feat(usage): add OpenCode usage reporting

[gmmeyer]

What Changed

Add Opencode usage to t3 usage page

Why

I use opencode as well as claude and codex so I can use open or alternative models. This will add opencode usage to the page as well. Opencode stores the data in a different way than claude or codex (sqlite), which forces us to slightly change the calculation mechanism. But it's basically the same.

UI Changes

This is what it looks like now:

This is what it will look like:

Checklist

• This PR is small and focused
• I explained what changed and why
• I included before/after screenshots for any UI changes
• I included a video for animation/interaction changes

---

Note

Medium Risk
New local SQLite reads and a contract version bump affect usage aggregation across clients; reads are scoped to usage scalars only, limiting exposure of prompt content.

Overview
Adds OpenCode as a third usage provider alongside Claude Code and Codex, reading local SQLite assistant-message data instead of JSONL transcripts.

The server introduces usageOpenCode for read-only SQLite access (Bun and Node), maps legacy message and current session_message rows into shared UsageRecords without selecting conversation content, and discovers databases under OpenCode’s data dir with support for OPENCODE_DB, channel DBs, and OPENCODE_DISABLE_CHANNEL_DB. UsageService branches on source kind (jsonl vs opencodeSqlite) and reports OpenCode-specific missing/partial/failed source status.

The shared contract adds opencode to UsageProviderKind and bumps USAGE_CONTRACT_VERSION to 5. Web and mobile charts/tables register OpenCode label, color, and icon; the web usage table’s empty-state colSpan now follows PROVIDER_ORDER length. User docs describe OpenCode sourcing and privacy boundaries.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 3bd1517. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

Note

Add OpenCode usage reporting to usage summary and UI

• Adds readOpenCodeUsage and resolveOpenCodeDatabasePaths in usageOpenCode.ts to read assistant usage from OpenCode SQLite databases, supporting both current and legacy schemas with deduplication by message ID.
• Integrates OpenCode as a new source in UsageService, discovering channel databases via directory scan and reporting partial/failed states per database.
• Registers opencode in provider ordering, labels, colors, and icons across web and mobile UI, and adds an OpenCodeIcon mark to the chart legend.
• Increments USAGE_CONTRACT_VERSION from 4 to 5 and adds opencode to the UsageProviderKind schema in packages/contracts/src/usage.ts.
• Risk: version bump to contract v5 may cause version-mismatch warnings or partial-state handling in clients that validate the contract version.

^{Macroscope summarized 3bd1517.}

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 44678b53-e708-4389-b6aa-3a97bdafbf47

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[macroscopeapp]

Approvability

Verdict: Needs human review

Adds a new third-party tool integration (OpenCode) with SQLite database reading, new UI display, and contract changes. While well-tested and following existing patterns, the scope of new capability (~850 lines, new database access, schema handling) warrants human review.

^{You can customize Macroscope's approvability policy. Learn more.}

[AskPlays]

Two follow-ups from running this on a fork of t3code (I cherry-picked this
branch locally):

1. The opencode.db path is hardcoded, OPENCODE_DB and channel installs are
ignored

UsageService.ts resolves the database as {XDG data dir}/opencode/opencode.db,
but opencode's own resolution (packages/core/src/database/database.ts in
v1.18.16) is:

• OPENCODE_DB wins when set: absolute paths are used verbatim, relative paths
  resolve against the data dir (:memory: aside);
• non-stable channels write opencode-<channel>.db instead of opencode.db.

Any install with OPENCODE_DB set (or a channel build) would silently report
zero OpenCode usage. I suggest mirroring opencode's resolution, e.g. a small
resolveOpenCodeDatabasePath(dataDir) helper that honors OPENCODE_DB, and
either handles the channel suffix or documents it as out of scope.

2. Zero-token placeholder rows are counted as malformed → the source reports
partial

parseOpenCodeUsageRow returns null for the placeholder assistant rows
opencode writes for aborted/empty attempts (valid identity + model, zero
tokens, cost: 0), and readOpenCodeUsage counts every null as
malformedRecords. The source then reports status: "partial" with "Some
OpenCode usage records could not be parsed" on perfectly healthy installs
(75 such rows in my db). I suggest distinguishing placeholders from malformed
rows, e.g. an isOpenCodePlaceholderRow check before incrementing the
malformed count. So that partial stays reserved for actually malformed rows.

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes using high effort and found 1 potential issue.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

Want fixes drafted automatically? Bugbot Autofix can create code changes for findings. A team admin can enable Autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit ffbd13f7365502fec8a1bb8e151b36c4390dd2d9. Configure here.}

[gmmeyer]

@AskPlays I fixed these issues thank you!

[t3dotgg]

Note

🤖 GPT-5.6 Sol responding on behalf of Theo

Closing this PR after an automated pass over open pull requests. Duplicates another usage-reporting proposal while adding a broad client, contract, or provider integration.

[gmmeyer]

What Changed

Add Opencode usage to t3 usage page

Why

I use opencode as well as claude and codex so I can use open or alternative models. This will add opencode usage to the page as well. Opencode stores the data in a different way than claude or codex (sqlite), which forces us to slightly change the calculation mechanism. But it's basically the same.

UI Changes

This is what it looks like now:

This is what it will look like:

Checklist

• This PR is small and focused
• I explained what changed and why
• I included before/after screenshots for any UI changes
• I included a video for animation/interaction changes

---

Note

Medium Risk
New local SQLite reads and a contract version bump affect usage aggregation across clients; reads are scoped to usage scalars only, limiting exposure of prompt content.

Overview
Adds OpenCode as a third usage provider alongside Claude Code and Codex, reading local SQLite assistant-message data instead of JSONL transcripts.

The server introduces usageOpenCode for read-only SQLite access (Bun and Node), maps legacy message and current session_message rows into shared UsageRecords without selecting conversation content, and discovers databases under OpenCode’s data dir with support for OPENCODE_DB, channel DBs, and OPENCODE_DISABLE_CHANNEL_DB. UsageService branches on source kind (jsonl vs opencodeSqlite) and reports OpenCode-specific missing/partial/failed source status.

The shared contract adds opencode to UsageProviderKind and bumps USAGE_CONTRACT_VERSION to 5. Web and mobile charts/tables register OpenCode label, color, and icon; the web usage table’s empty-state colSpan now follows PROVIDER_ORDER length. User docs describe OpenCode sourcing and privacy boundaries.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 3bd1517. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

Note

Add OpenCode usage reporting to usage summary and UI

• Adds readOpenCodeUsage and resolveOpenCodeDatabasePaths in usageOpenCode.ts to read assistant usage from OpenCode SQLite databases, supporting both current and legacy schemas with deduplication by message ID.
• Integrates OpenCode as a new source in UsageService, discovering channel databases via directory scan and reporting partial/failed states per database.
• Registers opencode in provider ordering, labels, colors, and icons across web and mobile UI, and adds an OpenCodeIcon mark to the chart legend.
• Increments USAGE_CONTRACT_VERSION from 4 to 5 and adds opencode to the UsageProviderKind schema in packages/contracts/src/usage.ts.
• Risk: version bump to contract v5 may cause version-mismatch warnings or partial-state handling in clients that validate the contract version.

^{Macroscope summarized 3bd1517.}

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 44678b53-e708-4389-b6aa-3a97bdafbf47

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[macroscopeapp]

Approvability

Verdict: Needs human review

Adds a new third-party tool integration (OpenCode) with SQLite database reading, new UI display, and contract changes. While well-tested and following existing patterns, the scope of new capability (~850 lines, new database access, schema handling) warrants human review.

^{You can customize Macroscope's approvability policy. Learn more.}

[AskPlays]

Two follow-ups from running this on a fork of t3code (I cherry-picked this
branch locally):

1. The opencode.db path is hardcoded, OPENCODE_DB and channel installs are
ignored

UsageService.ts resolves the database as {XDG data dir}/opencode/opencode.db,
but opencode's own resolution (packages/core/src/database/database.ts in
v1.18.16) is:

• OPENCODE_DB wins when set: absolute paths are used verbatim, relative paths
  resolve against the data dir (:memory: aside);
• non-stable channels write opencode-<channel>.db instead of opencode.db.

Any install with OPENCODE_DB set (or a channel build) would silently report
zero OpenCode usage. I suggest mirroring opencode's resolution, e.g. a small
resolveOpenCodeDatabasePath(dataDir) helper that honors OPENCODE_DB, and
either handles the channel suffix or documents it as out of scope.

2. Zero-token placeholder rows are counted as malformed → the source reports
partial

parseOpenCodeUsageRow returns null for the placeholder assistant rows
opencode writes for aborted/empty attempts (valid identity + model, zero
tokens, cost: 0), and readOpenCodeUsage counts every null as
malformedRecords. The source then reports status: "partial" with "Some
OpenCode usage records could not be parsed" on perfectly healthy installs
(75 such rows in my db). I suggest distinguishing placeholders from malformed
rows, e.g. an isOpenCodePlaceholderRow check before incrementing the
malformed count. So that partial stays reserved for actually malformed rows.

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes using high effort and found 1 potential issue.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

Want fixes drafted automatically? Bugbot Autofix can create code changes for findings. A team admin can enable Autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit ffbd13f7365502fec8a1bb8e151b36c4390dd2d9. Configure here.}

[gmmeyer]

@AskPlays I fixed these issues thank you!

[t3dotgg]

Note

🤖 GPT-5.6 Sol responding on behalf of Theo

Closing this PR after an automated pass over open pull requests. Duplicates another usage-reporting proposal while adding a broad client, contract, or provider integration.

[gmmeyer]

What Changed

Add Opencode usage to t3 usage page

Why

I use opencode as well as claude and codex so I can use open or alternative models. This will add opencode usage to the page as well. Opencode stores the data in a different way than claude or codex (sqlite), which forces us to slightly change the calculation mechanism. But it's basically the same.

UI Changes

This is what it looks like now:

This is what it will look like:

Checklist

• This PR is small and focused
• I explained what changed and why
• I included before/after screenshots for any UI changes
• I included a video for animation/interaction changes

---

Note

Medium Risk
New local SQLite reads and a contract version bump affect usage aggregation across clients; reads are scoped to usage scalars only, limiting exposure of prompt content.

Overview
Adds OpenCode as a third usage provider alongside Claude Code and Codex, reading local SQLite assistant-message data instead of JSONL transcripts.

The server introduces usageOpenCode for read-only SQLite access (Bun and Node), maps legacy message and current session_message rows into shared UsageRecords without selecting conversation content, and discovers databases under OpenCode’s data dir with support for OPENCODE_DB, channel DBs, and OPENCODE_DISABLE_CHANNEL_DB. UsageService branches on source kind (jsonl vs opencodeSqlite) and reports OpenCode-specific missing/partial/failed source status.

The shared contract adds opencode to UsageProviderKind and bumps USAGE_CONTRACT_VERSION to 5. Web and mobile charts/tables register OpenCode label, color, and icon; the web usage table’s empty-state colSpan now follows PROVIDER_ORDER length. User docs describe OpenCode sourcing and privacy boundaries.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 3bd1517. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

Note

Add OpenCode usage reporting to usage summary and UI

• Adds readOpenCodeUsage and resolveOpenCodeDatabasePaths in usageOpenCode.ts to read assistant usage from OpenCode SQLite databases, supporting both current and legacy schemas with deduplication by message ID.
• Integrates OpenCode as a new source in UsageService, discovering channel databases via directory scan and reporting partial/failed states per database.
• Registers opencode in provider ordering, labels, colors, and icons across web and mobile UI, and adds an OpenCodeIcon mark to the chart legend.
• Increments USAGE_CONTRACT_VERSION from 4 to 5 and adds opencode to the UsageProviderKind schema in packages/contracts/src/usage.ts.
• Risk: version bump to contract v5 may cause version-mismatch warnings or partial-state handling in clients that validate the contract version.

^{Macroscope summarized 3bd1517.}

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 44678b53-e708-4389-b6aa-3a97bdafbf47

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[macroscopeapp]

Approvability

Verdict: Needs human review

Adds a new third-party tool integration (OpenCode) with SQLite database reading, new UI display, and contract changes. While well-tested and following existing patterns, the scope of new capability (~850 lines, new database access, schema handling) warrants human review.

^{You can customize Macroscope's approvability policy. Learn more.}

[AskPlays]

Two follow-ups from running this on a fork of t3code (I cherry-picked this
branch locally):

1. The opencode.db path is hardcoded, OPENCODE_DB and channel installs are
ignored

UsageService.ts resolves the database as {XDG data dir}/opencode/opencode.db,
but opencode's own resolution (packages/core/src/database/database.ts in
v1.18.16) is:

• OPENCODE_DB wins when set: absolute paths are used verbatim, relative paths
  resolve against the data dir (:memory: aside);
• non-stable channels write opencode-<channel>.db instead of opencode.db.

Any install with OPENCODE_DB set (or a channel build) would silently report
zero OpenCode usage. I suggest mirroring opencode's resolution, e.g. a small
resolveOpenCodeDatabasePath(dataDir) helper that honors OPENCODE_DB, and
either handles the channel suffix or documents it as out of scope.

2. Zero-token placeholder rows are counted as malformed → the source reports
partial

parseOpenCodeUsageRow returns null for the placeholder assistant rows
opencode writes for aborted/empty attempts (valid identity + model, zero
tokens, cost: 0), and readOpenCodeUsage counts every null as
malformedRecords. The source then reports status: "partial" with "Some
OpenCode usage records could not be parsed" on perfectly healthy installs
(75 such rows in my db). I suggest distinguishing placeholders from malformed
rows, e.g. an isOpenCodePlaceholderRow check before incrementing the
malformed count. So that partial stays reserved for actually malformed rows.

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes using high effort and found 1 potential issue.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

Want fixes drafted automatically? Bugbot Autofix can create code changes for findings. A team admin can enable Autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit ffbd13f7365502fec8a1bb8e151b36c4390dd2d9. Configure here.}

[gmmeyer]

@AskPlays I fixed these issues thank you!

[t3dotgg]

Note

🤖 GPT-5.6 Sol responding on behalf of Theo

Closing this PR after an automated pass over open pull requests. Duplicates another usage-reporting proposal while adding a broad client, contract, or provider integration.

[gmmeyer]

What Changed

Add Opencode usage to t3 usage page

Why

I use opencode as well as claude and codex so I can use open or alternative models. This will add opencode usage to the page as well. Opencode stores the data in a different way than claude or codex (sqlite), which forces us to slightly change the calculation mechanism. But it's basically the same.

UI Changes

This is what it looks like now:

This is what it will look like:

Checklist

• This PR is small and focused
• I explained what changed and why
• I included before/after screenshots for any UI changes
• I included a video for animation/interaction changes

---

Note

Medium Risk
New local SQLite reads and a contract version bump affect usage aggregation across clients; reads are scoped to usage scalars only, limiting exposure of prompt content.

Overview
Adds OpenCode as a third usage provider alongside Claude Code and Codex, reading local SQLite assistant-message data instead of JSONL transcripts.

The server introduces usageOpenCode for read-only SQLite access (Bun and Node), maps legacy message and current session_message rows into shared UsageRecords without selecting conversation content, and discovers databases under OpenCode’s data dir with support for OPENCODE_DB, channel DBs, and OPENCODE_DISABLE_CHANNEL_DB. UsageService branches on source kind (jsonl vs opencodeSqlite) and reports OpenCode-specific missing/partial/failed source status.

The shared contract adds opencode to UsageProviderKind and bumps USAGE_CONTRACT_VERSION to 5. Web and mobile charts/tables register OpenCode label, color, and icon; the web usage table’s empty-state colSpan now follows PROVIDER_ORDER length. User docs describe OpenCode sourcing and privacy boundaries.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 3bd1517. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

Note

Add OpenCode usage reporting to usage summary and UI

• Adds readOpenCodeUsage and resolveOpenCodeDatabasePaths in usageOpenCode.ts to read assistant usage from OpenCode SQLite databases, supporting both current and legacy schemas with deduplication by message ID.
• Integrates OpenCode as a new source in UsageService, discovering channel databases via directory scan and reporting partial/failed states per database.
• Registers opencode in provider ordering, labels, colors, and icons across web and mobile UI, and adds an OpenCodeIcon mark to the chart legend.
• Increments USAGE_CONTRACT_VERSION from 4 to 5 and adds opencode to the UsageProviderKind schema in packages/contracts/src/usage.ts.
• Risk: version bump to contract v5 may cause version-mismatch warnings or partial-state handling in clients that validate the contract version.

^{Macroscope summarized 3bd1517.}

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 44678b53-e708-4389-b6aa-3a97bdafbf47

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[macroscopeapp]

Approvability

Verdict: Needs human review

Adds a new third-party tool integration (OpenCode) with SQLite database reading, new UI display, and contract changes. While well-tested and following existing patterns, the scope of new capability (~850 lines, new database access, schema handling) warrants human review.

^{You can customize Macroscope's approvability policy. Learn more.}

[AskPlays]

Two follow-ups from running this on a fork of t3code (I cherry-picked this
branch locally):

1. The opencode.db path is hardcoded, OPENCODE_DB and channel installs are
ignored

UsageService.ts resolves the database as {XDG data dir}/opencode/opencode.db,
but opencode's own resolution (packages/core/src/database/database.ts in
v1.18.16) is:

• OPENCODE_DB wins when set: absolute paths are used verbatim, relative paths
  resolve against the data dir (:memory: aside);
• non-stable channels write opencode-<channel>.db instead of opencode.db.

Any install with OPENCODE_DB set (or a channel build) would silently report
zero OpenCode usage. I suggest mirroring opencode's resolution, e.g. a small
resolveOpenCodeDatabasePath(dataDir) helper that honors OPENCODE_DB, and
either handles the channel suffix or documents it as out of scope.

2. Zero-token placeholder rows are counted as malformed → the source reports
partial

parseOpenCodeUsageRow returns null for the placeholder assistant rows
opencode writes for aborted/empty attempts (valid identity + model, zero
tokens, cost: 0), and readOpenCodeUsage counts every null as
malformedRecords. The source then reports status: "partial" with "Some
OpenCode usage records could not be parsed" on perfectly healthy installs
(75 such rows in my db). I suggest distinguishing placeholders from malformed
rows, e.g. an isOpenCodePlaceholderRow check before incrementing the
malformed count. So that partial stays reserved for actually malformed rows.

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes using high effort and found 1 potential issue.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

Want fixes drafted automatically? Bugbot Autofix can create code changes for findings. A team admin can enable Autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit ffbd13f7365502fec8a1bb8e151b36c4390dd2d9. Configure here.}

[gmmeyer]

@AskPlays I fixed these issues thank you!

[t3dotgg]

Note

🤖 GPT-5.6 Sol responding on behalf of Theo

Closing this PR after an automated pass over open pull requests. Duplicates another usage-reporting proposal while adding a broad client, contract, or provider integration.

