Creating a std::string with a null pointer is undefined behaviour - #3220
Merged
Merged
Conversation
- cppreference mentions this about the constructor that receives a
const char *:
- Constructs the string with the contents initialized with a copy of
the null-terminated character string pointed to by s. The length of
the string is determined by the first null character. The behavior
is undefined if [s, s + Traits::length(s)) is not a valid range
(for example, if s is a null pointer).
- C++23 introduces a deleted constructor to prevent this in static
scenarios, which is how this issue was detected.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.




what
Minor changes to avoid initializing a
std::stringwith a null pointer.why
cppreference mentions this about the constructor that receives a
const char *(see here):references
C++23 introduces a deleted constructor to prevent this in static scenarios, which is how this issue was detected.