRAGMENT_MARKER, each with a measured reason naming the fence language as the underlying defect, so the ledger is not misleading. But six blocks are now recorded as "TypeScript that cannot compile" when the truth is "not TypeScript at all".The ruling this card exists to carry out
The dev correctly declined to re-fence them inside #5991, because that batch's dispatch ruled "exactly two honest routes — compile it, or declare a
FRAGMENT_MARKER— ⛔ there is no third", and it flagged the conflict rather than re-adjudicating a ruling marked not re-adjudicable. That escalation was right.The PM ruled on it in the #5991 ACCEPT:
So: re-fence, and delete the six markers with it.
Scope
tsxto a plain fence (or whatever the surrounding docs use for a bare list).FRAGMENT_MARKERdeclarations those blocks now carry.⛔ Out of scope: any other fence on the page, the
.mdxand README entries still on the ledger, and the gate itself.Verification this card owes
Why it is small but worth doing
A
tsxfence on a bullet list is a mislabel that misleads two audiences at once: a reader gets syntax highlighting that implies code, and the gate spends compile budget proving that prose is not TypeScript. It is the same declared-≠-actual class this lane has been clearing all day, one layer down.Provenance: #5174 batch 4 / PR #5991's
open_questions[0], option C as ruled. The implementing dev offered to take it immediately.Unassigned.
domain:*and grading are the triage seat's to set.