fix(server): treat Bitbucket permissions 404 as a removed endpoint - #8557

Closed
iamshadmantaqi wants to merge 2 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
iamshadmantaqi:fix/bitbucket-permissions-404
Closed

fix(server): treat Bitbucket permissions 404 as a removed endpoint#8557
iamshadmantaqi wants to merge 2 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
iamshadmantaqi:fix/bitbucket-permissions-404

Conversation

@iamshadmantaqi

@iamshadmantaqiiamshadmantaqi commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

What Changed

isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError now treats HTTP 404 the same as HTTP 410 on GET /user/permissions/repositories. Merge no longer dies in the permission gate when Bitbucket Cloud answers 404 for the removed endpoint.

401 and other real failures still fail.

Why

#6525 already treats CHANGE-2770's 410 as "endpoint gone, do not block, let the merge call decide." Cloud now returns 404 for the same URL. The catch never fires, so merge fails with Bitbucket returned HTTP 404.

Closes#8328

Blast Radius

Bitbucket permission reads only. GitHub and GitLab are untouched. A 404 on this one retired endpoint is treated as unknown permission, same as 410 already was. A bad token still fails.

Verification

Failing-then-passing regression in apps/server/src/pullRequest/BitbucketPullRequestApi.test.ts.

  • Before the fix, the new 404 case failed with Bitbucket returned HTTP 404.
  • After the fix, that file is 44/44 passing. The existing 410 and 401 cases still pass.
  • vp lint on the two changed files: 0 errors.
  • vp run --filter t3 typecheck: no errors in the changed file.

No UI chrome changed, so no screenshots.

Checklist

  • This PR is small and focused
  • I explained what changed and why
  • No UI change (screenshots not applicable)
  • No motion change (video not applicable)

Note

Low Risk
Scoped to Bitbucket repository permission reads; only widens the “removed endpoint” catch to 404, matching existing 410 semantics without relaxing real auth failures.

Overview
Bitbucket Cloud now returns HTTP 404 (not only 410) for the retired GET /user/permissions/repositories endpoint. isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError treats 404 like 410, so getRepositoryPermission still resolves to granted when the endpoint is gone instead of surfacing Bitbucket returned HTTP 404 and blocking merge.

Comments document the Cloud vs original CHANGE-2770 behavior. A regression test asserts a 404 on that URL yields true; 401 and other failures are unchanged.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 8662e6f. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Note

Treat Bitbucket permissions endpoint 404 as removed in isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError

Bitbucket Cloud now returns 404 (in addition to the original 410) for the removed repository-permissions endpoint. isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError in BitbucketPullRequestApi.ts is broadened to classify both statuses as the removed-endpoint signal, so getRepositoryPermission still resolves true instead of failing the merge.

  • Risk: any unrelated 404 from this Bitbucket endpoint will now be silently treated as "permission granted" rather than surfacing as an error.

Macroscope summarized 8662e6f.

CHANGE-2770 already treats HTTP 410 as gone. Cloud now answers 404, and
getRepositoryPermission still fails the merge on that status.
The 410 fallback from CHANGE-2770 never fires on Cloud, which returns
404 for /user/permissions/repositories. Grant on 404 the same way as
410. Real auth failures still fail.
Closespingdotgg#8328
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: d27b99fe-de0d-4b40-8422-82e4672439ae

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added vouch:unvouched PR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list. size:S 10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions). labels Aug 28, 2026
@macroscopeapp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approvability

Verdict: Approved at 8662e6f

Macroscope's review found this PR approvable — This is a small, well-scoped Bitbucket compatibility fix that broadens the existing retired-endpoint handling from HTTP 410 to HTTP 404. Regression coverage verifies the new case while preserving authentication and other failure behavior.

You can add or adjust custom eligibility rules. Learn more.

@MichaelCharles

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hit this today on 0.0.37 (macOS), but on comment posting rather than merge. pullRequests.comment goes through the same getViewerPermissions gate, so it fails identically: bitbucket failed in getViewerPermissions: Bitbucket returned HTTP 404.

