Left-ray topology on $\omega_1$ - #1591

Merged
prabau merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
uncountable-left-ray
Jan 16, 2026
Merged

Left-ray topology on $\omega_1$#1591
prabau merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
uncountable-left-ray

Conversation

@felixpernegger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The latest addition in the Artinian saga.

See #1589.

We could add some more traits in this PR or later.

@felixpernegger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

I don't plan on working on this or my other PR's anytime soon anymore, so I close them for now.

@prabau
prabau marked this pull request as ready for review January 16, 2026 02:27

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@prabau since I saw you changed the definition, I copied the definition from S199 (left ray topology on $\omega$), so if you prefer this, maybe we should also change it there

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One of the reasons I changed the definition is that the previous one had a problem. It claimed the collection of open sets was (apart from boundary cases) exactly all the "closed rays", and also was exactly all the "open rays". That does not quite work, due to limit ordinals below $\omega_1$.

The new description (inspired by S166) also seemed more informative and easier to grasp.

Not sure I want to modify S199 here, but it could be helpful.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I dont really like this, since the "basic open set" depends on a basis, but the basis isn't fixed or anything.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right. It was referring to the base described in the definition, but it's out of context here.
I'll modify.

@felixpernegger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

@prabau I think all your changes are good now, if you are happy with all my (initial) files, I guess feel free to apporve this.

This space can easily be completed, but maybe its more appropriate to do this later.

@prabau
prabau merged commit cdfae02 into mainJan 16, 2026
1 check passed
@prabau
prabau deleted the uncountable-left-ray branch January 16, 2026 23:43
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@felixpernegger@prabau
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Left-ray topology on $\omega_1$ - #1591

Merged
prabau merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
uncountable-left-ray
Jan 16, 2026
Merged

Left-ray topology on $\omega_1$#1591
prabau merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
uncountable-left-ray

Conversation

@felixpernegger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The latest addition in the Artinian saga.

See #1589.

We could add some more traits in this PR or later.

@felixpernegger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

I don't plan on working on this or my other PR's anytime soon anymore, so I close them for now.

@prabau
prabau marked this pull request as ready for review January 16, 2026 02:27

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@prabau since I saw you changed the definition, I copied the definition from S199 (left ray topology on $\omega$), so if you prefer this, maybe we should also change it there

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One of the reasons I changed the definition is that the previous one had a problem. It claimed the collection of open sets was (apart from boundary cases) exactly all the "closed rays", and also was exactly all the "open rays". That does not quite work, due to limit ordinals below $\omega_1$.

The new description (inspired by S166) also seemed more informative and easier to grasp.

Not sure I want to modify S199 here, but it could be helpful.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I dont really like this, since the "basic open set" depends on a basis, but the basis isn't fixed or anything.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right. It was referring to the base described in the definition, but it's out of context here.
I'll modify.

@felixpernegger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

@prabau I think all your changes are good now, if you are happy with all my (initial) files, I guess feel free to apporve this.

This space can easily be completed, but maybe its more appropriate to do this later.

@prabau
prabau merged commit cdfae02 into mainJan 16, 2026
1 check passed
@prabau
prabau deleted the uncountable-left-ray branch January 16, 2026 23:43
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@felixpernegger@prabau
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Left-ray topology on $\omega_1$ - #1591

Merged
prabau merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
uncountable-left-ray
Jan 16, 2026
Merged

Left-ray topology on $\omega_1$#1591
prabau merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
uncountable-left-ray

Conversation

@felixpernegger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The latest addition in the Artinian saga.

See #1589.

We could add some more traits in this PR or later.

@felixpernegger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

I don't plan on working on this or my other PR's anytime soon anymore, so I close them for now.

@prabau
prabau marked this pull request as ready for review January 16, 2026 02:27

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@prabau since I saw you changed the definition, I copied the definition from S199 (left ray topology on $\omega$), so if you prefer this, maybe we should also change it there

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One of the reasons I changed the definition is that the previous one had a problem. It claimed the collection of open sets was (apart from boundary cases) exactly all the "closed rays", and also was exactly all the "open rays". That does not quite work, due to limit ordinals below $\omega_1$.

The new description (inspired by S166) also seemed more informative and easier to grasp.

