Tracing uniquely identifies requests - #574

Merged
bulldozer-bot[bot] merged 9 commits into
developfrom
ckozak/request_identifier
Jul 14, 2020
Merged

Tracing uniquely identifies requests#574
bulldozer-bot[bot] merged 9 commits into
developfrom
ckozak/request_identifier

Conversation

@carterkozak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before this PR

Many requests may share a single traceId, there was no identifying information to distinguish between requests.

After this PR

==COMMIT_MSG==
Tracing uniquely identifies requests
==COMMIT_MSG==

Possible downsides?

  • The request identifier is arguably not a tracing concern, implementing it at this layer is a matter of convenience.We already wrap requests and executors with tracing-aware components, and tell tracing when a request begins and ends, making tracing an ideal candidate to house this identifier.
  • Possible performance cost of generating another unique identifier for each request.

@changelog-app

changelog-appBot commented Jul 13, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Generate changelog in changelog/@unreleased

Type

  • Feature
  • Improvement
  • Fix
  • Break
  • Deprecation
  • Manual task
  • Migration

Description

Tracing uniquely identifies requests with request metadata and a _requestId MDC property.

Check the box to generate changelog(s)

  • Generate changelog entry

@carterkozak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

needs more test coverage

Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/DetachedSpan.java Outdated
Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/Tracer.java Outdated
public static final String TRACE_SAMPLED_KEY = "_sampled";

/** The key under which tracing request ids are inserted into SLF4J {@link org.slf4j.MDC MDCs}. */
public static final String REQUEST_ID_KEY = "_requestId";

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will appear in every log line. Do we want to abbreviate it in some way? As written it's self-explanatory.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like it as is

Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/Tracer.java
Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/Tracer.java
/**
* Initializes the current thread's trace, erasing any previously accrued open spans.
*
* @deprecated Use {@link #initTraceWithSpan(Observability, String, String, SpanType)}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there seems to be relatively little usage of this method, with the majority of it being in tests

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunately many tests attempt to peel back layers of abstraction rather than testing results. These methods are only really used for server-incoming requests where we have prior knowledge of a request identifier.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry my comment was unclear, I was looking at internal usage across the fleet

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, that makes sense 👍

Comment threadtracing/src/test/java/com/palantir/tracing/TraceTest.java
if (!requestId.isPresent()) {
throw new SafeIllegalStateException("No requestId is set", SafeArg.of("span", detachedSpan));
}
exchange.putAttachment(TracingAttachments.REQUEST_ID, requestId.get());

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should add a response header as well for easier debugging

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure I'm ready to modify the wire api at this point, the traceid is more actionable in the majority of cases as an api consumer while the requestId gives us the ability to do stronger structured analysis.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, we can add it later if needed

@ferozco

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👍 looks great!

@bulldozer-bot
bulldozer-botBot merged commit 9eecbc7 into developJul 14, 2020
@bulldozer-bot
bulldozer-botBot deleted the ckozak/request_identifier branch July 14, 2020 15:36
@svc-autorelease

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Released 4.6.0

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@carterkozak@ferozco@svc-autorelease
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Tracing uniquely identifies requests - #574

Merged
bulldozer-bot[bot] merged 9 commits into
developfrom
ckozak/request_identifier
Jul 14, 2020
Merged

Tracing uniquely identifies requests#574
bulldozer-bot[bot] merged 9 commits into
developfrom
ckozak/request_identifier

Conversation

@carterkozak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before this PR

Many requests may share a single traceId, there was no identifying information to distinguish between requests.

After this PR

==COMMIT_MSG==
Tracing uniquely identifies requests
==COMMIT_MSG==

Possible downsides?

  • The request identifier is arguably not a tracing concern, implementing it at this layer is a matter of convenience.We already wrap requests and executors with tracing-aware components, and tell tracing when a request begins and ends, making tracing an ideal candidate to house this identifier.
  • Possible performance cost of generating another unique identifier for each request.

@changelog-app

changelog-appBot commented Jul 13, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Generate changelog in changelog/@unreleased

Type

  • Feature
  • Improvement
  • Fix
  • Break
  • Deprecation
  • Manual task
  • Migration

Description

Tracing uniquely identifies requests with request metadata and a _requestId MDC property.

Check the box to generate changelog(s)

  • Generate changelog entry

@carterkozak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

needs more test coverage

Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/DetachedSpan.java Outdated
Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/Tracer.java Outdated
public static final String TRACE_SAMPLED_KEY = "_sampled";

/** The key under which tracing request ids are inserted into SLF4J {@link org.slf4j.MDC MDCs}. */
public static final String REQUEST_ID_KEY = "_requestId";

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will appear in every log line. Do we want to abbreviate it in some way? As written it's self-explanatory.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like it as is

Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/Tracer.java
Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/Tracer.java
/**
* Initializes the current thread's trace, erasing any previously accrued open spans.
*
* @deprecated Use {@link #initTraceWithSpan(Observability, String, String, SpanType)}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there seems to be relatively little usage of this method, with the majority of it being in tests

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunately many tests attempt to peel back layers of abstraction rather than testing results. These methods are only really used for server-incoming requests where we have prior knowledge of a request identifier.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry my comment was unclear, I was looking at internal usage across the fleet

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, that makes sense 👍

Comment threadtracing/src/test/java/com/palantir/tracing/TraceTest.java
if (!requestId.isPresent()) {
throw new SafeIllegalStateException("No requestId is set", SafeArg.of("span", detachedSpan));
}
exchange.putAttachment(TracingAttachments.REQUEST_ID, requestId.get());

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should add a response header as well for easier debugging

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure I'm ready to modify the wire api at this point, the traceid is more actionable in the majority of cases as an api consumer while the requestId gives us the ability to do stronger structured analysis.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, we can add it later if needed

@ferozco

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👍 looks great!

@bulldozer-bot
bulldozer-botBot merged commit 9eecbc7 into developJul 14, 2020
@bulldozer-bot
bulldozer-botBot deleted the ckozak/request_identifier branch July 14, 2020 15:36
@svc-autorelease

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Released 4.6.0

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@carterkozak@ferozco@svc-autorelease
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Tracing uniquely identifies requests - #574

Merged
bulldozer-bot[bot] merged 9 commits into
developfrom
ckozak/request_identifier
Jul 14, 2020
Merged

Tracing uniquely identifies requests#574
bulldozer-bot[bot] merged 9 commits into
developfrom
ckozak/request_identifier

Conversation

@carterkozak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before this PR

Many requests may share a single traceId, there was no identifying information to distinguish between requests.

After this PR

==COMMIT_MSG==
Tracing uniquely identifies requests
==COMMIT_MSG==

Possible downsides?

  • The request identifier is arguably not a tracing concern, implementing it at this layer is a matter of convenience.We already wrap requests and executors with tracing-aware components, and tell tracing when a request begins and ends, making tracing an ideal candidate to house this identifier.
  • Possible performance cost of generating another unique identifier for each request.

@changelog-app

changelog-appBot commented Jul 13, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Generate changelog in changelog/@unreleased

Type

  • Feature
  • Improvement
  • Fix
  • Break
  • Deprecation
  • Manual task
  • Migration

Description

Tracing uniquely identifies requests with request metadata and a _requestId MDC property.

Check the box to generate changelog(s)

  • Generate changelog entry

@carterkozak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

needs more test coverage

Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/DetachedSpan.java Outdated
Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/Tracer.java Outdated
public static final String TRACE_SAMPLED_KEY = "_sampled";

/** The key under which tracing request ids are inserted into SLF4J {@link org.slf4j.MDC MDCs}. */
public static final String REQUEST_ID_KEY = "_requestId";

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will appear in every log line. Do we want to abbreviate it in some way? As written it's self-explanatory.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like it as is

Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/Tracer.java
Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/Tracer.java
/**
* Initializes the current thread's trace, erasing any previously accrued open spans.
*
* @deprecated Use {@link #initTraceWithSpan(Observability, String, String, SpanType)}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there seems to be relatively little usage of this method, with the majority of it being in tests

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunately many tests attempt to peel back layers of abstraction rather than testing results. These methods are only really used for server-incoming requests where we have prior knowledge of a request identifier.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry my comment was unclear, I was looking at internal usage across the fleet

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, that makes sense 👍

Comment threadtracing/src/test/java/com/palantir/tracing/TraceTest.java
if (!requestId.isPresent()) {
throw new SafeIllegalStateException("No requestId is set", SafeArg.of("span", detachedSpan));
}
exchange.putAttachment(TracingAttachments.REQUEST_ID, requestId.get());

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should add a response header as well for easier debugging

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure I'm ready to modify the wire api at this point, the traceid is more actionable in the majority of cases as an api consumer while the requestId gives us the ability to do stronger structured analysis.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, we can add it later if needed

@ferozco

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👍 looks great!

@bulldozer-bot
bulldozer-botBot merged commit 9eecbc7 into developJul 14, 2020
@bulldozer-bot
bulldozer-botBot deleted the ckozak/request_identifier branch July 14, 2020 15:36
@svc-autorelease

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Released 4.6.0

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@carterkozak@ferozco@svc-autorelease
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Tracing uniquely identifies requests - #574

Merged
bulldozer-bot[bot] merged 9 commits into
developfrom
ckozak/request_identifier
Jul 14, 2020
Merged

Tracing uniquely identifies requests#574
bulldozer-bot[bot] merged 9 commits into
developfrom
ckozak/request_identifier

Conversation

@carterkozak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before this PR

Many requests may share a single traceId, there was no identifying information to distinguish between requests.

After this PR

==COMMIT_MSG==
Tracing uniquely identifies requests
==COMMIT_MSG==

Possible downsides?

  • The request identifier is arguably not a tracing concern, implementing it at this layer is a matter of convenience.We already wrap requests and executors with tracing-aware components, and tell tracing when a request begins and ends, making tracing an ideal candidate to house this identifier.
  • Possible performance cost of generating another unique identifier for each request.

@changelog-app

changelog-appBot commented Jul 13, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Generate changelog in changelog/@unreleased

Type

  • Feature
  • Improvement
  • Fix
  • Break
  • Deprecation
  • Manual task
  • Migration

Description

Tracing uniquely identifies requests with request metadata and a _requestId MDC property.

Check the box to generate changelog(s)

  • Generate changelog entry

@carterkozak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

needs more test coverage

Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/DetachedSpan.java Outdated
Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/Tracer.java Outdated
public static final String TRACE_SAMPLED_KEY = "_sampled";

/** The key under which tracing request ids are inserted into SLF4J {@link org.slf4j.MDC MDCs}. */
public static final String REQUEST_ID_KEY = "_requestId";

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will appear in every log line. Do we want to abbreviate it in some way? As written it's self-explanatory.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like it as is

Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/Tracer.java
Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/Tracer.java
/**
* Initializes the current thread's trace, erasing any previously accrued open spans.
*
* @deprecated Use {@link #initTraceWithSpan(Observability, String, String, SpanType)}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there seems to be relatively little usage of this method, with the majority of it being in tests

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunately many tests attempt to peel back layers of abstraction rather than testing results. These methods are only really used for server-incoming requests where we have prior knowledge of a request identifier.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry my comment was unclear, I was looking at internal usage across the fleet

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, that makes sense 👍

Comment threadtracing/src/test/java/com/palantir/tracing/TraceTest.java
if (!requestId.isPresent()) {
throw new SafeIllegalStateException("No requestId is set", SafeArg.of("span", detachedSpan));
}
exchange.putAttachment(TracingAttachments.REQUEST_ID, requestId.get());

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should add a response header as well for easier debugging

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure I'm ready to modify the wire api at this point, the traceid is more actionable in the majority of cases as an api consumer while the requestId gives us the ability to do stronger structured analysis.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, we can add it later if needed

@ferozco

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👍 looks great!

@bulldozer-bot
bulldozer-botBot merged commit 9eecbc7 into developJul 14, 2020
@bulldozer-bot
bulldozer-botBot deleted the ckozak/request_identifier branch July 14, 2020 15:36
@svc-autorelease

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Released 4.6.0

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@carterkozak@ferozco@svc-autorelease
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Tracing uniquely identifies requests - #574

Merged
bulldozer-bot[bot] merged 9 commits into
developfrom
ckozak/request_identifier
Jul 14, 2020
Merged

Tracing uniquely identifies requests#574
bulldozer-bot[bot] merged 9 commits into
developfrom
ckozak/request_identifier

Conversation

@carterkozak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before this PR

Many requests may share a single traceId, there was no identifying information to distinguish between requests.

After this PR

==COMMIT_MSG==
Tracing uniquely identifies requests
==COMMIT_MSG==

Possible downsides?

  • The request identifier is arguably not a tracing concern, implementing it at this layer is a matter of convenience.We already wrap requests and executors with tracing-aware components, and tell tracing when a request begins and ends, making tracing an ideal candidate to house this identifier.
  • Possible performance cost of generating another unique identifier for each request.

@changelog-app

changelog-appBot commented Jul 13, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Generate changelog in changelog/@unreleased

Type

  • Feature
  • Improvement
  • Fix
  • Break
  • Deprecation
  • Manual task
  • Migration

Description

Tracing uniquely identifies requests with request metadata and a _requestId MDC property.

Check the box to generate changelog(s)

  • Generate changelog entry

@carterkozak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

needs more test coverage

Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/DetachedSpan.java Outdated
Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/Tracer.java Outdated
public static final String TRACE_SAMPLED_KEY = "_sampled";

/** The key under which tracing request ids are inserted into SLF4J {@link org.slf4j.MDC MDCs}. */
public static final String REQUEST_ID_KEY = "_requestId";

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will appear in every log line. Do we want to abbreviate it in some way? As written it's self-explanatory.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like it as is

Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/Tracer.java
Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/Tracer.java
/**
* Initializes the current thread's trace, erasing any previously accrued open spans.
*
* @deprecated Use {@link #initTraceWithSpan(Observability, String, String, SpanType)}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there seems to be relatively little usage of this method, with the majority of it being in tests

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunately many tests attempt to peel back layers of abstraction rather than testing results. These methods are only really used for server-incoming requests where we have prior knowledge of a request identifier.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry my comment was unclear, I was looking at internal usage across the fleet

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, that makes sense 👍

Comment threadtracing/src/test/java/com/palantir/tracing/TraceTest.java
if (!requestId.isPresent()) {
throw new SafeIllegalStateException("No requestId is set", SafeArg.of("span", detachedSpan));
}
exchange.putAttachment(TracingAttachments.REQUEST_ID, requestId.get());

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should add a response header as well for easier debugging

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure I'm ready to modify the wire api at this point, the traceid is more actionable in the majority of cases as an api consumer while the requestId gives us the ability to do stronger structured analysis.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, we can add it later if needed

@ferozco

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👍 looks great!

@bulldozer-bot
bulldozer-botBot merged commit 9eecbc7 into developJul 14, 2020
@bulldozer-bot
bulldozer-botBot deleted the ckozak/request_identifier branch July 14, 2020 15:36
@svc-autorelease

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Released 4.6.0

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@carterkozak@ferozco@svc-autorelease
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Tracing uniquely identifies requests - #574

Merged
bulldozer-bot[bot] merged 9 commits into
developfrom
ckozak/request_identifier
Jul 14, 2020
Merged

Tracing uniquely identifies requests#574
bulldozer-bot[bot] merged 9 commits into
developfrom
ckozak/request_identifier

Conversation

@carterkozak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before this PR

Many requests may share a single traceId, there was no identifying information to distinguish between requests.

After this PR

==COMMIT_MSG==
Tracing uniquely identifies requests
==COMMIT_MSG==

Possible downsides?

  • The request identifier is arguably not a tracing concern, implementing it at this layer is a matter of convenience.We already wrap requests and executors with tracing-aware components, and tell tracing when a request begins and ends, making tracing an ideal candidate to house this identifier.
  • Possible performance cost of generating another unique identifier for each request.

@changelog-app

changelog-appBot commented Jul 13, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Generate changelog in changelog/@unreleased

Type

  • Feature
  • Improvement
  • Fix
  • Break
  • Deprecation
  • Manual task
  • Migration

Description

Tracing uniquely identifies requests with request metadata and a _requestId MDC property.

Check the box to generate changelog(s)

  • Generate changelog entry

@carterkozak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

needs more test coverage

Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/DetachedSpan.java Outdated
Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/Tracer.java Outdated
public static final String TRACE_SAMPLED_KEY = "_sampled";

/** The key under which tracing request ids are inserted into SLF4J {@link org.slf4j.MDC MDCs}. */
public static final String REQUEST_ID_KEY = "_requestId";

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will appear in every log line. Do we want to abbreviate it in some way? As written it's self-explanatory.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like it as is

Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/Tracer.java
Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/Tracer.java
/**
* Initializes the current thread's trace, erasing any previously accrued open spans.
*
* @deprecated Use {@link #initTraceWithSpan(Observability, String, String, SpanType)}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there seems to be relatively little usage of this method, with the majority of it being in tests

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunately many tests attempt to peel back layers of abstraction rather than testing results. These methods are only really used for server-incoming requests where we have prior knowledge of a request identifier.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry my comment was unclear, I was looking at internal usage across the fleet

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, that makes sense 👍

Comment threadtracing/src/test/java/com/palantir/tracing/TraceTest.java
if (!requestId.isPresent()) {
throw new SafeIllegalStateException("No requestId is set", SafeArg.of("span", detachedSpan));
}
exchange.putAttachment(TracingAttachments.REQUEST_ID, requestId.get());

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should add a response header as well for easier debugging

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure I'm ready to modify the wire api at this point, the traceid is more actionable in the majority of cases as an api consumer while the requestId gives us the ability to do stronger structured analysis.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, we can add it later if needed

@ferozco

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👍 looks great!

@bulldozer-bot
bulldozer-botBot merged commit 9eecbc7 into developJul 14, 2020
@bulldozer-bot
bulldozer-botBot deleted the ckozak/request_identifier branch July 14, 2020 15:36
@svc-autorelease

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Released 4.6.0

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@carterkozak@ferozco@svc-autorelease
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Tracing uniquely identifies requests - #574

Merged
bulldozer-bot[bot] merged 9 commits into
developfrom
ckozak/request_identifier
Jul 14, 2020
Merged

Tracing uniquely identifies requests#574
bulldozer-bot[bot] merged 9 commits into
developfrom
ckozak/request_identifier

Conversation

@carterkozak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before this PR

Many requests may share a single traceId, there was no identifying information to distinguish between requests.

After this PR

==COMMIT_MSG==
Tracing uniquely identifies requests
==COMMIT_MSG==

Possible downsides?

  • The request identifier is arguably not a tracing concern, implementing it at this layer is a matter of convenience.We already wrap requests and executors with tracing-aware components, and tell tracing when a request begins and ends, making tracing an ideal candidate to house this identifier.
  • Possible performance cost of generating another unique identifier for each request.

@changelog-app

changelog-appBot commented Jul 13, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Generate changelog in changelog/@unreleased

Type

  • Feature
  • Improvement
  • Fix
  • Break
  • Deprecation
  • Manual task
  • Migration

Description

Tracing uniquely identifies requests with request metadata and a _requestId MDC property.

Check the box to generate changelog(s)

  • Generate changelog entry

@carterkozak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

needs more test coverage

Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/DetachedSpan.java Outdated
Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/Tracer.java Outdated
public static final String TRACE_SAMPLED_KEY = "_sampled";

/** The key under which tracing request ids are inserted into SLF4J {@link org.slf4j.MDC MDCs}. */
public static final String REQUEST_ID_KEY = "_requestId";

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will appear in every log line. Do we want to abbreviate it in some way? As written it's self-explanatory.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like it as is

Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/Tracer.java
Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/Tracer.java
/**
* Initializes the current thread's trace, erasing any previously accrued open spans.
*
* @deprecated Use {@link #initTraceWithSpan(Observability, String, String, SpanType)}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there seems to be relatively little usage of this method, with the majority of it being in tests

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunately many tests attempt to peel back layers of abstraction rather than testing results. These methods are only really used for server-incoming requests where we have prior knowledge of a request identifier.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry my comment was unclear, I was looking at internal usage across the fleet

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, that makes sense 👍

Comment threadtracing/src/test/java/com/palantir/tracing/TraceTest.java
if (!requestId.isPresent()) {
throw new SafeIllegalStateException("No requestId is set", SafeArg.of("span", detachedSpan));
}
exchange.putAttachment(TracingAttachments.REQUEST_ID, requestId.get());

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should add a response header as well for easier debugging

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure I'm ready to modify the wire api at this point, the traceid is more actionable in the majority of cases as an api consumer while the requestId gives us the ability to do stronger structured analysis.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, we can add it later if needed

@ferozco

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👍 looks great!

@bulldozer-bot
bulldozer-botBot merged commit 9eecbc7 into developJul 14, 2020
@bulldozer-bot
bulldozer-botBot deleted the ckozak/request_identifier branch July 14, 2020 15:36
@svc-autorelease

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Released 4.6.0

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@carterkozak@ferozco@svc-autorelease
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Tracing uniquely identifies requests - #574

Merged
bulldozer-bot[bot] merged 9 commits into
developfrom
ckozak/request_identifier
Jul 14, 2020
Merged

Tracing uniquely identifies requests#574
bulldozer-bot[bot] merged 9 commits into
developfrom
ckozak/request_identifier

Conversation

@carterkozak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before this PR

Many requests may share a single traceId, there was no identifying information to distinguish between requests.

After this PR

==COMMIT_MSG==
Tracing uniquely identifies requests
==COMMIT_MSG==

Possible downsides?

  • The request identifier is arguably not a tracing concern, implementing it at this layer is a matter of convenience.We already wrap requests and executors with tracing-aware components, and tell tracing when a request begins and ends, making tracing an ideal candidate to house this identifier.
  • Possible performance cost of generating another unique identifier for each request.

@changelog-app

changelog-appBot commented Jul 13, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Generate changelog in changelog/@unreleased

Type

  • Feature
  • Improvement
  • Fix
  • Break
  • Deprecation
  • Manual task
  • Migration

Description

Tracing uniquely identifies requests with request metadata and a _requestId MDC property.

Check the box to generate changelog(s)

  • Generate changelog entry

@carterkozak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

needs more test coverage

Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/DetachedSpan.java Outdated
Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/Tracer.java Outdated
public static final String TRACE_SAMPLED_KEY = "_sampled";

/** The key under which tracing request ids are inserted into SLF4J {@link org.slf4j.MDC MDCs}. */
public static final String REQUEST_ID_KEY = "_requestId";

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will appear in every log line. Do we want to abbreviate it in some way? As written it's self-explanatory.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like it as is

Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/Tracer.java
Comment threadtracing/src/main/java/com/palantir/tracing/Tracer.java
/**
* Initializes the current thread's trace, erasing any previously accrued open spans.
*
* @deprecated Use {@link #initTraceWithSpan(Observability, String, String, SpanType)}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there seems to be relatively little usage of this method, with the majority of it being in tests

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunately many tests attempt to peel back layers of abstraction rather than testing results. These methods are only really used for server-incoming requests where we have prior knowledge of a request identifier.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry my comment was unclear, I was looking at internal usage across the fleet

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, that makes sense 👍

Comment threadtracing/src/test/java/com/palantir/tracing/TraceTest.java
if (!requestId.isPresent()) {
throw new SafeIllegalStateException("No requestId is set", SafeArg.of("span", detachedSpan));
}
exchange.putAttachment(TracingAttachments.REQUEST_ID, requestId.get());

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should add a response header as well for easier debugging

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure I'm ready to modify the wire api at this point, the traceid is more actionable in the majority of cases as an api consumer while the requestId gives us the ability to do stronger structured analysis.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, we can add it later if needed

@ferozco

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👍 looks great!

@bulldozer-bot
bulldozer-botBot merged commit 9eecbc7 into developJul 14, 2020
@bulldozer-bot
bulldozer-botBot deleted the ckozak/request_identifier branch July 14, 2020 15:36
@svc-autorelease

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Released 4.6.0

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@carterkozak@ferozco@svc-autorelease