Repository files navigation

ReadWriteLock

GitHub releaseUnit Tests

Pharo 7.0Pharo 8.0Pharo 9.0Pharo 10Pharo 11

It's implementation of reentral read write lock which described in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Readers–writer_lock. From the article:

A ReadWriteLock allows concurrent access for read-only operations, while write operations require exclusive access. This means that multiple threads can read the data in parallel but an exclusive lock is needed for writing or modifying data. When a writer is writing the data, all other writers or readers will be blocked until the writer is finished writing.

Installation

Metacellonewbaseline:'ReadWriteLock';
repository:'github://pharo-ide/ReadWriteLock';
load

Use following snippet for stable dependency in your project baseline:

spec
baseline:'ReadWriteLock'with: [ spec repository:'github://pharo-ide/ReadWriteLock:v3.0.0' ]

Public API and Key Messages:

lock :=ReadWriteLocknew.
lock criticalRead: ["read code"].
lock criticalWrite: ["write code"]

Main difficulty is carefully handle process termination during execution of critical sections. This problem described in Semaphore>>critical: comment. Same approach is used here. But synchronization logic around two semaphores for reading and writing complicates things very much. No simple way to decompose logic on methods because information about process interruption become hidden.
From Semaphore comment:

The main trick is assignment right before we go into the wait primitive (which is not a real send and therefore not interruptable either). So after we can check that waiting is happen or not.

About

Implementation of reentral read write lock which described in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Readers–writer_lock.

Topics

Resources

Stars

3 stars

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Repository files navigation

ReadWriteLock

GitHub releaseUnit Tests

Pharo 7.0Pharo 8.0Pharo 9.0Pharo 10Pharo 11

It's implementation of reentral read write lock which described in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Readers–writer_lock. From the article:

A ReadWriteLock allows concurrent access for read-only operations, while write operations require exclusive access. This means that multiple threads can read the data in parallel but an exclusive lock is needed for writing or modifying data. When a writer is writing the data, all other writers or readers will be blocked until the writer is finished writing.

Installation

Metacellonewbaseline:'ReadWriteLock';
repository:'github://pharo-ide/ReadWriteLock';
load

Use following snippet for stable dependency in your project baseline:

spec
baseline:'ReadWriteLock'with: [ spec repository:'github://pharo-ide/ReadWriteLock:v3.0.0' ]

Public API and Key Messages:

lock :=ReadWriteLocknew.
lock criticalRead: ["read code"].
lock criticalWrite: ["write code"]

Main difficulty is carefully handle process termination during execution of critical sections. This problem described in Semaphore>>critical: comment. Same approach is used here. But synchronization logic around two semaphores for reading and writing complicates things very much. No simple way to decompose logic on methods because information about process interruption become hidden.
From Semaphore comment:

The main trick is assignment right before we go into the wait primitive (which is not a real send and therefore not interruptable either). So after we can check that waiting is happen or not.

About

Implementation of reentral read write lock which described in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Readers–writer_lock.

Topics

Resources

Stars

3 stars

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Repository files navigation

ReadWriteLock

GitHub releaseUnit Tests

Pharo 7.0Pharo 8.0Pharo 9.0Pharo 10Pharo 11

It's implementation of reentral read write lock which described in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Readers–writer_lock. From the article:

A ReadWriteLock allows concurrent access for read-only operations, while write operations require exclusive access. This means that multiple threads can read the data in parallel but an exclusive lock is needed for writing or modifying data. When a writer is writing the data, all other writers or readers will be blocked until the writer is finished writing.

Installation

Metacellonewbaseline:'ReadWriteLock';
repository:'github://pharo-ide/ReadWriteLock';
load

Use following snippet for stable dependency in your project baseline:

spec
baseline:'ReadWriteLock'with: [ spec repository:'github://pharo-ide/ReadWriteLock:v3.0.0' ]

Public API and Key Messages:

lock :=ReadWriteLocknew.
lock criticalRead: ["read code"].
lock criticalWrite: ["write code"]

Main difficulty is carefully handle process termination during execution of critical sections. This problem described in Semaphore>>critical: comment. Same approach is used here. But synchronization logic around two semaphores for reading and writing complicates things very much. No simple way to decompose logic on methods because information about process interruption become hidden.
From Semaphore comment:

The main trick is assignment right before we go into the wait primitive (which is not a real send and therefore not interruptable either). So after we can check that waiting is happen or not.

About

Implementation of reentral read write lock which described in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Readers–writer_lock.

Topics

Resources

Stars

3 stars

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Repository files navigation

ReadWriteLock

GitHub releaseUnit Tests

Pharo 7.0Pharo 8.0Pharo 9.0Pharo 10Pharo 11

It's implementation of reentral read write lock which described in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Readers–writer_lock. From the article:

A ReadWriteLock allows concurrent access for read-only operations, while write operations require exclusive access. This means that multiple threads can read the data in parallel but an exclusive lock is needed for writing or modifying data. When a writer is writing the data, all other writers or readers will be blocked until the writer is finished writing.

Installation

Metacellonewbaseline:'ReadWriteLock';
repository:'github://pharo-ide/ReadWriteLock';
load

Use following snippet for stable dependency in your project baseline:

spec
baseline:'ReadWriteLock'with: [ spec repository:'github://pharo-ide/ReadWriteLock:v3.0.0' ]

Public API and Key Messages:

lock :=ReadWriteLocknew.
lock criticalRead: ["read code"].
lock criticalWrite: ["write code"]

Main difficulty is carefully handle process termination during execution of critical sections. This problem described in Semaphore>>critical: comment. Same approach is used here. But synchronization logic around two semaphores for reading and writing complicates things very much. No simple way to decompose logic on methods because information about process interruption become hidden.
From Semaphore comment:

The main trick is assignment right before we go into the wait primitive (which is not a real send and therefore not interruptable either). So after we can check that waiting is happen or not.

About

Implementation of reentral read write lock which described in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Readers–writer_lock.

Topics

Resources

Stars

3 stars

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Repository files navigation

ReadWriteLock

GitHub releaseUnit Tests

Pharo 7.0Pharo 8.0Pharo 9.0Pharo 10Pharo 11

It's implementation of reentral read write lock which described in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Readers–writer_lock. From the article:

A ReadWriteLock allows concurrent access for read-only operations, while write operations require exclusive access. This means that multiple threads can read the data in parallel but an exclusive lock is needed for writing or modifying data. When a writer is writing the data, all other writers or readers will be blocked until the writer is finished writing.

Installation

Metacellonewbaseline:'ReadWriteLock';
repository:'github://pharo-ide/ReadWriteLock';
load

Use following snippet for stable dependency in your project baseline:

spec
baseline:'ReadWriteLock'with: [ spec repository:'github://pharo-ide/ReadWriteLock:v3.0.0' ]

Public API and Key Messages:

lock :=ReadWriteLocknew.
lock criticalRead: ["read code"].
lock criticalWrite: ["write code"]

Main difficulty is carefully handle process termination during execution of critical sections. This problem described in Semaphore>>critical: comment. Same approach is used here. But synchronization logic around two semaphores for reading and writing complicates things very much. No simple way to decompose logic on methods because information about process interruption become hidden.
From Semaphore comment:

The main trick is assignment right before we go into the wait primitive (which is not a real send and therefore not interruptable either). So after we can check that waiting is happen or not.

About

Implementation of reentral read write lock which described in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Readers–writer_lock.

Topics

Resources

Stars

3 stars

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Repository files navigation

ReadWriteLock

GitHub releaseUnit Tests

Pharo 7.0Pharo 8.0Pharo 9.0Pharo 10Pharo 11

It's implementation of reentral read write lock which described in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Readers–writer_lock. From the article:

A ReadWriteLock allows concurrent access for read-only operations, while write operations require exclusive access. This means that multiple threads can read the data in parallel but an exclusive lock is needed for writing or modifying data. When a writer is writing the data, all other writers or readers will be blocked until the writer is finished writing.

Installation

Metacellonewbaseline:'ReadWriteLock';
repository:'github://pharo-ide/ReadWriteLock';
load

Use following snippet for stable dependency in your project baseline:

spec
baseline:'ReadWriteLock'with: [ spec repository:'github://pharo-ide/ReadWriteLock:v3.0.0' ]

Public API and Key Messages:

lock :=ReadWriteLocknew.
lock criticalRead: ["read code"].
lock criticalWrite: ["write code"]

Main difficulty is carefully handle process termination during execution of critical sections. This problem described in Semaphore>>critical: comment. Same approach is used here. But synchronization logic around two semaphores for reading and writing complicates things very much. No simple way to decompose logic on methods because information about process interruption become hidden.
From Semaphore comment:

The main trick is assignment right before we go into the wait primitive (which is not a real send and therefore not interruptable either). So after we can check that waiting is happen or not.

About

Implementation of reentral read write lock which described in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Readers–writer_lock.

Topics

Resources

Stars

3 stars

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Repository files navigation

ReadWriteLock

GitHub releaseUnit Tests

Pharo 7.0Pharo 8.0Pharo 9.0Pharo 10Pharo 11

It's implementation of reentral read write lock which described in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Readers–writer_lock. From the article:

A ReadWriteLock allows concurrent access for read-only operations, while write operations require exclusive access. This means that multiple threads can read the data in parallel but an exclusive lock is needed for writing or modifying data. When a writer is writing the data, all other writers or readers will be blocked until the writer is finished writing.

Installation

Metacellonewbaseline:'ReadWriteLock';
repository:'github://pharo-ide/ReadWriteLock';
load

Use following snippet for stable dependency in your project baseline:

spec
baseline:'ReadWriteLock'with: [ spec repository:'github://pharo-ide/ReadWriteLock:v3.0.0' ]

Public API and Key Messages:

lock :=ReadWriteLocknew.
lock criticalRead: ["read code"].
lock criticalWrite: ["write code"]

Main difficulty is carefully handle process termination during execution of critical sections. This problem described in Semaphore>>critical: comment. Same approach is used here. But synchronization logic around two semaphores for reading and writing complicates things very much. No simple way to decompose logic on methods because information about process interruption become hidden.
From Semaphore comment:

The main trick is assignment right before we go into the wait primitive (which is not a real send and therefore not interruptable either). So after we can check that waiting is happen or not.

About

Implementation of reentral read write lock which described in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Readers–writer_lock.

Topics

Resources

Stars

3 stars

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Repository files navigation

ReadWriteLock

GitHub releaseUnit Tests

Pharo 7.0Pharo 8.0Pharo 9.0Pharo 10Pharo 11

It's implementation of reentral read write lock which described in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Readers–writer_lock. From the article:

A ReadWriteLock allows concurrent access for read-only operations, while write operations require exclusive access. This means that multiple threads can read the data in parallel but an exclusive lock is needed for writing or modifying data. When a writer is writing the data, all other writers or readers will be blocked until the writer is finished writing.

Installation

Metacellonewbaseline:'ReadWriteLock';
repository:'github://pharo-ide/ReadWriteLock';
load

Use following snippet for stable dependency in your project baseline:

spec
baseline:'ReadWriteLock'with: [ spec repository:'github://pharo-ide/ReadWriteLock:v3.0.0' ]

Public API and Key Messages:

lock :=ReadWriteLocknew.
lock criticalRead: ["read code"].
lock criticalWrite: ["write code"]

Main difficulty is carefully handle process termination during execution of critical sections. This problem described in Semaphore>>critical: comment. Same approach is used here. But synchronization logic around two semaphores for reading and writing complicates things very much. No simple way to decompose logic on methods because information about process interruption become hidden.
From Semaphore comment:

The main trick is assignment right before we go into the wait primitive (which is not a real send and therefore not interruptable either). So after we can check that waiting is happen or not.

About

Implementation of reentral read write lock which described in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Readers–writer_lock.

Topics

Resources

Stars

3 stars

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages