ci: use configuration variables for Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames - #212

Open
jefferyto wants to merge 1 commit into
openwrt:mainfrom
jefferyto:config-var-usernames
Open

ci: use configuration variables for Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames#212
jefferyto wants to merge 1 commit into
openwrt:mainfrom
jefferyto:config-var-usernames

Conversation

@jefferyto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I believe recent build failures (#211) are caused by GitHub redacting the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames inside Docker tag names passed to buildx.

This changes the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames to be stored as configuration variables, which are not redacted by GitHub, rather than as secrets.

I believe recent build failures (openwrt#211) are caused by GitHub redacting
the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames inside Docker tag names passed to
buildx.
This changes the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames to be stored as
configuration variables[1], which are not redacted by GitHub, rather
than as secrets.
[1]: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/how-tos/write-workflows/choose-what-workflows-do/use-variables#defining-configuration-variables-for-multiple-workflows
Signed-off-by: Jeffery To <jeffery.to@gmail.com>
@jefferyto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I should note that I'm only guessing this will fix #211 as I don't have a practical way to debug the issue or test this fix. I think it is a good idea in general to store the usernames as variables instead of as secrets.

@efahl

efahl commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I just spent a while poking around and I'm still pretty hazy on what might be failing, but it seems to me that the secrets.*_USER values are set and passing through into the various replacements correctly, as evidenced by the fact that the logins are succeeding (here's a recent one https://github.com/openwrt/docker/actions/runs/33351815257/job/99366744712).

Then after that, it's only in the buildx where something is parsing the tags that it fails. The *** in the error doesn't surprise me, I assume that's just github CI redacting the log file, but if the arguments are processed in order, then the first one that fails is the firsts quay.io one, with all the ghcr and docker ones preceding it being accepted.

ERROR: failed to build: invalid tag "quay.io/***/imagebuilder:airoha-an7581-main": invalid reference format

Or, if buildx is not processing args in order, maybe all of the --tag entries are incorrect??? The docs say they look ok to me: https://docs.docker.com/reference/cli/docker/image/tag/

@jefferyto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

My guess is either the tags passed to buildx have literal asterisks (quay.io/***/imagebuilder:airoha-an7581-main) instead of the username, or have invisible delimiters (quay.io/[delimiter]openwrt[/delimiter]/imagebuilder:airoha-an7581-main) which is how GitHub is able to redact the usernames in logs. (Notice that not all instances of "openwrt" are redacted, just the ones corresponding to the "secret" usernames.) I believe either case results in invalid tags.

I think buildx is processing tags in random order and exiting with an error for the first invalid tag it finds, but this is also just a guess.

@efahl

efahl commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Notice that not all instances of "openwrt" are redacted, just the ones corresponding to the "secret" usernames.

Yeah, that does seem very strange, doesn't it? From what I've read, github's redaction algo is pretty stupid and brute force, so you'd expect all of them to get swapped. At this point, I'm betting on your idea about invisible delimiters.

@BKPepe Could you copy the *_USER values from secrets into vars and fire this off again, so we can see what happens?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@jefferyto@efahl
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

ci: use configuration variables for Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames - #212

Open
jefferyto wants to merge 1 commit into
openwrt:mainfrom
jefferyto:config-var-usernames
Open

ci: use configuration variables for Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames#212
jefferyto wants to merge 1 commit into
openwrt:mainfrom
jefferyto:config-var-usernames

Conversation

@jefferyto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I believe recent build failures (#211) are caused by GitHub redacting the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames inside Docker tag names passed to buildx.

This changes the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames to be stored as configuration variables, which are not redacted by GitHub, rather than as secrets.

I believe recent build failures (openwrt#211) are caused by GitHub redacting
the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames inside Docker tag names passed to
buildx.
This changes the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames to be stored as
configuration variables[1], which are not redacted by GitHub, rather
than as secrets.
[1]: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/how-tos/write-workflows/choose-what-workflows-do/use-variables#defining-configuration-variables-for-multiple-workflows
Signed-off-by: Jeffery To <jeffery.to@gmail.com>
@jefferyto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I should note that I'm only guessing this will fix #211 as I don't have a practical way to debug the issue or test this fix. I think it is a good idea in general to store the usernames as variables instead of as secrets.

@efahl

efahl commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I just spent a while poking around and I'm still pretty hazy on what might be failing, but it seems to me that the secrets.*_USER values are set and passing through into the various replacements correctly, as evidenced by the fact that the logins are succeeding (here's a recent one https://github.com/openwrt/docker/actions/runs/33351815257/job/99366744712).

Then after that, it's only in the buildx where something is parsing the tags that it fails. The *** in the error doesn't surprise me, I assume that's just github CI redacting the log file, but if the arguments are processed in order, then the first one that fails is the firsts quay.io one, with all the ghcr and docker ones preceding it being accepted.

ERROR: failed to build: invalid tag "quay.io/***/imagebuilder:airoha-an7581-main": invalid reference format

Or, if buildx is not processing args in order, maybe all of the --tag entries are incorrect??? The docs say they look ok to me: https://docs.docker.com/reference/cli/docker/image/tag/

@jefferyto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

My guess is either the tags passed to buildx have literal asterisks (quay.io/***/imagebuilder:airoha-an7581-main) instead of the username, or have invisible delimiters (quay.io/[delimiter]openwrt[/delimiter]/imagebuilder:airoha-an7581-main) which is how GitHub is able to redact the usernames in logs. (Notice that not all instances of "openwrt" are redacted, just the ones corresponding to the "secret" usernames.) I believe either case results in invalid tags.

I think buildx is processing tags in random order and exiting with an error for the first invalid tag it finds, but this is also just a guess.

@efahl

efahl commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Notice that not all instances of "openwrt" are redacted, just the ones corresponding to the "secret" usernames.

Yeah, that does seem very strange, doesn't it? From what I've read, github's redaction algo is pretty stupid and brute force, so you'd expect all of them to get swapped. At this point, I'm betting on your idea about invisible delimiters.

@BKPepe Could you copy the *_USER values from secrets into vars and fire this off again, so we can see what happens?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@jefferyto@efahl
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

ci: use configuration variables for Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames - #212

Open
jefferyto wants to merge 1 commit into
openwrt:mainfrom
jefferyto:config-var-usernames
Open

ci: use configuration variables for Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames#212
jefferyto wants to merge 1 commit into
openwrt:mainfrom
jefferyto:config-var-usernames

Conversation

@jefferyto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I believe recent build failures (#211) are caused by GitHub redacting the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames inside Docker tag names passed to buildx.

This changes the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames to be stored as configuration variables, which are not redacted by GitHub, rather than as secrets.

I believe recent build failures (openwrt#211) are caused by GitHub redacting
the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames inside Docker tag names passed to
buildx.
This changes the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames to be stored as
configuration variables[1], which are not redacted by GitHub, rather
than as secrets.
[1]: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/how-tos/write-workflows/choose-what-workflows-do/use-variables#defining-configuration-variables-for-multiple-workflows
Signed-off-by: Jeffery To <jeffery.to@gmail.com>
@jefferyto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I should note that I'm only guessing this will fix #211 as I don't have a practical way to debug the issue or test this fix. I think it is a good idea in general to store the usernames as variables instead of as secrets.

@efahl

efahl commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I just spent a while poking around and I'm still pretty hazy on what might be failing, but it seems to me that the secrets.*_USER values are set and passing through into the various replacements correctly, as evidenced by the fact that the logins are succeeding (here's a recent one https://github.com/openwrt/docker/actions/runs/33351815257/job/99366744712).

Then after that, it's only in the buildx where something is parsing the tags that it fails. The *** in the error doesn't surprise me, I assume that's just github CI redacting the log file, but if the arguments are processed in order, then the first one that fails is the firsts quay.io one, with all the ghcr and docker ones preceding it being accepted.

ERROR: failed to build: invalid tag "quay.io/***/imagebuilder:airoha-an7581-main": invalid reference format

Or, if buildx is not processing args in order, maybe all of the --tag entries are incorrect??? The docs say they look ok to me: https://docs.docker.com/reference/cli/docker/image/tag/

@jefferyto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

My guess is either the tags passed to buildx have literal asterisks (quay.io/***/imagebuilder:airoha-an7581-main) instead of the username, or have invisible delimiters (quay.io/[delimiter]openwrt[/delimiter]/imagebuilder:airoha-an7581-main) which is how GitHub is able to redact the usernames in logs. (Notice that not all instances of "openwrt" are redacted, just the ones corresponding to the "secret" usernames.) I believe either case results in invalid tags.

I think buildx is processing tags in random order and exiting with an error for the first invalid tag it finds, but this is also just a guess.

@efahl

efahl commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Notice that not all instances of "openwrt" are redacted, just the ones corresponding to the "secret" usernames.

Yeah, that does seem very strange, doesn't it? From what I've read, github's redaction algo is pretty stupid and brute force, so you'd expect all of them to get swapped. At this point, I'm betting on your idea about invisible delimiters.

@BKPepe Could you copy the *_USER values from secrets into vars and fire this off again, so we can see what happens?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@jefferyto@efahl
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

ci: use configuration variables for Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames - #212

Open
jefferyto wants to merge 1 commit into
openwrt:mainfrom
jefferyto:config-var-usernames
Open

ci: use configuration variables for Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames#212
jefferyto wants to merge 1 commit into
openwrt:mainfrom
jefferyto:config-var-usernames

Conversation

@jefferyto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I believe recent build failures (#211) are caused by GitHub redacting the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames inside Docker tag names passed to buildx.

This changes the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames to be stored as configuration variables, which are not redacted by GitHub, rather than as secrets.

I believe recent build failures (openwrt#211) are caused by GitHub redacting
the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames inside Docker tag names passed to
buildx.
This changes the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames to be stored as
configuration variables[1], which are not redacted by GitHub, rather
than as secrets.
[1]: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/how-tos/write-workflows/choose-what-workflows-do/use-variables#defining-configuration-variables-for-multiple-workflows
Signed-off-by: Jeffery To <jeffery.to@gmail.com>
@jefferyto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I should note that I'm only guessing this will fix #211 as I don't have a practical way to debug the issue or test this fix. I think it is a good idea in general to store the usernames as variables instead of as secrets.

@efahl

efahl commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I just spent a while poking around and I'm still pretty hazy on what might be failing, but it seems to me that the secrets.*_USER values are set and passing through into the various replacements correctly, as evidenced by the fact that the logins are succeeding (here's a recent one https://github.com/openwrt/docker/actions/runs/33351815257/job/99366744712).

Then after that, it's only in the buildx where something is parsing the tags that it fails. The *** in the error doesn't surprise me, I assume that's just github CI redacting the log file, but if the arguments are processed in order, then the first one that fails is the firsts quay.io one, with all the ghcr and docker ones preceding it being accepted.

ERROR: failed to build: invalid tag "quay.io/***/imagebuilder:airoha-an7581-main": invalid reference format

Or, if buildx is not processing args in order, maybe all of the --tag entries are incorrect??? The docs say they look ok to me: https://docs.docker.com/reference/cli/docker/image/tag/

@jefferyto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

My guess is either the tags passed to buildx have literal asterisks (quay.io/***/imagebuilder:airoha-an7581-main) instead of the username, or have invisible delimiters (quay.io/[delimiter]openwrt[/delimiter]/imagebuilder:airoha-an7581-main) which is how GitHub is able to redact the usernames in logs. (Notice that not all instances of "openwrt" are redacted, just the ones corresponding to the "secret" usernames.) I believe either case results in invalid tags.

I think buildx is processing tags in random order and exiting with an error for the first invalid tag it finds, but this is also just a guess.

@efahl

efahl commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Notice that not all instances of "openwrt" are redacted, just the ones corresponding to the "secret" usernames.

Yeah, that does seem very strange, doesn't it? From what I've read, github's redaction algo is pretty stupid and brute force, so you'd expect all of them to get swapped. At this point, I'm betting on your idea about invisible delimiters.

@BKPepe Could you copy the *_USER values from secrets into vars and fire this off again, so we can see what happens?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@jefferyto@efahl
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

ci: use configuration variables for Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames - #212

Open
jefferyto wants to merge 1 commit into
openwrt:mainfrom
jefferyto:config-var-usernames
Open

ci: use configuration variables for Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames#212
jefferyto wants to merge 1 commit into
openwrt:mainfrom
jefferyto:config-var-usernames

Conversation

@jefferyto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I believe recent build failures (#211) are caused by GitHub redacting the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames inside Docker tag names passed to buildx.

This changes the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames to be stored as configuration variables, which are not redacted by GitHub, rather than as secrets.

I believe recent build failures (openwrt#211) are caused by GitHub redacting
the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames inside Docker tag names passed to
buildx.
This changes the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames to be stored as
configuration variables[1], which are not redacted by GitHub, rather
than as secrets.
[1]: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/how-tos/write-workflows/choose-what-workflows-do/use-variables#defining-configuration-variables-for-multiple-workflows
Signed-off-by: Jeffery To <jeffery.to@gmail.com>
@jefferyto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I should note that I'm only guessing this will fix #211 as I don't have a practical way to debug the issue or test this fix. I think it is a good idea in general to store the usernames as variables instead of as secrets.

@efahl

efahl commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I just spent a while poking around and I'm still pretty hazy on what might be failing, but it seems to me that the secrets.*_USER values are set and passing through into the various replacements correctly, as evidenced by the fact that the logins are succeeding (here's a recent one https://github.com/openwrt/docker/actions/runs/33351815257/job/99366744712).

Then after that, it's only in the buildx where something is parsing the tags that it fails. The *** in the error doesn't surprise me, I assume that's just github CI redacting the log file, but if the arguments are processed in order, then the first one that fails is the firsts quay.io one, with all the ghcr and docker ones preceding it being accepted.

ERROR: failed to build: invalid tag "quay.io/***/imagebuilder:airoha-an7581-main": invalid reference format

Or, if buildx is not processing args in order, maybe all of the --tag entries are incorrect??? The docs say they look ok to me: https://docs.docker.com/reference/cli/docker/image/tag/

@jefferyto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

My guess is either the tags passed to buildx have literal asterisks (quay.io/***/imagebuilder:airoha-an7581-main) instead of the username, or have invisible delimiters (quay.io/[delimiter]openwrt[/delimiter]/imagebuilder:airoha-an7581-main) which is how GitHub is able to redact the usernames in logs. (Notice that not all instances of "openwrt" are redacted, just the ones corresponding to the "secret" usernames.) I believe either case results in invalid tags.

I think buildx is processing tags in random order and exiting with an error for the first invalid tag it finds, but this is also just a guess.

@efahl

efahl commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Notice that not all instances of "openwrt" are redacted, just the ones corresponding to the "secret" usernames.

Yeah, that does seem very strange, doesn't it? From what I've read, github's redaction algo is pretty stupid and brute force, so you'd expect all of them to get swapped. At this point, I'm betting on your idea about invisible delimiters.

@BKPepe Could you copy the *_USER values from secrets into vars and fire this off again, so we can see what happens?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@jefferyto@efahl
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

ci: use configuration variables for Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames - #212

Open
jefferyto wants to merge 1 commit into
openwrt:mainfrom
jefferyto:config-var-usernames
Open

ci: use configuration variables for Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames#212
jefferyto wants to merge 1 commit into
openwrt:mainfrom
jefferyto:config-var-usernames

Conversation

@jefferyto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I believe recent build failures (#211) are caused by GitHub redacting the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames inside Docker tag names passed to buildx.

This changes the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames to be stored as configuration variables, which are not redacted by GitHub, rather than as secrets.

I believe recent build failures (openwrt#211) are caused by GitHub redacting
the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames inside Docker tag names passed to
buildx.
This changes the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames to be stored as
configuration variables[1], which are not redacted by GitHub, rather
than as secrets.
[1]: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/how-tos/write-workflows/choose-what-workflows-do/use-variables#defining-configuration-variables-for-multiple-workflows
Signed-off-by: Jeffery To <jeffery.to@gmail.com>
@jefferyto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I should note that I'm only guessing this will fix #211 as I don't have a practical way to debug the issue or test this fix. I think it is a good idea in general to store the usernames as variables instead of as secrets.

@efahl

efahl commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I just spent a while poking around and I'm still pretty hazy on what might be failing, but it seems to me that the secrets.*_USER values are set and passing through into the various replacements correctly, as evidenced by the fact that the logins are succeeding (here's a recent one https://github.com/openwrt/docker/actions/runs/33351815257/job/99366744712).

Then after that, it's only in the buildx where something is parsing the tags that it fails. The *** in the error doesn't surprise me, I assume that's just github CI redacting the log file, but if the arguments are processed in order, then the first one that fails is the firsts quay.io one, with all the ghcr and docker ones preceding it being accepted.

ERROR: failed to build: invalid tag "quay.io/***/imagebuilder:airoha-an7581-main": invalid reference format

Or, if buildx is not processing args in order, maybe all of the --tag entries are incorrect??? The docs say they look ok to me: https://docs.docker.com/reference/cli/docker/image/tag/

@jefferyto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

My guess is either the tags passed to buildx have literal asterisks (quay.io/***/imagebuilder:airoha-an7581-main) instead of the username, or have invisible delimiters (quay.io/[delimiter]openwrt[/delimiter]/imagebuilder:airoha-an7581-main) which is how GitHub is able to redact the usernames in logs. (Notice that not all instances of "openwrt" are redacted, just the ones corresponding to the "secret" usernames.) I believe either case results in invalid tags.

I think buildx is processing tags in random order and exiting with an error for the first invalid tag it finds, but this is also just a guess.

@efahl

efahl commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Notice that not all instances of "openwrt" are redacted, just the ones corresponding to the "secret" usernames.

Yeah, that does seem very strange, doesn't it? From what I've read, github's redaction algo is pretty stupid and brute force, so you'd expect all of them to get swapped. At this point, I'm betting on your idea about invisible delimiters.

@BKPepe Could you copy the *_USER values from secrets into vars and fire this off again, so we can see what happens?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@jefferyto@efahl
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

ci: use configuration variables for Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames - #212

Open
jefferyto wants to merge 1 commit into
openwrt:mainfrom
jefferyto:config-var-usernames
Open

ci: use configuration variables for Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames#212
jefferyto wants to merge 1 commit into
openwrt:mainfrom
jefferyto:config-var-usernames

Conversation

@jefferyto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I believe recent build failures (#211) are caused by GitHub redacting the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames inside Docker tag names passed to buildx.

This changes the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames to be stored as configuration variables, which are not redacted by GitHub, rather than as secrets.

I believe recent build failures (openwrt#211) are caused by GitHub redacting
the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames inside Docker tag names passed to
buildx.
This changes the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames to be stored as
configuration variables[1], which are not redacted by GitHub, rather
than as secrets.
[1]: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/how-tos/write-workflows/choose-what-workflows-do/use-variables#defining-configuration-variables-for-multiple-workflows
Signed-off-by: Jeffery To <jeffery.to@gmail.com>
@jefferyto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I should note that I'm only guessing this will fix #211 as I don't have a practical way to debug the issue or test this fix. I think it is a good idea in general to store the usernames as variables instead of as secrets.

@efahl

efahl commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I just spent a while poking around and I'm still pretty hazy on what might be failing, but it seems to me that the secrets.*_USER values are set and passing through into the various replacements correctly, as evidenced by the fact that the logins are succeeding (here's a recent one https://github.com/openwrt/docker/actions/runs/33351815257/job/99366744712).

Then after that, it's only in the buildx where something is parsing the tags that it fails. The *** in the error doesn't surprise me, I assume that's just github CI redacting the log file, but if the arguments are processed in order, then the first one that fails is the firsts quay.io one, with all the ghcr and docker ones preceding it being accepted.

ERROR: failed to build: invalid tag "quay.io/***/imagebuilder:airoha-an7581-main": invalid reference format

Or, if buildx is not processing args in order, maybe all of the --tag entries are incorrect??? The docs say they look ok to me: https://docs.docker.com/reference/cli/docker/image/tag/

@jefferyto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

My guess is either the tags passed to buildx have literal asterisks (quay.io/***/imagebuilder:airoha-an7581-main) instead of the username, or have invisible delimiters (quay.io/[delimiter]openwrt[/delimiter]/imagebuilder:airoha-an7581-main) which is how GitHub is able to redact the usernames in logs. (Notice that not all instances of "openwrt" are redacted, just the ones corresponding to the "secret" usernames.) I believe either case results in invalid tags.

I think buildx is processing tags in random order and exiting with an error for the first invalid tag it finds, but this is also just a guess.

@efahl

efahl commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Notice that not all instances of "openwrt" are redacted, just the ones corresponding to the "secret" usernames.

Yeah, that does seem very strange, doesn't it? From what I've read, github's redaction algo is pretty stupid and brute force, so you'd expect all of them to get swapped. At this point, I'm betting on your idea about invisible delimiters.

@BKPepe Could you copy the *_USER values from secrets into vars and fire this off again, so we can see what happens?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@jefferyto@efahl
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

ci: use configuration variables for Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames - #212

Open
jefferyto wants to merge 1 commit into
openwrt:mainfrom
jefferyto:config-var-usernames
Open

ci: use configuration variables for Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames#212
jefferyto wants to merge 1 commit into
openwrt:mainfrom
jefferyto:config-var-usernames

Conversation

@jefferyto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I believe recent build failures (#211) are caused by GitHub redacting the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames inside Docker tag names passed to buildx.

This changes the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames to be stored as configuration variables, which are not redacted by GitHub, rather than as secrets.

I believe recent build failures (openwrt#211) are caused by GitHub redacting
the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames inside Docker tag names passed to
buildx.
This changes the Docker Hub and Quay.io usernames to be stored as
configuration variables[1], which are not redacted by GitHub, rather
than as secrets.
[1]: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/how-tos/write-workflows/choose-what-workflows-do/use-variables#defining-configuration-variables-for-multiple-workflows
Signed-off-by: Jeffery To <jeffery.to@gmail.com>
@jefferyto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I should note that I'm only guessing this will fix #211 as I don't have a practical way to debug the issue or test this fix. I think it is a good idea in general to store the usernames as variables instead of as secrets.

@efahl

efahl commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I just spent a while poking around and I'm still pretty hazy on what might be failing, but it seems to me that the secrets.*_USER values are set and passing through into the various replacements correctly, as evidenced by the fact that the logins are succeeding (here's a recent one https://github.com/openwrt/docker/actions/runs/33351815257/job/99366744712).

Then after that, it's only in the buildx where something is parsing the tags that it fails. The *** in the error doesn't surprise me, I assume that's just github CI redacting the log file, but if the arguments are processed in order, then the first one that fails is the firsts quay.io one, with all the ghcr and docker ones preceding it being accepted.

ERROR: failed to build: invalid tag "quay.io/***/imagebuilder:airoha-an7581-main": invalid reference format

Or, if buildx is not processing args in order, maybe all of the --tag entries are incorrect??? The docs say they look ok to me: https://docs.docker.com/reference/cli/docker/image/tag/

@jefferyto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

My guess is either the tags passed to buildx have literal asterisks (quay.io/***/imagebuilder:airoha-an7581-main) instead of the username, or have invisible delimiters (quay.io/[delimiter]openwrt[/delimiter]/imagebuilder:airoha-an7581-main) which is how GitHub is able to redact the usernames in logs. (Notice that not all instances of "openwrt" are redacted, just the ones corresponding to the "secret" usernames.) I believe either case results in invalid tags.

I think buildx is processing tags in random order and exiting with an error for the first invalid tag it finds, but this is also just a guess.

@efahl

efahl commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Notice that not all instances of "openwrt" are redacted, just the ones corresponding to the "secret" usernames.

Yeah, that does seem very strange, doesn't it? From what I've read, github's redaction algo is pretty stupid and brute force, so you'd expect all of them to get swapped. At this point, I'm betting on your idea about invisible delimiters.

@BKPepe Could you copy the *_USER values from secrets into vars and fire this off again, so we can see what happens?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@jefferyto@efahl