[gmmeyer]

What Changed

Add Opencode usage to t3 usage page

Why

I use opencode as well as claude and codex so I can use open or alternative models. This will add opencode usage to the page as well. Opencode stores the data in a different way than claude or codex (sqlite), which forces us to slightly change the calculation mechanism. But it's basically the same.

UI Changes

This is what it looks like now:

This is what it will look like:

Checklist

• This PR is small and focused
• I explained what changed and why
• I included before/after screenshots for any UI changes
• I included a video for animation/interaction changes

---

Note

Medium Risk
New local SQLite reads and a contract version bump affect usage aggregation across clients; reads are scoped to usage scalars only, limiting exposure of prompt content.

Overview
Adds OpenCode as a third usage provider alongside Claude Code and Codex, reading local SQLite assistant-message data instead of JSONL transcripts.

The server introduces usageOpenCode for read-only SQLite access (Bun and Node), maps legacy message and current session_message rows into shared UsageRecords without selecting conversation content, and discovers databases under OpenCode’s data dir with support for OPENCODE_DB, channel DBs, and OPENCODE_DISABLE_CHANNEL_DB. UsageService branches on source kind (jsonl vs opencodeSqlite) and reports OpenCode-specific missing/partial/failed source status.

The shared contract adds opencode to UsageProviderKind and bumps USAGE_CONTRACT_VERSION to 5. Web and mobile charts/tables register OpenCode label, color, and icon; the web usage table’s empty-state colSpan now follows PROVIDER_ORDER length. User docs describe OpenCode sourcing and privacy boundaries.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 3bd1517. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

Note

Add OpenCode usage reporting to usage summary and UI

• Adds readOpenCodeUsage and resolveOpenCodeDatabasePaths in usageOpenCode.ts to read assistant usage from OpenCode SQLite databases, supporting both current and legacy schemas with deduplication by message ID.
• Integrates OpenCode as a new source in UsageService, discovering channel databases via directory scan and reporting partial/failed states per database.
• Registers opencode in provider ordering, labels, colors, and icons across web and mobile UI, and adds an OpenCodeIcon mark to the chart legend.
• Increments USAGE_CONTRACT_VERSION from 4 to 5 and adds opencode to the UsageProviderKind schema in packages/contracts/src/usage.ts.
• Risk: version bump to contract v5 may cause version-mismatch warnings or partial-state handling in clients that validate the contract version.

^{Macroscope summarized 3bd1517.}

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 44678b53-e708-4389-b6aa-3a97bdafbf47

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[macroscopeapp]

Approvability

Verdict: Needs human review

Adds a new third-party tool integration (OpenCode) with SQLite database reading, new UI display, and contract changes. While well-tested and following existing patterns, the scope of new capability (~850 lines, new database access, schema handling) warrants human review.

^{You can customize Macroscope's approvability policy. Learn more.}

[AskPlays]

Two follow-ups from running this on a fork of t3code (I cherry-picked this
branch locally):

1. The opencode.db path is hardcoded, OPENCODE_DB and channel installs are
ignored

UsageService.ts resolves the database as {XDG data dir}/opencode/opencode.db,
but opencode's own resolution (packages/core/src/database/database.ts in
v1.18.16) is:

• OPENCODE_DB wins when set: absolute paths are used verbatim, relative paths
  resolve against the data dir (:memory: aside);
• non-stable channels write opencode-<channel>.db instead of opencode.db.

Any install with OPENCODE_DB set (or a channel build) would silently report
zero OpenCode usage. I suggest mirroring opencode's resolution, e.g. a small
resolveOpenCodeDatabasePath(dataDir) helper that honors OPENCODE_DB, and
either handles the channel suffix or documents it as out of scope.

2. Zero-token placeholder rows are counted as malformed → the source reports
partial

parseOpenCodeUsageRow returns null for the placeholder assistant rows
opencode writes for aborted/empty attempts (valid identity + model, zero
tokens, cost: 0), and readOpenCodeUsage counts every null as
malformedRecords. The source then reports status: "partial" with "Some
OpenCode usage records could not be parsed" on perfectly healthy installs
(75 such rows in my db). I suggest distinguishing placeholders from malformed
rows, e.g. an isOpenCodePlaceholderRow check before incrementing the
malformed count. So that partial stays reserved for actually malformed rows.

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes using high effort and found 1 potential issue.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

Want fixes drafted automatically? Bugbot Autofix can create code changes for findings. A team admin can enable Autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit ffbd13f7365502fec8a1bb8e151b36c4390dd2d9. Configure here.}

[gmmeyer]

@AskPlays I fixed these issues thank you!

[t3dotgg]

Note

🤖 GPT-5.6 Sol responding on behalf of Theo

Closing this PR after an automated pass over open pull requests. Duplicates another usage-reporting proposal while adding a broad client, contract, or provider integration.

[gmmeyer]

What Changed

Add Opencode usage to t3 usage page

Why

I use opencode as well as claude and codex so I can use open or alternative models. This will add opencode usage to the page as well. Opencode stores the data in a different way than claude or codex (sqlite), which forces us to slightly change the calculation mechanism. But it's basically the same.

UI Changes

This is what it looks like now:

This is what it will look like:

Checklist

• This PR is small and focused
• I explained what changed and why
• I included before/after screenshots for any UI changes
• I included a video for animation/interaction changes

---

Note

Medium Risk
New local SQLite reads and a contract version bump affect usage aggregation across clients; reads are scoped to usage scalars only, limiting exposure of prompt content.

Overview
Adds OpenCode as a third usage provider alongside Claude Code and Codex, reading local SQLite assistant-message data instead of JSONL transcripts.

The server introduces usageOpenCode for read-only SQLite access (Bun and Node), maps legacy message and current session_message rows into shared UsageRecords without selecting conversation content, and discovers databases under OpenCode’s data dir with support for OPENCODE_DB, channel DBs, and OPENCODE_DISABLE_CHANNEL_DB. UsageService branches on source kind (jsonl vs opencodeSqlite) and reports OpenCode-specific missing/partial/failed source status.

The shared contract adds opencode to UsageProviderKind and bumps USAGE_CONTRACT_VERSION to 5. Web and mobile charts/tables register OpenCode label, color, and icon; the web usage table’s empty-state colSpan now follows PROVIDER_ORDER length. User docs describe OpenCode sourcing and privacy boundaries.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 3bd1517. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

Note

Add OpenCode usage reporting to usage summary and UI

• Adds readOpenCodeUsage and resolveOpenCodeDatabasePaths in usageOpenCode.ts to read assistant usage from OpenCode SQLite databases, supporting both current and legacy schemas with deduplication by message ID.
• Integrates OpenCode as a new source in UsageService, discovering channel databases via directory scan and reporting partial/failed states per database.
• Registers opencode in provider ordering, labels, colors, and icons across web and mobile UI, and adds an OpenCodeIcon mark to the chart legend.
• Increments USAGE_CONTRACT_VERSION from 4 to 5 and adds opencode to the UsageProviderKind schema in packages/contracts/src/usage.ts.
• Risk: version bump to contract v5 may cause version-mismatch warnings or partial-state handling in clients that validate the contract version.

^{Macroscope summarized 3bd1517.}

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 44678b53-e708-4389-b6aa-3a97bdafbf47

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[macroscopeapp]

Approvability

Verdict: Needs human review

Adds a new third-party tool integration (OpenCode) with SQLite database reading, new UI display, and contract changes. While well-tested and following existing patterns, the scope of new capability (~850 lines, new database access, schema handling) warrants human review.

^{You can customize Macroscope's approvability policy. Learn more.}

[AskPlays]

Two follow-ups from running this on a fork of t3code (I cherry-picked this
branch locally):

1. The opencode.db path is hardcoded, OPENCODE_DB and channel installs are
ignored

UsageService.ts resolves the database as {XDG data dir}/opencode/opencode.db,
but opencode's own resolution (packages/core/src/database/database.ts in
v1.18.16) is:

• OPENCODE_DB wins when set: absolute paths are used verbatim, relative paths
  resolve against the data dir (:memory: aside);
• non-stable channels write opencode-<channel>.db instead of opencode.db.

Any install with OPENCODE_DB set (or a channel build) would silently report
zero OpenCode usage. I suggest mirroring opencode's resolution, e.g. a small
resolveOpenCodeDatabasePath(dataDir) helper that honors OPENCODE_DB, and
either handles the channel suffix or documents it as out of scope.

2. Zero-token placeholder rows are counted as malformed → the source reports
partial

parseOpenCodeUsageRow returns null for the placeholder assistant rows
opencode writes for aborted/empty attempts (valid identity + model, zero
tokens, cost: 0), and readOpenCodeUsage counts every null as
malformedRecords. The source then reports status: "partial" with "Some
OpenCode usage records could not be parsed" on perfectly healthy installs
(75 such rows in my db). I suggest distinguishing placeholders from malformed
rows, e.g. an isOpenCodePlaceholderRow check before incrementing the
malformed count. So that partial stays reserved for actually malformed rows.

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes using high effort and found 1 potential issue.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

Want fixes drafted automatically? Bugbot Autofix can create code changes for findings. A team admin can enable Autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit ffbd13f7365502fec8a1bb8e151b36c4390dd2d9. Configure here.}

[gmmeyer]

@AskPlays I fixed these issues thank you!

[t3dotgg]

Note

🤖 GPT-5.6 Sol responding on behalf of Theo

Closing this PR after an automated pass over open pull requests. Duplicates another usage-reporting proposal while adding a broad client, contract, or provider integration.

[gmmeyer]

What Changed

Add Opencode usage to t3 usage page

Why

I use opencode as well as claude and codex so I can use open or alternative models. This will add opencode usage to the page as well. Opencode stores the data in a different way than claude or codex (sqlite), which forces us to slightly change the calculation mechanism. But it's basically the same.

UI Changes

This is what it looks like now:

This is what it will look like:

Checklist

• This PR is small and focused
• I explained what changed and why
• I included before/after screenshots for any UI changes
• I included a video for animation/interaction changes

---

Note

Medium Risk
New local SQLite reads and a contract version bump affect usage aggregation across clients; reads are scoped to usage scalars only, limiting exposure of prompt content.

Overview
Adds OpenCode as a third usage provider alongside Claude Code and Codex, reading local SQLite assistant-message data instead of JSONL transcripts.

The server introduces usageOpenCode for read-only SQLite access (Bun and Node), maps legacy message and current session_message rows into shared UsageRecords without selecting conversation content, and discovers databases under OpenCode’s data dir with support for OPENCODE_DB, channel DBs, and OPENCODE_DISABLE_CHANNEL_DB. UsageService branches on source kind (jsonl vs opencodeSqlite) and reports OpenCode-specific missing/partial/failed source status.

The shared contract adds opencode to UsageProviderKind and bumps USAGE_CONTRACT_VERSION to 5. Web and mobile charts/tables register OpenCode label, color, and icon; the web usage table’s empty-state colSpan now follows PROVIDER_ORDER length. User docs describe OpenCode sourcing and privacy boundaries.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 3bd1517. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

Note

Add OpenCode usage reporting to usage summary and UI

• Adds readOpenCodeUsage and resolveOpenCodeDatabasePaths in usageOpenCode.ts to read assistant usage from OpenCode SQLite databases, supporting both current and legacy schemas with deduplication by message ID.
• Integrates OpenCode as a new source in UsageService, discovering channel databases via directory scan and reporting partial/failed states per database.
• Registers opencode in provider ordering, labels, colors, and icons across web and mobile UI, and adds an OpenCodeIcon mark to the chart legend.
• Increments USAGE_CONTRACT_VERSION from 4 to 5 and adds opencode to the UsageProviderKind schema in packages/contracts/src/usage.ts.
• Risk: version bump to contract v5 may cause version-mismatch warnings or partial-state handling in clients that validate the contract version.

^{Macroscope summarized 3bd1517.}

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 44678b53-e708-4389-b6aa-3a97bdafbf47

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[macroscopeapp]

Approvability

Verdict: Needs human review

Adds a new third-party tool integration (OpenCode) with SQLite database reading, new UI display, and contract changes. While well-tested and following existing patterns, the scope of new capability (~850 lines, new database access, schema handling) warrants human review.

^{You can customize Macroscope's approvability policy. Learn more.}

[AskPlays]

Two follow-ups from running this on a fork of t3code (I cherry-picked this
branch locally):

1. The opencode.db path is hardcoded, OPENCODE_DB and channel installs are
ignored

UsageService.ts resolves the database as {XDG data dir}/opencode/opencode.db,
but opencode's own resolution (packages/core/src/database/database.ts in
v1.18.16) is:

• OPENCODE_DB wins when set: absolute paths are used verbatim, relative paths
  resolve against the data dir (:memory: aside);
• non-stable channels write opencode-<channel>.db instead of opencode.db.

Any install with OPENCODE_DB set (or a channel build) would silently report
zero OpenCode usage. I suggest mirroring opencode's resolution, e.g. a small
resolveOpenCodeDatabasePath(dataDir) helper that honors OPENCODE_DB, and
either handles the channel suffix or documents it as out of scope.

2. Zero-token placeholder rows are counted as malformed → the source reports
partial

parseOpenCodeUsageRow returns null for the placeholder assistant rows
opencode writes for aborted/empty attempts (valid identity + model, zero
tokens, cost: 0), and readOpenCodeUsage counts every null as
malformedRecords. The source then reports status: "partial" with "Some
OpenCode usage records could not be parsed" on perfectly healthy installs
(75 such rows in my db). I suggest distinguishing placeholders from malformed
rows, e.g. an isOpenCodePlaceholderRow check before incrementing the
malformed count. So that partial stays reserved for actually malformed rows.

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes using high effort and found 1 potential issue.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

Want fixes drafted automatically? Bugbot Autofix can create code changes for findings. A team admin can enable Autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit ffbd13f7365502fec8a1bb8e151b36c4390dd2d9. Configure here.}

[gmmeyer]

@AskPlays I fixed these issues thank you!

[t3dotgg]

Note

🤖 GPT-5.6 Sol responding on behalf of Theo

Closing this PR after an automated pass over open pull requests. Duplicates another usage-reporting proposal while adding a broad client, contract, or provider integration.

[gmmeyer]

What Changed

Add Opencode usage to t3 usage page

Why

I use opencode as well as claude and codex so I can use open or alternative models. This will add opencode usage to the page as well. Opencode stores the data in a different way than claude or codex (sqlite), which forces us to slightly change the calculation mechanism. But it's basically the same.

UI Changes

This is what it looks like now:

This is what it will look like:

Checklist

• This PR is small and focused
• I explained what changed and why
• I included before/after screenshots for any UI changes
• I included a video for animation/interaction changes

---

Note

Medium Risk
New local SQLite reads and a contract version bump affect usage aggregation across clients; reads are scoped to usage scalars only, limiting exposure of prompt content.

Overview
Adds OpenCode as a third usage provider alongside Claude Code and Codex, reading local SQLite assistant-message data instead of JSONL transcripts.

The server introduces usageOpenCode for read-only SQLite access (Bun and Node), maps legacy message and current session_message rows into shared UsageRecords without selecting conversation content, and discovers databases under OpenCode’s data dir with support for OPENCODE_DB, channel DBs, and OPENCODE_DISABLE_CHANNEL_DB. UsageService branches on source kind (jsonl vs opencodeSqlite) and reports OpenCode-specific missing/partial/failed source status.

The shared contract adds opencode to UsageProviderKind and bumps USAGE_CONTRACT_VERSION to 5. Web and mobile charts/tables register OpenCode label, color, and icon; the web usage table’s empty-state colSpan now follows PROVIDER_ORDER length. User docs describe OpenCode sourcing and privacy boundaries.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 3bd1517. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

Note

Add OpenCode usage reporting to usage summary and UI

• Adds readOpenCodeUsage and resolveOpenCodeDatabasePaths in usageOpenCode.ts to read assistant usage from OpenCode SQLite databases, supporting both current and legacy schemas with deduplication by message ID.
• Integrates OpenCode as a new source in UsageService, discovering channel databases via directory scan and reporting partial/failed states per database.
• Registers opencode in provider ordering, labels, colors, and icons across web and mobile UI, and adds an OpenCodeIcon mark to the chart legend.
• Increments USAGE_CONTRACT_VERSION from 4 to 5 and adds opencode to the UsageProviderKind schema in packages/contracts/src/usage.ts.
• Risk: version bump to contract v5 may cause version-mismatch warnings or partial-state handling in clients that validate the contract version.

^{Macroscope summarized 3bd1517.}

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 44678b53-e708-4389-b6aa-3a97bdafbf47

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[macroscopeapp]

Approvability

Verdict: Needs human review

Adds a new third-party tool integration (OpenCode) with SQLite database reading, new UI display, and contract changes. While well-tested and following existing patterns, the scope of new capability (~850 lines, new database access, schema handling) warrants human review.

^{You can customize Macroscope's approvability policy. Learn more.}

[AskPlays]

Two follow-ups from running this on a fork of t3code (I cherry-picked this
branch locally):

1. The opencode.db path is hardcoded, OPENCODE_DB and channel installs are
ignored

UsageService.ts resolves the database as {XDG data dir}/opencode/opencode.db,
but opencode's own resolution (packages/core/src/database/database.ts in
v1.18.16) is:

• OPENCODE_DB wins when set: absolute paths are used verbatim, relative paths
  resolve against the data dir (:memory: aside);
• non-stable channels write opencode-<channel>.db instead of opencode.db.

Any install with OPENCODE_DB set (or a channel build) would silently report
zero OpenCode usage. I suggest mirroring opencode's resolution, e.g. a small
resolveOpenCodeDatabasePath(dataDir) helper that honors OPENCODE_DB, and
either handles the channel suffix or documents it as out of scope.

2. Zero-token placeholder rows are counted as malformed → the source reports
partial

parseOpenCodeUsageRow returns null for the placeholder assistant rows
opencode writes for aborted/empty attempts (valid identity + model, zero
tokens, cost: 0), and readOpenCodeUsage counts every null as
malformedRecords. The source then reports status: "partial" with "Some
OpenCode usage records could not be parsed" on perfectly healthy installs
(75 such rows in my db). I suggest distinguishing placeholders from malformed
rows, e.g. an isOpenCodePlaceholderRow check before incrementing the
malformed count. So that partial stays reserved for actually malformed rows.

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes using high effort and found 1 potential issue.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

Want fixes drafted automatically? Bugbot Autofix can create code changes for findings. A team admin can enable Autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit ffbd13f7365502fec8a1bb8e151b36c4390dd2d9. Configure here.}

[gmmeyer]

@AskPlays I fixed these issues thank you!

[t3dotgg]

Note

🤖 GPT-5.6 Sol responding on behalf of Theo

Closing this PR after an automated pass over open pull requests. Duplicates another usage-reporting proposal while adding a broad client, contract, or provider integration.