Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Fix GH-21746 - #21891
Closed
arnaud-lb wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
theodorejb
commented
Apr 27, 2026
Contributor
I confirmed that this patch resolves both the |
arnaud-lb
commented
Apr 28, 2026
MemberAuthor
@theodorejb I can not guarantee it, but there is a good chance it will |
arnaud-lb
marked this pull request as ready for review
April 28, 2026 07:28
iluuu1994
commented
May 1, 2026
Member
8.5.6 RC is already tagged (has been for almost two weeks), so this won't land unless cherry-picked, but that's unlikely given it's not a new regression. |
arnaud-lb
commented
May 2, 2026
MemberAuthor
Oh, forgot about RCs |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
FixesGH-21746
This is the same fix as 79aaeea, which was likely lost in the rebase of 76d7c61.
In the reproducer, variable
$iofLR::p()was marked asZREG_STORE, and the store happened after leavingLR::p's frame, so it was overriding some variable in the parent frame.