Skip to content

Fix SQL explain API rejecting ?format=json parameter - #5607

Open
gingeekrishna wants to merge 1 commit into
opensearch-project:mainfrom
gingeekrishna:fix/4373-explain-api-json-format
Open

Fix SQL explain API rejecting ?format=json parameter#5607
gingeekrishna wants to merge 1 commit into
opensearch-project:mainfrom
gingeekrishna:fix/4373-explain-api-json-format

Conversation

@gingeekrishna

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Fixes#4373

Problem: Since OpenSearch 3.0, calling POST /_plugins/_sql/_explain?format=json returns:

{
"error": {
"reason": "Invalid SQL query",
"details": "Failed to create executor due to unknown response format: json",
"type": "IllegalArgumentException"
},
"status": 400
}

Root cause:isSupportedExplainFormat() in SQLQueryRequest.java only accepted "simple", "standard", "extended", and "cost""json" was never in the list. The explain endpoint itself always returns JSON unconditionally (the format parameter has no effect on the response), so "json" was effectively accepted before this validation was tightened.

Fix: Add "json" to isSupportedExplainFormat(). The explain response path in SQLPlugin.java uses JsonResponseFormatter<ExplainResponse> regardless of the format parameter, so this is a pure backward-compatibility fix with no behavioral change.

Changes

  • sql/src/main/java/.../SQLQueryRequest.java — add "json" to isSupportedExplainFormat()
  • sql/src/test/java/.../SQLQueryRequestTest.java — regression test asserting ?format=json is accepted on explain requests

Testing

29/29 tests pass in SQLQueryRequestTest.

isSupportedExplainFormat() only accepted "simple", "standard",
"extended", and "cost" — excluding "json". Before OpenSearch 3.0,
?format=json was valid for the explain endpoint, so existing workflows
that pass this parameter now receive:
"Failed to create executor due to unknown response format: json"
The explain endpoint already returns JSON unconditionally regardless of
the format parameter, so accepting "json" is a pure backward-
compatibility restoration with no behavioral change.
Fixesopensearch-project#4373
Signed-off-by: Radhakrishnan Pachyappan <gingeekrishna@gmail.com>
CopilotAI reviewed Jul 5, 2026

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

🧪 PR contains tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
✅ No TODO sections
🔀 No multiple PR themes
⚡ No major issues detected

@gingeekrishna

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

The enforce-label check is failing — a release label is required. Since this PR improves the error message for unsupported window functions (a UX/error-experience fix), the bugFix label would be appropriate. Could a maintainer add it? Thanks!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Deprecation of OpenSearch DSL format has affected the behavior of the explain API

2 participants

@gingeekrishna
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Fix SQL explain API rejecting ?format=json parameter by gingeekrishna · Pull Request #5607 · opensearch-project/sql · GitHub
Skip to content

Fix SQL explain API rejecting ?format=json parameter - #5607

Open
gingeekrishna wants to merge 1 commit into
opensearch-project:mainfrom
gingeekrishna:fix/4373-explain-api-json-format
Open

Fix SQL explain API rejecting ?format=json parameter#5607
gingeekrishna wants to merge 1 commit into
opensearch-project:mainfrom
gingeekrishna:fix/4373-explain-api-json-format

Conversation

@gingeekrishna

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Fixes#4373

Problem: Since OpenSearch 3.0, calling POST /_plugins/_sql/_explain?format=json returns:

{
"error": {
"reason": "Invalid SQL query",
"details": "Failed to create executor due to unknown response format: json",
"type": "IllegalArgumentException"
},
"status": 400
}

Root cause:isSupportedExplainFormat() in SQLQueryRequest.java only accepted "simple", "standard", "extended", and "cost""json" was never in the list. The explain endpoint itself always returns JSON unconditionally (the format parameter has no effect on the response), so "json" was effectively accepted before this validation was tightened.

Fix: Add "json" to isSupportedExplainFormat(). The explain response path in SQLPlugin.java uses JsonResponseFormatter<ExplainResponse> regardless of the format parameter, so this is a pure backward-compatibility fix with no behavioral change.

Changes

  • sql/src/main/java/.../SQLQueryRequest.java — add "json" to isSupportedExplainFormat()
  • sql/src/test/java/.../SQLQueryRequestTest.java — regression test asserting ?format=json is accepted on explain requests

Testing

29/29 tests pass in SQLQueryRequestTest.

isSupportedExplainFormat() only accepted "simple", "standard",
"extended", and "cost" — excluding "json". Before OpenSearch 3.0,
?format=json was valid for the explain endpoint, so existing workflows
that pass this parameter now receive:
"Failed to create executor due to unknown response format: json"
The explain endpoint already returns JSON unconditionally regardless of
the format parameter, so accepting "json" is a pure backward-
compatibility restoration with no behavioral change.
Fixesopensearch-project#4373
Signed-off-by: Radhakrishnan Pachyappan <gingeekrishna@gmail.com>
CopilotAI reviewed Jul 5, 2026

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

🧪 PR contains tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
✅ No TODO sections
🔀 No multiple PR themes
⚡ No major issues detected

@gingeekrishna

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

The enforce-label check is failing — a release label is required. Since this PR improves the error message for unsupported window functions (a UX/error-experience fix), the bugFix label would be appropriate. Could a maintainer add it? Thanks!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Deprecation of OpenSearch DSL format has affected the behavior of the explain API

2 participants

@gingeekrishna
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Fix SQL explain API rejecting ?format=json parameter by gingeekrishna · Pull Request #5607 · opensearch-project/sql · GitHub
Skip to content

Fix SQL explain API rejecting ?format=json parameter - #5607

Open
gingeekrishna wants to merge 1 commit into
opensearch-project:mainfrom
gingeekrishna:fix/4373-explain-api-json-format
Open

Fix SQL explain API rejecting ?format=json parameter#5607
gingeekrishna wants to merge 1 commit into
opensearch-project:mainfrom
gingeekrishna:fix/4373-explain-api-json-format

Conversation

@gingeekrishna

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Fixes#4373

Problem: Since OpenSearch 3.0, calling POST /_plugins/_sql/_explain?format=json returns:

{
"error": {
"reason": "Invalid SQL query",
"details": "Failed to create executor due to unknown response format: json",
"type": "IllegalArgumentException"
},
"status": 400
}

Root cause:isSupportedExplainFormat() in SQLQueryRequest.java only accepted "simple", "standard", "extended", and "cost""json" was never in the list. The explain endpoint itself always returns JSON unconditionally (the format parameter has no effect on the response), so "json" was effectively accepted before this validation was tightened.

Fix: Add "json" to isSupportedExplainFormat(). The explain response path in SQLPlugin.java uses JsonResponseFormatter<ExplainResponse> regardless of the format parameter, so this is a pure backward-compatibility fix with no behavioral change.

Changes

  • sql/src/main/java/.../SQLQueryRequest.java — add "json" to isSupportedExplainFormat()
  • sql/src/test/java/.../SQLQueryRequestTest.java — regression test asserting ?format=json is accepted on explain requests

Testing

29/29 tests pass in SQLQueryRequestTest.

isSupportedExplainFormat() only accepted "simple", "standard",
"extended", and "cost" — excluding "json". Before OpenSearch 3.0,
?format=json was valid for the explain endpoint, so existing workflows
that pass this parameter now receive:
"Failed to create executor due to unknown response format: json"
The explain endpoint already returns JSON unconditionally regardless of
the format parameter, so accepting "json" is a pure backward-
compatibility restoration with no behavioral change.
Fixesopensearch-project#4373
Signed-off-by: Radhakrishnan Pachyappan <gingeekrishna@gmail.com>
CopilotAI reviewed Jul 5, 2026

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

🧪 PR contains tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
✅ No TODO sections
🔀 No multiple PR themes
⚡ No major issues detected

@gingeekrishna

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

The enforce-label check is failing — a release label is required. Since this PR improves the error message for unsupported window functions (a UX/error-experience fix), the bugFix label would be appropriate. Could a maintainer add it? Thanks!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Deprecation of OpenSearch DSL format has affected the behavior of the explain API

2 participants

@gingeekrishna
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Fix SQL explain API rejecting ?format=json parameter by gingeekrishna · Pull Request #5607 · opensearch-project/sql · GitHub
Skip to content

Fix SQL explain API rejecting ?format=json parameter - #5607

Open
gingeekrishna wants to merge 1 commit into
opensearch-project:mainfrom
gingeekrishna:fix/4373-explain-api-json-format
Open

Fix SQL explain API rejecting ?format=json parameter#5607
gingeekrishna wants to merge 1 commit into
opensearch-project:mainfrom
gingeekrishna:fix/4373-explain-api-json-format

Conversation

@gingeekrishna

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Fixes#4373

Problem: Since OpenSearch 3.0, calling POST /_plugins/_sql/_explain?format=json returns:

{
"error": {
"reason": "Invalid SQL query",
"details": "Failed to create executor due to unknown response format: json",
"type": "IllegalArgumentException"
},
"status": 400
}

Root cause:isSupportedExplainFormat() in SQLQueryRequest.java only accepted "simple", "standard", "extended", and "cost""json" was never in the list. The explain endpoint itself always returns JSON unconditionally (the format parameter has no effect on the response), so "json" was effectively accepted before this validation was tightened.

Fix: Add "json" to isSupportedExplainFormat(). The explain response path in SQLPlugin.java uses JsonResponseFormatter<ExplainResponse> regardless of the format parameter, so this is a pure backward-compatibility fix with no behavioral change.

Changes

  • sql/src/main/java/.../SQLQueryRequest.java — add "json" to isSupportedExplainFormat()
  • sql/src/test/java/.../SQLQueryRequestTest.java — regression test asserting ?format=json is accepted on explain requests

Testing

29/29 tests pass in SQLQueryRequestTest.

isSupportedExplainFormat() only accepted "simple", "standard",
"extended", and "cost" — excluding "json". Before OpenSearch 3.0,
?format=json was valid for the explain endpoint, so existing workflows
that pass this parameter now receive:
"Failed to create executor due to unknown response format: json"
The explain endpoint already returns JSON unconditionally regardless of
the format parameter, so accepting "json" is a pure backward-
compatibility restoration with no behavioral change.
Fixesopensearch-project#4373
Signed-off-by: Radhakrishnan Pachyappan <gingeekrishna@gmail.com>
CopilotAI reviewed Jul 5, 2026

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

🧪 PR contains tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
✅ No TODO sections
🔀 No multiple PR themes
⚡ No major issues detected

@gingeekrishna

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

The enforce-label check is failing — a release label is required. Since this PR improves the error message for unsupported window functions (a UX/error-experience fix), the bugFix label would be appropriate. Could a maintainer add it? Thanks!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Deprecation of OpenSearch DSL format has affected the behavior of the explain API

2 participants

@gingeekrishna
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Fix SQL explain API rejecting ?format=json parameter by gingeekrishna · Pull Request #5607 · opensearch-project/sql · GitHub
Skip to content

Fix SQL explain API rejecting ?format=json parameter - #5607

Open
gingeekrishna wants to merge 1 commit into
opensearch-project:mainfrom
gingeekrishna:fix/4373-explain-api-json-format
Open

Fix SQL explain API rejecting ?format=json parameter#5607
gingeekrishna wants to merge 1 commit into
opensearch-project:mainfrom
gingeekrishna:fix/4373-explain-api-json-format

Conversation

@gingeekrishna

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Fixes#4373

Problem: Since OpenSearch 3.0, calling POST /_plugins/_sql/_explain?format=json returns:

{
"error": {
"reason": "Invalid SQL query",
"details": "Failed to create executor due to unknown response format: json",
"type": "IllegalArgumentException"
},
"status": 400
}

Root cause:isSupportedExplainFormat() in SQLQueryRequest.java only accepted "simple", "standard", "extended", and "cost""json" was never in the list. The explain endpoint itself always returns JSON unconditionally (the format parameter has no effect on the response), so "json" was effectively accepted before this validation was tightened.

Fix: Add "json" to isSupportedExplainFormat(). The explain response path in SQLPlugin.java uses JsonResponseFormatter<ExplainResponse> regardless of the format parameter, so this is a pure backward-compatibility fix with no behavioral change.

Changes

  • sql/src/main/java/.../SQLQueryRequest.java — add "json" to isSupportedExplainFormat()
  • sql/src/test/java/.../SQLQueryRequestTest.java — regression test asserting ?format=json is accepted on explain requests

Testing

29/29 tests pass in SQLQueryRequestTest.

isSupportedExplainFormat() only accepted "simple", "standard",
"extended", and "cost" — excluding "json". Before OpenSearch 3.0,
?format=json was valid for the explain endpoint, so existing workflows
that pass this parameter now receive:
"Failed to create executor due to unknown response format: json"
The explain endpoint already returns JSON unconditionally regardless of
the format parameter, so accepting "json" is a pure backward-
compatibility restoration with no behavioral change.
Fixesopensearch-project#4373
Signed-off-by: Radhakrishnan Pachyappan <gingeekrishna@gmail.com>
CopilotAI reviewed Jul 5, 2026

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

🧪 PR contains tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
✅ No TODO sections
🔀 No multiple PR themes
⚡ No major issues detected

@gingeekrishna

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

The enforce-label check is failing — a release label is required. Since this PR improves the error message for unsupported window functions (a UX/error-experience fix), the bugFix label would be appropriate. Could a maintainer add it? Thanks!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Deprecation of OpenSearch DSL format has affected the behavior of the explain API

2 participants

@gingeekrishna
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Fix SQL explain API rejecting ?format=json parameter by gingeekrishna · Pull Request #5607 · opensearch-project/sql · GitHub
Skip to content

Fix SQL explain API rejecting ?format=json parameter - #5607

Open
gingeekrishna wants to merge 1 commit into
opensearch-project:mainfrom
gingeekrishna:fix/4373-explain-api-json-format
Open

Fix SQL explain API rejecting ?format=json parameter#5607
gingeekrishna wants to merge 1 commit into
opensearch-project:mainfrom
gingeekrishna:fix/4373-explain-api-json-format

Conversation

@gingeekrishna

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Fixes#4373

Problem: Since OpenSearch 3.0, calling POST /_plugins/_sql/_explain?format=json returns:

{
"error": {
"reason": "Invalid SQL query",
"details": "Failed to create executor due to unknown response format: json",
"type": "IllegalArgumentException"
},
"status": 400
}

Root cause:isSupportedExplainFormat() in SQLQueryRequest.java only accepted "simple", "standard", "extended", and "cost""json" was never in the list. The explain endpoint itself always returns JSON unconditionally (the format parameter has no effect on the response), so "json" was effectively accepted before this validation was tightened.

Fix: Add "json" to isSupportedExplainFormat(). The explain response path in SQLPlugin.java uses JsonResponseFormatter<ExplainResponse> regardless of the format parameter, so this is a pure backward-compatibility fix with no behavioral change.

Changes

  • sql/src/main/java/.../SQLQueryRequest.java — add "json" to isSupportedExplainFormat()
  • sql/src/test/java/.../SQLQueryRequestTest.java — regression test asserting ?format=json is accepted on explain requests

Testing

29/29 tests pass in SQLQueryRequestTest.

isSupportedExplainFormat() only accepted "simple", "standard",
"extended", and "cost" — excluding "json". Before OpenSearch 3.0,
?format=json was valid for the explain endpoint, so existing workflows
that pass this parameter now receive:
"Failed to create executor due to unknown response format: json"
The explain endpoint already returns JSON unconditionally regardless of
the format parameter, so accepting "json" is a pure backward-
compatibility restoration with no behavioral change.
Fixesopensearch-project#4373
Signed-off-by: Radhakrishnan Pachyappan <gingeekrishna@gmail.com>
CopilotAI reviewed Jul 5, 2026

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

🧪 PR contains tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
✅ No TODO sections
🔀 No multiple PR themes
⚡ No major issues detected

@gingeekrishna

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

The enforce-label check is failing — a release label is required. Since this PR improves the error message for unsupported window functions (a UX/error-experience fix), the bugFix label would be appropriate. Could a maintainer add it? Thanks!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Deprecation of OpenSearch DSL format has affected the behavior of the explain API

2 participants

@gingeekrishna
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Fix SQL explain API rejecting ?format=json parameter by gingeekrishna · Pull Request #5607 · opensearch-project/sql · GitHub
Skip to content

Fix SQL explain API rejecting ?format=json parameter - #5607

Open
gingeekrishna wants to merge 1 commit into
opensearch-project:mainfrom
gingeekrishna:fix/4373-explain-api-json-format
Open

Fix SQL explain API rejecting ?format=json parameter#5607
gingeekrishna wants to merge 1 commit into
opensearch-project:mainfrom
gingeekrishna:fix/4373-explain-api-json-format

Conversation

@gingeekrishna

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Fixes#4373

Problem: Since OpenSearch 3.0, calling POST /_plugins/_sql/_explain?format=json returns:

{
"error": {
"reason": "Invalid SQL query",
"details": "Failed to create executor due to unknown response format: json",
"type": "IllegalArgumentException"
},
"status": 400
}

Root cause:isSupportedExplainFormat() in SQLQueryRequest.java only accepted "simple", "standard", "extended", and "cost""json" was never in the list. The explain endpoint itself always returns JSON unconditionally (the format parameter has no effect on the response), so "json" was effectively accepted before this validation was tightened.

Fix: Add "json" to isSupportedExplainFormat(). The explain response path in SQLPlugin.java uses JsonResponseFormatter<ExplainResponse> regardless of the format parameter, so this is a pure backward-compatibility fix with no behavioral change.

Changes

  • sql/src/main/java/.../SQLQueryRequest.java — add "json" to isSupportedExplainFormat()
  • sql/src/test/java/.../SQLQueryRequestTest.java — regression test asserting ?format=json is accepted on explain requests

Testing

29/29 tests pass in SQLQueryRequestTest.

isSupportedExplainFormat() only accepted "simple", "standard",
"extended", and "cost" — excluding "json". Before OpenSearch 3.0,
?format=json was valid for the explain endpoint, so existing workflows
that pass this parameter now receive:
"Failed to create executor due to unknown response format: json"
The explain endpoint already returns JSON unconditionally regardless of
the format parameter, so accepting "json" is a pure backward-
compatibility restoration with no behavioral change.
Fixesopensearch-project#4373
Signed-off-by: Radhakrishnan Pachyappan <gingeekrishna@gmail.com>
CopilotAI reviewed Jul 5, 2026

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

🧪 PR contains tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
✅ No TODO sections
🔀 No multiple PR themes
⚡ No major issues detected

@gingeekrishna

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

The enforce-label check is failing — a release label is required. Since this PR improves the error message for unsupported window functions (a UX/error-experience fix), the bugFix label would be appropriate. Could a maintainer add it? Thanks!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Deprecation of OpenSearch DSL format has affected the behavior of the explain API

2 participants

@gingeekrishna
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Fix SQL explain API rejecting ?format=json parameter by gingeekrishna · Pull Request #5607 · opensearch-project/sql · GitHub
Skip to content

Fix SQL explain API rejecting ?format=json parameter - #5607

Open
gingeekrishna wants to merge 1 commit into
opensearch-project:mainfrom
gingeekrishna:fix/4373-explain-api-json-format
Open

Fix SQL explain API rejecting ?format=json parameter#5607
gingeekrishna wants to merge 1 commit into
opensearch-project:mainfrom
gingeekrishna:fix/4373-explain-api-json-format

Conversation

@gingeekrishna

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Fixes#4373

Problem: Since OpenSearch 3.0, calling POST /_plugins/_sql/_explain?format=json returns:

{
"error": {
"reason": "Invalid SQL query",
"details": "Failed to create executor due to unknown response format: json",
"type": "IllegalArgumentException"
},
"status": 400
}

Root cause:isSupportedExplainFormat() in SQLQueryRequest.java only accepted "simple", "standard", "extended", and "cost""json" was never in the list. The explain endpoint itself always returns JSON unconditionally (the format parameter has no effect on the response), so "json" was effectively accepted before this validation was tightened.

Fix: Add "json" to isSupportedExplainFormat(). The explain response path in SQLPlugin.java uses JsonResponseFormatter<ExplainResponse> regardless of the format parameter, so this is a pure backward-compatibility fix with no behavioral change.

Changes

  • sql/src/main/java/.../SQLQueryRequest.java — add "json" to isSupportedExplainFormat()
  • sql/src/test/java/.../SQLQueryRequestTest.java — regression test asserting ?format=json is accepted on explain requests

Testing

29/29 tests pass in SQLQueryRequestTest.

isSupportedExplainFormat() only accepted "simple", "standard",
"extended", and "cost" — excluding "json". Before OpenSearch 3.0,
?format=json was valid for the explain endpoint, so existing workflows
that pass this parameter now receive:
"Failed to create executor due to unknown response format: json"
The explain endpoint already returns JSON unconditionally regardless of
the format parameter, so accepting "json" is a pure backward-
compatibility restoration with no behavioral change.
Fixesopensearch-project#4373
Signed-off-by: Radhakrishnan Pachyappan <gingeekrishna@gmail.com>
CopilotAI reviewed Jul 5, 2026

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

🧪 PR contains tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
✅ No TODO sections
🔀 No multiple PR themes
⚡ No major issues detected

@gingeekrishna

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

The enforce-label check is failing — a release label is required. Since this PR improves the error message for unsupported window functions (a UX/error-experience fix), the bugFix label would be appropriate. Could a maintainer add it? Thanks!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Deprecation of OpenSearch DSL format has affected the behavior of the explain API

2 participants

@gingeekrishna