[finding] ObjectFormSection still declares className / gridClassName after objectstack#13626 retired every authored-metadata read of them #7200

Description

@os-support-ai

Observation only, filed unassigned and not queued — surfaced while implementing the objectstack#13626 ruling (PR #7198). Not graded here.

The shape

objectstack#13626 (maintainer ruling 2026-09-01, director decision batch C: retire the reads) removed all seven as any reads of className / gridClassName off the form-view section family, on the grounds that @objectstack/spec deliberately does not declare either key on the form-view/section authorable surface.

ObjectFormSection in @object-ui/types (packages/types/src/objectql.ts) still declares both keys, with doc comments describing an effect they no longer have:

/** * Custom CSS class for the section's wrapper (Card, when the form variant * renders sections as cards; the divider header, for the flat/simple path). */
className?: string;/** * Custom CSS class for the section's field grid. Only used by form variants * that render sections as Card chrome (Modal/Split/Tabbed/Wizard). */
gridClassName?: string;

ObjectFormSchema.sections is typed ObjectFormSection[], so this is the type an author's section metadata is checked against. After #7198 an author can write either key, have it type-check, read a doc comment promising a wrapper class — and get nothing.

That is the mirror image of the original finding rather than its resolution: objectstack#13626 was "not declared on one side, consumed on the other"; what remains is "declared on one side, consumed nowhere" — the declared-but-inert shape of the enforce-or-remove class.

Why it was left alone in #7198

Deliberately out of scope, not overlooked:

  • The ruling's action was specifically the cast reads. Removing two members from a published type in @object-ui/types is a different action against a different surface, and the maintainer weighed three routes (retire the reads / declare the keys / write the status quo down) — not this fourth one.
  • The declarations are not fully dead. The per-layout section types (ModalFormSectionConfig, TabbedForm's FormSectionConfig, SplitFormSectionConfig, DrawerFormSectionConfig, WizardStepConfig) declare their own copies and their components still consume them — ModalForm.tsx:668, TabbedForm.tsx:469, SplitForm.tsx:414, WizardForm.tsx:1025 — for programmatic React mounts, which the authorable boundary does not govern. Only the ObjectFormSection (authored-metadata) declaration is now inert.

Why it is worth recording

The live consequence is small but real, and it is the exact hazard that makes the #7198 pin behavioural rather than a source grep:

Because the keys are still declared, restoring consumption needs no cast. A later "cleanup" writing a plain className: s.className type-checks and silently puts the retired read back. packages/plugin-form/src/__tests__/sectionStyleKeysRetired-13626.test.tsx is what catches that; the type system will not.

The question, not answered here

Should ObjectFormSection drop the two members (making the authored-metadata type agree with the authorable boundary, at the cost of a breaking type change to @object-ui/types and a doc pass over the per-layout section types), or keep them with doc comments corrected to say they are inert for authored metadata and honoured only on direct programmatic mounts?

Refs: objectstack#13626 (the ruling) · #7198 (the implementation) · packages/types/src/objectql.ts · packages/plugin-form/README.md "Section styling is not authorable"

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

domain:specobjectui spec stream: fix lands on packages/types, schema corpus or spec pin coupling — spec lanepackage: types

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
     blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
    }
    } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
    })();
    (function(){
    try {
    var __m = "github.com";
    var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
    
    Skip to content

    [finding] ObjectFormSection still declares className / gridClassName after objectstack#13626 retired every authored-metadata read of them #7200

    Description

    @os-support-ai

    Observation only, filed unassigned and not queued — surfaced while implementing the objectstack#13626 ruling (PR #7198). Not graded here.

    The shape

    objectstack#13626 (maintainer ruling 2026-09-01, director decision batch C: retire the reads) removed all seven as any reads of className / gridClassName off the form-view section family, on the grounds that @objectstack/spec deliberately does not declare either key on the form-view/section authorable surface.

    ObjectFormSection in @object-ui/types (packages/types/src/objectql.ts) still declares both keys, with doc comments describing an effect they no longer have:

    /** * Custom CSS class for the section's wrapper (Card, when the form variant * renders sections as cards; the divider header, for the flat/simple path). */
    className?: string;/** * Custom CSS class for the section's field grid. Only used by form variants * that render sections as Card chrome (Modal/Split/Tabbed/Wizard). */
    gridClassName?: string;

    ObjectFormSchema.sections is typed ObjectFormSection[], so this is the type an author's section metadata is checked against. After #7198 an author can write either key, have it type-check, read a doc comment promising a wrapper class — and get nothing.

