You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The goal of this issue is to collect and centralize information about multi-threading support of the current version of modSecurity , as the topic has come up in a number of issues and there are documented guidelines about usage in this context.
Multi-threading support
The library is expected to work in multi-threaded scenarios, as stated in #1726. This means that any issues should be related to incorrect usage or bugs in the current implementation.
"The modSecurity life cycle is divided into different stages. The stage that the rules are loaded is not threading safe by design. (...) Once the rules are loaded multiple requests can share the same RulesSet object, leading to parallelism while addressing different requests in different processes or threads." (Source: #2536, here)
Notes
Operator & Action (including Transformation) objects are created in the first stage, when rules are loaded and parsed, so their initialization is not synchronized. If their evaluation updates internal state, this needs to be protected to prevent issues in multithreaded contexts.
Examples
The repository currently includes an example of usage of the library in a multi-threaded context, see reading_logs_via_rule_message in the examples directory.
Potential issues/limitations
Shared files (audit or debug log) potential deadlock or incorrect behaviour on non-Windows platforms
NOTE: This has not been reproduced or reported as an issue, but is documented here as discussed in the context of a similar issue in the Windows port.
The PR discussion mentions the possibility of a similar issue (or other incorrect behaviour) happening in non-Unix platforms due to the use of the F_SETLKWfcntl to lock the shared files.
The library previously used a mutex (using shared memory to make it available to other processes in a multi-process context), but this was replaced by the F_SETLKWfcntl in commit 3d20304 due to an unlocking issue under heavy load using nginx, where an acquired lock would not be released when the process was killed.
A possible way to address this would be to go back to the mutex (plus shared memory) implementation but using the robust mutex feature in pthreads, that when a process terminates while holding the mutex notifies the next acquirer of this situation with the EOWNERDEAD return value, which allows it to recover the mutex and make it 'consistent' (see PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST).
The asctime() and ctime() functions, and other time functions can use a common, statically allocated buffer to hold the return string. Each call to one of these functions might destroy the result of the previous call. The asctime_r(), ctime_r(), gmtime_r(), and localtime_r() functions do not use a common, statically allocated buffer to hold the return string. These functions can be used in place of asctime(), ctime(), gmtime(), and localtime() if reentrancy is desired.
ascTime is used by Transaction::toJSON, which is used to log transactions.
The unit_test program has support to run the operator/transformation tests in a multi-threaded context (launching 50 threads and running each test 5000 times).
The goal is to check if the evaluation of the operator/transformation triggers an issue or unexpected result.
Notice that allocation & initialization of the operator/transformation is performed in the main thread (as this is done in the stage where rules are loaded, see above).
The goal of this issue is to collect and centralize information about multi-threading support of the current version of modSecurity , as the topic has come up in a number of issues and there are documented guidelines about usage in this context.
Multi-threading support
The library is expected to work in multi-threaded scenarios, as stated in #1726. This means that any issues should be related to incorrect usage or bugs in the current implementation.
"The modSecurity life cycle is divided into different stages. The stage that the rules are loaded is not threading safe by design. (...) Once the rules are loaded multiple requests can share the same
RulesSetobject, leading to parallelism while addressing different requests in different processes or threads." (Source: #2536, here)Notes
Operator&Action(includingTransformation) objects are created in the first stage, when rules are loaded and parsed, so their initialization is not synchronized. If their evaluation updates internal state, this needs to be protected to prevent issues in multithreaded contexts.Examples
The repository currently includes an example of usage of the library in a multi-threaded context, see reading_logs_via_rule_message in the
examplesdirectory.Potential issues/limitations
F_SETLKWfcntlto lock the shared files.F_SETLKWfcntlin commit 3d20304 due to an unlocking issue under heavy load using nginx, where an acquired lock would not be released when the process was killed.EOWNERDEADreturn value, which allows it to recover the mutex and make it 'consistent' (see PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST).Reviewed/addressed issues
MODSEC_MUTEX_ON_PMdefine &--enable-mutex-on-pmconfigure flagacmptrees.string.h'sascTimeusesstd::ctime, which is not safe in multi-threaded contextsascTimeis used byTransaction::toJSON, which is used to log transactions.Non-reentrant POSIX functions should be replaced with their reentrant versions cpp:S1912Misc
unit_testprogram has support to run the operator/transformation tests in a multi-threaded context (launching 50 threads and running each test 5000 times).