Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
feat(types)!: ChartSchema declares the data model it renders — chart-level data, xAxisKey, and both series binding dialects - #7545
Conversation
`ChartSchema` gains chart-level `data` and `xAxisKey`, the bare-string `xAxis` folds onto the latter at parse, and `ChartDataSeries` accepts both binding dialects (`name` and `dataKey`). Both keys were authored, read by the renderer, and unchecked — they survived only on `BaseSchema`'s `.passthrough()` and its `[key: string]: any` index signature, so `data: 'oops'` and `xAxisKey: 123` parsed clean and drew an empty chart. The mirror meanwhile REQUIRED `series[].name`, refusing the `dataKey` dialect that `normalizeSeries` prefers and that both catalog chart fixtures are written in. The fold uses `.overwrite()`, not `.transform()`: a pipe has no `.shape`, which `zod-mirror-parity.test.ts` reads on every mirror, and no `.extend()`, which `reports.zod.ts` needs. Only the bare-string `xAxis` is folded — the config object's `format`/`title`/`showGridLines` are presentation the fold would discard. Published `content/docs/api/schema-reference.md` still taught the inline `series[].data` model retired by objectui#6896; its two chart examples are rewritten to the model the renderer draws, and both now validate. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EMrWaQw3XS5DxTHxp4yRyC
✅ Console Performance Budget
The eager closure is every chunk the entry reaches through static imports — what the browser fetches and parses before the app renders. The entry chunk on its own is a small fraction of it. 📦 Bundle Size Report
Size Limits
|
os-project-manager
commented
Sep 3, 2026
合约复核裁断:FAIL — 逐字转录隔离审查者, ⛔ 以下为裁断原文,逐字,未改写、未删节、未润色。本席不在 tier 上,无权重述。 VERDICT: FAIL The contract movement itself — FINDINGS1. Scope — the diff rewrites three of #7112's five doc sites, which ruling #7113 clause 5 excludes verbatim (「#7112 的五处教材站点按其自身卡修,⛔ 不折」), and the PR body does not say so. 2. The changeset's "What now refuses (the narrowing, named)" is not the whole narrowing: 3. Ruling 5510084784's per-group pin is only half implemented for the chart group, and the PR does not say the other half was dropped. OBSERVATIONS
MEASUREMENTS
NARROWINGS
本席的处置(⛔ 不改动上面任何一个字)PR 保持 draft, Finding 1 的取向:⛔ 本席不选审查者列出的第二条路(「维护者若更愿意折进来,就在 #7113 上说,并把 #7112 重定范围、把 #7549 关到本 PR 名下」)。裁断第 5 条已经写了不折,照裁断执行不需要新裁决 ⇒ 补丁轮的指令是把 #7549 我会另行核实并处置(审查者报它是 20:01Z 由另一席位在不知情下立的重复卡)。 Generated by Claude Code |
…nder pin Addresses the three contract-review findings on PR #7545. The reviewed contract surface is deliberately untouched: `packages/types/src/zod/data-display.zod.ts` and `packages/types/src/data-display.ts` keep the blobs the review read. F1 — scope. `content/docs/api/schema-reference.md` is dropped from this PR and restored to the merge-base byte for byte. Ruling objectui#7113 clause 5 fences #7112's five teaching sites to their own card; the edit was correct in content but was not this PR's to make, and the body did not disclose it. F2 — disclosure. The changeset named two refusal classes and missed a third: `series[].dataKey` with a non-string value ACCEPTed at base (silently stripped by the non-strict object) and refuses now — and unlike the other two it draws a real chart today, `normalizeChartSchema` falling back to `name`. Two prose corrections alongside it: `xAxisKey: 123` leaves a drawn chart with a broken category axis rather than an empty one, and `.pick()`/`.omit()`/`.partial()` now throw on both refined consts, a published-surface change that was undisclosed. F3 — the per-group pin's render half, which ruling 5510084784 requires and this PR had omitted. Element count, tag census and a SHA-256 of the text for both catalog fixtures, re-derived on this harness at the merge-base rather than transcribed: identical across the change while the validator's verdict flips. Carries a lit control so the identity assertions cannot pass vacuously. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EMrWaQw3XS5DxTHxp4yRyC
✅ Console Performance Budget
The eager closure is every chunk the entry reaches through static imports — what the browser fetches and parses before the app renders. The entry chunk on its own is a small fraction of it. 📦 Bundle Size Report
Size Limits
|
os-project-manager
commented
Sep 3, 2026
补丁轮复核通过,原裁断沿用(未重开复核)——已 ready + auto-merge (SQUASH), |
| 实测 | |
|---|---|
F1 撤出 content/docs/api/schema-reference.md | ✅ 已从 diff 中消失(现 5 个文件)。并且没有采用审查者列的第二条路(请维护者改判折叠)—— 照裁断第 5 条执行不需要新裁决,偏离它才需要 |
| F2 第三类拒绝进 changeset | ✅ 在,且单独标注「str(123) 为 undefined ⇒ 读回退到 name)与 #6939 分级语言的关联;class 2 的「空图」散文已订正 |
| F2b 组合子披露 | ✅ 在,且比审查者报的更广:.pick() / .omit() / .partial() 在 ChartSchema与ChartDataSeriesSchema 上都抛 |
| F3 渲染半 pin | ✅ ChartRenderer.catalogRender-6939.test.tsx,带会点亮的对照(扰动数据后 sha256 与元素数都必须改变),否则 toEqual(PRE_REPAIR) 会空转通过 |
⭐ 一条值得单独记的:审查者的渲染数字没有复现,而这正是它该有的样子
审查者读到 area-chart = 132 元素 / 11 刻度;实现者在自己的 harness 上读到 127 / 6。
⛔ 这不是任何一方错了。 元素数是 harness 绑定的——ResponsiveContainer 在这里被 mock 成固定 480×320,而刻度密度是宽度的函数。两个读数对各自的 harness 都成立,能判别的断言是「同一 harness 内前后一致」。
⇒ 这正是我在补丁指令里写「⛔ 重新导出,不许抄审查者的 136/2/11 与 132/1/11」的原因,而它兑现了。一个用别人跑出来的数字建的 pin,就是一个手抄常数——本轮 #7433 记录的整类缺陷。
一条 harness 事实,实现者记在报告里而非另立卡(我同意这个处置)
vi.mock('recharts')无法从 examples/schema-catalog/test 里拦截 plugin-charts 的 import —— pnpm 的严格布局让两个包解析到不同路径,真的 ResponsiveContainer 会渲染,于是什么都画不出来。这就是 pin 必须放在 packages/plugin-charts/src/ 的原因,与 plugin-map 的兄弟 pin 同址。
放行范围
⛔ 放行的是 #7113 的 option B 与 #6939 的 chart 行。本 PR 记录的两条「裁断理由不成立」(clause 2 指名的函数零读取、clause 1 的拼错论据为假)已上账在 #7113 评论 5531374600,不改变决定,⛔ 也不需要维护者动作,除非维护者认为 ③ 轴论据被削弱到要重新权衡 option B —— 那样请直接说,我会撤回放行。
Generated by Claude Code
CI red at e7a4b77: four TS2591 "Cannot find name 'node:fs'" errors from the new objectui#6939 render pin. The pin's node builtins are the same ones the plugin-map sibling uses for the same job; this package's tsconfig was the outlier. `packages/plugin-charts` had NO test exclusion at all — `include: ["src"]` with no `exclude` — so its 45 test files were inputs to a program that EMITS (`declaration`, `composite`, `outDir: dist`). That is both why a test could not be given `node` types without putting them in the published program, and the defect class objectui#4006 / #4836 / #6943 hit three times. Ported the arrangement 34 of this repo's 38 test-bearing packages already use: tests excluded from the build tsconfig BY DIRECTORY, type-checked by a new `tsconfig.test.json`, chained from `type-check`. Measured, not assumed: the build program now reads 0 test files and the test program reads all 45, and `type-check:coverage` still reports 41/41 packages compiling their tests, so this trades no red for a hole. `check:published-tsconfig-exclude` listed this package as a named carve-out justified by "carries no `exclude` key at all". Adding one fired that entry's own `requires` predicate, which named the remedy: the package has the directory form now, so the entry is deleted and its list pin updated. The gate's population moves 33 enforced / 6 carve-outs -> 34 / 5, and the `dts()` exclude is untouched, so tooling protection is doubled rather than moved. ⛔ No contract file touched: packages/types/src/zod/data-display.zod.ts stays 1178da4 and packages/types/src/data-display.ts stays 681dfc5. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EMrWaQw3XS5DxTHxp4yRyC
✅ Console Performance Budget
The eager closure is every chunk the entry reaches through static imports — what the browser fetches and parses before the app renders. The entry chunk on its own is a small fraction of it. 📦 Bundle Size Report
Size Limits
|
os-dev-report — CI fix round (Type Check red at New head: Chose (a), the sibling arrangement. Measured before choosing, not after:
Blast radius, measured: no non-test source imports a test file; the build is vite-driven from the entry graph. After the change the build program reads 0 test files and the test program reads all 45 (
One thing the change surfaced that I had to fix properly: Failure reproduced, then green (the exact command CI ran):
Rest of the verification at the new head: CI on Nothing weakened to get green: the render half, the identity assertion and the lit control are untouched, and the pin is now compiled by a program that actually reads it. Declared, since my last report did not: I had added a file to a package whose own Not mine, left alone: Generated by Claude Code |
os-project-manager
commented
Sep 3, 2026
CI 修复轮已核验 —— |
| 断言 | 我的独立读数 |
|---|---|
| 合约面仍逐字节未动 | ✅ data-display.zod.ts = 1178da417…、data-display.ts = 681dfc58b…,与审查者读的 2a927f390 完全一致;两条路径间的提交记录为空 ⇒ 裁断沿用,不重开复核 |
Type Check 转绿 | ✅ head 3d657cfb8 上 SUCCESS(22:01:16Z 完成);32 项无失败 |
| 门禁改动是收紧不是放松 | ✅ EMITTER_CARVE_OUTS 条目数 6 → 5 |
| 新 pin 退出构建程序 | ✅ exclude 含 **/*.test.tsx,ChartRenderer.catalogRender-6939.test.tsx 命中 |
⭐ 关于那处门禁改动——我先查了它,因为它是最容易出事的形状
一个 dev 在修 CI 时改门禁脚本,通常正是「为了让自己的 PR 通过而抬门槛」的样子,而 auto-merge 已武装意味着它可能赶在我核验前落地。所以我在报告到达之前就查了。
结论相反:它删掉了一条豁免。被删的 EMITTER_CARVE_OUTS['@object-ui/plugin-charts'] 成立的前提恰恰是「它的构建 tsconfig 完全没有 exclude 键」,而那条豁免自己的 requires 谓词写明了退休条件——
if(facts.hasExcludeKey)return'its build tsconfig now HAS an `exclude` key, so the directory form belongs in it';⇒ 给包加上目录形 exclude触发了这条豁免自己的退休条件,门禁点名了补救办法,实现者照做。dts() 的 exclude 未动 ⇒ 保护是加倍而非搬家。⭐ 而且它在改门禁脚本后跑了该脚本自己的测试套件,第一次就抓到一条陈旧的列表 pin(1 失败 / 62 通过),修正后 63 通过——这一步不是可选的,它做对了。
根因值得记住:写法没错,是这个包的配置是异类
plugin-map(先例,绿) | plugin-charts(红时) | |
|---|---|---|
type-check | tsc --noEmit && tsc -p tsconfig.test.json | 只有 tsc --noEmit |
| 测试落在哪 | 主配置按目录排除,tsconfig.test.json 单独编译 | include:["src"],落进会发射的构建程序 |
实现者补充了一层我没量到的:该包的构建程序是 declaration / composite / outDir: dist ⇒ 45 个测试文件曾经是发射程序的输入。这既解释了「为什么给测试加 node types 就等于把它们塞进已发布程序」,也说明这个缺陷比一次红更早就在了。38 个带测试的包里 34 个已有 tsconfig.test.json,这个包是缺的 4 个之一。
⚠️ 一条它主动披露、值得单独记的读数
第一次复现显示 51 个错误,不是 4 个 —— 依赖解析噪声,因为新 worktree 没有构建过依赖。先构建
^...闭包后才得到与 CI 完全一致的那 4 个。
⛔ 51 那个读数会把下一个读者引向错误的缺陷。它没有把 51 当成读数报上来,而是先建闭包、拿到 4,再把 51 作为陷阱记下。这与本轮 #7014 的实现者踩过的 TS2307 Cannot find module @object-ui/core 是同一个坑。
它也主动声明了上一轮漏掉的那条收窄:「我往一个自己从没跑过 type-check 的包里加了文件」——这次跑了,packages/types 的也跑了,parity ratchet 仍绿。
⛔ 没有为求绿削弱任何东西:渲染半、identity 断言、点亮对照都原样,而且 pin 现在被一个真的会读它的程序编译。
Generated by Claude Code
Fixes#7113
Also covers #6939's
chartgroup. Both rulings independently instruct declaringxAxisKeyand chart-leveldataonChartSchema, so they land as one change rather than two PRs racing on the same keys — the reconciliation recorded on #7113 (comment 5521506615), whose single requirement was that whoever lands it says so here.Clause-②: yes — this changes what a published mirror accepts. Draft, with
needs:contract-review; not marked ready, no auto-merge.Rulings implemented:
ChartSchema's real data model — chart-leveldataandxAxisKey— is undeclared, and #6896's retirement now points authors at it by name #7113 comment 5494801290 — 项目总监席, 总监批 Implement UI components from @object-ui/types #28, 2026-09-01, maintainer verbatim 「同意」 — option B.safeValidateSchemabecause the Zod mirror names a key its renderer never reads (8 components) #6939 comment 5510084784 — 2026-09-02, maintainer verbatim 「同意」 — thechartrow.Re-measured on the merge-base
98d4108a2:ChartSchemaatpackages/types/src/zod/data-display.zod.ts:380declared neither key; thexAxisKeyat:552belongs toBarChartSchema. Meanwhile this file's own published.describe()prose at:368and:392was already teaching authors to write both. Published prose taught keys the validator did not model — the restoration ofdeclared = enforcedthat ruling clause 4 names.Patch round — the three contract-review findings (comment 5531522981)
The reviewed contract surface is byte-unmoved:
packages/types/src/zod/data-display.zod.tsis still1178da417a3ded8beae7ed05fe616a16aab57336andpackages/types/src/data-display.tsstill681dfc58be5f395fb89a81d8852d738d2b22a415, verified after the base merge. Nothing in this round touches either file.F1 — the docs sweep is REMOVED from this PR (scope)
content/docs/api/schema-reference.mdhas been restored to the merge-base byte for byte and no longer appears in this diff.Ruling #7113 clause 5 says verbatim 「#7112 的五处教材站点按其自身卡修,⛔ 不折」 — #7112's five teaching sites are repaired on their own card and are not folded in here. Three of those five live in that file. The earlier revision of this PR edited them and presented it as a routine "published docs sweep" without disclosing the deviation, which is the defect; the rewritten content itself was correct. #7112 will land them, and can now cite
dataandxAxisKeyas declared keys rather than describing an undeclared model.Following the ruling as written needs no new ruling, so the reviewer's alternative — asking the maintainer to bless the fold — was deliberately not taken.
F2 — the changeset's named narrowing was incomplete, and the missing class is the sharp one
The changeset named two refusal classes. There is a third, and unlike the other two it draws a real chart today:
{ "type": "chart", "chartType": "bar", "series": [{ "name": "a", "dataKey": 123 }] }Re-derived independently on both states rather than inherited:
98d4108a2series: [{ name: 'a' }]— the non-strict object strips the key in silence[series.0.dataKey] invalid_type: expected string, received numberdataKey: nullbehaves identically. And it renders:normalizeChartSchemagivesseries: [{ dataKey: 'a' }], becausestr(123)isundefinedand the read falls back toname(normalizeChartSchema.ts:239) — measured through the built normaliser. That is a narrowing away from a document that renders, which is exactly the distinction #6939's grading language turns on. Added to the changeset and to §3 below.Two prose corrections in the same file:
xAxisKey: 123did not draw an "EMPTY CHART". Measured through the normaliser, the result keeps the series and loses only the category binding — a drawn chart with a broken category axis. Only class 1 (datamalformed) leaves nothing to plot. The changeset now says what the reads support..pick(),.omit()and.partial()throw onChartSchemaand onChartDataSeriesSchema("cannot be used on object schemas containing refinements") where they previously returned a schema. Measured at base (all OK) and head (all throw)..extend()with a new key still works and preserves the fold and the refinement;.optional(),z.discriminatedUnion,z.toJSONSchemaandsafeValidateSchemaare unaffected. Nothing in-repo calls the throwing combinators on either const, and the published surface already ships refined mirrors, so the class is not new — but it belongs in the release note. Now in the changeset.F3 — the per-group render pin, which was missing
Ruling 5510084784 sets the bar per group: "the catalog entry validates, and its render is byte-identical in element count and text before and after". The earlier revision pinned only the validator half.
packages/plugin-charts/src/ChartRenderer.catalogRender-6939.test.tsxadds the render half, in the idiom the landed siblings use.Measurements re-derived on this harness at the merge-base, not transcribed:
advanced-line-chartseries.N.name)dd56a5f8…→dd56a5f8…area-chartseries.N.name)c1270f60…→c1270f60…The validator's verdict moves; the drawing does not. Element count, a tag census and the text hash all match, because a count alone cannot tell a swapped element from an equal one.
area-chart). Element counts are harness-bound —ResponsiveContaineris mocked to a fixed 480x320 here and tick density is a function of that width. Both readings are right about their own harness; the claim that discriminates is identity within one harness, which is why they were re-measured here. A pin built from another run's figures is a hand-copied constant.Note the asymmetry the pin has to survive: at base both fixtures fail validation while drawing correctly, so the before/after identity cannot go through a parse-then-render path — there is no parse at base. It is measured through
ChartRendererdirectly, which is also how charts really reach the screen: the renderer consumes the authored schema and never sees the mirror's parse output. The pin carries a lit control (perturb the authored rows; the same measurement must move) so the identity assertions cannot pass vacuously.1.
data's declared shape, and the lines it was derived fromDeclared as:
data: z.array(z.record(z.string(), z.any())).optional()— an array of row objects keyed by column name. TS twin: optional, an array ofRecordwith string keys andanyvalues, byte-identical to the siblingBarChartSchema.data.Derived from these read sites (all in
packages/plugin-charts/src):ChartRenderer.tsx:17,:47Recordstring-to-anyChartRenderer.tsx:164data: Array.isArray(schema.data) ? schema.data : []AdvancedChartImpl.tsx:2229Object.keys(props.data[0] ?? {})— a row's keys are the column namesAdvancedChartImpl.tsx:1968d[xAxisKey]— a row is indexed by column nameObjectChart.tsx:279,:703Array.isArray(schema.data), rows used verbatimCross-check: identical to
BarChartSchema.data, which #6318 derived from the same renderer independently.Ruling clause 2 says
data's declared shape followsnormalizeChartSchema's actual read. That function has zero reads ofschema.data—grep -n 'schema\.data\b' packages/plugin-charts/src/normalizeChartSchema.tsreturns nothing. The ruling's intent (derive the shape from the real read) is what was followed; only the function it names is wrong. The reviewer confirmed this independently.2. The
xAxisfold — pinned in both directionsPer the objectstack#13897 precedent: parse-time fold, no second writable name, no precedence semantics minted here.
xAxis: 'month'authored alone parses and lands onxAxisKey.xAxisdoes not survive the parse — the output carriesxAxisKeyand nothing else for the category column.normalizeChartSchema.ts:292, wherexAxisKeyis the first limb ofstr(schema.xAxisKey) ?? xAxisSpec?.field ?? str(xAxisRaw).field,format,title,showGridLines) has itsfieldreachxAxisKeythrough that same line, but its presentation keys survive separately intoout.xAxisatnormalizeChartSchema.ts:289-291— folding it would discard them. Left untouched, and pinned..overwrite(), not.transform()—.transform()returns aZodPipe: no.shape, no.extend().zod-mirror-parity.test.tsreads every mirror's own.shapeand a pipe answers with an empty set — a silent hole in the ratchet — andreports.zod.ts:105consumesChartSchemaas an object.3. Both binding dialects, with controls
normalizeSeriesreadsstr(raw.dataKey) ?? str(raw.name)(normalizeChartSchema.ts:239), so either alone is a complete binding. The mirror requiredname.series: [{ name: 'revenue' }]series: [{ dataKey: 'revenue' }]series.0.name)series: [{ name: 'a', dataKey: 123 }]— renders todayseries.0.dataKey)series: [{ color: '#fff' }]— binds to neitherseries: [{ name: 'r', data: [1,2,3] }]— retired keyThe two controls are legal in both states, so neither reddens for the very thing it controls for. Row 3 is F2's third class, now disclosed here and in the changeset.
That refusal is why
advanced-line-chart.jsonandarea-chart.jsonfailed validation — they are written in thedataKeydialect, and are thechart: 2entry inobjectui check's census. Both validate now;objectui checkreports nochartentries.#6939's
chartrow also says "series[].datastops being required". On this base it already is not, by a stronger mechanism: #6896 (landed inb0d308da9) replaced it withretirementTombstone(...)=z.never({ error }).optional()— optional and refusing by name. Implementing the clause literally would re-widen a retired key and reverse a landed ruling, so it is deliberately not done, and a pin holds that line.4. Changeset level —
minorThree document classes validated before and refuse now (§F2 above lists all three, one of which renders today). Not a pure widening, so not the
patchbranch of #6939's grading.minorfollows #6896's precedent in this same file for the same transition, and AGENTS.md's rule that objectui's own breaking changes shipminor(majoris forbidden bycheck-changeset-no-major).5.⚠️ What this does NOT do — the ruling's typo justification is false
Ruling clause 1 claims misspellings like
xAxiskey/datasbecome loud. Measured false on both faces, before and after: the mirror'sBaseSchemais.passthrough()(base.zod.ts) and the TSBaseSchemacarries an index signature. Both typos still ACCEPT; section (f) of the pin file asserts that rather than letting the claim stand. What the declaration buys is the value check, plus editor completion and prose that is finally true. The decision (option B) is unaffected; only its stated justification is. The reviewer confirmed this independently.Verification
All at head
e7a4b7786, after mergingorigin/main(⛔ merge, not rebase — no history rewritten).pnpm --filter '@object-ui/types...' build— green, 120 emitted files verified.pnpm --filter '@object-ui/types' type-check— green, all threetscprojects echoed.vitest runonchart-data-model-7113+chart-inline-data-retired+zod-mirror-parity+ChartRenderer.catalogRender-6939— 4 files, 58 tests, all pass (was 53; +5 from the new render pin). The parity ratchet passing is the check that the TS twin and the mirror moved together — and it re-passes after the merge, which brought in changes tobase.zod.ts/base.ts/ the ratchet itself.vitest run packages/plugin-charts/src— 45 files, 410 tests, all pass, run as its own leg so no recursive first-fail could hide a later package.check:control-bytes(6227 files),check:doc-types(188 docs),check:doc-fences(227 documents),check:element-data-source-declaration,check:spec-symbols(1345 files), and — newly relevant because this round adds avi.mock—check:vi-mock-specifiersandcheck:vi-mock-inherit(4267 files, 573 carrying a mock).eslint .—packages/types0 errors / 269 warnings over 165 files;packages/plugin-charts0 errors / 334 warnings over 58 files. The new pin file contributes 0 errors and 3no-explicit-anywarnings, all in the recharts mock, identical to the sibling chart render tests; the rule iswarn.Reverse verification (earlier revision, still valid — the contract files are unchanged)
Red set predicted before running, then measured by reverting the mirror to its pre-change state; mutation proven on disk by blob hash and anchor counts in both directions, restore proven by state (
git diff HEADempty and worktree blob equal to the HEAD blob). Predicted 9 red, measured 10 red / 16 green; the extra one was a real finding — a pin labelled a control was reddening for the declaration rather than theZodObject-ness it claimed to measure, and was split into a genuine control plus an honest probe.Not measured
check:doc-snippetsandcheck:sdui-registration-pinsreturn exit 2 = precondition not met, which those gates document as "I could not run", not a failure.doc-snippetsneeds a full workspace build; this round removes the only docs edit, so nothing in the diff can reach it.sdui-registration-pinsweighsapps/console/distbundle assets. Both CI-owned.projectService/projectin the flat config), so this diff cannot move the verdict on a file it does not touch.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01EMrWaQw3XS5DxTHxp4yRyC
Generated by Claude Code