fix(web): allow removing projects that still contain threads - #1922

Closed
rohankumawat wants to merge 1 commit into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
rohankumawat:fix/allow-remove-project-with-threads
Closed

fix(web): allow removing projects that still contain threads#1922
rohankumawat wants to merge 1 commit into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
rohankumawat:fix/allow-remove-project-with-threads

Conversation

@rohankumawat

@rohankumawatrohankumawat commented Apr 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Removing a project with existing threads showed a blocking warning toast ("Project is not empty") and refused to proceed, forcing users to manually delete every thread first.
  • The confirmation dialog now automatically deletes all threads before removing the project.
  • The dialog also clarifies that files on disk are not affected.

What changed

  • Replaced the blocking toast with a cascading delete: all threads are deleted before the project is removed.
  • Updated the native confirmation dialog message to include thread count (when applicable) and a reassurance that local files remain untouched.
  • Added deleteThread and projectThreads to the useCallback dependency array.

Before

Screenshot 2026-04-11 at 06 46 27

After

Screen.Recording.2026-04-11.at.06.47.27.mov

Test plan

  • Right-click a project with threads → "Remove project" → confirm → project and threads removed
  • Right-click an empty project → "Remove project" → confirm → project removed
  • Cancel the confirmation → nothing happens
  • Files on disk remain untouched after removal

Note

Medium Risk
Changes deletion behavior to automatically delete all threads before removing a project, which could cause unintended data loss or partial-failure states if thread deletions fail mid-sequence.

Overview
Removing a project from the sidebar no longer blocks when the project contains threads; it now confirms and then deletes all threads in the project before dispatching the project.delete command.

The confirmation dialog message is expanded to include the number of threads that will be deleted (when non-zero) and to clarify that files on disk are unaffected, and the callback dependencies are updated to track deleteThread and projectThreads.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Previously, attempting to remove a project with existing threads showed
a blocking warning toast ("Project is not empty") and refused to proceed,
forcing users to manually delete every thread first.
Now the confirmation dialog deletes all threads in the project
automatically before removing it. The dialog also clarifies that
files on disk are not affected.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 701f2707-6ffd-48a2-8f87-d150126c1044

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added size:S 10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions). vouch:unvouched PR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list. labels Apr 11, 2026

@cursorcursorBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 2 potential issues.

Fix All in Cursor

❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Configure here.

// Delete all threads in the project first
for (const thread of projectThreads) {
await deleteThread(scopeThreadRef(thread.environmentId, thread.id));
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cascading delete triggers per-thread worktree confirmation dialogs

High Severity

The loop calls deleteThread for each thread, but deleteThread internally shows a native confirmation dialog for every thread that has an orphaned worktree (asking "Delete the worktree too?"). After the user already confirmed the project removal, they can be bombarded with additional unexpected dialogs — one per qualifying thread. This also contradicts the parent confirmation message claiming "Your files on disk will not be affected," since deleteThread can actually remove worktrees from disk if the user clicks through those prompts.

Fix in CursorFix in Web

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Configure here.

// Delete all threads in the project first
for (const thread of projectThreads) {
await deleteThread(scopeThreadRef(thread.environmentId, thread.id));
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thread deletion before project validation risks data loss

High Severity

All threads are irreversibly deleted before validating that the project API is available and before attempting the project deletion command. If readEnvironmentApi returns null or dispatchCommand throws, the catch block shows a "Failed to remove project" toast — but the threads are already gone. This is a non-atomic cascading delete that can silently cause data loss while leaving the project intact.

Additional Locations (1)
Fix in CursorFix in Web

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Configure here.

@macroscopeapp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approvability

Verdict: Needs human review

This PR changes project deletion from blocking (when threads exist) to cascading deletion of all threads. Two high-severity unresolved review comments identify potential data loss scenarios and UX issues with the non-atomic delete implementation. The behavioral change and substantive concerns warrant human review.

