fix(vcs): fetch GitLab merge-request refs for worktree checkout - #7174

Closed
maslinedwin wants to merge 3 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
maslinedwin:fix/gitlab-mr-fetch-refs
Closed

fix(vcs): fetch GitLab merge-request refs for worktree checkout#7174
maslinedwin wants to merge 3 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
maslinedwin:fix/gitlab-mr-fetch-refs

Conversation

@maslinedwin

@maslinedwinmaslinedwin commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Fixes#6448.

fetchPullRequestBranch / fetchPullRequestHeadCommit hardcoded GitHub's refs/pull/<n>/head. GitLab publishes refs/merge-requests/<n>/head, so every Checkout merge request → Worktree on a GitLab remote failed with couldn't find remote ref.

The fetch now tries the GitHub layout first and falls back to the GitLab layout.

Test plan

  • GitHub: Checkout PR → Worktree still works
  • GitLab: Checkout MR → Worktree fetches refs/merge-requests/<n>/head and opens the draft thread
  • Local mode for the same MR still works

Note

Medium Risk
Touches shared Git fetch paths used for checkout/worktree; behavior change is additive fallback, but mis-numbered or missing refs on both hosts still fail and now surface an aggregate error.

Overview
Fixes GitLab Checkout merge request → Worktree failures caused by only fetching GitHub-style refs/pull/<n>/head.

GitVcsDriverCore adds fetchPullThenMergeRequestRef, which tries the GitHub pull ref first and on failure retries with GitLab’s refs/merge-requests/<n>/head. fetchPullRequestBranch and fetchPullRequestHeadCommit both use this helper (branch refspec vs. FETCH_HEAD unchanged). When both fetches fail, callers get a GitCommandError whose cause is an AggregateError holding both underlying errors.

Tests cover successful GitLab fallback after a failed GitHub fetch and the dual-failure aggregation path. The public API comment on fetchPullRequestHeadCommit now documents both ref layouts.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 6eeb0c3. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Note

Fix fetchPullRequestBranch and fetchPullRequestHeadCommit to fall back to GitLab merge-request refs

  • Both methods in GitVcsDriverCore.ts previously only attempted GitHub refs/pull/<n>/head, failing silently on GitLab repositories.
  • A new fetchPullThenMergeRequestRef helper tries the GitHub refspec first, then falls back to the GitLab refs/merge-requests/<n>/head refspec on failure.
  • If both fetches fail, a GitCommandError is thrown with an AggregateError cause containing both failures.
  • Behavioral Change: callers that previously received a single GitCommandError on failure will now receive one whose cause is an AggregateError when both refspecs are attempted and fail.

Macroscope summarized 6eeb0c3.

…issing
Worktree checkout of a GitLab MR called git fetch refs/pull/<n>/head,
which GitLab does not publish. Fall back to refs/merge-requests/<n>/head
so Checkout merge request works on GitLab remotes.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: da3820e6-b1d9-469f-a4ea-e0e51385b10f

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added vouch:unvouched PR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list. size:M 30-99 changed lines (additions + deletions). labels Aug 16, 2026

@macroscopeappmacroscopeappBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One convention issue found in apps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.ts: the new GitLab fallbacks use Effect.orElse, which drops the original refs/pull/<n>/head failure, so a failure of both attempts surfaces only the merge-request error and loses the real cause chain. The repo already has the intended pattern in materializePullRequestHeadBranch (apps/server/src/git/GitManager.ts), which preserves both failures via an AggregateError cause.

Also, this is a backend behavior change (a second fetch attempt on every failed pull-ref fetch) and the new refs/merge-requests/<n>/head path currently has no coverage — a focused test in apps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.test.ts (spawner mock asserting the second refspec and that both failures are preserved) would be worth adding.

Posted via Macroscope — Effect Service Conventions

Comment threadapps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.ts Outdated
Comment threadapps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.ts Outdated
@macroscopeapp

macroscopeappBot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approvability

Verdict: Approved 6eeb0c3

This PR adds GitLab merge-request ref support as a fallback to existing GitHub pull ref fetching. The change is well-scoped to VCS driver fetch logic and includes comprehensive test coverage for both the fallback scenario and error aggregation when both providers fail.

You can customize Macroscope's approvability policy. Learn more.

When GitHub pull refs and GitLab merge-request refs both fail, surface
an AggregateError cause so the original pull-head error is not lost
behind the fallback message.

@macroscopeappmacroscopeappBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One finding: the new GitLab merge-request fallback is a backend behavior change without focused test coverage. The error-preservation issue flagged on the previous revision is resolved — both fetch failures are now surfaced as an AggregateError cause on GitCommandError, matching materializePullRequestHeadBranch in apps/server/src/git/GitManager.ts.

Posted via Macroscope — Effect Service Conventions

Comment on lines +2794 to +2803
const fetchPullThenMergeRequestRef = (
operation: string,
cwd: string,
remoteName: string,
pullSpec: string,
mergeRequestSpec: string,
pullFailureDetail: string,
mergeRequestFailureDetail: string,
) =>
executeGit(operation, cwd, ["fetch", "--quiet", "--no-tags", remoteName, pullSpec], {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This changes backend fetch behavior (new refs/merge-requests/<n>/head fallback plus a combined failure error), but no test covers it. Consider adding focused cases in apps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.test.ts using the existing ChildProcessSpawner.make harness (see the failingFetchSpawner test around line 556): one asserting the merge-request refspec is retried after the pull refspec fails, and one asserting that when both fail the resulting GitCommandError.cause is an AggregateError containing both failures.

Posted via Macroscope — Effect Service Conventions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added focused coverage in GitVcsDriverCore.test.ts: one case retries refs/merge-requests/<n>/head after the pull refspec fails, and one case asserts both failures land in an AggregateError cause.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I'm unable to act on this request because you do not have permissions within this repository.

Assert the pull-ref fetch is retried with refs/merge-requests/<n>/head,
and that both failures are preserved as an AggregateError cause.
@t3dotgg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Note

🤖 GPT-5.6 Sol responding on behalf of Theo

We're closing this PR as we clean up the T3 Code backlog. Thank you for taking the time to put this together.

We are keeping OPEN #6532 as the review path for host-specific change-request refs. It covers GitLab merge-request checkout as part of the broader host contract.

If you believe we closed this in error, please reopen the PR and leave a comment explaining what we missed.

@t3dotggt3dotgg closed this Aug 28, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:M30-99 changed lines (additions + deletions).vouch:unvouchedPR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Worktree checkout of GitLab merge requests always fails — fetchPullRequestBranch hardcodes GitHub's refs/pull/<n>/head

2 participants

@maslinedwin@t3dotgg
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix(vcs): fetch GitLab merge-request refs for worktree checkout - #7174

Closed
maslinedwin wants to merge 3 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
maslinedwin:fix/gitlab-mr-fetch-refs
Closed

fix(vcs): fetch GitLab merge-request refs for worktree checkout#7174
maslinedwin wants to merge 3 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
maslinedwin:fix/gitlab-mr-fetch-refs

Conversation

@maslinedwin

@maslinedwinmaslinedwin commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Fixes#6448.

fetchPullRequestBranch / fetchPullRequestHeadCommit hardcoded GitHub's refs/pull/<n>/head. GitLab publishes refs/merge-requests/<n>/head, so every Checkout merge request → Worktree on a GitLab remote failed with couldn't find remote ref.

The fetch now tries the GitHub layout first and falls back to the GitLab layout.

Test plan

  • GitHub: Checkout PR → Worktree still works
  • GitLab: Checkout MR → Worktree fetches refs/merge-requests/<n>/head and opens the draft thread
  • Local mode for the same MR still works

Note

Medium Risk
Touches shared Git fetch paths used for checkout/worktree; behavior change is additive fallback, but mis-numbered or missing refs on both hosts still fail and now surface an aggregate error.

Overview
Fixes GitLab Checkout merge request → Worktree failures caused by only fetching GitHub-style refs/pull/<n>/head.

GitVcsDriverCore adds fetchPullThenMergeRequestRef, which tries the GitHub pull ref first and on failure retries with GitLab’s refs/merge-requests/<n>/head. fetchPullRequestBranch and fetchPullRequestHeadCommit both use this helper (branch refspec vs. FETCH_HEAD unchanged). When both fetches fail, callers get a GitCommandError whose cause is an AggregateError holding both underlying errors.

Tests cover successful GitLab fallback after a failed GitHub fetch and the dual-failure aggregation path. The public API comment on fetchPullRequestHeadCommit now documents both ref layouts.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 6eeb0c3. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Note

Fix fetchPullRequestBranch and fetchPullRequestHeadCommit to fall back to GitLab merge-request refs

  • Both methods in GitVcsDriverCore.ts previously only attempted GitHub refs/pull/<n>/head, failing silently on GitLab repositories.
  • A new fetchPullThenMergeRequestRef helper tries the GitHub refspec first, then falls back to the GitLab refs/merge-requests/<n>/head refspec on failure.
  • If both fetches fail, a GitCommandError is thrown with an AggregateError cause containing both failures.
  • Behavioral Change: callers that previously received a single GitCommandError on failure will now receive one whose cause is an AggregateError when both refspecs are attempted and fail.

Macroscope summarized 6eeb0c3.

…issing
Worktree checkout of a GitLab MR called git fetch refs/pull/<n>/head,
which GitLab does not publish. Fall back to refs/merge-requests/<n>/head
so Checkout merge request works on GitLab remotes.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: da3820e6-b1d9-469f-a4ea-e0e51385b10f

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added vouch:unvouched PR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list. size:M 30-99 changed lines (additions + deletions). labels Aug 16, 2026

@macroscopeappmacroscopeappBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One convention issue found in apps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.ts: the new GitLab fallbacks use Effect.orElse, which drops the original refs/pull/<n>/head failure, so a failure of both attempts surfaces only the merge-request error and loses the real cause chain. The repo already has the intended pattern in materializePullRequestHeadBranch (apps/server/src/git/GitManager.ts), which preserves both failures via an AggregateError cause.

Also, this is a backend behavior change (a second fetch attempt on every failed pull-ref fetch) and the new refs/merge-requests/<n>/head path currently has no coverage — a focused test in apps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.test.ts (spawner mock asserting the second refspec and that both failures are preserved) would be worth adding.

Posted via Macroscope — Effect Service Conventions

Comment threadapps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.ts Outdated
Comment threadapps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.ts Outdated
@macroscopeapp

macroscopeappBot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approvability

Verdict: Approved 6eeb0c3

This PR adds GitLab merge-request ref support as a fallback to existing GitHub pull ref fetching. The change is well-scoped to VCS driver fetch logic and includes comprehensive test coverage for both the fallback scenario and error aggregation when both providers fail.

You can customize Macroscope's approvability policy. Learn more.

When GitHub pull refs and GitLab merge-request refs both fail, surface
an AggregateError cause so the original pull-head error is not lost
behind the fallback message.

@macroscopeappmacroscopeappBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One finding: the new GitLab merge-request fallback is a backend behavior change without focused test coverage. The error-preservation issue flagged on the previous revision is resolved — both fetch failures are now surfaced as an AggregateError cause on GitCommandError, matching materializePullRequestHeadBranch in apps/server/src/git/GitManager.ts.

Posted via Macroscope — Effect Service Conventions

Comment on lines +2794 to +2803
const fetchPullThenMergeRequestRef = (
operation: string,
cwd: string,
remoteName: string,
pullSpec: string,
mergeRequestSpec: string,
pullFailureDetail: string,
mergeRequestFailureDetail: string,
) =>
executeGit(operation, cwd, ["fetch", "--quiet", "--no-tags", remoteName, pullSpec], {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This changes backend fetch behavior (new refs/merge-requests/<n>/head fallback plus a combined failure error), but no test covers it. Consider adding focused cases in apps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.test.ts using the existing ChildProcessSpawner.make harness (see the failingFetchSpawner test around line 556): one asserting the merge-request refspec is retried after the pull refspec fails, and one asserting that when both fail the resulting GitCommandError.cause is an AggregateError containing both failures.

Posted via Macroscope — Effect Service Conventions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added focused coverage in GitVcsDriverCore.test.ts: one case retries refs/merge-requests/<n>/head after the pull refspec fails, and one case asserts both failures land in an AggregateError cause.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I'm unable to act on this request because you do not have permissions within this repository.

Assert the pull-ref fetch is retried with refs/merge-requests/<n>/head,
and that both failures are preserved as an AggregateError cause.
@t3dotgg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Note

🤖 GPT-5.6 Sol responding on behalf of Theo

We're closing this PR as we clean up the T3 Code backlog. Thank you for taking the time to put this together.

We are keeping OPEN #6532 as the review path for host-specific change-request refs. It covers GitLab merge-request checkout as part of the broader host contract.

If you believe we closed this in error, please reopen the PR and leave a comment explaining what we missed.

@t3dotggt3dotgg closed this Aug 28, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:M30-99 changed lines (additions + deletions).vouch:unvouchedPR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Worktree checkout of GitLab merge requests always fails — fetchPullRequestBranch hardcodes GitHub's refs/pull/<n>/head

2 participants

@maslinedwin@t3dotgg
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(vcs): fetch GitLab merge-request refs for worktree checkout - #7174

Closed
maslinedwin wants to merge 3 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
maslinedwin:fix/gitlab-mr-fetch-refs
Closed

fix(vcs): fetch GitLab merge-request refs for worktree checkout#7174
maslinedwin wants to merge 3 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
maslinedwin:fix/gitlab-mr-fetch-refs

Conversation

@maslinedwin

@maslinedwinmaslinedwin commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Fixes#6448.

fetchPullRequestBranch / fetchPullRequestHeadCommit hardcoded GitHub's refs/pull/<n>/head. GitLab publishes refs/merge-requests/<n>/head, so every Checkout merge request → Worktree on a GitLab remote failed with couldn't find remote ref.

The fetch now tries the GitHub layout first and falls back to the GitLab layout.

Test plan

  • GitHub: Checkout PR → Worktree still works
  • GitLab: Checkout MR → Worktree fetches refs/merge-requests/<n>/head and opens the draft thread
  • Local mode for the same MR still works

Note

Medium Risk
Touches shared Git fetch paths used for checkout/worktree; behavior change is additive fallback, but mis-numbered or missing refs on both hosts still fail and now surface an aggregate error.

Overview
Fixes GitLab Checkout merge request → Worktree failures caused by only fetching GitHub-style refs/pull/<n>/head.

GitVcsDriverCore adds fetchPullThenMergeRequestRef, which tries the GitHub pull ref first and on failure retries with GitLab’s refs/merge-requests/<n>/head. fetchPullRequestBranch and fetchPullRequestHeadCommit both use this helper (branch refspec vs. FETCH_HEAD unchanged). When both fetches fail, callers get a GitCommandError whose cause is an AggregateError holding both underlying errors.

Tests cover successful GitLab fallback after a failed GitHub fetch and the dual-failure aggregation path. The public API comment on fetchPullRequestHeadCommit now documents both ref layouts.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 6eeb0c3. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Note

Fix fetchPullRequestBranch and fetchPullRequestHeadCommit to fall back to GitLab merge-request refs

  • Both methods in GitVcsDriverCore.ts previously only attempted GitHub refs/pull/<n>/head, failing silently on GitLab repositories.
  • A new fetchPullThenMergeRequestRef helper tries the GitHub refspec first, then falls back to the GitLab refs/merge-requests/<n>/head refspec on failure.
  • If both fetches fail, a GitCommandError is thrown with an AggregateError cause containing both failures.
  • Behavioral Change: callers that previously received a single GitCommandError on failure will now receive one whose cause is an AggregateError when both refspecs are attempted and fail.

Macroscope summarized 6eeb0c3.

…issing
Worktree checkout of a GitLab MR called git fetch refs/pull/<n>/head,
which GitLab does not publish. Fall back to refs/merge-requests/<n>/head
so Checkout merge request works on GitLab remotes.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: da3820e6-b1d9-469f-a4ea-e0e51385b10f

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added vouch:unvouched PR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list. size:M 30-99 changed lines (additions + deletions). labels Aug 16, 2026

@macroscopeappmacroscopeappBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One convention issue found in apps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.ts: the new GitLab fallbacks use Effect.orElse, which drops the original refs/pull/<n>/head failure, so a failure of both attempts surfaces only the merge-request error and loses the real cause chain. The repo already has the intended pattern in materializePullRequestHeadBranch (apps/server/src/git/GitManager.ts), which preserves both failures via an AggregateError cause.

Also, this is a backend behavior change (a second fetch attempt on every failed pull-ref fetch) and the new refs/merge-requests/<n>/head path currently has no coverage — a focused test in apps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.test.ts (spawner mock asserting the second refspec and that both failures are preserved) would be worth adding.

Posted via Macroscope — Effect Service Conventions

Comment threadapps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.ts Outdated
Comment threadapps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.ts Outdated
@macroscopeapp

macroscopeappBot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approvability

Verdict: Approved 6eeb0c3

This PR adds GitLab merge-request ref support as a fallback to existing GitHub pull ref fetching. The change is well-scoped to VCS driver fetch logic and includes comprehensive test coverage for both the fallback scenario and error aggregation when both providers fail.

You can customize Macroscope's approvability policy. Learn more.

When GitHub pull refs and GitLab merge-request refs both fail, surface
an AggregateError cause so the original pull-head error is not lost
behind the fallback message.

@macroscopeappmacroscopeappBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One finding: the new GitLab merge-request fallback is a backend behavior change without focused test coverage. The error-preservation issue flagged on the previous revision is resolved — both fetch failures are now surfaced as an AggregateError cause on GitCommandError, matching materializePullRequestHeadBranch in apps/server/src/git/GitManager.ts.

Posted via Macroscope — Effect Service Conventions

Comment on lines +2794 to +2803
const fetchPullThenMergeRequestRef = (
operation: string,
cwd: string,
remoteName: string,
pullSpec: string,
mergeRequestSpec: string,
pullFailureDetail: string,
mergeRequestFailureDetail: string,
) =>
executeGit(operation, cwd, ["fetch", "--quiet", "--no-tags", remoteName, pullSpec], {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This changes backend fetch behavior (new refs/merge-requests/<n>/head fallback plus a combined failure error), but no test covers it. Consider adding focused cases in apps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.test.ts using the existing ChildProcessSpawner.make harness (see the failingFetchSpawner test around line 556): one asserting the merge-request refspec is retried after the pull refspec fails, and one asserting that when both fail the resulting GitCommandError.cause is an AggregateError containing both failures.

Posted via Macroscope — Effect Service Conventions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added focused coverage in GitVcsDriverCore.test.ts: one case retries refs/merge-requests/<n>/head after the pull refspec fails, and one case asserts both failures land in an AggregateError cause.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I'm unable to act on this request because you do not have permissions within this repository.

Assert the pull-ref fetch is retried with refs/merge-requests/<n>/head,
and that both failures are preserved as an AggregateError cause.
@t3dotgg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Note

🤖 GPT-5.6 Sol responding on behalf of Theo

We're closing this PR as we clean up the T3 Code backlog. Thank you for taking the time to put this together.

We are keeping OPEN #6532 as the review path for host-specific change-request refs. It covers GitLab merge-request checkout as part of the broader host contract.

If you believe we closed this in error, please reopen the PR and leave a comment explaining what we missed.

@t3dotggt3dotgg closed this Aug 28, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:M30-99 changed lines (additions + deletions).vouch:unvouchedPR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Worktree checkout of GitLab merge requests always fails — fetchPullRequestBranch hardcodes GitHub's refs/pull/<n>/head

2 participants

@maslinedwin@t3dotgg
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(vcs): fetch GitLab merge-request refs for worktree checkout - #7174

Closed
maslinedwin wants to merge 3 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
maslinedwin:fix/gitlab-mr-fetch-refs
Closed

fix(vcs): fetch GitLab merge-request refs for worktree checkout#7174
maslinedwin wants to merge 3 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
maslinedwin:fix/gitlab-mr-fetch-refs

Conversation

@maslinedwin

@maslinedwinmaslinedwin commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Fixes#6448.

fetchPullRequestBranch / fetchPullRequestHeadCommit hardcoded GitHub's refs/pull/<n>/head. GitLab publishes refs/merge-requests/<n>/head, so every Checkout merge request → Worktree on a GitLab remote failed with couldn't find remote ref.

The fetch now tries the GitHub layout first and falls back to the GitLab layout.

Test plan

  • GitHub: Checkout PR → Worktree still works
  • GitLab: Checkout MR → Worktree fetches refs/merge-requests/<n>/head and opens the draft thread
  • Local mode for the same MR still works

Note

Medium Risk
Touches shared Git fetch paths used for checkout/worktree; behavior change is additive fallback, but mis-numbered or missing refs on both hosts still fail and now surface an aggregate error.

Overview
Fixes GitLab Checkout merge request → Worktree failures caused by only fetching GitHub-style refs/pull/<n>/head.

GitVcsDriverCore adds fetchPullThenMergeRequestRef, which tries the GitHub pull ref first and on failure retries with GitLab’s refs/merge-requests/<n>/head. fetchPullRequestBranch and fetchPullRequestHeadCommit both use this helper (branch refspec vs. FETCH_HEAD unchanged). When both fetches fail, callers get a GitCommandError whose cause is an AggregateError holding both underlying errors.

Tests cover successful GitLab fallback after a failed GitHub fetch and the dual-failure aggregation path. The public API comment on fetchPullRequestHeadCommit now documents both ref layouts.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 6eeb0c3. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Note

Fix fetchPullRequestBranch and fetchPullRequestHeadCommit to fall back to GitLab merge-request refs

  • Both methods in GitVcsDriverCore.ts previously only attempted GitHub refs/pull/<n>/head, failing silently on GitLab repositories.
  • A new fetchPullThenMergeRequestRef helper tries the GitHub refspec first, then falls back to the GitLab refs/merge-requests/<n>/head refspec on failure.
  • If both fetches fail, a GitCommandError is thrown with an AggregateError cause containing both failures.
  • Behavioral Change: callers that previously received a single GitCommandError on failure will now receive one whose cause is an AggregateError when both refspecs are attempted and fail.

Macroscope summarized 6eeb0c3.

…issing
Worktree checkout of a GitLab MR called git fetch refs/pull/<n>/head,
which GitLab does not publish. Fall back to refs/merge-requests/<n>/head
so Checkout merge request works on GitLab remotes.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: da3820e6-b1d9-469f-a4ea-e0e51385b10f

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added vouch:unvouched PR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list. size:M 30-99 changed lines (additions + deletions). labels Aug 16, 2026

@macroscopeappmacroscopeappBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One convention issue found in apps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.ts: the new GitLab fallbacks use Effect.orElse, which drops the original refs/pull/<n>/head failure, so a failure of both attempts surfaces only the merge-request error and loses the real cause chain. The repo already has the intended pattern in materializePullRequestHeadBranch (apps/server/src/git/GitManager.ts), which preserves both failures via an AggregateError cause.

Also, this is a backend behavior change (a second fetch attempt on every failed pull-ref fetch) and the new refs/merge-requests/<n>/head path currently has no coverage — a focused test in apps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.test.ts (spawner mock asserting the second refspec and that both failures are preserved) would be worth adding.

Posted via Macroscope — Effect Service Conventions

Comment threadapps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.ts Outdated
Comment threadapps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.ts Outdated
@macroscopeapp

macroscopeappBot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approvability

Verdict: Approved 6eeb0c3

This PR adds GitLab merge-request ref support as a fallback to existing GitHub pull ref fetching. The change is well-scoped to VCS driver fetch logic and includes comprehensive test coverage for both the fallback scenario and error aggregation when both providers fail.

You can customize Macroscope's approvability policy. Learn more.

When GitHub pull refs and GitLab merge-request refs both fail, surface
an AggregateError cause so the original pull-head error is not lost
behind the fallback message.

@macroscopeappmacroscopeappBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One finding: the new GitLab merge-request fallback is a backend behavior change without focused test coverage. The error-preservation issue flagged on the previous revision is resolved — both fetch failures are now surfaced as an AggregateError cause on GitCommandError, matching materializePullRequestHeadBranch in apps/server/src/git/GitManager.ts.

Posted via Macroscope — Effect Service Conventions

Comment on lines +2794 to +2803
const fetchPullThenMergeRequestRef = (
operation: string,
cwd: string,
remoteName: string,
pullSpec: string,
mergeRequestSpec: string,
pullFailureDetail: string,
mergeRequestFailureDetail: string,
) =>
executeGit(operation, cwd, ["fetch", "--quiet", "--no-tags", remoteName, pullSpec], {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This changes backend fetch behavior (new refs/merge-requests/<n>/head fallback plus a combined failure error), but no test covers it. Consider adding focused cases in apps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.test.ts using the existing ChildProcessSpawner.make harness (see the failingFetchSpawner test around line 556): one asserting the merge-request refspec is retried after the pull refspec fails, and one asserting that when both fail the resulting GitCommandError.cause is an AggregateError containing both failures.

Posted via Macroscope — Effect Service Conventions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added focused coverage in GitVcsDriverCore.test.ts: one case retries refs/merge-requests/<n>/head after the pull refspec fails, and one case asserts both failures land in an AggregateError cause.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I'm unable to act on this request because you do not have permissions within this repository.

Assert the pull-ref fetch is retried with refs/merge-requests/<n>/head,
and that both failures are preserved as an AggregateError cause.
@t3dotgg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Note

🤖 GPT-5.6 Sol responding on behalf of Theo

We're closing this PR as we clean up the T3 Code backlog. Thank you for taking the time to put this together.

We are keeping OPEN #6532 as the review path for host-specific change-request refs. It covers GitLab merge-request checkout as part of the broader host contract.

If you believe we closed this in error, please reopen the PR and leave a comment explaining what we missed.

