⚠️ Remove Paused ClusterExtensionRevision LifecycleState

[perdasilva]

Description

Removes references from the ClusterExtensionRevision Paused lifecycle state, since we don't plan on including it for now

Reviewer Checklist

• API Go Documentation
• Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
• Comprehensive Commit Messages
• Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	0d98698
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/olmv1/deploys/6931bca81f1ff60008069dea
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-2373--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR removes the "Paused" lifecycle state from the ClusterExtensionRevision API, simplifying the lifecycle model to only support "Active" and "Archived" states. The removal is comprehensive, eliminating the constant definition, related controller logic, and boxcutter integration code.

• Removed the ClusterExtensionRevisionLifecycleStatePaused constant and its documentation
• Removed controller logic that handled paused state (boxcutter WithPaused option)
• Simplified revision filtering logic to only skip archived revisions

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File	Description
api/v1/clusterextensionrevision_types.go	Removed the ClusterExtensionRevisionLifecycleStatePaused constant and its documentation
internal/operator-controller/controllers/clusterextensionrevision_controller.go	Removed the conditional logic that added boxcutter.WithPaused option for paused revisions
internal/operator-controller/controllers/boxcutter_reconcile_steps.go	Simplified from a switch statement to a simple conditional check, now only skipping archived revisions

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 74.86%. Comparing base (d44cbaf) to head (0d98698).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2373 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 72.26% 74.86% +2.60% 
==========================================
Files 95 95 Lines 7336 7332 -4 ==========================================
+ Hits 5301 5489 +188 + Misses 1631 1409 -222 - Partials 404 434 +30 

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e	44.88% <0.00%> (?)
experimental-e2e	49.29% <100.00%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
unit	58.85% <0.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[pedjak]

/lgtm

[rashmigottipati]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pedjak, rashmigottipati

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• api/OWNERS [pedjak]
• internal/operator-controller/OWNERS [pedjak]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[perdasilva]

/override go-apidiff

[openshift-ci]

@perdasilva: Overrode contexts on behalf of perdasilva: go-apidiff

Details

In response to this:

/override go-apidiff

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.