You can customize Macroscope's approvability policy. Learn more.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:S10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions).vouch:unvouchedPR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@rohankumawat@maria-rcks
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix(web): allow removing projects that still contain threads - #1922

Closed
rohankumawat wants to merge 1 commit into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
rohankumawat:fix/allow-remove-project-with-threads
Closed

fix(web): allow removing projects that still contain threads#1922
rohankumawat wants to merge 1 commit into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
rohankumawat:fix/allow-remove-project-with-threads

Conversation

@rohankumawat

@rohankumawatrohankumawat commented Apr 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Removing a project with existing threads showed a blocking warning toast ("Project is not empty") and refused to proceed, forcing users to manually delete every thread first.
  • The confirmation dialog now automatically deletes all threads before removing the project.
  • The dialog also clarifies that files on disk are not affected.

What changed

  • Replaced the blocking toast with a cascading delete: all threads are deleted before the project is removed.
  • Updated the native confirmation dialog message to include thread count (when applicable) and a reassurance that local files remain untouched.
  • Added deleteThread and projectThreads to the useCallback dependency array.

Before

Screenshot 2026-04-11 at 06 46 27

After

Screen.Recording.2026-04-11.at.06.47.27.mov

Test plan

  • Right-click a project with threads → "Remove project" → confirm → project and threads removed
  • Right-click an empty project → "Remove project" → confirm → project removed
  • Cancel the confirmation → nothing happens
  • Files on disk remain untouched after removal

Note

Medium Risk
Changes deletion behavior to automatically delete all threads before removing a project, which could cause unintended data loss or partial-failure states if thread deletions fail mid-sequence.

Overview
Removing a project from the sidebar no longer blocks when the project contains threads; it now confirms and then deletes all threads in the project before dispatching the project.delete command.

The confirmation dialog message is expanded to include the number of threads that will be deleted (when non-zero) and to clarify that files on disk are unaffected, and the callback dependencies are updated to track deleteThread and projectThreads.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Previously, attempting to remove a project with existing threads showed
a blocking warning toast ("Project is not empty") and refused to proceed,
forcing users to manually delete every thread first.
Now the confirmation dialog deletes all threads in the project
automatically before removing it. The dialog also clarifies that
files on disk are not affected.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 701f2707-6ffd-48a2-8f87-d150126c1044

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added size:S 10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions). vouch:unvouched PR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list. labels Apr 11, 2026

@cursorcursorBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 2 potential issues.

Fix All in Cursor

❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Configure here.

// Delete all threads in the project first
for (const thread of projectThreads) {
await deleteThread(scopeThreadRef(thread.environmentId, thread.id));
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cascading delete triggers per-thread worktree confirmation dialogs

High Severity

The loop calls deleteThread for each thread, but deleteThread internally shows a native confirmation dialog for every thread that has an orphaned worktree (asking "Delete the worktree too?"). After the user already confirmed the project removal, they can be bombarded with additional unexpected dialogs — one per qualifying thread. This also contradicts the parent confirmation message claiming "Your files on disk will not be affected," since deleteThread can actually remove worktrees from disk if the user clicks through those prompts.

Fix in CursorFix in Web

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Configure here.

// Delete all threads in the project first
for (const thread of projectThreads) {
await deleteThread(scopeThreadRef(thread.environmentId, thread.id));
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thread deletion before project validation risks data loss

High Severity

All threads are irreversibly deleted before validating that the project API is available and before attempting the project deletion command. If readEnvironmentApi returns null or dispatchCommand throws, the catch block shows a "Failed to remove project" toast — but the threads are already gone. This is a non-atomic cascading delete that can silently cause data loss while leaving the project intact.

Additional Locations (1)
Fix in CursorFix in Web

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Configure here.

@macroscopeapp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approvability

Verdict: Needs human review

This PR changes project deletion from blocking (when threads exist) to cascading deletion of all threads. Two high-severity unresolved review comments identify potential data loss scenarios and UX issues with the non-atomic delete implementation. The behavioral change and substantive concerns warrant human review.

You can customize Macroscope's approvability policy. Learn more.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:S10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions).vouch:unvouchedPR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@rohankumawat@maria-rcks
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(web): allow removing projects that still contain threads - #1922

Closed
rohankumawat wants to merge 1 commit into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
rohankumawat:fix/allow-remove-project-with-threads
Closed

fix(web): allow removing projects that still contain threads#1922
rohankumawat wants to merge 1 commit into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
rohankumawat:fix/allow-remove-project-with-threads

Conversation

@rohankumawat

@rohankumawatrohankumawat commented Apr 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Removing a project with existing threads showed a blocking warning toast ("Project is not empty") and refused to proceed, forcing users to manually delete every thread first.
  • The confirmation dialog now automatically deletes all threads before removing the project.
  • The dialog also clarifies that files on disk are not affected.

What changed

  • Replaced the blocking toast with a cascading delete: all threads are deleted before the project is removed.
  • Updated the native confirmation dialog message to include thread count (when applicable) and a reassurance that local files remain untouched.
  • Added deleteThread and projectThreads to the useCallback dependency array.

Before

Screenshot 2026-04-11 at 06 46 27

After

Screen.Recording.2026-04-11.at.06.47.27.mov

Test plan

  • Right-click a project with threads → "Remove project" → confirm → project and threads removed
  • Right-click an empty project → "Remove project" → confirm → project removed
  • Cancel the confirmation → nothing happens
  • Files on disk remain untouched after removal

Note

Medium Risk
Changes deletion behavior to automatically delete all threads before removing a project, which could cause unintended data loss or partial-failure states if thread deletions fail mid-sequence.

Overview
Removing a project from the sidebar no longer blocks when the project contains threads; it now confirms and then deletes all threads in the project before dispatching the project.delete command.

The confirmation dialog message is expanded to include the number of threads that will be deleted (when non-zero) and to clarify that files on disk are unaffected, and the callback dependencies are updated to track deleteThread and projectThreads.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Previously, attempting to remove a project with existing threads showed
a blocking warning toast ("Project is not empty") and refused to proceed,
forcing users to manually delete every thread first.
Now the confirmation dialog deletes all threads in the project
automatically before removing it. The dialog also clarifies that
files on disk are not affected.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 701f2707-6ffd-48a2-8f87-d150126c1044

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added size:S 10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions). vouch:unvouched PR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list. labels Apr 11, 2026

@cursorcursorBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 2 potential issues.

Fix All in Cursor

❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Configure here.

// Delete all threads in the project first
for (const thread of projectThreads) {
await deleteThread(scopeThreadRef(thread.environmentId, thread.id));
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cascading delete triggers per-thread worktree confirmation dialogs

High Severity

The loop calls deleteThread for each thread, but deleteThread internally shows a native confirmation dialog for every thread that has an orphaned worktree (asking "Delete the worktree too?"). After the user already confirmed the project removal, they can be bombarded with additional unexpected dialogs — one per qualifying thread. This also contradicts the parent confirmation message claiming "Your files on disk will not be affected," since deleteThread can actually remove worktrees from disk if the user clicks through those prompts.

Fix in CursorFix in Web

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Configure here.

// Delete all threads in the project first
for (const thread of projectThreads) {
await deleteThread(scopeThreadRef(thread.environmentId, thread.id));
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thread deletion before project validation risks data loss

High Severity

All threads are irreversibly deleted before validating that the project API is available and before attempting the project deletion command. If readEnvironmentApi returns null or dispatchCommand throws, the catch block shows a "Failed to remove project" toast — but the threads are already gone. This is a non-atomic cascading delete that can silently cause data loss while leaving the project intact.

Additional Locations (1)
Fix in CursorFix in Web

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Configure here.

@macroscopeapp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approvability

Verdict: Needs human review

This PR changes project deletion from blocking (when threads exist) to cascading deletion of all threads. Two high-severity unresolved review comments identify potential data loss scenarios and UX issues with the non-atomic delete implementation. The behavioral change and substantive concerns warrant human review.

