Skip to content

[Decision] CarouselSchema.opts is declared as an OPEN record while the docs declare a two-key shape — narrowing it needs a census of authored embla option bags (deferred ruling carried out of #6150) #6952

Description

@os-sam

Filed unassigned by the domain:ui execution seat (PM session session_013hfmP9hoMd3dJwTh85J4yB) as the carrier for a deferred ruling, at the explicit condition of the contract review on PR #6945 / card #6150. ⛔ Recording, not choosing.

The divergence

#6150 / PR #6945 declared opts on CarouselSchema as an open record. The published docs declare a two-key shape:

facesays
content/docs/.../carousel.mdx:30-33the two-key shape
carousel.tsx:23 (the renderer)forwards the whole bag verbatim to embla
CarouselSchema.opts after #6150open record — any object accepted, non-object values refused

The renderer is the honest description of what works today: whatever an author puts in opts reaches embla. So the declared two-key shape is narrower than the behaviour, and the docs are the face that is wrong about the current system.

Why #6150 did not settle it, and was right not to

Quoted from the contract review:

Narrowing to the documented pair would refuse authored embla options that work today — a ruling needing a census of authored data; this card was right not to make it.

⇒ Choosing the documented pair is a behaviour narrowing with unknown blast radius. Nobody has counted how many authored carousel documents pass a third embla option, and until someone does, either choice is a guess:

  • Narrow to the documented pair ⇒ every authored bag carrying a third key starts being refused. Needs the census first.
  • Keep the open record and correct the docs ⇒ the declared surface honestly describes a pass-through, but the contract stops constraining anything inside opts, and embla's own option set becomes an undeclared dependency of the published schema.

⭐ The open record is not nothing: the review measured that it still refuses non-object values. So the current state is a real constraint, just a weak one — this is a question of how much further to go, not whether there is a gate.

What a claimant delivers first

A census, not a fix. Per reader/author document: which opts keys are actually authored, across examples/, content/docs/, catalog fixtures, and apps/. ⭐ State the pathspec bound of the census, not just the number — and carry a hot control, because a zero without a control is not a measurement.

That census makes the ruling decidable. Without it, this card stays a decision.

Explicitly NOT in this card

Provenance

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    domain:uiobjectui ui stream: fix lands on the published library or apps — objectui execution seatpm:queue

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
       blocks
      (function() {
      function addCopyButtons() {
      document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
      if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
      codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
      var btn = document.createElement('button');
      btn.textContent = 'Copy';
      btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
      btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
      btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
      btn.onclick = function() {
      navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
      btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
      setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
      });
      };
      codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
      codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
      });
      }
      addCopyButtons();
      // Re-run on dynamic content
      var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
      observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
      })();
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      [Decision] `CarouselSchema.opts` is declared as an OPEN record while the docs declare a two-key shape — narrowing it needs a census of authored embla option bags (deferred ruling carried out of #6150) · Issue #6952 · objectstack-ai/objectui · GitHub
      Skip to content

      [Decision] CarouselSchema.opts is declared as an OPEN record while the docs declare a two-key shape — narrowing it needs a census of authored embla option bags (deferred ruling carried out of #6150) #6952

      Description

      @os-sam

      Filed unassigned by the domain:ui execution seat (PM session session_013hfmP9hoMd3dJwTh85J4yB) as the carrier for a deferred ruling, at the explicit condition of the contract review on PR #6945 / card #6150. ⛔ Recording, not choosing.

      The divergence

      #6150 / PR #6945 declared opts on CarouselSchema as an open record. The published docs declare a two-key shape:

      facesays
      content/docs/.../carousel.mdx:30-33the two-key shape
      carousel.tsx:23 (the renderer)forwards the whole bag verbatim to embla
      CarouselSchema.opts after #6150open record — any object accepted, non-object values refused

      The renderer is the honest description of what works today: whatever an author puts in opts reaches embla. So the declared two-key shape is narrower than the behaviour, and the docs are the face that is wrong about the current system.

      Why #6150 did not settle it, and was right not to

      Quoted from the contract review:

      Narrowing to the documented pair would refuse authored embla options that work today — a ruling needing a census of authored data; this card was right not to make it.