    That is the mirror image of the original finding rather than its resolution: objectstack#13626 was "not declared on one side, consumed on the other"; what remains is "declared on one side, consumed nowhere" — the declared-but-inert shape of the enforce-or-remove class.

    Why it was left alone in #7198

    Deliberately out of scope, not overlooked:

    • The ruling's action was specifically the cast reads. Removing two members from a published type in @object-ui/types is a different action against a different surface, and the maintainer weighed three routes (retire the reads / declare the keys / write the status quo down) — not this fourth one.
    • The declarations are not fully dead. The per-layout section types (ModalFormSectionConfig, TabbedForm's FormSectionConfig, SplitFormSectionConfig, DrawerFormSectionConfig, WizardStepConfig) declare their own copies and their components still consume them — ModalForm.tsx:668, TabbedForm.tsx:469, SplitForm.tsx:414, WizardForm.tsx:1025 — for programmatic React mounts, which the authorable boundary does not govern. Only the ObjectFormSection (authored-metadata) declaration is now inert.

    Why it is worth recording

    The live consequence is small but real, and it is the exact hazard that makes the #7198 pin behavioural rather than a source grep:

    Because the keys are still declared, restoring consumption needs no cast. A later "cleanup" writing a plain className: s.className type-checks and silently puts the retired read back. packages/plugin-form/src/__tests__/sectionStyleKeysRetired-13626.test.tsx is what catches that; the type system will not.

    The question, not answered here

    Should ObjectFormSection drop the two members (making the authored-metadata type agree with the authorable boundary, at the cost of a breaking type change to @object-ui/types and a doc pass over the per-layout section types), or keep them with doc comments corrected to say they are inert for authored metadata and honoured only on direct programmatic mounts?

    Refs: objectstack#13626 (the ruling) · #7198 (the implementation) · packages/types/src/objectql.ts · packages/plugin-form/README.md "Section styling is not authorable"

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    Labels

    domain:specobjectui spec stream: fix lands on packages/types, schema corpus or spec pin coupling — spec lanepackage: types

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
      Skip to content

      [finding] ObjectFormSection still declares className / gridClassName after objectstack#13626 retired every authored-metadata read of them #7200

      Description

      @os-support-ai

      Observation only, filed unassigned and not queued — surfaced while implementing the objectstack#13626 ruling (PR #7198). Not graded here.

      The shape

      objectstack#13626 (maintainer ruling 2026-09-01, director decision batch C: retire the reads) removed all seven as any reads of className / gridClassName off the form-view section family, on the grounds that @objectstack/spec deliberately does not declare either key on the form-view/section authorable surface.

      ObjectFormSection in @object-ui/types (packages/types/src/objectql.ts) still declares both keys, with doc comments describing an effect they no longer have:

      /** * Custom CSS class for the section's wrapper (Card, when the form variant * renders sections as cards; the divider header, for the flat/simple path). */
      className?: string;/** * Custom CSS class for the section's field grid. Only used by form variants * that render sections as Card chrome (Modal/Split/Tabbed/Wizard). */
      gridClassName?: string;

      ObjectFormSchema.sections is typed ObjectFormSection[], so this is the type an author's section metadata is checked against. After #7198 an author can write either key, have it type-check, read a doc comment promising a wrapper class — and get nothing.

      That is the mirror image of the original finding rather than its resolution: objectstack#13626 was "not declared on one side, consumed on the other"; what remains is "declared on one side, consumed nowhere" — the declared-but-inert shape of the enforce-or-remove class.

      Why it was left alone in #7198

      Deliberately out of scope, not overlooked:

      • The ruling's action was specifically the cast reads. Removing two members from a published type in @object-ui/types is a different action against a different surface, and the maintainer weighed three routes (retire the reads / declare the keys / write the status quo down) — not this fourth one.
      • The declarations are not fully dead. The per-layout section types (ModalFormSectionConfig, TabbedForm's FormSectionConfig, SplitFormSectionConfig, DrawerFormSectionConfig, WizardStepConfig) declare their own copies and their components still consume them — ModalForm.tsx:668, TabbedForm.tsx:469, SplitForm.tsx:414, WizardForm.tsx:1025 — for programmatic React mounts, which the authorable boundary does not govern. Only the ObjectFormSection (authored-metadata) declaration is now inert.

      Why it is worth recording

      The live consequence is small but real, and it is the exact hazard that makes the #7198 pin behavioural rather than a source grep:

      Because the keys are still declared, restoring consumption needs no cast. A later "cleanup" writing a plain className: s.className type-checks and silently puts the retired read back. packages/plugin-form/src/__tests__/sectionStyleKeysRetired-13626.test.tsx is what catches that; the type system will not.

      The question, not answered here

      Should ObjectFormSection drop the two members (making the authored-metadata type agree with the authorable boundary, at the cost of a breaking type change to @object-ui/types and a doc pass over the per-layout section types), or keep them with doc comments corrected to say they are inert for authored metadata and honoured only on direct programmatic mounts?

      Refs: objectstack#13626 (the ruling) · #7198 (the implementation) · packages/types/src/objectql.ts · packages/plugin-form/README.md "Section styling is not authorable"

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      Labels

      domain:specobjectui spec stream: fix lands on packages/types, schema corpus or spec pin coupling — spec lanepackage: types

      Type

      No type

      Projects

      No projects

        Milestone

        No milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions

        , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
        Skip to content

        [finding] ObjectFormSection still declares className / gridClassName after objectstack#13626 retired every authored-metadata read of them #7200

        Description

        @os-support-ai

        Observation only, filed unassigned and not queued — surfaced while implementing the objectstack#13626 ruling (PR #7198). Not graded here.

        The shape

        objectstack#13626 (maintainer ruling 2026-09-01, director decision batch C: retire the reads) removed all seven as any reads of className / gridClassName off the form-view section family, on the grounds that @objectstack/spec deliberately does not declare either key on the form-view/section authorable surface.

        ObjectFormSection in @object-ui/types (packages/types/src/objectql.ts) still declares both keys, with doc comments describing an effect they no longer have:

        /** * Custom CSS class for the section's wrapper (Card, when the form variant * renders sections as cards; the divider header, for the flat/simple path). */
        className?: string;/** * Custom CSS class for the section's field grid. Only used by form variants * that render sections as Card chrome (Modal/Split/Tabbed/Wizard). */
        gridClassName?: string;

        ObjectFormSchema.sections is typed ObjectFormSection[], so this is the type an author's section metadata is checked against. After #7198 an author can write either key, have it type-check, read a doc comment promising a wrapper class — and get nothing.

        That is the mirror image of the original finding rather than its resolution: objectstack#13626 was "not declared on one side, consumed on the other"; what remains is "declared on one side, consumed nowhere" — the declared-but-inert shape of the enforce-or-remove class.

        Why it was left alone in #7198

        Deliberately out of scope, not overlooked:

        • The ruling's action was specifically the cast reads. Removing two members from a published type in @object-ui/types is a different action against a different surface, and the maintainer weighed three routes (retire the reads / declare the keys / write the status quo down) — not this fourth one.
        • The declarations are not fully dead. The per-layout section types (ModalFormSectionConfig, TabbedForm's FormSectionConfig, SplitFormSectionConfig, DrawerFormSectionConfig, WizardStepConfig) declare their own copies and their components still consume them — ModalForm.tsx:668, TabbedForm.tsx:469, SplitForm.tsx:414, WizardForm.tsx:1025 — for programmatic React mounts, which the authorable boundary does not govern. Only the ObjectFormSection (authored-metadata) declaration is now inert.

        Why it is worth recording

        The live consequence is small but real, and it is the exact hazard that makes the #7198 pin behavioural rather than a source grep:

        Because the keys are still declared, restoring consumption needs no cast. A later "cleanup" writing a plain className: s.className type-checks and silently puts the retired read back. packages/plugin-form/src/__tests__/sectionStyleKeysRetired-13626.test.tsx is what catches that; the type system will not.

        The question, not answered here

        Should ObjectFormSection drop the two members (making the authored-metadata type agree with the authorable boundary, at the cost of a breaking type change to @object-ui/types and a doc pass over the per-layout section types), or keep them with doc comments corrected to say they are inert for authored metadata and honoured only on direct programmatic mounts?

        Refs: objectstack#13626 (the ruling) · #7198 (the implementation) · packages/types/src/objectql.ts · packages/plugin-form/README.md "Section styling is not authorable"

        Metadata

        Metadata

        Assignees

        Labels

        domain:specobjectui spec stream: fix lands on packages/types, schema corpus or spec pin coupling — spec lanepackage: types

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
          Skip to content

          [finding] ObjectFormSection still declares className / gridClassName after objectstack#13626 retired every authored-metadata read of them #7200

          Description

          @os-support-ai

          Observation only, filed unassigned and not queued — surfaced while implementing the objectstack#13626 ruling (PR #7198). Not graded here.

          The shape

          objectstack#13626 (maintainer ruling 2026-09-01, director decision batch C: retire the reads) removed all seven as any reads of className / gridClassName off the form-view section family, on the grounds that @objectstack/spec deliberately does not declare either key on the form-view/section authorable surface.

          ObjectFormSection in @object-ui/types (packages/types/src/objectql.ts) still declares both keys, with doc comments describing an effect they no longer have:

          /** * Custom CSS class for the section's wrapper (Card, when the form variant * renders sections as cards; the divider header, for the flat/simple path). */
          className?: string;/** * Custom CSS class for the section's field grid. Only used by form variants * that render sections as Card chrome (Modal/Split/Tabbed/Wizard). */
          gridClassName?: string;

          ObjectFormSchema.sections is typed ObjectFormSection[], so this is the type an author's section metadata is checked against. After #7198 an author can write either key, have it type-check, read a doc comment promising a wrapper class — and get nothing.

          That is the mirror image of the original finding rather than its resolution: objectstack#13626 was "not declared on one side, consumed on the other"; what remains is "declared on one side, consumed nowhere" — the declared-but-inert shape of the enforce-or-remove class.

          Why it was left alone in #7198

          Deliberately out of scope, not overlooked:

          • The ruling's action was specifically the cast reads. Removing two members from a published type in @object-ui/types is a different action against a different surface, and the maintainer weighed three routes (retire the reads / declare the keys / write the status quo down) — not this fourth one.
          • The declarations are not fully dead. The per-layout section types (ModalFormSectionConfig, TabbedForm's FormSectionConfig, SplitFormSectionConfig, DrawerFormSectionConfig, WizardStepConfig) declare their own copies and their components still consume them — ModalForm.tsx:668, TabbedForm.tsx:469, SplitForm.tsx:414, WizardForm.tsx:1025 — for programmatic React mounts, which the authorable boundary does not govern. Only the ObjectFormSection (authored-metadata) declaration is now inert.

          Why it is worth recording

          The live consequence is small but real, and it is the exact hazard that makes the #7198 pin behavioural rather than a source grep:

          Because the keys are still declared, restoring consumption needs no cast. A later "cleanup" writing a plain className: s.className type-checks and silently puts the retired read back. packages/plugin-form/src/__tests__/sectionStyleKeysRetired-13626.test.tsx is what catches that; the type system will not.

          The question, not answered here

          Should ObjectFormSection drop the two members (making the authored-metadata type agree with the authorable boundary, at the cost of a breaking type change to @object-ui/types and a doc pass over the per-layout section types), or keep them with doc comments corrected to say they are inert for authored metadata and honoured only on direct programmatic mounts?

          Refs: objectstack#13626 (the ruling) · #7198 (the implementation) · packages/types/src/objectql.ts · packages/plugin-form/README.md "Section styling is not authorable"

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          Labels

          domain:specobjectui spec stream: fix lands on packages/types, schema corpus or spec pin coupling — spec lanepackage: types

          Type

          No type

          Projects

          No projects

            Milestone

            No milestone

            Relationships

            None yet

            Development

            No branches or pull requests

            Issue actions

            , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
            Skip to content

            [finding] ObjectFormSection still declares className / gridClassName after objectstack#13626 retired every authored-metadata read of them #7200

            Description

            @os-support-ai

            Observation only, filed unassigned and not queued — surfaced while implementing the objectstack#13626 ruling (PR #7198). Not graded here.

            The shape

            objectstack#13626 (maintainer ruling 2026-09-01, director decision batch C: retire the reads) removed all seven as any reads of className / gridClassName off the form-view section family, on the grounds that @objectstack/spec deliberately does not declare either key on the form-view/section authorable surface.

            ObjectFormSection in @object-ui/types (packages/types/src/objectql.ts) still declares both keys, with doc comments describing an effect they no longer have:

            /** * Custom CSS class for the section's wrapper (Card, when the form variant * renders sections as cards; the divider header, for the flat/simple path). */
            className?: string;/** * Custom CSS class for the section's field grid. Only used by form variants * that render sections as Card chrome (Modal/Split/Tabbed/Wizard). */
            gridClassName?: string;

            ObjectFormSchema.sections is typed ObjectFormSection[], so this is the type an author's section metadata is checked against. After #7198 an author can write either key, have it type-check, read a doc comment promising a wrapper class — and get nothing.

            That is the mirror image of the original finding rather than its resolution: objectstack#13626 was "not declared on one side, consumed on the other"; what remains is "declared on one side, consumed nowhere" — the declared-but-inert shape of the enforce-or-remove class.

            Why it was left alone in #7198

            Deliberately out of scope, not overlooked:

            • The ruling's action was specifically the cast reads. Removing two members from a published type in @object-ui/types is a different action against a different surface, and the maintainer weighed three routes (retire the reads / declare the keys / write the status quo down) — not this fourth one.
            • The declarations are not fully dead. The per-layout section types (ModalFormSectionConfig, TabbedForm's FormSectionConfig, SplitFormSectionConfig, DrawerFormSectionConfig, WizardStepConfig) declare their own copies and their components still consume them — ModalForm.tsx:668, TabbedForm.tsx:469, SplitForm.tsx:414, WizardForm.tsx:1025 — for programmatic React mounts, which the authorable boundary does not govern. Only the ObjectFormSection (authored-metadata) declaration is now inert.

            Why it is worth recording

            The live consequence is small but real, and it is the exact hazard that makes the #7198 pin behavioural rather than a source grep:

            Because the keys are still declared, restoring consumption needs no cast. A later "cleanup" writing a plain className: s.className type-checks and silently puts the retired read back. packages/plugin-form/src/__tests__/sectionStyleKeysRetired-13626.test.tsx is what catches that; the type system will not.

            The question, not answered here

            Should ObjectFormSection drop the two members (making the authored-metadata type agree with the authorable boundary, at the cost of a breaking type change to @object-ui/types and a doc pass over the per-layout section types), or keep them with doc comments corrected to say they are inert for authored metadata and honoured only on direct programmatic mounts?

            Refs: objectstack#13626 (the ruling) · #7198 (the implementation) · packages/types/src/objectql.ts · packages/plugin-form/README.md "Section styling is not authorable"

            Metadata

            Metadata

            Assignees

            Labels

            domain:specobjectui spec stream: fix lands on packages/types, schema corpus or spec pin coupling — spec lanepackage: types

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              [finding] ObjectFormSection still declares className / gridClassName after objectstack#13626 retired every authored-metadata read of them #7200

              Description

              @os-support-ai

              Observation only, filed unassigned and not queued — surfaced while implementing the objectstack#13626 ruling (PR #7198). Not graded here.

              The shape

              objectstack#13626 (maintainer ruling 2026-09-01, director decision batch C: retire the reads) removed all seven as any reads of className / gridClassName off the form-view section family, on the grounds that @objectstack/spec deliberately does not declare either key on the form-view/section authorable surface.

              ObjectFormSection in @object-ui/types (packages/types/src/objectql.ts) still declares both keys, with doc comments describing an effect they no longer have:

              /** * Custom CSS class for the section's wrapper (Card, when the form variant * renders sections as cards; the divider header, for the flat/simple path). */
              className?: string;/** * Custom CSS class for the section's field grid. Only used by form variants * that render sections as Card chrome (Modal/Split/Tabbed/Wizard). */
              gridClassName?: string;

              ObjectFormSchema.sections is typed ObjectFormSection[], so this is the type an author's section metadata is checked against. After #7198 an author can write either key, have it type-check, read a doc comment promising a wrapper class — and get nothing.

              That is the mirror image of the original finding rather than its resolution: objectstack#13626 was "not declared on one side, consumed on the other"; what remains is "declared on one side, consumed nowhere" — the declared-but-inert shape of the enforce-or-remove class.

              Why it was left alone in #7198

              Deliberately out of scope, not overlooked:

              • The ruling's action was specifically the cast reads. Removing two members from a published type in @object-ui/types is a different action against a different surface, and the maintainer weighed three routes (retire the reads / declare the keys / write the status quo down) — not this fourth one.
              • The declarations are not fully dead. The per-layout section types (ModalFormSectionConfig, TabbedForm's FormSectionConfig, SplitFormSectionConfig, DrawerFormSectionConfig, WizardStepConfig) declare their own copies and their components still consume them — ModalForm.tsx:668, TabbedForm.tsx:469, SplitForm.tsx:414, WizardForm.tsx:1025 — for programmatic React mounts, which the authorable boundary does not govern. Only the ObjectFormSection (authored-metadata) declaration is now inert.

              Why it is worth recording

              The live consequence is small but real, and it is the exact hazard that makes the #7198 pin behavioural rather than a source grep:

              Because the keys are still declared, restoring consumption needs no cast. A later "cleanup" writing a plain className: s.className type-checks and silently puts the retired read back. packages/plugin-form/src/__tests__/sectionStyleKeysRetired-13626.test.tsx is what catches that; the type system will not.

              The question, not answered here

              Should ObjectFormSection drop the two members (making the authored-metadata type agree with the authorable boundary, at the cost of a breaking type change to @object-ui/types and a doc pass over the per-layout section types), or keep them with doc comments corrected to say they are inert for authored metadata and honoured only on direct programmatic mounts?

              Refs: objectstack#13626 (the ruling) · #7198 (the implementation) · packages/types/src/objectql.ts · packages/plugin-form/README.md "Section styling is not authorable"

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              Labels

              domain:specobjectui spec stream: fix lands on packages/types, schema corpus or spec pin coupling — spec lanepackage: types

              Type

              No type

              Projects

              No projects

                Milestone

                No milestone

                Relationships

                None yet

                Development

                No branches or pull requests

                Issue actions

                , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                Skip to content

                [finding] ObjectFormSection still declares className / gridClassName after objectstack#13626 retired every authored-metadata read of them #7200

                Description

                @os-support-ai

                Observation only, filed unassigned and not queued — surfaced while implementing the objectstack#13626 ruling (PR #7198). Not graded here.

                The shape

                objectstack#13626 (maintainer ruling 2026-09-01, director decision batch C: retire the reads) removed all seven as any reads of className / gridClassName off the form-view section family, on the grounds that @objectstack/spec deliberately does not declare either key on the form-view/section authorable surface.

                ObjectFormSection in @object-ui/types (packages/types/src/objectql.ts) still declares both keys, with doc comments describing an effect they no longer have:

                /** * Custom CSS class for the section's wrapper (Card, when the form variant * renders sections as cards; the divider header, for the flat/simple path). */
                className?: string;/** * Custom CSS class for the section's field grid. Only used by form variants * that render sections as Card chrome (Modal/Split/Tabbed/Wizard). */
                gridClassName?: string;

                ObjectFormSchema.sections is typed ObjectFormSection[], so this is the type an author's section metadata is checked against. After #7198 an author can write either key, have it type-check, read a doc comment promising a wrapper class — and get nothing.

                That is the mirror image of the original finding rather than its resolution: objectstack#13626 was "not declared on one side, consumed on the other"; what remains is "declared on one side, consumed nowhere" — the declared-but-inert shape of the enforce-or-remove class.

                Why it was left alone in #7198

                Deliberately out of scope, not overlooked:

                • The ruling's action was specifically the cast reads. Removing two members from a published type in @object-ui/types is a different action against a different surface, and the maintainer weighed three routes (retire the reads / declare the keys / write the status quo down) — not this fourth one.
                • The declarations are not fully dead. The per-layout section types (ModalFormSectionConfig, TabbedForm's FormSectionConfig, SplitFormSectionConfig, DrawerFormSectionConfig, WizardStepConfig) declare their own copies and their components still consume them — ModalForm.tsx:668, TabbedForm.tsx:469, SplitForm.tsx:414, WizardForm.tsx:1025 — for programmatic React mounts, which the authorable boundary does not govern. Only the ObjectFormSection (authored-metadata) declaration is now inert.

                Why it is worth recording

                The live consequence is small but real, and it is the exact hazard that makes the #7198 pin behavioural rather than a source grep:

                Because the keys are still declared, restoring consumption needs no cast. A later "cleanup" writing a plain className: s.className type-checks and silently puts the retired read back. packages/plugin-form/src/__tests__/sectionStyleKeysRetired-13626.test.tsx is what catches that; the type system will not.

                The question, not answered here

                Should ObjectFormSection drop the two members (making the authored-metadata type agree with the authorable boundary, at the cost of a breaking type change to @object-ui/types and a doc pass over the per-layout section types), or keep them with doc comments corrected to say they are inert for authored metadata and honoured only on direct programmatic mounts?

                Refs: objectstack#13626 (the ruling) · #7198 (the implementation) · packages/types/src/objectql.ts · packages/plugin-form/README.md "Section styling is not authorable"

                Metadata

                Metadata

                Assignees

                Labels

                domain:specobjectui spec stream: fix lands on packages/types, schema corpus or spec pin coupling — spec lanepackage: types

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions