Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Executing user-defined callbacks/handlers while holding a lock (
_client_lock) is a known anti-pattern. If a handler blocks, performs a slow operation, or attempts to acquire another lock (or re-acquire this lock from another thread), it can lead to deadlocks or severely degrade performance by blocking other threads.To prevent this, we should copy the list of handlers while holding the lock, and then iterate and execute them outside of the lock context.
Additionally, using
__qualname__instead of__name__provides a more descriptive name for class methods or nested functions during logging.