Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
shrink-0here works against themin-w-0/max-w-fulladded to the segment and chip: the chip can now shrink below its content width, but the title can't shrink and has no clipping, so a long phase title renders outside the chip's border (and past the section, which has nooverflow-hidden) rather than being contained. Truncating the title instead keeps the chip's border box and single-line geometry intact and matches the workflow-name span in this file (min-w-0 truncate, line 403).Posted via Macroscope — UI Consistency