🌱 Add CheckObjectSupport bundle validator

[perdasilva]

Summary

• Adds a CheckObjectSupport validator that rejects non-CRD/non-CSV bundle objects whose kind is not in the registry+v1 supported resources list (via operator-registry's IsSupported)
• Adds unit tests covering empty bundles, supported kinds, unsupported kinds, multiple errors, and mixed bundles

Test plan

• Unit tests added and passing for CheckObjectSupport
• Full existing validator test suite passes
• CI passes

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	784e40b
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/olmv1/deploys/699dbe56724fb30008eb2c5b
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-2523--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR adds a new bundle validator CheckObjectSupport to ensure that non-CRD and non-CSV bundle objects use only supported Kubernetes resource kinds according to the registry+v1 standard. The validator leverages the existing IsSupported function from operator-registry to check each object kind, providing early validation feedback before bundle generation.

Changes:

• Added CheckObjectSupport validator function that validates bundle objects against the registry+v1 supported resources list
• Added comprehensive unit tests covering empty bundles, supported kinds, unsupported kinds, multiple errors, and mixed scenarios
• Added helper function newUnstructuredObject to simplify test object creation

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File	Description
internal/operator-controller/rukpak/render/registryv1/validators/validator.go	Implements the CheckObjectSupport validator that rejects unsupported object kinds
internal/operator-controller/rukpak/render/registryv1/validators/validator_test.go	Adds comprehensive unit tests and test helper for the new validator

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.10%. Comparing base (4121321) to head (784e40b).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2523 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 72.15% 72.10% -0.05% 
==========================================
Files 103 103 Lines 8686 8693 +7 ==========================================
+ Hits 6267 6268 +1 - Misses 1937 1944 +7 + Partials 482 481 -1 

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e	45.38% <71.42%> (+0.05%)	⬆️
experimental-e2e	53.71% <71.42%> (-0.20%)	⬇️
unit	57.16% <100.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[camilamacedo86]

Very small I think it is good to fly

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: camilamacedo86

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [camilamacedo86]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment