ListView's speculative view-binding fields (kanban / gantt / timeline / calendar / gallery) reach $select without an FLS check #7216

Description

@os-warren

Filed by the domain:ui execution seat (session session_012wwHa4aaFybxXrfmfHioDM) from a surfacing during objectui#7179's implementation. Filed unassigned.

The claim

In packages/plugin-list/src/ListView.tsx, the view-binding fields routed through addSpeculative — the kanban, gantt, timeline, calendar and gallery field bindings — are checked against the known-object-fields set but never against perms.checkField.

So a field the current principal is denied on read can still reach $select, provided the object declares it. The known-field gate and the FLS gate answer different questions, and only the first one is being asked on this path.

The asymmetry, precisely

Within the same builder:

field sourceknown-field gateFLS gate
schema.columnscheckField
grouping fields (added by objectui#7179)
view bindings via addSpeculative

objectui#7179 did not create this gap and does not widen it — the grouping fields it added are FLS-gated explicitly. It made the asymmetry legible by gating the thing it added and leaving its neighbour visibly ungated. Worth closing deliberately rather than as a rider on an unrelated card, which is why it is filed rather than fixed in place.

Why the known-field gate does not cover it

The two gates exist for unrelated failures, and neither substitutes for the other:

  • Known-field gate — protects against an unknown key, because some backends answer an unknown $select key with an empty result set rather than ignoring it (the cloud multi-tenant runtime does exactly that), which silently zeroes the whole list.
  • FLS gate — protects against a known but denied key, per objectui#6898: sending it leaks the value at the server boundary even though the UI hides it.

A field can be perfectly well-declared and still denied. That is the case this path does not handle.

Suggested direction

Apply checkField to the speculative bindings, using the ordering objectui#7179 established for the grouping fields: intersect against the declared fields first, then ask checkField only about survivors. That ordering matters — checkField answers false for an undeclared key, so asking it first would drop derived and computed columns that are not real object fields.

The grouping-field guard added in #7179 is the working reference for the shape.

Provenance, stated honestly

This is the implementing lane's reading, relayed by the PM. I have not independently reproduced it. Filed as a finding to verify, not a confirmed defect. The first task for whoever takes it is a failing test; packages/plugin-grid/src/__tests__/projectionFls-6898.test.tsx pins the equivalent $select behaviour and is the model to copy.

Related: objectui#6898 (the original $select FLS card, closed) · objectui#7179 (where this surfaced; its grouping guard is the reference shape) · the $expand FLS gap, filed separately as #7215.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

domain:uiobjectui ui stream: fix lands on the published library or apps — objectui execution seatpriority:p2

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
     blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
    }
    } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
    })();
    (function(){
    try {
    var __m = "github.com";
    var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
    
    Skip to content

    ListView's speculative view-binding fields (kanban / gantt / timeline / calendar / gallery) reach $select without an FLS check #7216

    Description

    @os-warren

    Filed by the domain:ui execution seat (session session_012wwHa4aaFybxXrfmfHioDM) from a surfacing during objectui#7179's implementation. Filed unassigned.

    The claim

    In packages/plugin-list/src/ListView.tsx, the view-binding fields routed through addSpeculative — the kanban, gantt, timeline, calendar and gallery field bindings — are checked against the known-object-fields set but never against perms.checkField.

    So a field the current principal is denied on read can still reach $select, provided the object declares it. The known-field gate and the FLS gate answer different questions, and only the first one is being asked on this path.

    The asymmetry, precisely

    Within the same builder:

    field sourceknown-field gateFLS gate
    schema.columnscheckField
    grouping fields (added by objectui#7179)
    view bindings via addSpeculative

    objectui#7179 did not create this gap and does not widen it — the grouping fields it added are FLS-gated explicitly. It made the asymmetry legible by gating the thing it added and leaving its neighbour visibly ungated. Worth closing deliberately rather than as a rider on an unrelated card, which is why it is filed rather than fixed in place.

    Why the known-field gate does not cover it

    The two gates exist for unrelated failures, and neither substitutes for the other:

    • Known-field gate — protects against an unknown key, because some backends answer an unknown $select key with an empty result set rather than ignoring it (the cloud multi-tenant runtime does exactly that), which silently zeroes the whole list.
    • FLS gate — protects against a known but denied key, per objectui#6898: sending it leaks the value at the server boundary even though the UI hides it.

    A field can be perfectly well-declared and still denied. That is the case this path does not handle.

    Suggested direction

    Apply checkField to the speculative bindings, using the ordering objectui#7179 established for the grouping fields: intersect against the declared fields first, then ask checkField only about survivors. That ordering matters — checkField answers false for an undeclared key, so asking it first would drop derived and computed columns that are not real object fields.

    The grouping-field guard added in #7179 is the working reference for the shape.

    Provenance, stated honestly

    This is the implementing lane's reading, relayed by the PM. I have not independently reproduced it. Filed as a finding to verify, not a confirmed defect. The first task for whoever takes it is a failing test; packages/plugin-grid/src/__tests__/projectionFls-6898.test.tsx pins the equivalent $select behaviour and is the model to copy.

    Related: objectui#6898 (the original $select FLS card, closed) · objectui#7179 (where this surfaced; its grouping guard is the reference shape) · the $expand FLS gap, filed separately as #7215.

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    Labels

    domain:uiobjectui ui stream: fix lands on the published library or apps — objectui execution seatpriority:p2

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
      Skip to content

      ListView's speculative view-binding fields (kanban / gantt / timeline / calendar / gallery) reach $select without an FLS check #7216

      Description

      @os-warren

      Filed by the domain:ui execution seat (session session_012wwHa4aaFybxXrfmfHioDM) from a surfacing during objectui#7179's implementation. Filed unassigned.

      The claim

      In packages/plugin-list/src/ListView.tsx, the view-binding fields routed through addSpeculative — the kanban, gantt, timeline, calendar and gallery field bindings — are checked against the known-object-fields set but never against perms.checkField.

      So a field the current principal is denied on read can still reach $select, provided the object declares it. The known-field gate and the FLS gate answer different questions, and only the first one is being asked on this path.

      The asymmetry, precisely

      Within the same builder:

      field sourceknown-field gateFLS gate
      schema.columnscheckField
      grouping fields (added by objectui#7179)
      view bindings via addSpeculative

      objectui#7179 did not create this gap and does not widen it — the grouping fields it added are FLS-gated explicitly. It made the asymmetry legible by gating the thing it added and leaving its neighbour visibly ungated. Worth closing deliberately rather than as a rider on an unrelated card, which is why it is filed rather than fixed in place.

      Why the known-field gate does not cover it

      The two gates exist for unrelated failures, and neither substitutes for the other:

      • Known-field gate — protects against an unknown key, because some backends answer an unknown $select key with an empty result set rather than ignoring it (the cloud multi-tenant runtime does exactly that), which silently zeroes the whole list.
      • FLS gate — protects against a known but denied key, per objectui#6898: sending it leaks the value at the server boundary even though the UI hides it.

      A field can be perfectly well-declared and still denied. That is the case this path does not handle.

      Suggested direction

      Apply checkField to the speculative bindings, using the ordering objectui#7179 established for the grouping fields: intersect against the declared fields first, then ask checkField only about survivors. That ordering matters — checkField answers false for an undeclared key, so asking it first would drop derived and computed columns that are not real object fields.

      The grouping-field guard added in #7179 is the working reference for the shape.

      Provenance, stated honestly

      This is the implementing lane's reading, relayed by the PM. I have not independently reproduced it. Filed as a finding to verify, not a confirmed defect. The first task for whoever takes it is a failing test; packages/plugin-grid/src/__tests__/projectionFls-6898.test.tsx pins the equivalent $select behaviour and is the model to copy.

      Related: objectui#6898 (the original $select FLS card, closed) · objectui#7179 (where this surfaced; its grouping guard is the reference shape) · the $expand FLS gap, filed separately as #7215.

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      Labels

      domain:uiobjectui ui stream: fix lands on the published library or apps — objectui execution seatpriority:p2

      Type

      No type

      Projects

      No projects

        Milestone

        No milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions

        , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
        Skip to content

        ListView's speculative view-binding fields (kanban / gantt / timeline / calendar / gallery) reach $select without an FLS check #7216

        Description

        @os-warren

        Filed by the domain:ui execution seat (session session_012wwHa4aaFybxXrfmfHioDM) from a surfacing during objectui#7179's implementation. Filed unassigned.

        The claim

        In packages/plugin-list/src/ListView.tsx, the view-binding fields routed through addSpeculative — the kanban, gantt, timeline, calendar and gallery field bindings — are checked against the known-object-fields set but never against perms.checkField.

        So a field the current principal is denied on read can still reach $select, provided the object declares it. The known-field gate and the FLS gate answer different questions, and only the first one is being asked on this path.

        The asymmetry, precisely

        Within the same builder:

        field sourceknown-field gateFLS gate
        schema.columnscheckField
        grouping fields (added by objectui#7179)
        view bindings via addSpeculative

        objectui#7179 did not create this gap and does not widen it — the grouping fields it added are FLS-gated explicitly. It made the asymmetry legible by gating the thing it added and leaving its neighbour visibly ungated. Worth closing deliberately rather than as a rider on an unrelated card, which is why it is filed rather than fixed in place.

        Why the known-field gate does not cover it

        The two gates exist for unrelated failures, and neither substitutes for the other:

        • Known-field gate — protects against an unknown key, because some backends answer an unknown $select key with an empty result set rather than ignoring it (the cloud multi-tenant runtime does exactly that), which silently zeroes the whole list.
        • FLS gate — protects against a known but denied key, per objectui#6898: sending it leaks the value at the server boundary even though the UI hides it.

        A field can be perfectly well-declared and still denied. That is the case this path does not handle.

        Suggested direction

        Apply checkField to the speculative bindings, using the ordering objectui#7179 established for the grouping fields: intersect against the declared fields first, then ask checkField only about survivors. That ordering matters — checkField answers false for an undeclared key, so asking it first would drop derived and computed columns that are not real object fields.

        The grouping-field guard added in #7179 is the working reference for the shape.

        Provenance, stated honestly

        This is the implementing lane's reading, relayed by the PM. I have not independently reproduced it. Filed as a finding to verify, not a confirmed defect. The first task for whoever takes it is a failing test; packages/plugin-grid/src/__tests__/projectionFls-6898.test.tsx pins the equivalent $select behaviour and is the model to copy.

        Related: objectui#6898 (the original $select FLS card, closed) · objectui#7179 (where this surfaced; its grouping guard is the reference shape) · the $expand FLS gap, filed separately as #7215.

        Metadata

        Metadata

        Assignees

        Labels

        domain:uiobjectui ui stream: fix lands on the published library or apps — objectui execution seatpriority:p2

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
          Skip to content

          ListView's speculative view-binding fields (kanban / gantt / timeline / calendar / gallery) reach $select without an FLS check #7216

          Description

          @os-warren

          Filed by the domain:ui execution seat (session session_012wwHa4aaFybxXrfmfHioDM) from a surfacing during objectui#7179's implementation. Filed unassigned.

          The claim

          In packages/plugin-list/src/ListView.tsx, the view-binding fields routed through addSpeculative — the kanban, gantt, timeline, calendar and gallery field bindings — are checked against the known-object-fields set but never against perms.checkField.

          So a field the current principal is denied on read can still reach $select, provided the object declares it. The known-field gate and the FLS gate answer different questions, and only the first one is being asked on this path.

          The asymmetry, precisely

          Within the same builder:

          field sourceknown-field gateFLS gate
          schema.columnscheckField
          grouping fields (added by objectui#7179)
          view bindings via addSpeculative

          objectui#7179 did not create this gap and does not widen it — the grouping fields it added are FLS-gated explicitly. It made the asymmetry legible by gating the thing it added and leaving its neighbour visibly ungated. Worth closing deliberately rather than as a rider on an unrelated card, which is why it is filed rather than fixed in place.

          Why the known-field gate does not cover it

          The two gates exist for unrelated failures, and neither substitutes for the other:

          • Known-field gate — protects against an unknown key, because some backends answer an unknown $select key with an empty result set rather than ignoring it (the cloud multi-tenant runtime does exactly that), which silently zeroes the whole list.
          • FLS gate — protects against a known but denied key, per objectui#6898: sending it leaks the value at the server boundary even though the UI hides it.

          A field can be perfectly well-declared and still denied. That is the case this path does not handle.

          Suggested direction

          Apply checkField to the speculative bindings, using the ordering objectui#7179 established for the grouping fields: intersect against the declared fields first, then ask checkField only about survivors. That ordering matters — checkField answers false for an undeclared key, so asking it first would drop derived and computed columns that are not real object fields.

          The grouping-field guard added in #7179 is the working reference for the shape.

          Provenance, stated honestly

          This is the implementing lane's reading, relayed by the PM. I have not independently reproduced it. Filed as a finding to verify, not a confirmed defect. The first task for whoever takes it is a failing test; packages/plugin-grid/src/__tests__/projectionFls-6898.test.tsx pins the equivalent $select behaviour and is the model to copy.

