Describe the bug
Originally reported by @mihailefter.
VariantValidator doesn't handle the mapping well from transcript to genome around a gap in NM_017680.6.
Bases NC_000009.12:g.92474743_92474745 are not present in NM_017680.6.
NC_000009.12:g.92474743_92474745del => NM_017680.6:c.151_153=.
Therefore, submitting NC_000009.12:g.92474742C>A returns NM_017680.6:c.153delinsTGAT on both the LOVD endpoint and the VV endpoint. This is as I expect.
However, when we submit NM_017680.6:c.153G>T (the "dumb" version of the genomic C>A) to the VV endpoint, the genomic mapping is NC_000009.12:g.92474742C>A, which is incorrect.
To Reproduce
See above.
Expected behavior
I expect to see NC_000009.12:g.92474742delinsATCA. However, when I submit that variant to the LOVD endpoint, I get NM_017680.6:c.153delinsTGAT back, the mapping earlier linked to the input NC_000009.12:g.92474742C>A. I had expected to see NM_017680.6:c.153G>T, instead.
Additional context
Notes: this gene is on the reverse strand, and the gap is within a repeat region. I suspect the gap isn't fully justified in both directions while applying the variant.
Describe the bug
Originally reported by @mihailefter.
VariantValidator doesn't handle the mapping well from transcript to genome around a gap in
NM_017680.6.Bases
NC_000009.12:g.92474743_92474745are not present inNM_017680.6.NC_000009.12:g.92474743_92474745del=>NM_017680.6:c.151_153=.Therefore, submitting
NC_000009.12:g.92474742C>AreturnsNM_017680.6:c.153delinsTGATon both the LOVD endpoint and the VV endpoint. This is as I expect.However, when we submit
NM_017680.6:c.153G>T(the "dumb" version of the genomic C>A) to the VV endpoint, the genomic mapping isNC_000009.12:g.92474742C>A, which is incorrect.To Reproduce
See above.
Expected behavior
I expect to see
NC_000009.12:g.92474742delinsATCA. However, when I submit that variant to the LOVD endpoint, I getNM_017680.6:c.153delinsTGATback, the mapping earlier linked to the inputNC_000009.12:g.92474742C>A. I had expected to seeNM_017680.6:c.153G>T, instead.Additional context
Notes: this gene is on the reverse strand, and the gap is within a repeat region. I suspect the gap isn't fully justified in both directions while applying the variant.