Align CONTRIBUTING's #9 entry with the reframed monitoring issue - #23
Merged
Conversation
Issue #9 now argues against reimplementing PSI/CSI and scopes the work to exact score-drift decomposition. The contributor table still advertised it as 'PSI/CSI/drift', which pointed newcomers at precisely the commodity work the issue declines.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
One-line docs fix following the rewrite of #9.
The issue now argues that PSI and CSI should not be reimplemented — they are commodity, well served by evidently/NannyML/deepchecks, and competing there is a losing position. The scoped work is exact score-drift decomposition across features, which the reconciliation identity makes possible and external tooling can only approximate.
The contributor table still described #9 as "Stability monitoring (PSI/CSI/drift)", which advertised exactly the work the issue declines — and would have pointed a newcomer at the wrong thing before they opened it.