          Related: objectui#6898 (the original $select FLS card, closed) · objectui#7179 (where this surfaced; its grouping guard is the reference shape) · the $expand FLS gap, filed separately as #7215.

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          Labels

          domain:uiobjectui ui stream: fix lands on the published library or apps — objectui execution seatpriority:p2

          Type

          No type

          Projects

          No projects

            Milestone

            No milestone

            Relationships

            None yet

            Development

            No branches or pull requests

            Issue actions

            , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
            Skip to content

            ListView's speculative view-binding fields (kanban / gantt / timeline / calendar / gallery) reach $select without an FLS check #7216

            Description

            @os-warren

            Filed by the domain:ui execution seat (session session_012wwHa4aaFybxXrfmfHioDM) from a surfacing during objectui#7179's implementation. Filed unassigned.

            The claim

            In packages/plugin-list/src/ListView.tsx, the view-binding fields routed through addSpeculative — the kanban, gantt, timeline, calendar and gallery field bindings — are checked against the known-object-fields set but never against perms.checkField.

            So a field the current principal is denied on read can still reach $select, provided the object declares it. The known-field gate and the FLS gate answer different questions, and only the first one is being asked on this path.

            The asymmetry, precisely

            Within the same builder:

            field sourceknown-field gateFLS gate
            schema.columnscheckField
            grouping fields (added by objectui#7179)
            view bindings via addSpeculative

            objectui#7179 did not create this gap and does not widen it — the grouping fields it added are FLS-gated explicitly. It made the asymmetry legible by gating the thing it added and leaving its neighbour visibly ungated. Worth closing deliberately rather than as a rider on an unrelated card, which is why it is filed rather than fixed in place.

            Why the known-field gate does not cover it

            The two gates exist for unrelated failures, and neither substitutes for the other:

            • Known-field gate — protects against an unknown key, because some backends answer an unknown $select key with an empty result set rather than ignoring it (the cloud multi-tenant runtime does exactly that), which silently zeroes the whole list.
            • FLS gate — protects against a known but denied key, per objectui#6898: sending it leaks the value at the server boundary even though the UI hides it.

            A field can be perfectly well-declared and still denied. That is the case this path does not handle.

            Suggested direction

            Apply checkField to the speculative bindings, using the ordering objectui#7179 established for the grouping fields: intersect against the declared fields first, then ask checkField only about survivors. That ordering matters — checkField answers false for an undeclared key, so asking it first would drop derived and computed columns that are not real object fields.

            The grouping-field guard added in #7179 is the working reference for the shape.

            Provenance, stated honestly

            This is the implementing lane's reading, relayed by the PM. I have not independently reproduced it. Filed as a finding to verify, not a confirmed defect. The first task for whoever takes it is a failing test; packages/plugin-grid/src/__tests__/projectionFls-6898.test.tsx pins the equivalent $select behaviour and is the model to copy.

            Related: objectui#6898 (the original $select FLS card, closed) · objectui#7179 (where this surfaced; its grouping guard is the reference shape) · the $expand FLS gap, filed separately as #7215.

            Metadata

            Metadata

            Assignees

            Labels

            domain:uiobjectui ui stream: fix lands on the published library or apps — objectui execution seatpriority:p2

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              ListView's speculative view-binding fields (kanban / gantt / timeline / calendar / gallery) reach $select without an FLS check #7216

              Description

              @os-warren

              Filed by the domain:ui execution seat (session session_012wwHa4aaFybxXrfmfHioDM) from a surfacing during objectui#7179's implementation. Filed unassigned.

              The claim

              In packages/plugin-list/src/ListView.tsx, the view-binding fields routed through addSpeculative — the kanban, gantt, timeline, calendar and gallery field bindings — are checked against the known-object-fields set but never against perms.checkField.

              So a field the current principal is denied on read can still reach $select, provided the object declares it. The known-field gate and the FLS gate answer different questions, and only the first one is being asked on this path.

              The asymmetry, precisely

              Within the same builder:

              field sourceknown-field gateFLS gate
              schema.columnscheckField
              grouping fields (added by objectui#7179)
              view bindings via addSpeculative

              objectui#7179 did not create this gap and does not widen it — the grouping fields it added are FLS-gated explicitly. It made the asymmetry legible by gating the thing it added and leaving its neighbour visibly ungated. Worth closing deliberately rather than as a rider on an unrelated card, which is why it is filed rather than fixed in place.

              Why the known-field gate does not cover it

              The two gates exist for unrelated failures, and neither substitutes for the other:

              • Known-field gate — protects against an unknown key, because some backends answer an unknown $select key with an empty result set rather than ignoring it (the cloud multi-tenant runtime does exactly that), which silently zeroes the whole list.
              • FLS gate — protects against a known but denied key, per objectui#6898: sending it leaks the value at the server boundary even though the UI hides it.

              A field can be perfectly well-declared and still denied. That is the case this path does not handle.

              Suggested direction

              Apply checkField to the speculative bindings, using the ordering objectui#7179 established for the grouping fields: intersect against the declared fields first, then ask checkField only about survivors. That ordering matters — checkField answers false for an undeclared key, so asking it first would drop derived and computed columns that are not real object fields.

              The grouping-field guard added in #7179 is the working reference for the shape.

              Provenance, stated honestly

              This is the implementing lane's reading, relayed by the PM. I have not independently reproduced it. Filed as a finding to verify, not a confirmed defect. The first task for whoever takes it is a failing test; packages/plugin-grid/src/__tests__/projectionFls-6898.test.tsx pins the equivalent $select behaviour and is the model to copy.

              Related: objectui#6898 (the original $select FLS card, closed) · objectui#7179 (where this surfaced; its grouping guard is the reference shape) · the $expand FLS gap, filed separately as #7215.

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              Labels

              domain:uiobjectui ui stream: fix lands on the published library or apps — objectui execution seatpriority:p2

              Type

              No type

              Projects

              No projects

                Milestone

                No milestone

                Relationships

                None yet

                Development

                No branches or pull requests

                Issue actions

                , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                Skip to content

                ListView's speculative view-binding fields (kanban / gantt / timeline / calendar / gallery) reach $select without an FLS check #7216

                Description

                @os-warren

                Filed by the domain:ui execution seat (session session_012wwHa4aaFybxXrfmfHioDM) from a surfacing during objectui#7179's implementation. Filed unassigned.

                The claim

                In packages/plugin-list/src/ListView.tsx, the view-binding fields routed through addSpeculative — the kanban, gantt, timeline, calendar and gallery field bindings — are checked against the known-object-fields set but never against perms.checkField.

                So a field the current principal is denied on read can still reach $select, provided the object declares it. The known-field gate and the FLS gate answer different questions, and only the first one is being asked on this path.

                The asymmetry, precisely

                Within the same builder:

                field sourceknown-field gateFLS gate
                schema.columnscheckField
                grouping fields (added by objectui#7179)
                view bindings via addSpeculative

                objectui#7179 did not create this gap and does not widen it — the grouping fields it added are FLS-gated explicitly. It made the asymmetry legible by gating the thing it added and leaving its neighbour visibly ungated. Worth closing deliberately rather than as a rider on an unrelated card, which is why it is filed rather than fixed in place.

                Why the known-field gate does not cover it

                The two gates exist for unrelated failures, and neither substitutes for the other:

                • Known-field gate — protects against an unknown key, because some backends answer an unknown $select key with an empty result set rather than ignoring it (the cloud multi-tenant runtime does exactly that), which silently zeroes the whole list.
                • FLS gate — protects against a known but denied key, per objectui#6898: sending it leaks the value at the server boundary even though the UI hides it.

                A field can be perfectly well-declared and still denied. That is the case this path does not handle.

                Suggested direction

                Apply checkField to the speculative bindings, using the ordering objectui#7179 established for the grouping fields: intersect against the declared fields first, then ask checkField only about survivors. That ordering matters — checkField answers false for an undeclared key, so asking it first would drop derived and computed columns that are not real object fields.

                The grouping-field guard added in #7179 is the working reference for the shape.

                Provenance, stated honestly

                This is the implementing lane's reading, relayed by the PM. I have not independently reproduced it. Filed as a finding to verify, not a confirmed defect. The first task for whoever takes it is a failing test; packages/plugin-grid/src/__tests__/projectionFls-6898.test.tsx pins the equivalent $select behaviour and is the model to copy.

                Related: objectui#6898 (the original $select FLS card, closed) · objectui#7179 (where this surfaced; its grouping guard is the reference shape) · the $expand FLS gap, filed separately as #7215.

                Metadata

                Metadata

                Assignees

                Labels

                domain:uiobjectui ui stream: fix lands on the published library or apps — objectui execution seatpriority:p2

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions