OCPBUGS-61213: [OTE] Update webhook ote tests to use latest webhook-operator

[perdasilva]

Due to kube-rbac-proxy deprecation the webhook-operator (created 5 years ago) started to create problems downstream [link].

As a mitigation I've recreated the webhook-operator using a latest version of kubebuilder here. We should definitely eventually move to an in-tree test-operator.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61213, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Due to kube-rbac-proxy deprecation the webhook-operator (created 5 years ago) started to create problems downstream [link].

As a mitigation I've recreated the webhook-operator using a latest version of kubebuilder here. We should definitely eventually move to an in-tree test-operator.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[perdasilva]

/payload-aggregate periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.20-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial 10

[openshift-ci]

@perdasilva: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

• periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.20-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/e980f570-89a4-11f0-862d-85971cf843d5-0

[perdasilva]

/jire refresh

[perdasilva]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61213, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
• bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (bandrade@redhat.com), skipping review request.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[anik120]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: anik120, perdasilva

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• DOWNSTREAM_OWNERS [perdasilva]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[perdasilva]

/retest

[perdasilva]

/payload-aggregate periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.20-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial 1

[openshift-ci]

@perdasilva: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

• periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.20-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/c65e8c70-8a2a-11f0-933c-60756fda7f63-0

[perdasilva]

/retest

[perdasilva]

/retest

[perdasilva]

/retest

[perdasilva]

/payload-aggregate periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.20-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial 10

[openshift-ci]

@perdasilva: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

• periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.20-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/94442de0-8ae7-11f0-8a60-43dab3307b95-0

[jianzhangbjz]

Hi @bandrade, could you help verify it? Thanks!
/assign @bandrade

[tmshort]

To not break the bumper
/label tide/merge-method-rebase

[bandrade]

/verified by @bandrade
/label qe-approved

[openshift-ci-robot]

@bandrade: This PR has been marked as verified by @bandrade.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by @bandrade
/label qe-approved

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61213, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (bandrade@redhat.com), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

Due to kube-rbac-proxy deprecation the webhook-operator (created 5 years ago) started to create problems downstream [link].

As a mitigation I've recreated the webhook-operator using a latest version of kubebuilder here. We should definitely eventually move to an in-tree test-operator.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 40dae8e and 2 for PR HEAD 3a756aa in total

[tmshort]

/retest-required

[tmshort]

/test openshift-e2e-aws

[bandrade]

/retest

[tmshort]

/hold
I want to hold this until after #465, as the automatic bumper jobs aren't working, and this will mess up that manual sync.

[tmshort]

/unhold

[openshift-ci]

@perdasilva: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@perdasilva: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61213
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61213 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

Details

In response to this:

Due to kube-rbac-proxy deprecation the webhook-operator (created 5 years ago) started to create problems downstream [link].

As a mitigation I've recreated the webhook-operator using a latest version of kubebuilder here. We should definitely eventually move to an in-tree test-operator.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[perdasilva]

/cherry-pick release-4.20

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@perdasilva: new pull request created: #469

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.