refactor: resolve the informer target client without a downcast - #3548

Merged
csviri merged 1 commit into
operator-framework:nextfrom
csviri:informer-target-client-lookup
Aug 11, 2026
Merged

refactor: resolve the informer target client without a downcast#3548
csviri merged 1 commit into
operator-framework:nextfrom
csviri:informer-target-client-lookup

Conversation

@csviri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.

Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.


Quality-only change: no intended behavior difference. Cut from next and
touches a disjoint set of files from the sibling cleanup PRs, so it can be merged
independently and in any order.

Verified on this branch alone: mvn -o -pl operator-framework-core,operator-framework-junit -am test
(693 core + 6 junit tests, no failures) and mvn spotless:check.

InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
CopilotAI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 7, 2026 11:55
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 8bd2ac12-c22a-4858-9b13-755916ce07e2

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR refactors informer target-client resolution so InformerManager can ask the configuration for an optional per-informer KubernetesClient without downcasting to InformerEventSourceConfiguration, improving type-safety and avoiding unnecessary default-client creation.

Changes:

  • Move the default getKubernetesClient(): Optional<KubernetesClient> method from InformerEventSourceConfiguration to the common Informable interface.
  • Update InformerManager#getTargetClient() to resolve the client via configuration.getKubernetesClient().orElseGet(...), avoiding eager ConfigurationService client creation.
  • Remove the now-redundant default method from InformerEventSourceConfiguration while keeping its concrete implementation override.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

FileDescription
operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/processing/event/source/informer/InformerManager.javaRemoves configuration downcast and lazily resolves the target client via Informable#getKubernetesClient().
operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/api/config/informer/InformerEventSourceConfiguration.javaDrops the default getKubernetesClient() method (now inherited from Informable) while keeping the concrete override.
operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/api/config/Informable.javaIntroduces the default optional getKubernetesClient() hook for all informable configurations.

Comment on lines +36 to +39
/**
* Optional, specific kubernetes client, typically to connect to a different cluster than the rest
* of the operator. Note that this is solely for multi cluster support.
*/

@csviricsviri left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@csviri
csviri merged commit b5022e2 into operator-framework:nextAug 11, 2026
48 of 49 checks passed
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2026
InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2026
InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2026
InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@csviri
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all \u003cpre\u003e\u003ccode\u003e blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "github.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

refactor: resolve the informer target client without a downcast - #3548

Merged
csviri merged 1 commit into
operator-framework:nextfrom
csviri:informer-target-client-lookup
Aug 11, 2026
Merged

refactor: resolve the informer target client without a downcast#3548
csviri merged 1 commit into
operator-framework:nextfrom
csviri:informer-target-client-lookup

Conversation

@csviri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.

Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.


Quality-only change: no intended behavior difference. Cut from next and
touches a disjoint set of files from the sibling cleanup PRs, so it can be merged
independently and in any order.

Verified on this branch alone: mvn -o -pl operator-framework-core,operator-framework-junit -am test
(693 core + 6 junit tests, no failures) and mvn spotless:check.

InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
CopilotAI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 7, 2026 11:55
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 8bd2ac12-c22a-4858-9b13-755916ce07e2

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR refactors informer target-client resolution so InformerManager can ask the configuration for an optional per-informer KubernetesClient without downcasting to InformerEventSourceConfiguration, improving type-safety and avoiding unnecessary default-client creation.

Changes:

  • Move the default getKubernetesClient(): Optional<KubernetesClient> method from InformerEventSourceConfiguration to the common Informable interface.
  • Update InformerManager#getTargetClient() to resolve the client via configuration.getKubernetesClient().orElseGet(...), avoiding eager ConfigurationService client creation.
  • Remove the now-redundant default method from InformerEventSourceConfiguration while keeping its concrete implementation override.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

FileDescription
operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/processing/event/source/informer/InformerManager.javaRemoves configuration downcast and lazily resolves the target client via Informable#getKubernetesClient().
operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/api/config/informer/InformerEventSourceConfiguration.javaDrops the default getKubernetesClient() method (now inherited from Informable) while keeping the concrete override.
operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/api/config/Informable.javaIntroduces the default optional getKubernetesClient() hook for all informable configurations.

Comment on lines +36 to +39
/**
* Optional, specific kubernetes client, typically to connect to a different cluster than the rest
* of the operator. Note that this is solely for multi cluster support.
*/

@csviricsviri left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@csviri
csviri merged commit b5022e2 into operator-framework:nextAug 11, 2026
48 of 49 checks passed
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2026
InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2026
InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2026
InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@csviri
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

refactor: resolve the informer target client without a downcast - #3548

Merged
csviri merged 1 commit into
operator-framework:nextfrom
csviri:informer-target-client-lookup
Aug 11, 2026
Merged

refactor: resolve the informer target client without a downcast#3548
csviri merged 1 commit into
operator-framework:nextfrom
csviri:informer-target-client-lookup

Conversation

@csviri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.

Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.


Quality-only change: no intended behavior difference. Cut from next and
touches a disjoint set of files from the sibling cleanup PRs, so it can be merged
independently and in any order.

Verified on this branch alone: mvn -o -pl operator-framework-core,operator-framework-junit -am test
(693 core + 6 junit tests, no failures) and mvn spotless:check.

InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
CopilotAI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 7, 2026 11:55
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 8bd2ac12-c22a-4858-9b13-755916ce07e2

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR refactors informer target-client resolution so InformerManager can ask the configuration for an optional per-informer KubernetesClient without downcasting to InformerEventSourceConfiguration, improving type-safety and avoiding unnecessary default-client creation.

Changes:

  • Move the default getKubernetesClient(): Optional<KubernetesClient> method from InformerEventSourceConfiguration to the common Informable interface.
  • Update InformerManager#getTargetClient() to resolve the client via configuration.getKubernetesClient().orElseGet(...), avoiding eager ConfigurationService client creation.
  • Remove the now-redundant default method from InformerEventSourceConfiguration while keeping its concrete implementation override.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

FileDescription
operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/processing/event/source/informer/InformerManager.javaRemoves configuration downcast and lazily resolves the target client via Informable#getKubernetesClient().
operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/api/config/informer/InformerEventSourceConfiguration.javaDrops the default getKubernetesClient() method (now inherited from Informable) while keeping the concrete override.
operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/api/config/Informable.javaIntroduces the default optional getKubernetesClient() hook for all informable configurations.

Comment on lines +36 to +39
/**
* Optional, specific kubernetes client, typically to connect to a different cluster than the rest
* of the operator. Note that this is solely for multi cluster support.
*/

@csviricsviri left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@csviri
csviri merged commit b5022e2 into operator-framework:nextAug 11, 2026
48 of 49 checks passed
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2026
InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2026
InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2026
InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@csviri
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length \u003e 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

refactor: resolve the informer target client without a downcast - #3548

Merged
csviri merged 1 commit into
operator-framework:nextfrom
csviri:informer-target-client-lookup
Aug 11, 2026
Merged

refactor: resolve the informer target client without a downcast#3548
csviri merged 1 commit into
operator-framework:nextfrom
csviri:informer-target-client-lookup

Conversation

@csviri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.

Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.


Quality-only change: no intended behavior difference. Cut from next and
touches a disjoint set of files from the sibling cleanup PRs, so it can be merged
independently and in any order.

Verified on this branch alone: mvn -o -pl operator-framework-core,operator-framework-junit -am test
(693 core + 6 junit tests, no failures) and mvn spotless:check.

InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
CopilotAI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 7, 2026 11:55
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 8bd2ac12-c22a-4858-9b13-755916ce07e2

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR refactors informer target-client resolution so InformerManager can ask the configuration for an optional per-informer KubernetesClient without downcasting to InformerEventSourceConfiguration, improving type-safety and avoiding unnecessary default-client creation.

Changes:

  • Move the default getKubernetesClient(): Optional<KubernetesClient> method from InformerEventSourceConfiguration to the common Informable interface.
  • Update InformerManager#getTargetClient() to resolve the client via configuration.getKubernetesClient().orElseGet(...), avoiding eager ConfigurationService client creation.
  • Remove the now-redundant default method from InformerEventSourceConfiguration while keeping its concrete implementation override.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

FileDescription
operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/processing/event/source/informer/InformerManager.javaRemoves configuration downcast and lazily resolves the target client via Informable#getKubernetesClient().
operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/api/config/informer/InformerEventSourceConfiguration.javaDrops the default getKubernetesClient() method (now inherited from Informable) while keeping the concrete override.
operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/api/config/Informable.javaIntroduces the default optional getKubernetesClient() hook for all informable configurations.

Comment on lines +36 to +39
/**
* Optional, specific kubernetes client, typically to connect to a different cluster than the rest
* of the operator. Note that this is solely for multi cluster support.
*/

@csviricsviri left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@csviri
csviri merged commit b5022e2 into operator-framework:nextAug 11, 2026
48 of 49 checks passed
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2026
InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2026
InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2026
InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@csviri
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

refactor: resolve the informer target client without a downcast - #3548

Merged
csviri merged 1 commit into
operator-framework:nextfrom
csviri:informer-target-client-lookup
Aug 11, 2026
Merged

refactor: resolve the informer target client without a downcast#3548
csviri merged 1 commit into
operator-framework:nextfrom
csviri:informer-target-client-lookup

Conversation

@csviri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.

Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.


Quality-only change: no intended behavior difference. Cut from next and
touches a disjoint set of files from the sibling cleanup PRs, so it can be merged
independently and in any order.

Verified on this branch alone: mvn -o -pl operator-framework-core,operator-framework-junit -am test
(693 core + 6 junit tests, no failures) and mvn spotless:check.

InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
CopilotAI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 7, 2026 11:55
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 8bd2ac12-c22a-4858-9b13-755916ce07e2

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR refactors informer target-client resolution so InformerManager can ask the configuration for an optional per-informer KubernetesClient without downcasting to InformerEventSourceConfiguration, improving type-safety and avoiding unnecessary default-client creation.

Changes:

  • Move the default getKubernetesClient(): Optional<KubernetesClient> method from InformerEventSourceConfiguration to the common Informable interface.
  • Update InformerManager#getTargetClient() to resolve the client via configuration.getKubernetesClient().orElseGet(...), avoiding eager ConfigurationService client creation.
  • Remove the now-redundant default method from InformerEventSourceConfiguration while keeping its concrete implementation override.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

FileDescription
operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/processing/event/source/informer/InformerManager.javaRemoves configuration downcast and lazily resolves the target client via Informable#getKubernetesClient().
operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/api/config/informer/InformerEventSourceConfiguration.javaDrops the default getKubernetesClient() method (now inherited from Informable) while keeping the concrete override.
operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/api/config/Informable.javaIntroduces the default optional getKubernetesClient() hook for all informable configurations.

Comment on lines +36 to +39
/**
* Optional, specific kubernetes client, typically to connect to a different cluster than the rest
* of the operator. Note that this is solely for multi cluster support.
*/

@csviricsviri left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@csviri
csviri merged commit b5022e2 into operator-framework:nextAug 11, 2026
48 of 49 checks passed
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2026
InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2026
InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2026
InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@csviri
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

refactor: resolve the informer target client without a downcast - #3548

Merged
csviri merged 1 commit into
operator-framework:nextfrom
csviri:informer-target-client-lookup
Aug 11, 2026
Merged

refactor: resolve the informer target client without a downcast#3548
csviri merged 1 commit into
operator-framework:nextfrom
csviri:informer-target-client-lookup

Conversation

@csviri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.

Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.


Quality-only change: no intended behavior difference. Cut from next and
touches a disjoint set of files from the sibling cleanup PRs, so it can be merged
independently and in any order.

Verified on this branch alone: mvn -o -pl operator-framework-core,operator-framework-junit -am test
(693 core + 6 junit tests, no failures) and mvn spotless:check.

InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
CopilotAI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 7, 2026 11:55
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 8bd2ac12-c22a-4858-9b13-755916ce07e2

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR refactors informer target-client resolution so InformerManager can ask the configuration for an optional per-informer KubernetesClient without downcasting to InformerEventSourceConfiguration, improving type-safety and avoiding unnecessary default-client creation.

Changes:

  • Move the default getKubernetesClient(): Optional<KubernetesClient> method from InformerEventSourceConfiguration to the common Informable interface.
  • Update InformerManager#getTargetClient() to resolve the client via configuration.getKubernetesClient().orElseGet(...), avoiding eager ConfigurationService client creation.
  • Remove the now-redundant default method from InformerEventSourceConfiguration while keeping its concrete implementation override.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

FileDescription
operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/processing/event/source/informer/InformerManager.javaRemoves configuration downcast and lazily resolves the target client via Informable#getKubernetesClient().
operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/api/config/informer/InformerEventSourceConfiguration.javaDrops the default getKubernetesClient() method (now inherited from Informable) while keeping the concrete override.
operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/api/config/Informable.javaIntroduces the default optional getKubernetesClient() hook for all informable configurations.

Comment on lines +36 to +39
/**
* Optional, specific kubernetes client, typically to connect to a different cluster than the rest
* of the operator. Note that this is solely for multi cluster support.
*/

@csviricsviri left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@csviri
csviri merged commit b5022e2 into operator-framework:nextAug 11, 2026
48 of 49 checks passed
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2026
InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2026
InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2026
InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@csviri
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

refactor: resolve the informer target client without a downcast - #3548

Merged
csviri merged 1 commit into
operator-framework:nextfrom
csviri:informer-target-client-lookup
Aug 11, 2026
Merged

refactor: resolve the informer target client without a downcast#3548
csviri merged 1 commit into
operator-framework:nextfrom
csviri:informer-target-client-lookup

Conversation

@csviri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.

Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.


Quality-only change: no intended behavior difference. Cut from next and
touches a disjoint set of files from the sibling cleanup PRs, so it can be merged
independently and in any order.

Verified on this branch alone: mvn -o -pl operator-framework-core,operator-framework-junit -am test
(693 core + 6 junit tests, no failures) and mvn spotless:check.

InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
CopilotAI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 7, 2026 11:55
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 8bd2ac12-c22a-4858-9b13-755916ce07e2

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR refactors informer target-client resolution so InformerManager can ask the configuration for an optional per-informer KubernetesClient without downcasting to InformerEventSourceConfiguration, improving type-safety and avoiding unnecessary default-client creation.

Changes:

  • Move the default getKubernetesClient(): Optional<KubernetesClient> method from InformerEventSourceConfiguration to the common Informable interface.
  • Update InformerManager#getTargetClient() to resolve the client via configuration.getKubernetesClient().orElseGet(...), avoiding eager ConfigurationService client creation.
  • Remove the now-redundant default method from InformerEventSourceConfiguration while keeping its concrete implementation override.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

FileDescription
operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/processing/event/source/informer/InformerManager.javaRemoves configuration downcast and lazily resolves the target client via Informable#getKubernetesClient().
operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/api/config/informer/InformerEventSourceConfiguration.javaDrops the default getKubernetesClient() method (now inherited from Informable) while keeping the concrete override.
operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/api/config/Informable.javaIntroduces the default optional getKubernetesClient() hook for all informable configurations.

Comment on lines +36 to +39
/**
* Optional, specific kubernetes client, typically to connect to a different cluster than the rest
* of the operator. Note that this is solely for multi cluster support.
*/

@csviricsviri left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@csviri
csviri merged commit b5022e2 into operator-framework:nextAug 11, 2026
48 of 49 checks passed
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2026
InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2026
InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2026
InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@csviri
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

refactor: resolve the informer target client without a downcast - #3548

Merged
csviri merged 1 commit into
operator-framework:nextfrom
csviri:informer-target-client-lookup
Aug 11, 2026
Merged

refactor: resolve the informer target client without a downcast#3548
csviri merged 1 commit into
operator-framework:nextfrom
csviri:informer-target-client-lookup

Conversation

@csviri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.

Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.


Quality-only change: no intended behavior difference. Cut from next and
touches a disjoint set of files from the sibling cleanup PRs, so it can be merged
independently and in any order.

Verified on this branch alone: mvn -o -pl operator-framework-core,operator-framework-junit -am test
(693 core + 6 junit tests, no failures) and mvn spotless:check.

InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
CopilotAI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 7, 2026 11:55
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 8bd2ac12-c22a-4858-9b13-755916ce07e2

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR refactors informer target-client resolution so InformerManager can ask the configuration for an optional per-informer KubernetesClient without downcasting to InformerEventSourceConfiguration, improving type-safety and avoiding unnecessary default-client creation.

Changes:

  • Move the default getKubernetesClient(): Optional<KubernetesClient> method from InformerEventSourceConfiguration to the common Informable interface.
  • Update InformerManager#getTargetClient() to resolve the client via configuration.getKubernetesClient().orElseGet(...), avoiding eager ConfigurationService client creation.
  • Remove the now-redundant default method from InformerEventSourceConfiguration while keeping its concrete implementation override.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

FileDescription
operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/processing/event/source/informer/InformerManager.javaRemoves configuration downcast and lazily resolves the target client via Informable#getKubernetesClient().
operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/api/config/informer/InformerEventSourceConfiguration.javaDrops the default getKubernetesClient() method (now inherited from Informable) while keeping the concrete override.
operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/api/config/Informable.javaIntroduces the default optional getKubernetesClient() hook for all informable configurations.

Comment on lines +36 to +39
/**
* Optional, specific kubernetes client, typically to connect to a different cluster than the rest
* of the operator. Note that this is solely for multi cluster support.
*/

@csviricsviri left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@csviri
csviri merged commit b5022e2 into operator-framework:nextAug 11, 2026
48 of 49 checks passed
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2026
InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2026
InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2026
InformerManager is generic over C extends Informable, but getTargetClient
type-tested for InformerEventSourceConfiguration to find out whether a specific
(e.g. remote cluster) client was configured. Informable has two implementors
and only one could answer the question, so a third configuration type wanting
its own client would be ignored silently rather than failing to compile.
Move the default getKubernetesClient() up from InformerEventSourceConfiguration
to Informable and let InformerManager ask the configuration directly. The
default still returns Optional.empty(), so existing implementations are
unaffected. As a side effect the ConfigurationService client is now only
created when no specific client is configured, instead of being created and
then discarded.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@csviri