You can customize Macroscope's approvability policy. Learn more.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:S10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions).vouch:unvouchedPR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@rohankumawat@maria-rcks
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(web): allow removing projects that still contain threads - #1922

Closed
rohankumawat wants to merge 1 commit into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
rohankumawat:fix/allow-remove-project-with-threads
Closed

fix(web): allow removing projects that still contain threads#1922
rohankumawat wants to merge 1 commit into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
rohankumawat:fix/allow-remove-project-with-threads

Conversation

@rohankumawat

@rohankumawatrohankumawat commented Apr 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Removing a project with existing threads showed a blocking warning toast ("Project is not empty") and refused to proceed, forcing users to manually delete every thread first.
  • The confirmation dialog now automatically deletes all threads before removing the project.
  • The dialog also clarifies that files on disk are not affected.

What changed

  • Replaced the blocking toast with a cascading delete: all threads are deleted before the project is removed.
  • Updated the native confirmation dialog message to include thread count (when applicable) and a reassurance that local files remain untouched.
  • Added deleteThread and projectThreads to the useCallback dependency array.

Before

Screenshot 2026-04-11 at 06 46 27

After

Screen.Recording.2026-04-11.at.06.47.27.mov

Test plan

  • Right-click a project with threads → "Remove project" → confirm → project and threads removed
  • Right-click an empty project → "Remove project" → confirm → project removed
  • Cancel the confirmation → nothing happens
  • Files on disk remain untouched after removal

Note

Medium Risk
Changes deletion behavior to automatically delete all threads before removing a project, which could cause unintended data loss or partial-failure states if thread deletions fail mid-sequence.

Overview
Removing a project from the sidebar no longer blocks when the project contains threads; it now confirms and then deletes all threads in the project before dispatching the project.delete command.

The confirmation dialog message is expanded to include the number of threads that will be deleted (when non-zero) and to clarify that files on disk are unaffected, and the callback dependencies are updated to track deleteThread and projectThreads.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Previously, attempting to remove a project with existing threads showed
a blocking warning toast ("Project is not empty") and refused to proceed,
forcing users to manually delete every thread first.
Now the confirmation dialog deletes all threads in the project
automatically before removing it. The dialog also clarifies that
files on disk are not affected.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 701f2707-6ffd-48a2-8f87-d150126c1044

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added size:S 10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions). vouch:unvouched PR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list. labels Apr 11, 2026

@cursorcursorBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 2 potential issues.

Fix All in Cursor

❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Configure here.

// Delete all threads in the project first
for (const thread of projectThreads) {
await deleteThread(scopeThreadRef(thread.environmentId, thread.id));
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cascading delete triggers per-thread worktree confirmation dialogs

High Severity

The loop calls deleteThread for each thread, but deleteThread internally shows a native confirmation dialog for every thread that has an orphaned worktree (asking "Delete the worktree too?"). After the user already confirmed the project removal, they can be bombarded with additional unexpected dialogs — one per qualifying thread. This also contradicts the parent confirmation message claiming "Your files on disk will not be affected," since deleteThread can actually remove worktrees from disk if the user clicks through those prompts.

Fix in CursorFix in Web

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Configure here.

// Delete all threads in the project first
for (const thread of projectThreads) {
await deleteThread(scopeThreadRef(thread.environmentId, thread.id));
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thread deletion before project validation risks data loss

High Severity

All threads are irreversibly deleted before validating that the project API is available and before attempting the project deletion command. If readEnvironmentApi returns null or dispatchCommand throws, the catch block shows a "Failed to remove project" toast — but the threads are already gone. This is a non-atomic cascading delete that can silently cause data loss while leaving the project intact.

Additional Locations (1)
Fix in CursorFix in Web

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Configure here.

@macroscopeapp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approvability

Verdict: Needs human review

This PR changes project deletion from blocking (when threads exist) to cascading deletion of all threads. Two high-severity unresolved review comments identify potential data loss scenarios and UX issues with the non-atomic delete implementation. The behavioral change and substantive concerns warrant human review.

You can customize Macroscope's approvability policy. Learn more.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:S10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions).vouch:unvouchedPR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@rohankumawat@maria-rcks
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix(web): allow removing projects that still contain threads - #1922

Closed
rohankumawat wants to merge 1 commit into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
rohankumawat:fix/allow-remove-project-with-threads
Closed

fix(web): allow removing projects that still contain threads#1922
rohankumawat wants to merge 1 commit into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
rohankumawat:fix/allow-remove-project-with-threads

Conversation

@rohankumawat

@rohankumawatrohankumawat commented Apr 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Removing a project with existing threads showed a blocking warning toast ("Project is not empty") and refused to proceed, forcing users to manually delete every thread first.
  • The confirmation dialog now automatically deletes all threads before removing the project.
  • The dialog also clarifies that files on disk are not affected.

What changed

  • Replaced the blocking toast with a cascading delete: all threads are deleted before the project is removed.
  • Updated the native confirmation dialog message to include thread count (when applicable) and a reassurance that local files remain untouched.
  • Added deleteThread and projectThreads to the useCallback dependency array.

Before

Screenshot 2026-04-11 at 06 46 27

After

Screen.Recording.2026-04-11.at.06.47.27.mov

Test plan

  • Right-click a project with threads → "Remove project" → confirm → project and threads removed
  • Right-click an empty project → "Remove project" → confirm → project removed
  • Cancel the confirmation → nothing happens
  • Files on disk remain untouched after removal

Note

Medium Risk
Changes deletion behavior to automatically delete all threads before removing a project, which could cause unintended data loss or partial-failure states if thread deletions fail mid-sequence.

Overview
Removing a project from the sidebar no longer blocks when the project contains threads; it now confirms and then deletes all threads in the project before dispatching the project.delete command.

The confirmation dialog message is expanded to include the number of threads that will be deleted (when non-zero) and to clarify that files on disk are unaffected, and the callback dependencies are updated to track deleteThread and projectThreads.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Previously, attempting to remove a project with existing threads showed
a blocking warning toast ("Project is not empty") and refused to proceed,
forcing users to manually delete every thread first.
Now the confirmation dialog deletes all threads in the project
automatically before removing it. The dialog also clarifies that
files on disk are not affected.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 701f2707-6ffd-48a2-8f87-d150126c1044

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added size:S 10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions). vouch:unvouched PR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list. labels Apr 11, 2026

@cursorcursorBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 2 potential issues.

Fix All in Cursor

❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Configure here.

// Delete all threads in the project first
for (const thread of projectThreads) {
await deleteThread(scopeThreadRef(thread.environmentId, thread.id));
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cascading delete triggers per-thread worktree confirmation dialogs

High Severity

The loop calls deleteThread for each thread, but deleteThread internally shows a native confirmation dialog for every thread that has an orphaned worktree (asking "Delete the worktree too?"). After the user already confirmed the project removal, they can be bombarded with additional unexpected dialogs — one per qualifying thread. This also contradicts the parent confirmation message claiming "Your files on disk will not be affected," since deleteThread can actually remove worktrees from disk if the user clicks through those prompts.

Fix in CursorFix in Web

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Configure here.

// Delete all threads in the project first
for (const thread of projectThreads) {
await deleteThread(scopeThreadRef(thread.environmentId, thread.id));
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thread deletion before project validation risks data loss

High Severity

All threads are irreversibly deleted before validating that the project API is available and before attempting the project deletion command. If readEnvironmentApi returns null or dispatchCommand throws, the catch block shows a "Failed to remove project" toast — but the threads are already gone. This is a non-atomic cascading delete that can silently cause data loss while leaving the project intact.

Additional Locations (1)
Fix in CursorFix in Web

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Configure here.

@macroscopeapp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approvability

Verdict: Needs human review

This PR changes project deletion from blocking (when threads exist) to cascading deletion of all threads. Two high-severity unresolved review comments identify potential data loss scenarios and UX issues with the non-atomic delete implementation. The behavioral change and substantive concerns warrant human review.