@t3dotggt3dotgg closed this Aug 28, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:M30-99 changed lines (additions + deletions).vouch:unvouchedPR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Worktree checkout of GitLab merge requests always fails — fetchPullRequestBranch hardcodes GitHub's refs/pull/<n>/head

2 participants

@maslinedwin@t3dotgg
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix(vcs): fetch GitLab merge-request refs for worktree checkout - #7174

Closed
maslinedwin wants to merge 3 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
maslinedwin:fix/gitlab-mr-fetch-refs
Closed

fix(vcs): fetch GitLab merge-request refs for worktree checkout#7174
maslinedwin wants to merge 3 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
maslinedwin:fix/gitlab-mr-fetch-refs

Conversation

@maslinedwin

@maslinedwinmaslinedwin commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Fixes#6448.

fetchPullRequestBranch / fetchPullRequestHeadCommit hardcoded GitHub's refs/pull/<n>/head. GitLab publishes refs/merge-requests/<n>/head, so every Checkout merge request → Worktree on a GitLab remote failed with couldn't find remote ref.

The fetch now tries the GitHub layout first and falls back to the GitLab layout.

Test plan

  • GitHub: Checkout PR → Worktree still works
  • GitLab: Checkout MR → Worktree fetches refs/merge-requests/<n>/head and opens the draft thread
  • Local mode for the same MR still works

Note

Medium Risk
Touches shared Git fetch paths used for checkout/worktree; behavior change is additive fallback, but mis-numbered or missing refs on both hosts still fail and now surface an aggregate error.

Overview
Fixes GitLab Checkout merge request → Worktree failures caused by only fetching GitHub-style refs/pull/<n>/head.

GitVcsDriverCore adds fetchPullThenMergeRequestRef, which tries the GitHub pull ref first and on failure retries with GitLab’s refs/merge-requests/<n>/head. fetchPullRequestBranch and fetchPullRequestHeadCommit both use this helper (branch refspec vs. FETCH_HEAD unchanged). When both fetches fail, callers get a GitCommandError whose cause is an AggregateError holding both underlying errors.

Tests cover successful GitLab fallback after a failed GitHub fetch and the dual-failure aggregation path. The public API comment on fetchPullRequestHeadCommit now documents both ref layouts.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 6eeb0c3. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Note

Fix fetchPullRequestBranch and fetchPullRequestHeadCommit to fall back to GitLab merge-request refs

  • Both methods in GitVcsDriverCore.ts previously only attempted GitHub refs/pull/<n>/head, failing silently on GitLab repositories.
  • A new fetchPullThenMergeRequestRef helper tries the GitHub refspec first, then falls back to the GitLab refs/merge-requests/<n>/head refspec on failure.
  • If both fetches fail, a GitCommandError is thrown with an AggregateError cause containing both failures.
  • Behavioral Change: callers that previously received a single GitCommandError on failure will now receive one whose cause is an AggregateError when both refspecs are attempted and fail.

Macroscope summarized 6eeb0c3.

…issing
Worktree checkout of a GitLab MR called git fetch refs/pull/<n>/head,
which GitLab does not publish. Fall back to refs/merge-requests/<n>/head
so Checkout merge request works on GitLab remotes.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: da3820e6-b1d9-469f-a4ea-e0e51385b10f

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added vouch:unvouched PR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list. size:M 30-99 changed lines (additions + deletions). labels Aug 16, 2026

@macroscopeappmacroscopeappBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One convention issue found in apps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.ts: the new GitLab fallbacks use Effect.orElse, which drops the original refs/pull/<n>/head failure, so a failure of both attempts surfaces only the merge-request error and loses the real cause chain. The repo already has the intended pattern in materializePullRequestHeadBranch (apps/server/src/git/GitManager.ts), which preserves both failures via an AggregateError cause.

Also, this is a backend behavior change (a second fetch attempt on every failed pull-ref fetch) and the new refs/merge-requests/<n>/head path currently has no coverage — a focused test in apps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.test.ts (spawner mock asserting the second refspec and that both failures are preserved) would be worth adding.

Posted via Macroscope — Effect Service Conventions

Comment threadapps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.ts Outdated
Comment threadapps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.ts Outdated
@macroscopeapp

macroscopeappBot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approvability

Verdict: Approved 6eeb0c3

This PR adds GitLab merge-request ref support as a fallback to existing GitHub pull ref fetching. The change is well-scoped to VCS driver fetch logic and includes comprehensive test coverage for both the fallback scenario and error aggregation when both providers fail.

You can customize Macroscope's approvability policy. Learn more.

When GitHub pull refs and GitLab merge-request refs both fail, surface
an AggregateError cause so the original pull-head error is not lost
behind the fallback message.

@macroscopeappmacroscopeappBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One finding: the new GitLab merge-request fallback is a backend behavior change without focused test coverage. The error-preservation issue flagged on the previous revision is resolved — both fetch failures are now surfaced as an AggregateError cause on GitCommandError, matching materializePullRequestHeadBranch in apps/server/src/git/GitManager.ts.

Posted via Macroscope — Effect Service Conventions

Comment on lines +2794 to +2803
const fetchPullThenMergeRequestRef = (
operation: string,
cwd: string,
remoteName: string,
pullSpec: string,
mergeRequestSpec: string,
pullFailureDetail: string,
mergeRequestFailureDetail: string,
) =>
executeGit(operation, cwd, ["fetch", "--quiet", "--no-tags", remoteName, pullSpec], {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This changes backend fetch behavior (new refs/merge-requests/<n>/head fallback plus a combined failure error), but no test covers it. Consider adding focused cases in apps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.test.ts using the existing ChildProcessSpawner.make harness (see the failingFetchSpawner test around line 556): one asserting the merge-request refspec is retried after the pull refspec fails, and one asserting that when both fail the resulting GitCommandError.cause is an AggregateError containing both failures.

Posted via Macroscope — Effect Service Conventions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added focused coverage in GitVcsDriverCore.test.ts: one case retries refs/merge-requests/<n>/head after the pull refspec fails, and one case asserts both failures land in an AggregateError cause.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I'm unable to act on this request because you do not have permissions within this repository.

Assert the pull-ref fetch is retried with refs/merge-requests/<n>/head,
and that both failures are preserved as an AggregateError cause.
@t3dotgg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Note

🤖 GPT-5.6 Sol responding on behalf of Theo

We're closing this PR as we clean up the T3 Code backlog. Thank you for taking the time to put this together.

We are keeping OPEN #6532 as the review path for host-specific change-request refs. It covers GitLab merge-request checkout as part of the broader host contract.

If you believe we closed this in error, please reopen the PR and leave a comment explaining what we missed.

@t3dotggt3dotgg closed this Aug 28, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:M30-99 changed lines (additions + deletions).vouch:unvouchedPR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Worktree checkout of GitLab merge requests always fails — fetchPullRequestBranch hardcodes GitHub's refs/pull/<n>/head

2 participants

@maslinedwin@t3dotgg
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(vcs): fetch GitLab merge-request refs for worktree checkout - #7174

Closed
maslinedwin wants to merge 3 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
maslinedwin:fix/gitlab-mr-fetch-refs
Closed

fix(vcs): fetch GitLab merge-request refs for worktree checkout#7174
maslinedwin wants to merge 3 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
maslinedwin:fix/gitlab-mr-fetch-refs

Conversation

@maslinedwin

@maslinedwinmaslinedwin commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Fixes#6448.

fetchPullRequestBranch / fetchPullRequestHeadCommit hardcoded GitHub's refs/pull/<n>/head. GitLab publishes refs/merge-requests/<n>/head, so every Checkout merge request → Worktree on a GitLab remote failed with couldn't find remote ref.

The fetch now tries the GitHub layout first and falls back to the GitLab layout.

Test plan

  • GitHub: Checkout PR → Worktree still works
  • GitLab: Checkout MR → Worktree fetches refs/merge-requests/<n>/head and opens the draft thread
  • Local mode for the same MR still works

Note

Medium Risk
Touches shared Git fetch paths used for checkout/worktree; behavior change is additive fallback, but mis-numbered or missing refs on both hosts still fail and now surface an aggregate error.

Overview
Fixes GitLab Checkout merge request → Worktree failures caused by only fetching GitHub-style refs/pull/<n>/head.

GitVcsDriverCore adds fetchPullThenMergeRequestRef, which tries the GitHub pull ref first and on failure retries with GitLab’s refs/merge-requests/<n>/head. fetchPullRequestBranch and fetchPullRequestHeadCommit both use this helper (branch refspec vs. FETCH_HEAD unchanged). When both fetches fail, callers get a GitCommandError whose cause is an AggregateError holding both underlying errors.

Tests cover successful GitLab fallback after a failed GitHub fetch and the dual-failure aggregation path. The public API comment on fetchPullRequestHeadCommit now documents both ref layouts.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 6eeb0c3. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Note

Fix fetchPullRequestBranch and fetchPullRequestHeadCommit to fall back to GitLab merge-request refs

  • Both methods in GitVcsDriverCore.ts previously only attempted GitHub refs/pull/<n>/head, failing silently on GitLab repositories.
  • A new fetchPullThenMergeRequestRef helper tries the GitHub refspec first, then falls back to the GitLab refs/merge-requests/<n>/head refspec on failure.
  • If both fetches fail, a GitCommandError is thrown with an AggregateError cause containing both failures.
  • Behavioral Change: callers that previously received a single GitCommandError on failure will now receive one whose cause is an AggregateError when both refspecs are attempted and fail.

Macroscope summarized 6eeb0c3.

…issing
Worktree checkout of a GitLab MR called git fetch refs/pull/<n>/head,
which GitLab does not publish. Fall back to refs/merge-requests/<n>/head
so Checkout merge request works on GitLab remotes.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: da3820e6-b1d9-469f-a4ea-e0e51385b10f

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added vouch:unvouched PR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list. size:M 30-99 changed lines (additions + deletions). labels Aug 16, 2026

@macroscopeappmacroscopeappBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One convention issue found in apps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.ts: the new GitLab fallbacks use Effect.orElse, which drops the original refs/pull/<n>/head failure, so a failure of both attempts surfaces only the merge-request error and loses the real cause chain. The repo already has the intended pattern in materializePullRequestHeadBranch (apps/server/src/git/GitManager.ts), which preserves both failures via an AggregateError cause.

Also, this is a backend behavior change (a second fetch attempt on every failed pull-ref fetch) and the new refs/merge-requests/<n>/head path currently has no coverage — a focused test in apps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.test.ts (spawner mock asserting the second refspec and that both failures are preserved) would be worth adding.

Posted via Macroscope — Effect Service Conventions

Comment threadapps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.ts Outdated
Comment threadapps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.ts Outdated
@macroscopeapp

macroscopeappBot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approvability

Verdict: Approved 6eeb0c3

This PR adds GitLab merge-request ref support as a fallback to existing GitHub pull ref fetching. The change is well-scoped to VCS driver fetch logic and includes comprehensive test coverage for both the fallback scenario and error aggregation when both providers fail.

You can customize Macroscope's approvability policy. Learn more.

When GitHub pull refs and GitLab merge-request refs both fail, surface
an AggregateError cause so the original pull-head error is not lost
behind the fallback message.

@macroscopeappmacroscopeappBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One finding: the new GitLab merge-request fallback is a backend behavior change without focused test coverage. The error-preservation issue flagged on the previous revision is resolved — both fetch failures are now surfaced as an AggregateError cause on GitCommandError, matching materializePullRequestHeadBranch in apps/server/src/git/GitManager.ts.

Posted via Macroscope — Effect Service Conventions

Comment on lines +2794 to +2803
const fetchPullThenMergeRequestRef = (
operation: string,
cwd: string,
remoteName: string,
pullSpec: string,
mergeRequestSpec: string,
pullFailureDetail: string,
mergeRequestFailureDetail: string,
) =>
executeGit(operation, cwd, ["fetch", "--quiet", "--no-tags", remoteName, pullSpec], {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This changes backend fetch behavior (new refs/merge-requests/<n>/head fallback plus a combined failure error), but no test covers it. Consider adding focused cases in apps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.test.ts using the existing ChildProcessSpawner.make harness (see the failingFetchSpawner test around line 556): one asserting the merge-request refspec is retried after the pull refspec fails, and one asserting that when both fail the resulting GitCommandError.cause is an AggregateError containing both failures.

Posted via Macroscope — Effect Service Conventions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added focused coverage in GitVcsDriverCore.test.ts: one case retries refs/merge-requests/<n>/head after the pull refspec fails, and one case asserts both failures land in an AggregateError cause.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I'm unable to act on this request because you do not have permissions within this repository.

Assert the pull-ref fetch is retried with refs/merge-requests/<n>/head,
and that both failures are preserved as an AggregateError cause.
@t3dotgg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Note

🤖 GPT-5.6 Sol responding on behalf of Theo

We're closing this PR as we clean up the T3 Code backlog. Thank you for taking the time to put this together.

We are keeping OPEN #6532 as the review path for host-specific change-request refs. It covers GitLab merge-request checkout as part of the broader host contract.

If you believe we closed this in error, please reopen the PR and leave a comment explaining what we missed.

@t3dotggt3dotgg closed this Aug 28, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:M30-99 changed lines (additions + deletions).vouch:unvouchedPR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Worktree checkout of GitLab merge requests always fails — fetchPullRequestBranch hardcodes GitHub's refs/pull/<n>/head

2 participants

@maslinedwin@t3dotgg
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(vcs): fetch GitLab merge-request refs for worktree checkout - #7174

Closed
maslinedwin wants to merge 3 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
maslinedwin:fix/gitlab-mr-fetch-refs
Closed

fix(vcs): fetch GitLab merge-request refs for worktree checkout#7174
maslinedwin wants to merge 3 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
maslinedwin:fix/gitlab-mr-fetch-refs

Conversation

@maslinedwin

@maslinedwinmaslinedwin commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Fixes#6448.

fetchPullRequestBranch / fetchPullRequestHeadCommit hardcoded GitHub's refs/pull/<n>/head. GitLab publishes refs/merge-requests/<n>/head, so every Checkout merge request → Worktree on a GitLab remote failed with couldn't find remote ref.

The fetch now tries the GitHub layout first and falls back to the GitLab layout.

Test plan

  • GitHub: Checkout PR → Worktree still works
  • GitLab: Checkout MR → Worktree fetches refs/merge-requests/<n>/head and opens the draft thread
  • Local mode for the same MR still works

Note

Medium Risk
Touches shared Git fetch paths used for checkout/worktree; behavior change is additive fallback, but mis-numbered or missing refs on both hosts still fail and now surface an aggregate error.

Overview
Fixes GitLab Checkout merge request → Worktree failures caused by only fetching GitHub-style refs/pull/<n>/head.

GitVcsDriverCore adds fetchPullThenMergeRequestRef, which tries the GitHub pull ref first and on failure retries with GitLab’s refs/merge-requests/<n>/head. fetchPullRequestBranch and fetchPullRequestHeadCommit both use this helper (branch refspec vs. FETCH_HEAD unchanged). When both fetches fail, callers get a GitCommandError whose cause is an AggregateError holding both underlying errors.

Tests cover successful GitLab fallback after a failed GitHub fetch and the dual-failure aggregation path. The public API comment on fetchPullRequestHeadCommit now documents both ref layouts.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 6eeb0c3. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Note

Fix fetchPullRequestBranch and fetchPullRequestHeadCommit to fall back to GitLab merge-request refs

  • Both methods in GitVcsDriverCore.ts previously only attempted GitHub refs/pull/<n>/head, failing silently on GitLab repositories.
  • A new fetchPullThenMergeRequestRef helper tries the GitHub refspec first, then falls back to the GitLab refs/merge-requests/<n>/head refspec on failure.
  • If both fetches fail, a GitCommandError is thrown with an AggregateError cause containing both failures.
  • Behavioral Change: callers that previously received a single GitCommandError on failure will now receive one whose cause is an AggregateError when both refspecs are attempted and fail.

Macroscope summarized 6eeb0c3.

…issing
Worktree checkout of a GitLab MR called git fetch refs/pull/<n>/head,
which GitLab does not publish. Fall back to refs/merge-requests/<n>/head
so Checkout merge request works on GitLab remotes.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: da3820e6-b1d9-469f-a4ea-e0e51385b10f

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added vouch:unvouched PR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list. size:M 30-99 changed lines (additions + deletions). labels Aug 16, 2026

@macroscopeappmacroscopeappBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One convention issue found in apps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.ts: the new GitLab fallbacks use Effect.orElse, which drops the original refs/pull/<n>/head failure, so a failure of both attempts surfaces only the merge-request error and loses the real cause chain. The repo already has the intended pattern in materializePullRequestHeadBranch (apps/server/src/git/GitManager.ts), which preserves both failures via an AggregateError cause.

Also, this is a backend behavior change (a second fetch attempt on every failed pull-ref fetch) and the new refs/merge-requests/<n>/head path currently has no coverage — a focused test in apps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.test.ts (spawner mock asserting the second refspec and that both failures are preserved) would be worth adding.

Posted via Macroscope — Effect Service Conventions

Comment threadapps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.ts Outdated
Comment threadapps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.ts Outdated
@macroscopeapp

macroscopeappBot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approvability

Verdict: Approved 6eeb0c3

This PR adds GitLab merge-request ref support as a fallback to existing GitHub pull ref fetching. The change is well-scoped to VCS driver fetch logic and includes comprehensive test coverage for both the fallback scenario and error aggregation when both providers fail.

You can customize Macroscope's approvability policy. Learn more.

When GitHub pull refs and GitLab merge-request refs both fail, surface
an AggregateError cause so the original pull-head error is not lost
behind the fallback message.

@macroscopeappmacroscopeappBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One finding: the new GitLab merge-request fallback is a backend behavior change without focused test coverage. The error-preservation issue flagged on the previous revision is resolved — both fetch failures are now surfaced as an AggregateError cause on GitCommandError, matching materializePullRequestHeadBranch in apps/server/src/git/GitManager.ts.

Posted via Macroscope — Effect Service Conventions

Comment on lines +2794 to +2803
const fetchPullThenMergeRequestRef = (
operation: string,
cwd: string,
remoteName: string,
pullSpec: string,
mergeRequestSpec: string,
pullFailureDetail: string,
mergeRequestFailureDetail: string,
) =>
executeGit(operation, cwd, ["fetch", "--quiet", "--no-tags", remoteName, pullSpec], {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This changes backend fetch behavior (new refs/merge-requests/<n>/head fallback plus a combined failure error), but no test covers it. Consider adding focused cases in apps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.test.ts using the existing ChildProcessSpawner.make harness (see the failingFetchSpawner test around line 556): one asserting the merge-request refspec is retried after the pull refspec fails, and one asserting that when both fail the resulting GitCommandError.cause is an AggregateError containing both failures.

Posted via Macroscope — Effect Service Conventions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added focused coverage in GitVcsDriverCore.test.ts: one case retries refs/merge-requests/<n>/head after the pull refspec fails, and one case asserts both failures land in an AggregateError cause.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I'm unable to act on this request because you do not have permissions within this repository.

Assert the pull-ref fetch is retried with refs/merge-requests/<n>/head,
and that both failures are preserved as an AggregateError cause.
@t3dotgg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Note

🤖 GPT-5.6 Sol responding on behalf of Theo

We're closing this PR as we clean up the T3 Code backlog. Thank you for taking the time to put this together.

We are keeping OPEN #6532 as the review path for host-specific change-request refs. It covers GitLab merge-request checkout as part of the broader host contract.

If you believe we closed this in error, please reopen the PR and leave a comment explaining what we missed.

@t3dotggt3dotgg closed this Aug 28, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:M30-99 changed lines (additions + deletions).vouch:unvouchedPR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Worktree checkout of GitLab merge requests always fails — fetchPullRequestBranch hardcodes GitHub's refs/pull/<n>/head

2 participants

@maslinedwin@t3dotgg
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

fix(vcs): fetch GitLab merge-request refs for worktree checkout - #7174

Closed
maslinedwin wants to merge 3 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
maslinedwin:fix/gitlab-mr-fetch-refs
Closed

fix(vcs): fetch GitLab merge-request refs for worktree checkout#7174
maslinedwin wants to merge 3 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
maslinedwin:fix/gitlab-mr-fetch-refs

Conversation

@maslinedwin

@maslinedwinmaslinedwin commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Fixes#6448.

fetchPullRequestBranch / fetchPullRequestHeadCommit hardcoded GitHub's refs/pull/<n>/head. GitLab publishes refs/merge-requests/<n>/head, so every Checkout merge request → Worktree on a GitLab remote failed with couldn't find remote ref.

The fetch now tries the GitHub layout first and falls back to the GitLab layout.

Test plan

  • GitHub: Checkout PR → Worktree still works
  • GitLab: Checkout MR → Worktree fetches refs/merge-requests/<n>/head and opens the draft thread
  • Local mode for the same MR still works

Note

Medium Risk
Touches shared Git fetch paths used for checkout/worktree; behavior change is additive fallback, but mis-numbered or missing refs on both hosts still fail and now surface an aggregate error.

Overview
Fixes GitLab Checkout merge request → Worktree failures caused by only fetching GitHub-style refs/pull/<n>/head.

GitVcsDriverCore adds fetchPullThenMergeRequestRef, which tries the GitHub pull ref first and on failure retries with GitLab’s refs/merge-requests/<n>/head. fetchPullRequestBranch and fetchPullRequestHeadCommit both use this helper (branch refspec vs. FETCH_HEAD unchanged). When both fetches fail, callers get a GitCommandError whose cause is an AggregateError holding both underlying errors.

Tests cover successful GitLab fallback after a failed GitHub fetch and the dual-failure aggregation path. The public API comment on fetchPullRequestHeadCommit now documents both ref layouts.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 6eeb0c3. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Note

Fix fetchPullRequestBranch and fetchPullRequestHeadCommit to fall back to GitLab merge-request refs

  • Both methods in GitVcsDriverCore.ts previously only attempted GitHub refs/pull/<n>/head, failing silently on GitLab repositories.
  • A new fetchPullThenMergeRequestRef helper tries the GitHub refspec first, then falls back to the GitLab refs/merge-requests/<n>/head refspec on failure.
  • If both fetches fail, a GitCommandError is thrown with an AggregateError cause containing both failures.
  • Behavioral Change: callers that previously received a single GitCommandError on failure will now receive one whose cause is an AggregateError when both refspecs are attempted and fail.

Macroscope summarized 6eeb0c3.

…issing
Worktree checkout of a GitLab MR called git fetch refs/pull/<n>/head,
which GitLab does not publish. Fall back to refs/merge-requests/<n>/head
so Checkout merge request works on GitLab remotes.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: da3820e6-b1d9-469f-a4ea-e0e51385b10f

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added vouch:unvouched PR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list. size:M 30-99 changed lines (additions + deletions). labels Aug 16, 2026

@macroscopeappmacroscopeappBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One convention issue found in apps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.ts: the new GitLab fallbacks use Effect.orElse, which drops the original refs/pull/<n>/head failure, so a failure of both attempts surfaces only the merge-request error and loses the real cause chain. The repo already has the intended pattern in materializePullRequestHeadBranch (apps/server/src/git/GitManager.ts), which preserves both failures via an AggregateError cause.

Also, this is a backend behavior change (a second fetch attempt on every failed pull-ref fetch) and the new refs/merge-requests/<n>/head path currently has no coverage — a focused test in apps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.test.ts (spawner mock asserting the second refspec and that both failures are preserved) would be worth adding.

Posted via Macroscope — Effect Service Conventions

Comment threadapps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.ts Outdated
Comment threadapps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.ts Outdated
@macroscopeapp

macroscopeappBot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approvability

Verdict: Approved 6eeb0c3

This PR adds GitLab merge-request ref support as a fallback to existing GitHub pull ref fetching. The change is well-scoped to VCS driver fetch logic and includes comprehensive test coverage for both the fallback scenario and error aggregation when both providers fail.

You can customize Macroscope's approvability policy. Learn more.

When GitHub pull refs and GitLab merge-request refs both fail, surface
an AggregateError cause so the original pull-head error is not lost
behind the fallback message.

@macroscopeappmacroscopeappBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One finding: the new GitLab merge-request fallback is a backend behavior change without focused test coverage. The error-preservation issue flagged on the previous revision is resolved — both fetch failures are now surfaced as an AggregateError cause on GitCommandError, matching materializePullRequestHeadBranch in apps/server/src/git/GitManager.ts.

Posted via Macroscope — Effect Service Conventions

Comment on lines +2794 to +2803
const fetchPullThenMergeRequestRef = (
operation: string,
cwd: string,
remoteName: string,
pullSpec: string,
mergeRequestSpec: string,
pullFailureDetail: string,
mergeRequestFailureDetail: string,
) =>
executeGit(operation, cwd, ["fetch", "--quiet", "--no-tags", remoteName, pullSpec], {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This changes backend fetch behavior (new refs/merge-requests/<n>/head fallback plus a combined failure error), but no test covers it. Consider adding focused cases in apps/server/src/vcs/GitVcsDriverCore.test.ts using the existing ChildProcessSpawner.make harness (see the failingFetchSpawner test around line 556): one asserting the merge-request refspec is retried after the pull refspec fails, and one asserting that when both fail the resulting GitCommandError.cause is an AggregateError containing both failures.

Posted via Macroscope — Effect Service Conventions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added focused coverage in GitVcsDriverCore.test.ts: one case retries refs/merge-requests/<n>/head after the pull refspec fails, and one case asserts both failures land in an AggregateError cause.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I'm unable to act on this request because you do not have permissions within this repository.

Assert the pull-ref fetch is retried with refs/merge-requests/<n>/head,
and that both failures are preserved as an AggregateError cause.
@t3dotgg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Note

🤖 GPT-5.6 Sol responding on behalf of Theo

We're closing this PR as we clean up the T3 Code backlog. Thank you for taking the time to put this together.

We are keeping OPEN #6532 as the review path for host-specific change-request refs. It covers GitLab merge-request checkout as part of the broader host contract.

If you believe we closed this in error, please reopen the PR and leave a comment explaining what we missed.

@t3dotggt3dotgg closed this Aug 28, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:M30-99 changed lines (additions + deletions).vouch:unvouchedPR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Worktree checkout of GitLab merge requests always fails — fetchPullRequestBranch hardcodes GitHub's refs/pull/<n>/head

2 participants

@maslinedwin@t3dotgg