📖 fix broken catalod api reference link

[anik120]

The make target crd-ref-docs generates the api reference doc operator-controller-api-reference.md using the API types in the api/ directory.
The docs structure was expecting two files, while only one file was being generated.

This PR fixes the doc structure to expect only one file, getting rid of a broken link as a result.

Description

Reviewer Checklist

• API Go Documentation
• Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
• Comprehensive Commit Messages
• Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	0979e4d
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/olmv1/deploys/68a4bfe465d2ca000842df05
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-2152--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

[grokspawn]

IMHO, if we're going to drop discrete operator-controller / catalogd nomenclature w.r.t. the API docs, then we should consistently refer to it as "OLMv1 API", not "operator-controller", like here.

[anik120]

IMHO, if we're going to drop discrete operator-controller / catalogd nomenclature w.r.t. the API docs, then we should consistently refer to it as "OLMv1 API", not "operator-controller", like here.

@grokspawn that is totally fair. Pushed a new commit renaming that part. PTAL.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.83%. Comparing base (35bcd7a) to head (0979e4d).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2152 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 72.75% 72.83% +0.08% 
==========================================
Files 79 79 Lines 7340 7340 ==========================================
+ Hits 5340 5346 +6 + Misses 1653 1649 -4 + Partials 347 345 -2 

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e	44.43% <ø> (?)
experimental-e2e	55.16% <ø> (+0.24%)	⬆️
unit	58.24% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[grokspawn]

/lgtm
(I have no approver powers in this repo)

[grokspawn]

still some warnings in the workflow
Would you please capture an issue for these in the backlog, @anik120?
(Ideally, the CI would fail on warnings.)

[grokspawn]

Ooh. First time we've had a PR with contributions across api, Makefile, docs areas, so I'm curious to see how the new ladder works.

/approve

[grokspawn]

Ladder works. 😁

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: grokspawn, perdasilva

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [perdasilva]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[anik120]

still some warnings in the workflow Would you please capture an issue for these in the backlog, @anik120? (Ideally, the CI would fail on warnings.)

@grokspawn#2157