Checked the endpoint directly today (2026-09-01), using a scoped API token with write:pullrequest:

GET https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/user/permissions/repositories?q=repository.full_name="..."
404 {"type": "error", "error": {"message": "Resource not found", "detail": "There is no API hosted at this URL. ..."}}

Cloud answers 404 for the removed endpoint now, not 410. This change also fixes commenting, not just merge.

@t3dotgg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Note

🤖 GPT-5.6 Sol responding on behalf of Theo

We're closing this PR as we clean up the T3 Code backlog. Thank you for taking the time to put this together.

We are keeping the Bitbucket permission fix in the open PR #9035 instead of maintaining two implementations. It removes the request to the retired endpoint and uses the workspace permission endpoint, covering the same HTTP 404 failure before merges and comments while preserving real permission checks. The fix is not on main yet.

If you believe we closed this in error, please reopen the PR and leave a comment explaining what we missed.

@t3dotggt3dotgg closed this Sep 1, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:S10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions).vouch:unvouchedPR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Bitbucket merge still fails — removed /user/permissions/repositories endpoint returns 404, not 410

3 participants

@iamshadmantaqi@MichaelCharles@t3dotgg
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix(server): treat Bitbucket permissions 404 as a removed endpoint - #8557

Closed
iamshadmantaqi wants to merge 2 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
iamshadmantaqi:fix/bitbucket-permissions-404
Closed

fix(server): treat Bitbucket permissions 404 as a removed endpoint#8557
iamshadmantaqi wants to merge 2 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
iamshadmantaqi:fix/bitbucket-permissions-404

Conversation

@iamshadmantaqi

@iamshadmantaqiiamshadmantaqi commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

What Changed

isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError now treats HTTP 404 the same as HTTP 410 on GET /user/permissions/repositories. Merge no longer dies in the permission gate when Bitbucket Cloud answers 404 for the removed endpoint.

401 and other real failures still fail.

Why

#6525 already treats CHANGE-2770's 410 as "endpoint gone, do not block, let the merge call decide." Cloud now returns 404 for the same URL. The catch never fires, so merge fails with Bitbucket returned HTTP 404.

Closes#8328

Blast Radius

Bitbucket permission reads only. GitHub and GitLab are untouched. A 404 on this one retired endpoint is treated as unknown permission, same as 410 already was. A bad token still fails.

Verification

Failing-then-passing regression in apps/server/src/pullRequest/BitbucketPullRequestApi.test.ts.

  • Before the fix, the new 404 case failed with Bitbucket returned HTTP 404.
  • After the fix, that file is 44/44 passing. The existing 410 and 401 cases still pass.
  • vp lint on the two changed files: 0 errors.
  • vp run --filter t3 typecheck: no errors in the changed file.

No UI chrome changed, so no screenshots.

Checklist

  • This PR is small and focused
  • I explained what changed and why
  • No UI change (screenshots not applicable)
  • No motion change (video not applicable)

Note

Low Risk
Scoped to Bitbucket repository permission reads; only widens the “removed endpoint” catch to 404, matching existing 410 semantics without relaxing real auth failures.

Overview
Bitbucket Cloud now returns HTTP 404 (not only 410) for the retired GET /user/permissions/repositories endpoint. isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError treats 404 like 410, so getRepositoryPermission still resolves to granted when the endpoint is gone instead of surfacing Bitbucket returned HTTP 404 and blocking merge.

Comments document the Cloud vs original CHANGE-2770 behavior. A regression test asserts a 404 on that URL yields true; 401 and other failures are unchanged.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 8662e6f. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Note

Treat Bitbucket permissions endpoint 404 as removed in isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError

Bitbucket Cloud now returns 404 (in addition to the original 410) for the removed repository-permissions endpoint. isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError in BitbucketPullRequestApi.ts is broadened to classify both statuses as the removed-endpoint signal, so getRepositoryPermission still resolves true instead of failing the merge.

