Assigned by versus defined by

[larsolofsson]

papiNet has both AssignedBy and Agency in the XML standard.
papinet has only assignedBy in the API standard.

A party can assign a code defined by an agency to a thing.
In papiNet API the supplier has the role of an agency defining codes and identifiers to be used by logistics parties.

It might be confusing in some descriptions when assigned by is used instead of defined by.
The proposal is to make difference between assigned by and defined by in descriptions
Examples:
In locations and parties

 identifierBySupplier:
 type: string
 minLength: 1
 description: The identifier assigned by the _Supplier_.

to be changed to

 identifierBySupplier:
 type: string
 minLength: 1
 description: The identifier defined by the _Supplier_.

In the reference construct

 assignedByIdentifierBySupplier:
 type: string
 minLength: 1
 description: The identifier of the assigning party assigned by the _Supplier_.

To be changed to

 assignedByIdentifierBySupplier:
 type: string
 minLength: 1
 description: The identifier of the assigning party defined by the _Supplier_.

For codes:

 code:
 type: object
 unevaluatedProperties: false
 required:
 - value
 - assignedBy
 properties:
 value:
 type: string
 minLength: 1
 assignedBy:
 type: string
 enum:
 - Supplier

to be changed to

 codeBySupplier:
 type: string
 minLength: 1 
 description: The code defined by the _Supplier_