      ⇒ Choosing the documented pair is a behaviour narrowing with unknown blast radius. Nobody has counted how many authored carousel documents pass a third embla option, and until someone does, either choice is a guess:

      • Narrow to the documented pair ⇒ every authored bag carrying a third key starts being refused. Needs the census first.
      • Keep the open record and correct the docs ⇒ the declared surface honestly describes a pass-through, but the contract stops constraining anything inside opts, and embla's own option set becomes an undeclared dependency of the published schema.

      ⭐ The open record is not nothing: the review measured that it still refuses non-object values. So the current state is a real constraint, just a weak one — this is a question of how much further to go, not whether there is a gate.

      What a claimant delivers first

      A census, not a fix. Per reader/author document: which opts keys are actually authored, across examples/, content/docs/, catalog fixtures, and apps/. ⭐ State the pathspec bound of the census, not just the number — and carry a hot control, because a zero without a control is not a measurement.

      That census makes the ruling decidable. Without it, this card stays a decision.

      Explicitly NOT in this card

      Provenance

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        domain:uiobjectui ui stream: fix lands on the published library or apps — objectui execution seatpm:queue

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [Decision] `CarouselSchema.opts` is declared as an OPEN record while the docs declare a two-key shape — narrowing it needs a census of authored embla option bags (deferred ruling carried out of #6150) · Issue #6952 · objectstack-ai/objectui · GitHub
          Skip to content

          [Decision] CarouselSchema.opts is declared as an OPEN record while the docs declare a two-key shape — narrowing it needs a census of authored embla option bags (deferred ruling carried out of #6150) #6952

          Description

          @os-sam

          Filed unassigned by the domain:ui execution seat (PM session session_013hfmP9hoMd3dJwTh85J4yB) as the carrier for a deferred ruling, at the explicit condition of the contract review on PR #6945 / card #6150. ⛔ Recording, not choosing.

          The divergence

          #6150 / PR #6945 declared opts on CarouselSchema as an open record. The published docs declare a two-key shape:

          facesays
          content/docs/.../carousel.mdx:30-33the two-key shape
          carousel.tsx:23 (the renderer)forwards the whole bag verbatim to embla
          CarouselSchema.opts after #6150open record — any object accepted, non-object values refused

          The renderer is the honest description of what works today: whatever an author puts in opts reaches embla. So the declared two-key shape is narrower than the behaviour, and the docs are the face that is wrong about the current system.

          Why #6150 did not settle it, and was right not to

          Quoted from the contract review:

          Narrowing to the documented pair would refuse authored embla options that work today — a ruling needing a census of authored data; this card was right not to make it.

          ⇒ Choosing the documented pair is a behaviour narrowing with unknown blast radius. Nobody has counted how many authored carousel documents pass a third embla option, and until someone does, either choice is a guess:

          • Narrow to the documented pair ⇒ every authored bag carrying a third key starts being refused. Needs the census first.
          • Keep the open record and correct the docs ⇒ the declared surface honestly describes a pass-through, but the contract stops constraining anything inside opts, and embla's own option set becomes an undeclared dependency of the published schema.

          ⭐ The open record is not nothing: the review measured that it still refuses non-object values. So the current state is a real constraint, just a weak one — this is a question of how much further to go, not whether there is a gate.

          What a claimant delivers first

          A census, not a fix. Per reader/author document: which opts keys are actually authored, across examples/, content/docs/, catalog fixtures, and apps/. ⭐ State the pathspec bound of the census, not just the number — and carry a hot control, because a zero without a control is not a measurement.

          That census makes the ruling decidable. Without it, this card stays a decision.

          Explicitly NOT in this card

          Provenance

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            domain:uiobjectui ui stream: fix lands on the published library or apps — objectui execution seatpm:queue

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [Decision] `CarouselSchema.opts` is declared as an OPEN record while the docs declare a two-key shape — narrowing it needs a census of authored embla option bags (deferred ruling carried out of #6150) · Issue #6952 · objectstack-ai/objectui · GitHub
              Skip to content

              [Decision] CarouselSchema.opts is declared as an OPEN record while the docs declare a two-key shape — narrowing it needs a census of authored embla option bags (deferred ruling carried out of #6150) #6952

              Description

              @os-sam

              Filed unassigned by the domain:ui execution seat (PM session session_013hfmP9hoMd3dJwTh85J4yB) as the carrier for a deferred ruling, at the explicit condition of the contract review on PR #6945 / card #6150. ⛔ Recording, not choosing.