You can customize Macroscope's approvability policy. Learn more.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:S10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions).vouch:unvouchedPR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@rohankumawat@maria-rcks
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(web): allow removing projects that still contain threads - #1922

Closed
rohankumawat wants to merge 1 commit into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
rohankumawat:fix/allow-remove-project-with-threads
Closed

fix(web): allow removing projects that still contain threads#1922
rohankumawat wants to merge 1 commit into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
rohankumawat:fix/allow-remove-project-with-threads

Conversation

@rohankumawat

@rohankumawatrohankumawat commented Apr 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Removing a project with existing threads showed a blocking warning toast ("Project is not empty") and refused to proceed, forcing users to manually delete every thread first.
  • The confirmation dialog now automatically deletes all threads before removing the project.
  • The dialog also clarifies that files on disk are not affected.

What changed

  • Replaced the blocking toast with a cascading delete: all threads are deleted before the project is removed.
  • Updated the native confirmation dialog message to include thread count (when applicable) and a reassurance that local files remain untouched.
  • Added deleteThread and projectThreads to the useCallback dependency array.

Before

Screenshot 2026-04-11 at 06 46 27

After

Screen.Recording.2026-04-11.at.06.47.27.mov

Test plan

  • Right-click a project with threads → "Remove project" → confirm → project and threads removed
  • Right-click an empty project → "Remove project" → confirm → project removed
  • Cancel the confirmation → nothing happens
  • Files on disk remain untouched after removal

Note

Medium Risk
Changes deletion behavior to automatically delete all threads before removing a project, which could cause unintended data loss or partial-failure states if thread deletions fail mid-sequence.

Overview
Removing a project from the sidebar no longer blocks when the project contains threads; it now confirms and then deletes all threads in the project before dispatching the project.delete command.

The confirmation dialog message is expanded to include the number of threads that will be deleted (when non-zero) and to clarify that files on disk are unaffected, and the callback dependencies are updated to track deleteThread and projectThreads.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Previously, attempting to remove a project with existing threads showed
a blocking warning toast ("Project is not empty") and refused to proceed,
forcing users to manually delete every thread first.
Now the confirmation dialog deletes all threads in the project
automatically before removing it. The dialog also clarifies that
files on disk are not affected.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 701f2707-6ffd-48a2-8f87-d150126c1044

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added size:S 10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions). vouch:unvouched PR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list. labels Apr 11, 2026

@cursorcursorBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 2 potential issues.

Fix All in Cursor

❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Configure here.

// Delete all threads in the project first
for (const thread of projectThreads) {
await deleteThread(scopeThreadRef(thread.environmentId, thread.id));
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cascading delete triggers per-thread worktree confirmation dialogs

High Severity

The loop calls deleteThread for each thread, but deleteThread internally shows a native confirmation dialog for every thread that has an orphaned worktree (asking "Delete the worktree too?"). After the user already confirmed the project removal, they can be bombarded with additional unexpected dialogs — one per qualifying thread. This also contradicts the parent confirmation message claiming "Your files on disk will not be affected," since deleteThread can actually remove worktrees from disk if the user clicks through those prompts.

Fix in CursorFix in Web

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Configure here.

// Delete all threads in the project first
for (const thread of projectThreads) {
await deleteThread(scopeThreadRef(thread.environmentId, thread.id));
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thread deletion before project validation risks data loss

High Severity

All threads are irreversibly deleted before validating that the project API is available and before attempting the project deletion command. If readEnvironmentApi returns null or dispatchCommand throws, the catch block shows a "Failed to remove project" toast — but the threads are already gone. This is a non-atomic cascading delete that can silently cause data loss while leaving the project intact.

Additional Locations (1)
Fix in CursorFix in Web

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Configure here.

@macroscopeapp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approvability

Verdict: Needs human review

This PR changes project deletion from blocking (when threads exist) to cascading deletion of all threads. Two high-severity unresolved review comments identify potential data loss scenarios and UX issues with the non-atomic delete implementation. The behavioral change and substantive concerns warrant human review.

You can customize Macroscope's approvability policy. Learn more.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:S10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions).vouch:unvouchedPR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@rohankumawat@maria-rcks
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(web): allow removing projects that still contain threads - #1922

Closed
rohankumawat wants to merge 1 commit into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
rohankumawat:fix/allow-remove-project-with-threads
Closed

fix(web): allow removing projects that still contain threads#1922
rohankumawat wants to merge 1 commit into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
rohankumawat:fix/allow-remove-project-with-threads

Conversation

@rohankumawat

@rohankumawatrohankumawat commented Apr 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Removing a project with existing threads showed a blocking warning toast ("Project is not empty") and refused to proceed, forcing users to manually delete every thread first.
  • The confirmation dialog now automatically deletes all threads before removing the project.
  • The dialog also clarifies that files on disk are not affected.

What changed

  • Replaced the blocking toast with a cascading delete: all threads are deleted before the project is removed.
  • Updated the native confirmation dialog message to include thread count (when applicable) and a reassurance that local files remain untouched.
  • Added deleteThread and projectThreads to the useCallback dependency array.

Before

Screenshot 2026-04-11 at 06 46 27

After

Screen.Recording.2026-04-11.at.06.47.27.mov

Test plan

  • Right-click a project with threads → "Remove project" → confirm → project and threads removed
  • Right-click an empty project → "Remove project" → confirm → project removed
  • Cancel the confirmation → nothing happens
  • Files on disk remain untouched after removal

Note

Medium Risk
Changes deletion behavior to automatically delete all threads before removing a project, which could cause unintended data loss or partial-failure states if thread deletions fail mid-sequence.

Overview
Removing a project from the sidebar no longer blocks when the project contains threads; it now confirms and then deletes all threads in the project before dispatching the project.delete command.

The confirmation dialog message is expanded to include the number of threads that will be deleted (when non-zero) and to clarify that files on disk are unaffected, and the callback dependencies are updated to track deleteThread and projectThreads.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Previously, attempting to remove a project with existing threads showed
a blocking warning toast ("Project is not empty") and refused to proceed,
forcing users to manually delete every thread first.
Now the confirmation dialog deletes all threads in the project
automatically before removing it. The dialog also clarifies that
files on disk are not affected.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 701f2707-6ffd-48a2-8f87-d150126c1044

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added size:S 10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions). vouch:unvouched PR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list. labels Apr 11, 2026

@cursorcursorBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 2 potential issues.

Fix All in Cursor

❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Configure here.

// Delete all threads in the project first
for (const thread of projectThreads) {
await deleteThread(scopeThreadRef(thread.environmentId, thread.id));
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cascading delete triggers per-thread worktree confirmation dialogs

High Severity

The loop calls deleteThread for each thread, but deleteThread internally shows a native confirmation dialog for every thread that has an orphaned worktree (asking "Delete the worktree too?"). After the user already confirmed the project removal, they can be bombarded with additional unexpected dialogs — one per qualifying thread. This also contradicts the parent confirmation message claiming "Your files on disk will not be affected," since deleteThread can actually remove worktrees from disk if the user clicks through those prompts.

Fix in CursorFix in Web

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Configure here.

// Delete all threads in the project first
for (const thread of projectThreads) {
await deleteThread(scopeThreadRef(thread.environmentId, thread.id));
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thread deletion before project validation risks data loss

High Severity

All threads are irreversibly deleted before validating that the project API is available and before attempting the project deletion command. If readEnvironmentApi returns null or dispatchCommand throws, the catch block shows a "Failed to remove project" toast — but the threads are already gone. This is a non-atomic cascading delete that can silently cause data loss while leaving the project intact.

Additional Locations (1)
Fix in CursorFix in Web

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Configure here.

@macroscopeapp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approvability

Verdict: Needs human review

This PR changes project deletion from blocking (when threads exist) to cascading deletion of all threads. Two high-severity unresolved review comments identify potential data loss scenarios and UX issues with the non-atomic delete implementation. The behavioral change and substantive concerns warrant human review.

You can customize Macroscope's approvability policy. Learn more.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:S10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions).vouch:unvouchedPR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@rohankumawat@maria-rcks
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

fix(web): allow removing projects that still contain threads - #1922

Closed
rohankumawat wants to merge 1 commit into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
rohankumawat:fix/allow-remove-project-with-threads
Closed

fix(web): allow removing projects that still contain threads#1922
rohankumawat wants to merge 1 commit into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
rohankumawat:fix/allow-remove-project-with-threads

Conversation

@rohankumawat

@rohankumawatrohankumawat commented Apr 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Removing a project with existing threads showed a blocking warning toast ("Project is not empty") and refused to proceed, forcing users to manually delete every thread first.
  • The confirmation dialog now automatically deletes all threads before removing the project.
  • The dialog also clarifies that files on disk are not affected.

What changed

  • Replaced the blocking toast with a cascading delete: all threads are deleted before the project is removed.
  • Updated the native confirmation dialog message to include thread count (when applicable) and a reassurance that local files remain untouched.
  • Added deleteThread and projectThreads to the useCallback dependency array.

Before

Screenshot 2026-04-11 at 06 46 27

After

Screen.Recording.2026-04-11.at.06.47.27.mov

Test plan

  • Right-click a project with threads → "Remove project" → confirm → project and threads removed
  • Right-click an empty project → "Remove project" → confirm → project removed
  • Cancel the confirmation → nothing happens
  • Files on disk remain untouched after removal

Note

Medium Risk
Changes deletion behavior to automatically delete all threads before removing a project, which could cause unintended data loss or partial-failure states if thread deletions fail mid-sequence.

Overview
Removing a project from the sidebar no longer blocks when the project contains threads; it now confirms and then deletes all threads in the project before dispatching the project.delete command.

The confirmation dialog message is expanded to include the number of threads that will be deleted (when non-zero) and to clarify that files on disk are unaffected, and the callback dependencies are updated to track deleteThread and projectThreads.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Previously, attempting to remove a project with existing threads showed
a blocking warning toast ("Project is not empty") and refused to proceed,
forcing users to manually delete every thread first.
Now the confirmation dialog deletes all threads in the project
automatically before removing it. The dialog also clarifies that
files on disk are not affected.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 701f2707-6ffd-48a2-8f87-d150126c1044

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added size:S 10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions). vouch:unvouched PR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list. labels Apr 11, 2026

@cursorcursorBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 2 potential issues.

Fix All in Cursor

❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Configure here.

// Delete all threads in the project first
for (const thread of projectThreads) {
await deleteThread(scopeThreadRef(thread.environmentId, thread.id));
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cascading delete triggers per-thread worktree confirmation dialogs

High Severity

The loop calls deleteThread for each thread, but deleteThread internally shows a native confirmation dialog for every thread that has an orphaned worktree (asking "Delete the worktree too?"). After the user already confirmed the project removal, they can be bombarded with additional unexpected dialogs — one per qualifying thread. This also contradicts the parent confirmation message claiming "Your files on disk will not be affected," since deleteThread can actually remove worktrees from disk if the user clicks through those prompts.

Fix in CursorFix in Web

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Configure here.

// Delete all threads in the project first
for (const thread of projectThreads) {
await deleteThread(scopeThreadRef(thread.environmentId, thread.id));
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thread deletion before project validation risks data loss

High Severity

All threads are irreversibly deleted before validating that the project API is available and before attempting the project deletion command. If readEnvironmentApi returns null or dispatchCommand throws, the catch block shows a "Failed to remove project" toast — but the threads are already gone. This is a non-atomic cascading delete that can silently cause data loss while leaving the project intact.

Additional Locations (1)
Fix in CursorFix in Web

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 88532c1. Configure here.

@macroscopeapp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approvability

Verdict: Needs human review

This PR changes project deletion from blocking (when threads exist) to cascading deletion of all threads. Two high-severity unresolved review comments identify potential data loss scenarios and UX issues with the non-atomic delete implementation. The behavioral change and substantive concerns warrant human review.

You can customize Macroscope's approvability policy. Learn more.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:S10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions).vouch:unvouchedPR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@rohankumawat@maria-rcks