Not sure I want to modify S199 here, but it could be helpful.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I dont really like this, since the "basic open set" depends on a basis, but the basis isn't fixed or anything.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right. It was referring to the base described in the definition, but it's out of context here.
I'll modify.

@felixpernegger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

@prabau I think all your changes are good now, if you are happy with all my (initial) files, I guess feel free to apporve this.

This space can easily be completed, but maybe its more appropriate to do this later.

@prabau
prabau merged commit cdfae02 into mainJan 16, 2026
1 check passed
@prabau
prabau deleted the uncountable-left-ray branch January 16, 2026 23:43
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@felixpernegger@prabau
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Left-ray topology on $\omega_1$ - #1591

Merged
prabau merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
uncountable-left-ray
Jan 16, 2026
Merged

Left-ray topology on $\omega_1$#1591
prabau merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
uncountable-left-ray

Conversation

@felixpernegger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The latest addition in the Artinian saga.

See #1589.

We could add some more traits in this PR or later.

@felixpernegger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

I don't plan on working on this or my other PR's anytime soon anymore, so I close them for now.

@prabau
prabau marked this pull request as ready for review January 16, 2026 02:27

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@prabau since I saw you changed the definition, I copied the definition from S199 (left ray topology on $\omega$), so if you prefer this, maybe we should also change it there

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One of the reasons I changed the definition is that the previous one had a problem. It claimed the collection of open sets was (apart from boundary cases) exactly all the "closed rays", and also was exactly all the "open rays". That does not quite work, due to limit ordinals below $\omega_1$.

The new description (inspired by S166) also seemed more informative and easier to grasp.

Not sure I want to modify S199 here, but it could be helpful.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I dont really like this, since the "basic open set" depends on a basis, but the basis isn't fixed or anything.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right. It was referring to the base described in the definition, but it's out of context here.
I'll modify.

@felixpernegger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

@prabau I think all your changes are good now, if you are happy with all my (initial) files, I guess feel free to apporve this.

This space can easily be completed, but maybe its more appropriate to do this later.

@prabau
prabau merged commit cdfae02 into mainJan 16, 2026
1 check passed
@prabau
prabau deleted the uncountable-left-ray branch January 16, 2026 23:43
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@felixpernegger@prabau
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Left-ray topology on $\omega_1$ - #1591

Merged
prabau merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
uncountable-left-ray
Jan 16, 2026
Merged

Left-ray topology on $\omega_1$#1591
prabau merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
uncountable-left-ray

Conversation

@felixpernegger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The latest addition in the Artinian saga.

See #1589.

We could add some more traits in this PR or later.

@felixpernegger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

I don't plan on working on this or my other PR's anytime soon anymore, so I close them for now.

@prabau
prabau marked this pull request as ready for review January 16, 2026 02:27

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@prabau since I saw you changed the definition, I copied the definition from S199 (left ray topology on $\omega$), so if you prefer this, maybe we should also change it there

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One of the reasons I changed the definition is that the previous one had a problem. It claimed the collection of open sets was (apart from boundary cases) exactly all the "closed rays", and also was exactly all the "open rays". That does not quite work, due to limit ordinals below $\omega_1$.

The new description (inspired by S166) also seemed more informative and easier to grasp.

Not sure I want to modify S199 here, but it could be helpful.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I dont really like this, since the "basic open set" depends on a basis, but the basis isn't fixed or anything.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right. It was referring to the base described in the definition, but it's out of context here.
I'll modify.

@felixpernegger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

@prabau I think all your changes are good now, if you are happy with all my (initial) files, I guess feel free to apporve this.

This space can easily be completed, but maybe its more appropriate to do this later.

@prabau
prabau merged commit cdfae02 into mainJan 16, 2026
1 check passed
@prabau
prabau deleted the uncountable-left-ray branch January 16, 2026 23:43
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@felixpernegger@prabau
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Left-ray topology on $\omega_1$ - #1591

Merged
prabau merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
uncountable-left-ray
Jan 16, 2026
Merged

Left-ray topology on $\omega_1$#1591
prabau merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
uncountable-left-ray

Conversation

@felixpernegger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The latest addition in the Artinian saga.

See #1589.

We could add some more traits in this PR or later.

@felixpernegger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

I don't plan on working on this or my other PR's anytime soon anymore, so I close them for now.

@prabau
prabau marked this pull request as ready for review January 16, 2026 02:27

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@prabau since I saw you changed the definition, I copied the definition from S199 (left ray topology on $\omega$), so if you prefer this, maybe we should also change it there

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One of the reasons I changed the definition is that the previous one had a problem. It claimed the collection of open sets was (apart from boundary cases) exactly all the "closed rays", and also was exactly all the "open rays". That does not quite work, due to limit ordinals below $\omega_1$.

The new description (inspired by S166) also seemed more informative and easier to grasp.

Not sure I want to modify S199 here, but it could be helpful.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I dont really like this, since the "basic open set" depends on a basis, but the basis isn't fixed or anything.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right. It was referring to the base described in the definition, but it's out of context here.
I'll modify.

@felixpernegger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

@prabau I think all your changes are good now, if you are happy with all my (initial) files, I guess feel free to apporve this.

This space can easily be completed, but maybe its more appropriate to do this later.

@prabau
prabau merged commit cdfae02 into mainJan 16, 2026
1 check passed
@prabau
prabau deleted the uncountable-left-ray branch January 16, 2026 23:43
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@felixpernegger@prabau
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Left-ray topology on $\omega_1$ - #1591

Merged
prabau merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
uncountable-left-ray
Jan 16, 2026
Merged

Left-ray topology on $\omega_1$#1591
prabau merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
uncountable-left-ray

Conversation

@felixpernegger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The latest addition in the Artinian saga.

See #1589.

We could add some more traits in this PR or later.

@felixpernegger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

I don't plan on working on this or my other PR's anytime soon anymore, so I close them for now.

@prabau
prabau marked this pull request as ready for review January 16, 2026 02:27

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@prabau since I saw you changed the definition, I copied the definition from S199 (left ray topology on $\omega$), so if you prefer this, maybe we should also change it there

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One of the reasons I changed the definition is that the previous one had a problem. It claimed the collection of open sets was (apart from boundary cases) exactly all the "closed rays", and also was exactly all the "open rays". That does not quite work, due to limit ordinals below $\omega_1$.

The new description (inspired by S166) also seemed more informative and easier to grasp.

Not sure I want to modify S199 here, but it could be helpful.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I dont really like this, since the "basic open set" depends on a basis, but the basis isn't fixed or anything.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right. It was referring to the base described in the definition, but it's out of context here.
I'll modify.

@felixpernegger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

@prabau I think all your changes are good now, if you are happy with all my (initial) files, I guess feel free to apporve this.

This space can easily be completed, but maybe its more appropriate to do this later.

@prabau
prabau merged commit cdfae02 into mainJan 16, 2026
1 check passed
@prabau
prabau deleted the uncountable-left-ray branch January 16, 2026 23:43
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@felixpernegger@prabau
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Left-ray topology on $\omega_1$ - #1591

Merged
prabau merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
uncountable-left-ray
Jan 16, 2026
Merged

Left-ray topology on $\omega_1$#1591
prabau merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
uncountable-left-ray

Conversation

@felixpernegger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The latest addition in the Artinian saga.

See #1589.

We could add some more traits in this PR or later.

@felixpernegger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

I don't plan on working on this or my other PR's anytime soon anymore, so I close them for now.

@prabau
prabau marked this pull request as ready for review January 16, 2026 02:27

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@prabau since I saw you changed the definition, I copied the definition from S199 (left ray topology on $\omega$), so if you prefer this, maybe we should also change it there

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One of the reasons I changed the definition is that the previous one had a problem. It claimed the collection of open sets was (apart from boundary cases) exactly all the "closed rays", and also was exactly all the "open rays". That does not quite work, due to limit ordinals below $\omega_1$.

The new description (inspired by S166) also seemed more informative and easier to grasp.

Not sure I want to modify S199 here, but it could be helpful.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I dont really like this, since the "basic open set" depends on a basis, but the basis isn't fixed or anything.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right. It was referring to the base described in the definition, but it's out of context here.
I'll modify.

@felixpernegger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

@prabau I think all your changes are good now, if you are happy with all my (initial) files, I guess feel free to apporve this.

This space can easily be completed, but maybe its more appropriate to do this later.

@prabau
prabau merged commit cdfae02 into mainJan 16, 2026
1 check passed
@prabau
prabau deleted the uncountable-left-ray branch January 16, 2026 23:43
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@felixpernegger@prabau