              The divergence

              #6150 / PR #6945 declared opts on CarouselSchema as an open record. The published docs declare a two-key shape:

              facesays
              content/docs/.../carousel.mdx:30-33the two-key shape
              carousel.tsx:23 (the renderer)forwards the whole bag verbatim to embla
              CarouselSchema.opts after #6150open record — any object accepted, non-object values refused

              The renderer is the honest description of what works today: whatever an author puts in opts reaches embla. So the declared two-key shape is narrower than the behaviour, and the docs are the face that is wrong about the current system.

              Why #6150 did not settle it, and was right not to

              Quoted from the contract review:

              Narrowing to the documented pair would refuse authored embla options that work today — a ruling needing a census of authored data; this card was right not to make it.

              ⇒ Choosing the documented pair is a behaviour narrowing with unknown blast radius. Nobody has counted how many authored carousel documents pass a third embla option, and until someone does, either choice is a guess:

              • Narrow to the documented pair ⇒ every authored bag carrying a third key starts being refused. Needs the census first.
              • Keep the open record and correct the docs ⇒ the declared surface honestly describes a pass-through, but the contract stops constraining anything inside opts, and embla's own option set becomes an undeclared dependency of the published schema.

              ⭐ The open record is not nothing: the review measured that it still refuses non-object values. So the current state is a real constraint, just a weak one — this is a question of how much further to go, not whether there is a gate.

              What a claimant delivers first

              A census, not a fix. Per reader/author document: which opts keys are actually authored, across examples/, content/docs/, catalog fixtures, and apps/. ⭐ State the pathspec bound of the census, not just the number — and carry a hot control, because a zero without a control is not a measurement.

              That census makes the ruling decidable. Without it, this card stays a decision.

              Explicitly NOT in this card

              Provenance

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                domain:uiobjectui ui stream: fix lands on the published library or apps — objectui execution seatpm:queue

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' [Decision] `CarouselSchema.opts` is declared as an OPEN record while the docs declare a two-key shape — narrowing it needs a census of authored embla option bags (deferred ruling carried out of #6150) · Issue #6952 · objectstack-ai/objectui · GitHub
                  Skip to content

                  [Decision] CarouselSchema.opts is declared as an OPEN record while the docs declare a two-key shape — narrowing it needs a census of authored embla option bags (deferred ruling carried out of #6150) #6952

                  Description

                  @os-sam

                  Filed unassigned by the domain:ui execution seat (PM session session_013hfmP9hoMd3dJwTh85J4yB) as the carrier for a deferred ruling, at the explicit condition of the contract review on PR #6945 / card #6150. ⛔ Recording, not choosing.

                  The divergence

                  #6150 / PR #6945 declared opts on CarouselSchema as an open record. The published docs declare a two-key shape:

                  facesays
                  content/docs/.../carousel.mdx:30-33the two-key shape
                  carousel.tsx:23 (the renderer)forwards the whole bag verbatim to embla
                  CarouselSchema.opts after #6150open record — any object accepted, non-object values refused

                  The renderer is the honest description of what works today: whatever an author puts in opts reaches embla. So the declared two-key shape is narrower than the behaviour, and the docs are the face that is wrong about the current system.

                  Why #6150 did not settle it, and was right not to

                  Quoted from the contract review:

                  Narrowing to the documented pair would refuse authored embla options that work today — a ruling needing a census of authored data; this card was right not to make it.

                  ⇒ Choosing the documented pair is a behaviour narrowing with unknown blast radius. Nobody has counted how many authored carousel documents pass a third embla option, and until someone does, either choice is a guess:

                  • Narrow to the documented pair ⇒ every authored bag carrying a third key starts being refused. Needs the census first.
                  • Keep the open record and correct the docs ⇒ the declared surface honestly describes a pass-through, but the contract stops constraining anything inside opts, and embla's own option set becomes an undeclared dependency of the published schema.

                  ⭐ The open record is not nothing: the review measured that it still refuses non-object values. So the current state is a real constraint, just a weak one — this is a question of how much further to go, not whether there is a gate.

                  What a claimant delivers first

                  A census, not a fix. Per reader/author document: which opts keys are actually authored, across examples/, content/docs/, catalog fixtures, and apps/. ⭐ State the pathspec bound of the census, not just the number — and carry a hot control, because a zero without a control is not a measurement.

                  That census makes the ruling decidable. Without it, this card stays a decision.

                  Explicitly NOT in this card

                  Provenance

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Labels

                    domain:uiobjectui ui stream: fix lands on the published library or apps — objectui execution seatpm:queue

                    Type

                    No type

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [Decision] `CarouselSchema.opts` is declared as an OPEN record while the docs declare a two-key shape — narrowing it needs a census of authored embla option bags (deferred ruling carried out of #6150) · Issue #6952 · objectstack-ai/objectui · GitHub
                      Skip to content

                      [Decision] CarouselSchema.opts is declared as an OPEN record while the docs declare a two-key shape — narrowing it needs a census of authored embla option bags (deferred ruling carried out of #6150) #6952

                      Description

                      @os-sam

                      Filed unassigned by the domain:ui execution seat (PM session session_013hfmP9hoMd3dJwTh85J4yB) as the carrier for a deferred ruling, at the explicit condition of the contract review on PR #6945 / card #6150. ⛔ Recording, not choosing.

                      The divergence

                      #6150 / PR #6945 declared opts on CarouselSchema as an open record. The published docs declare a two-key shape:

                      facesays
                      content/docs/.../carousel.mdx:30-33the two-key shape
                      carousel.tsx:23 (the renderer)forwards the whole bag verbatim to embla
                      CarouselSchema.opts after #6150open record — any object accepted, non-object values refused

                      The renderer is the honest description of what works today: whatever an author puts in opts reaches embla. So the declared two-key shape is narrower than the behaviour, and the docs are the face that is wrong about the current system.

                      Why #6150 did not settle it, and was right not to

                      Quoted from the contract review:

                      Narrowing to the documented pair would refuse authored embla options that work today — a ruling needing a census of authored data; this card was right not to make it.

                      ⇒ Choosing the documented pair is a behaviour narrowing with unknown blast radius. Nobody has counted how many authored carousel documents pass a third embla option, and until someone does, either choice is a guess:

                      • Narrow to the documented pair ⇒ every authored bag carrying a third key starts being refused. Needs the census first.
                      • Keep the open record and correct the docs ⇒ the declared surface honestly describes a pass-through, but the contract stops constraining anything inside opts, and embla's own option set becomes an undeclared dependency of the published schema.

                      ⭐ The open record is not nothing: the review measured that it still refuses non-object values. So the current state is a real constraint, just a weak one — this is a question of how much further to go, not whether there is a gate.

                      What a claimant delivers first

                      A census, not a fix. Per reader/author document: which opts keys are actually authored, across examples/, content/docs/, catalog fixtures, and apps/. ⭐ State the pathspec bound of the census, not just the number — and carry a hot control, because a zero without a control is not a measurement.

                      That census makes the ruling decidable. Without it, this card stays a decision.

                      Explicitly NOT in this card

                      Provenance

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Labels

                        domain:uiobjectui ui stream: fix lands on the published library or apps — objectui execution seatpm:queue

                        Type

                        No type

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [Decision] `CarouselSchema.opts` is declared as an OPEN record while the docs declare a two-key shape — narrowing it needs a census of authored embla option bags (deferred ruling carried out of #6150) · Issue #6952 · objectstack-ai/objectui · GitHub
                          Skip to content

                          [Decision] CarouselSchema.opts is declared as an OPEN record while the docs declare a two-key shape — narrowing it needs a census of authored embla option bags (deferred ruling carried out of #6150) #6952

                          Description

                          @os-sam

                          Filed unassigned by the domain:ui execution seat (PM session session_013hfmP9hoMd3dJwTh85J4yB) as the carrier for a deferred ruling, at the explicit condition of the contract review on PR #6945 / card #6150. ⛔ Recording, not choosing.

                          The divergence

                          #6150 / PR #6945 declared opts on CarouselSchema as an open record. The published docs declare a two-key shape:

                          facesays
                          content/docs/.../carousel.mdx:30-33the two-key shape
                          carousel.tsx:23 (the renderer)forwards the whole bag verbatim to embla
                          CarouselSchema.opts after #6150open record — any object accepted, non-object values refused

                          The renderer is the honest description of what works today: whatever an author puts in opts reaches embla. So the declared two-key shape is narrower than the behaviour, and the docs are the face that is wrong about the current system.

                          Why #6150 did not settle it, and was right not to

                          Quoted from the contract review:

                          Narrowing to the documented pair would refuse authored embla options that work today — a ruling needing a census of authored data; this card was right not to make it.

                          ⇒ Choosing the documented pair is a behaviour narrowing with unknown blast radius. Nobody has counted how many authored carousel documents pass a third embla option, and until someone does, either choice is a guess:

                          • Narrow to the documented pair ⇒ every authored bag carrying a third key starts being refused. Needs the census first.
                          • Keep the open record and correct the docs ⇒ the declared surface honestly describes a pass-through, but the contract stops constraining anything inside opts, and embla's own option set becomes an undeclared dependency of the published schema.

                          ⭐ The open record is not nothing: the review measured that it still refuses non-object values. So the current state is a real constraint, just a weak one — this is a question of how much further to go, not whether there is a gate.

                          What a claimant delivers first

                          A census, not a fix. Per reader/author document: which opts keys are actually authored, across examples/, content/docs/, catalog fixtures, and apps/. ⭐ State the pathspec bound of the census, not just the number — and carry a hot control, because a zero without a control is not a measurement.

                          That census makes the ruling decidable. Without it, this card stays a decision.

                          Explicitly NOT in this card

                          Provenance

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Labels

                            domain:uiobjectui ui stream: fix lands on the published library or apps — objectui execution seatpm:queue

                            Type

                            No type

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); [Decision] `CarouselSchema.opts` is declared as an OPEN record while the docs declare a two-key shape — narrowing it needs a census of authored embla option bags (deferred ruling carried out of #6150) · Issue #6952 · objectstack-ai/objectui · GitHub
                              Skip to content

                              [Decision] CarouselSchema.opts is declared as an OPEN record while the docs declare a two-key shape — narrowing it needs a census of authored embla option bags (deferred ruling carried out of #6150) #6952

                              Description

                              @os-sam

                              Filed unassigned by the domain:ui execution seat (PM session session_013hfmP9hoMd3dJwTh85J4yB) as the carrier for a deferred ruling, at the explicit condition of the contract review on PR #6945 / card #6150. ⛔ Recording, not choosing.

                              The divergence

                              #6150 / PR #6945 declared opts on CarouselSchema as an open record. The published docs declare a two-key shape:

                              facesays
                              content/docs/.../carousel.mdx:30-33the two-key shape
                              carousel.tsx:23 (the renderer)forwards the whole bag verbatim to embla
                              CarouselSchema.opts after #6150open record — any object accepted, non-object values refused

                              The renderer is the honest description of what works today: whatever an author puts in opts reaches embla. So the declared two-key shape is narrower than the behaviour, and the docs are the face that is wrong about the current system.

                              Why #6150 did not settle it, and was right not to

                              Quoted from the contract review:

                              Narrowing to the documented pair would refuse authored embla options that work today — a ruling needing a census of authored data; this card was right not to make it.

                              ⇒ Choosing the documented pair is a behaviour narrowing with unknown blast radius. Nobody has counted how many authored carousel documents pass a third embla option, and until someone does, either choice is a guess:

                              • Narrow to the documented pair ⇒ every authored bag carrying a third key starts being refused. Needs the census first.
                              • Keep the open record and correct the docs ⇒ the declared surface honestly describes a pass-through, but the contract stops constraining anything inside opts, and embla's own option set becomes an undeclared dependency of the published schema.

                              ⭐ The open record is not nothing: the review measured that it still refuses non-object values. So the current state is a real constraint, just a weak one — this is a question of how much further to go, not whether there is a gate.

                              What a claimant delivers first

                              A census, not a fix. Per reader/author document: which opts keys are actually authored, across examples/, content/docs/, catalog fixtures, and apps/. ⭐ State the pathspec bound of the census, not just the number — and carry a hot control, because a zero without a control is not a measurement.

                              That census makes the ruling decidable. Without it, this card stays a decision.

                              Explicitly NOT in this card

                              Provenance

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Labels

                                domain:uiobjectui ui stream: fix lands on the published library or apps — objectui execution seatpm:queue

                                Type

                                No type

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions