ext/curl: improved tests - #23183

Closed
NickSdot wants to merge 1 commit into
php:masterfrom
NickSdot:hardening/22908-tests
Closed

ext/curl: improved tests#23183
NickSdot wants to merge 1 commit into
php:masterfrom
NickSdot:hardening/22908-tests

Conversation

@NickSdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow up to #22908.

@Sjord

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Is this just to make it look neat, or is there a risk that the wrong exception is thrown?

@NickSdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Is this just to make it look neat, or is there a risk that the wrong exception is thrown?

Regression protection. See the in progress effort in #22799; it's something that gets often flagged.

@LamentXU123

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Sjord As you are the author of that piece of code, do you think this change is good to go?

@LamentXU123

LamentXU123 commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Oh, and @NickSdot Since people constantly forget about applying these new error test styles, do you think it is reasonable to mention them in CODING_STANDARD.md? If you think so, feel free to open a PR, Cheers :)
(I am not approving it, just giving ideas. Because I think nowadays AI agents (which by the way are the most popular way newcomers contribute to the project) write tests in the exact same style of other tests, and if you don't mention this specifically, it won't remember your proposal.)

@NickSdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Oh, and @NickSdot Since people constantly forget about applying these new error test styles, do you think it is reasonable to mention them in CODING_STANDARD.md? If you think so, feel free to open a PR, Cheers :)

Good idea! PR incoming.

write tests in the exact same style of other tests

My point exactly; that's why I think unifying is important. :)

@Sjord

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It seems these changes are also in #23038. Perhaps it's better to close this one and continue with #23038?

I think these changes are fine. These tests already catch a ValueError so I can't see this going wrong easily, but it's nice to have this checked and consistent. The commit message could use some more detail.

@LamentXU123

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fair. I will merge #23038 and close this as superseded.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@NickSdot@Sjord@LamentXU123
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

ext/curl: improved tests - #23183

Closed
NickSdot wants to merge 1 commit into
php:masterfrom
NickSdot:hardening/22908-tests
Closed

ext/curl: improved tests#23183
NickSdot wants to merge 1 commit into
php:masterfrom
NickSdot:hardening/22908-tests

Conversation

@NickSdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow up to #22908.

@Sjord

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Is this just to make it look neat, or is there a risk that the wrong exception is thrown?

@NickSdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Is this just to make it look neat, or is there a risk that the wrong exception is thrown?

Regression protection. See the in progress effort in #22799; it's something that gets often flagged.

@LamentXU123

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Sjord As you are the author of that piece of code, do you think this change is good to go?

@LamentXU123

LamentXU123 commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Oh, and @NickSdot Since people constantly forget about applying these new error test styles, do you think it is reasonable to mention them in CODING_STANDARD.md? If you think so, feel free to open a PR, Cheers :)
(I am not approving it, just giving ideas. Because I think nowadays AI agents (which by the way are the most popular way newcomers contribute to the project) write tests in the exact same style of other tests, and if you don't mention this specifically, it won't remember your proposal.)

@NickSdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Oh, and @NickSdot Since people constantly forget about applying these new error test styles, do you think it is reasonable to mention them in CODING_STANDARD.md? If you think so, feel free to open a PR, Cheers :)

Good idea! PR incoming.

write tests in the exact same style of other tests

My point exactly; that's why I think unifying is important. :)

@Sjord

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It seems these changes are also in #23038. Perhaps it's better to close this one and continue with #23038?

I think these changes are fine. These tests already catch a ValueError so I can't see this going wrong easily, but it's nice to have this checked and consistent. The commit message could use some more detail.

@LamentXU123

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fair. I will merge #23038 and close this as superseded.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@NickSdot@Sjord@LamentXU123
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

ext/curl: improved tests - #23183

Closed
NickSdot wants to merge 1 commit into
php:masterfrom
NickSdot:hardening/22908-tests
Closed

ext/curl: improved tests#23183
NickSdot wants to merge 1 commit into
php:masterfrom
NickSdot:hardening/22908-tests

Conversation

@NickSdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow up to #22908.

@Sjord

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Is this just to make it look neat, or is there a risk that the wrong exception is thrown?

@NickSdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Is this just to make it look neat, or is there a risk that the wrong exception is thrown?

Regression protection. See the in progress effort in #22799; it's something that gets often flagged.

@LamentXU123

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Sjord As you are the author of that piece of code, do you think this change is good to go?

@LamentXU123

LamentXU123 commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Oh, and @NickSdot Since people constantly forget about applying these new error test styles, do you think it is reasonable to mention them in CODING_STANDARD.md? If you think so, feel free to open a PR, Cheers :)
(I am not approving it, just giving ideas. Because I think nowadays AI agents (which by the way are the most popular way newcomers contribute to the project) write tests in the exact same style of other tests, and if you don't mention this specifically, it won't remember your proposal.)

@NickSdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Oh, and @NickSdot Since people constantly forget about applying these new error test styles, do you think it is reasonable to mention them in CODING_STANDARD.md? If you think so, feel free to open a PR, Cheers :)

Good idea! PR incoming.

write tests in the exact same style of other tests

My point exactly; that's why I think unifying is important. :)

@Sjord

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It seems these changes are also in #23038. Perhaps it's better to close this one and continue with #23038?

I think these changes are fine. These tests already catch a ValueError so I can't see this going wrong easily, but it's nice to have this checked and consistent. The commit message could use some more detail.

@LamentXU123

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fair. I will merge #23038 and close this as superseded.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@NickSdot@Sjord@LamentXU123
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

ext/curl: improved tests - #23183

Closed
NickSdot wants to merge 1 commit into
php:masterfrom
NickSdot:hardening/22908-tests
Closed

ext/curl: improved tests#23183
NickSdot wants to merge 1 commit into
php:masterfrom
NickSdot:hardening/22908-tests

Conversation

@NickSdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow up to #22908.

@Sjord

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Is this just to make it look neat, or is there a risk that the wrong exception is thrown?

@NickSdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Is this just to make it look neat, or is there a risk that the wrong exception is thrown?

Regression protection. See the in progress effort in #22799; it's something that gets often flagged.

@LamentXU123

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Sjord As you are the author of that piece of code, do you think this change is good to go?

@LamentXU123

LamentXU123 commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Oh, and @NickSdot Since people constantly forget about applying these new error test styles, do you think it is reasonable to mention them in CODING_STANDARD.md? If you think so, feel free to open a PR, Cheers :)
(I am not approving it, just giving ideas. Because I think nowadays AI agents (which by the way are the most popular way newcomers contribute to the project) write tests in the exact same style of other tests, and if you don't mention this specifically, it won't remember your proposal.)

@NickSdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Oh, and @NickSdot Since people constantly forget about applying these new error test styles, do you think it is reasonable to mention them in CODING_STANDARD.md? If you think so, feel free to open a PR, Cheers :)

Good idea! PR incoming.

write tests in the exact same style of other tests

My point exactly; that's why I think unifying is important. :)

@Sjord

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It seems these changes are also in #23038. Perhaps it's better to close this one and continue with #23038?

I think these changes are fine. These tests already catch a ValueError so I can't see this going wrong easily, but it's nice to have this checked and consistent. The commit message could use some more detail.

@LamentXU123

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fair. I will merge #23038 and close this as superseded.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@NickSdot@Sjord@LamentXU123
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

ext/curl: improved tests - #23183

Closed
NickSdot wants to merge 1 commit into
php:masterfrom
NickSdot:hardening/22908-tests
Closed

ext/curl: improved tests#23183
NickSdot wants to merge 1 commit into
php:masterfrom
NickSdot:hardening/22908-tests

Conversation

@NickSdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow up to #22908.

@Sjord

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Is this just to make it look neat, or is there a risk that the wrong exception is thrown?

@NickSdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Is this just to make it look neat, or is there a risk that the wrong exception is thrown?

Regression protection. See the in progress effort in #22799; it's something that gets often flagged.

@LamentXU123

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Sjord As you are the author of that piece of code, do you think this change is good to go?

@LamentXU123

LamentXU123 commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Oh, and @NickSdot Since people constantly forget about applying these new error test styles, do you think it is reasonable to mention them in CODING_STANDARD.md? If you think so, feel free to open a PR, Cheers :)
(I am not approving it, just giving ideas. Because I think nowadays AI agents (which by the way are the most popular way newcomers contribute to the project) write tests in the exact same style of other tests, and if you don't mention this specifically, it won't remember your proposal.)

@NickSdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Oh, and @NickSdot Since people constantly forget about applying these new error test styles, do you think it is reasonable to mention them in CODING_STANDARD.md? If you think so, feel free to open a PR, Cheers :)

Good idea! PR incoming.

write tests in the exact same style of other tests

My point exactly; that's why I think unifying is important. :)

@Sjord

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It seems these changes are also in #23038. Perhaps it's better to close this one and continue with #23038?

I think these changes are fine. These tests already catch a ValueError so I can't see this going wrong easily, but it's nice to have this checked and consistent. The commit message could use some more detail.

@LamentXU123

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fair. I will merge #23038 and close this as superseded.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@NickSdot@Sjord@LamentXU123
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

ext/curl: improved tests - #23183

Closed
NickSdot wants to merge 1 commit into
php:masterfrom
NickSdot:hardening/22908-tests
Closed

ext/curl: improved tests#23183
NickSdot wants to merge 1 commit into
php:masterfrom
NickSdot:hardening/22908-tests

Conversation

@NickSdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow up to #22908.

@Sjord

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Is this just to make it look neat, or is there a risk that the wrong exception is thrown?

@NickSdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Is this just to make it look neat, or is there a risk that the wrong exception is thrown?

Regression protection. See the in progress effort in #22799; it's something that gets often flagged.

@LamentXU123

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Sjord As you are the author of that piece of code, do you think this change is good to go?

@LamentXU123

LamentXU123 commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Oh, and @NickSdot Since people constantly forget about applying these new error test styles, do you think it is reasonable to mention them in CODING_STANDARD.md? If you think so, feel free to open a PR, Cheers :)
(I am not approving it, just giving ideas. Because I think nowadays AI agents (which by the way are the most popular way newcomers contribute to the project) write tests in the exact same style of other tests, and if you don't mention this specifically, it won't remember your proposal.)

@NickSdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Oh, and @NickSdot Since people constantly forget about applying these new error test styles, do you think it is reasonable to mention them in CODING_STANDARD.md? If you think so, feel free to open a PR, Cheers :)

Good idea! PR incoming.

write tests in the exact same style of other tests

My point exactly; that's why I think unifying is important. :)

@Sjord

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It seems these changes are also in #23038. Perhaps it's better to close this one and continue with #23038?

I think these changes are fine. These tests already catch a ValueError so I can't see this going wrong easily, but it's nice to have this checked and consistent. The commit message could use some more detail.

@LamentXU123

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fair. I will merge #23038 and close this as superseded.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@NickSdot@Sjord@LamentXU123
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

ext/curl: improved tests - #23183

Closed
NickSdot wants to merge 1 commit into
php:masterfrom
NickSdot:hardening/22908-tests
Closed

ext/curl: improved tests#23183
NickSdot wants to merge 1 commit into
php:masterfrom
NickSdot:hardening/22908-tests

Conversation

@NickSdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow up to #22908.

@Sjord

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Is this just to make it look neat, or is there a risk that the wrong exception is thrown?

@NickSdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Is this just to make it look neat, or is there a risk that the wrong exception is thrown?

Regression protection. See the in progress effort in #22799; it's something that gets often flagged.

@LamentXU123

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Sjord As you are the author of that piece of code, do you think this change is good to go?

@LamentXU123

LamentXU123 commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Oh, and @NickSdot Since people constantly forget about applying these new error test styles, do you think it is reasonable to mention them in CODING_STANDARD.md? If you think so, feel free to open a PR, Cheers :)
(I am not approving it, just giving ideas. Because I think nowadays AI agents (which by the way are the most popular way newcomers contribute to the project) write tests in the exact same style of other tests, and if you don't mention this specifically, it won't remember your proposal.)

@NickSdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Oh, and @NickSdot Since people constantly forget about applying these new error test styles, do you think it is reasonable to mention them in CODING_STANDARD.md? If you think so, feel free to open a PR, Cheers :)

Good idea! PR incoming.

write tests in the exact same style of other tests

My point exactly; that's why I think unifying is important. :)

@Sjord

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It seems these changes are also in #23038. Perhaps it's better to close this one and continue with #23038?

I think these changes are fine. These tests already catch a ValueError so I can't see this going wrong easily, but it's nice to have this checked and consistent. The commit message could use some more detail.

@LamentXU123

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fair. I will merge #23038 and close this as superseded.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@NickSdot@Sjord@LamentXU123
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

ext/curl: improved tests - #23183

Closed
NickSdot wants to merge 1 commit into
php:masterfrom
NickSdot:hardening/22908-tests
Closed

ext/curl: improved tests#23183
NickSdot wants to merge 1 commit into
php:masterfrom
NickSdot:hardening/22908-tests

Conversation

@NickSdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow up to #22908.

@Sjord

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Is this just to make it look neat, or is there a risk that the wrong exception is thrown?

@NickSdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Is this just to make it look neat, or is there a risk that the wrong exception is thrown?

Regression protection. See the in progress effort in #22799; it's something that gets often flagged.

@LamentXU123

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Sjord As you are the author of that piece of code, do you think this change is good to go?

@LamentXU123

LamentXU123 commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Oh, and @NickSdot Since people constantly forget about applying these new error test styles, do you think it is reasonable to mention them in CODING_STANDARD.md? If you think so, feel free to open a PR, Cheers :)
(I am not approving it, just giving ideas. Because I think nowadays AI agents (which by the way are the most popular way newcomers contribute to the project) write tests in the exact same style of other tests, and if you don't mention this specifically, it won't remember your proposal.)

@NickSdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Oh, and @NickSdot Since people constantly forget about applying these new error test styles, do you think it is reasonable to mention them in CODING_STANDARD.md? If you think so, feel free to open a PR, Cheers :)

Good idea! PR incoming.

write tests in the exact same style of other tests

My point exactly; that's why I think unifying is important. :)

@Sjord

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It seems these changes are also in #23038. Perhaps it's better to close this one and continue with #23038?

I think these changes are fine. These tests already catch a ValueError so I can't see this going wrong easily, but it's nice to have this checked and consistent. The commit message could use some more detail.

@LamentXU123

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fair. I will merge #23038 and close this as superseded.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@NickSdot@Sjord@LamentXU123