  • Risk: any unrelated 404 from this Bitbucket endpoint will now be silently treated as "permission granted" rather than surfacing as an error.

Macroscope summarized 8662e6f.

CHANGE-2770 already treats HTTP 410 as gone. Cloud now answers 404, and
getRepositoryPermission still fails the merge on that status.
The 410 fallback from CHANGE-2770 never fires on Cloud, which returns
404 for /user/permissions/repositories. Grant on 404 the same way as
410. Real auth failures still fail.
Closespingdotgg#8328
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: d27b99fe-de0d-4b40-8422-82e4672439ae

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added vouch:unvouched PR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list. size:S 10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions). labels Aug 28, 2026
@macroscopeapp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approvability

Verdict: Approved at 8662e6f

Macroscope's review found this PR approvable — This is a small, well-scoped Bitbucket compatibility fix that broadens the existing retired-endpoint handling from HTTP 410 to HTTP 404. Regression coverage verifies the new case while preserving authentication and other failure behavior.

You can add or adjust custom eligibility rules. Learn more.

@MichaelCharles

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hit this today on 0.0.37 (macOS), but on comment posting rather than merge. pullRequests.comment goes through the same getViewerPermissions gate, so it fails identically: bitbucket failed in getViewerPermissions: Bitbucket returned HTTP 404.

Checked the endpoint directly today (2026-09-01), using a scoped API token with write:pullrequest:

GET https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/user/permissions/repositories?q=repository.full_name="..."
404 {"type": "error", "error": {"message": "Resource not found", "detail": "There is no API hosted at this URL. ..."}}

Cloud answers 404 for the removed endpoint now, not 410. This change also fixes commenting, not just merge.

@t3dotgg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Note

🤖 GPT-5.6 Sol responding on behalf of Theo

We're closing this PR as we clean up the T3 Code backlog. Thank you for taking the time to put this together.

We are keeping the Bitbucket permission fix in the open PR #9035 instead of maintaining two implementations. It removes the request to the retired endpoint and uses the workspace permission endpoint, covering the same HTTP 404 failure before merges and comments while preserving real permission checks. The fix is not on main yet.

If you believe we closed this in error, please reopen the PR and leave a comment explaining what we missed.

@t3dotggt3dotgg closed this Sep 1, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:S10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions).vouch:unvouchedPR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Bitbucket merge still fails — removed /user/permissions/repositories endpoint returns 404, not 410

3 participants

@iamshadmantaqi@MichaelCharles@t3dotgg
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(server): treat Bitbucket permissions 404 as a removed endpoint - #8557

Closed
iamshadmantaqi wants to merge 2 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
iamshadmantaqi:fix/bitbucket-permissions-404
Closed

fix(server): treat Bitbucket permissions 404 as a removed endpoint#8557
iamshadmantaqi wants to merge 2 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
iamshadmantaqi:fix/bitbucket-permissions-404

Conversation

@iamshadmantaqi

@iamshadmantaqiiamshadmantaqi commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

What Changed

isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError now treats HTTP 404 the same as HTTP 410 on GET /user/permissions/repositories. Merge no longer dies in the permission gate when Bitbucket Cloud answers 404 for the removed endpoint.

401 and other real failures still fail.

Why

#6525 already treats CHANGE-2770's 410 as "endpoint gone, do not block, let the merge call decide." Cloud now returns 404 for the same URL. The catch never fires, so merge fails with Bitbucket returned HTTP 404.

Closes#8328

Blast Radius

Bitbucket permission reads only. GitHub and GitLab are untouched. A 404 on this one retired endpoint is treated as unknown permission, same as 410 already was. A bad token still fails.

Verification

Failing-then-passing regression in apps/server/src/pullRequest/BitbucketPullRequestApi.test.ts.

  • Before the fix, the new 404 case failed with Bitbucket returned HTTP 404.
  • After the fix, that file is 44/44 passing. The existing 410 and 401 cases still pass.
  • vp lint on the two changed files: 0 errors.
  • vp run --filter t3 typecheck: no errors in the changed file.

No UI chrome changed, so no screenshots.

Checklist

  • This PR is small and focused
  • I explained what changed and why
  • No UI change (screenshots not applicable)
  • No motion change (video not applicable)

Note

Low Risk
Scoped to Bitbucket repository permission reads; only widens the “removed endpoint” catch to 404, matching existing 410 semantics without relaxing real auth failures.

Overview
Bitbucket Cloud now returns HTTP 404 (not only 410) for the retired GET /user/permissions/repositories endpoint. isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError treats 404 like 410, so getRepositoryPermission still resolves to granted when the endpoint is gone instead of surfacing Bitbucket returned HTTP 404 and blocking merge.

Comments document the Cloud vs original CHANGE-2770 behavior. A regression test asserts a 404 on that URL yields true; 401 and other failures are unchanged.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 8662e6f. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Note

Treat Bitbucket permissions endpoint 404 as removed in isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError

Bitbucket Cloud now returns 404 (in addition to the original 410) for the removed repository-permissions endpoint. isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError in BitbucketPullRequestApi.ts is broadened to classify both statuses as the removed-endpoint signal, so getRepositoryPermission still resolves true instead of failing the merge.

  • Risk: any unrelated 404 from this Bitbucket endpoint will now be silently treated as "permission granted" rather than surfacing as an error.

Macroscope summarized 8662e6f.

CHANGE-2770 already treats HTTP 410 as gone. Cloud now answers 404, and
getRepositoryPermission still fails the merge on that status.
The 410 fallback from CHANGE-2770 never fires on Cloud, which returns
404 for /user/permissions/repositories. Grant on 404 the same way as
410. Real auth failures still fail.
Closespingdotgg#8328
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: d27b99fe-de0d-4b40-8422-82e4672439ae

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added vouch:unvouched PR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list. size:S 10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions). labels Aug 28, 2026
@macroscopeapp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approvability

Verdict: Approved at 8662e6f

Macroscope's review found this PR approvable — This is a small, well-scoped Bitbucket compatibility fix that broadens the existing retired-endpoint handling from HTTP 410 to HTTP 404. Regression coverage verifies the new case while preserving authentication and other failure behavior.

You can add or adjust custom eligibility rules. Learn more.

@MichaelCharles

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hit this today on 0.0.37 (macOS), but on comment posting rather than merge. pullRequests.comment goes through the same getViewerPermissions gate, so it fails identically: bitbucket failed in getViewerPermissions: Bitbucket returned HTTP 404.

Checked the endpoint directly today (2026-09-01), using a scoped API token with write:pullrequest:

GET https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/user/permissions/repositories?q=repository.full_name="..."
404 {"type": "error", "error": {"message": "Resource not found", "detail": "There is no API hosted at this URL. ..."}}

Cloud answers 404 for the removed endpoint now, not 410. This change also fixes commenting, not just merge.

@t3dotgg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Note

🤖 GPT-5.6 Sol responding on behalf of Theo

We're closing this PR as we clean up the T3 Code backlog. Thank you for taking the time to put this together.

We are keeping the Bitbucket permission fix in the open PR #9035 instead of maintaining two implementations. It removes the request to the retired endpoint and uses the workspace permission endpoint, covering the same HTTP 404 failure before merges and comments while preserving real permission checks. The fix is not on main yet.

If you believe we closed this in error, please reopen the PR and leave a comment explaining what we missed.

@t3dotggt3dotgg closed this Sep 1, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:S10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions).vouch:unvouchedPR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Bitbucket merge still fails — removed /user/permissions/repositories endpoint returns 404, not 410

3 participants

@iamshadmantaqi@MichaelCharles@t3dotgg
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(server): treat Bitbucket permissions 404 as a removed endpoint - #8557

Closed
iamshadmantaqi wants to merge 2 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
iamshadmantaqi:fix/bitbucket-permissions-404
Closed

fix(server): treat Bitbucket permissions 404 as a removed endpoint#8557
iamshadmantaqi wants to merge 2 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
iamshadmantaqi:fix/bitbucket-permissions-404

Conversation

@iamshadmantaqi

@iamshadmantaqiiamshadmantaqi commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

What Changed

isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError now treats HTTP 404 the same as HTTP 410 on GET /user/permissions/repositories. Merge no longer dies in the permission gate when Bitbucket Cloud answers 404 for the removed endpoint.

401 and other real failures still fail.

Why

#6525 already treats CHANGE-2770's 410 as "endpoint gone, do not block, let the merge call decide." Cloud now returns 404 for the same URL. The catch never fires, so merge fails with Bitbucket returned HTTP 404.

Closes#8328

Blast Radius

Bitbucket permission reads only. GitHub and GitLab are untouched. A 404 on this one retired endpoint is treated as unknown permission, same as 410 already was. A bad token still fails.

Verification

Failing-then-passing regression in apps/server/src/pullRequest/BitbucketPullRequestApi.test.ts.

  • Before the fix, the new 404 case failed with Bitbucket returned HTTP 404.
  • After the fix, that file is 44/44 passing. The existing 410 and 401 cases still pass.
  • vp lint on the two changed files: 0 errors.
  • vp run --filter t3 typecheck: no errors in the changed file.

No UI chrome changed, so no screenshots.

Checklist

  • This PR is small and focused
  • I explained what changed and why
  • No UI change (screenshots not applicable)
  • No motion change (video not applicable)

Note

Low Risk
Scoped to Bitbucket repository permission reads; only widens the “removed endpoint” catch to 404, matching existing 410 semantics without relaxing real auth failures.

Overview
Bitbucket Cloud now returns HTTP 404 (not only 410) for the retired GET /user/permissions/repositories endpoint. isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError treats 404 like 410, so getRepositoryPermission still resolves to granted when the endpoint is gone instead of surfacing Bitbucket returned HTTP 404 and blocking merge.

Comments document the Cloud vs original CHANGE-2770 behavior. A regression test asserts a 404 on that URL yields true; 401 and other failures are unchanged.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 8662e6f. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Note

Treat Bitbucket permissions endpoint 404 as removed in isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError

Bitbucket Cloud now returns 404 (in addition to the original 410) for the removed repository-permissions endpoint. isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError in BitbucketPullRequestApi.ts is broadened to classify both statuses as the removed-endpoint signal, so getRepositoryPermission still resolves true instead of failing the merge.

  • Risk: any unrelated 404 from this Bitbucket endpoint will now be silently treated as "permission granted" rather than surfacing as an error.

Macroscope summarized 8662e6f.

CHANGE-2770 already treats HTTP 410 as gone. Cloud now answers 404, and
getRepositoryPermission still fails the merge on that status.
The 410 fallback from CHANGE-2770 never fires on Cloud, which returns
404 for /user/permissions/repositories. Grant on 404 the same way as
410. Real auth failures still fail.
Closespingdotgg#8328
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: d27b99fe-de0d-4b40-8422-82e4672439ae

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added vouch:unvouched PR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list. size:S 10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions). labels Aug 28, 2026
@macroscopeapp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approvability

Verdict: Approved at 8662e6f

Macroscope's review found this PR approvable — This is a small, well-scoped Bitbucket compatibility fix that broadens the existing retired-endpoint handling from HTTP 410 to HTTP 404. Regression coverage verifies the new case while preserving authentication and other failure behavior.

You can add or adjust custom eligibility rules. Learn more.

@MichaelCharles

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hit this today on 0.0.37 (macOS), but on comment posting rather than merge. pullRequests.comment goes through the same getViewerPermissions gate, so it fails identically: bitbucket failed in getViewerPermissions: Bitbucket returned HTTP 404.

Checked the endpoint directly today (2026-09-01), using a scoped API token with write:pullrequest:

GET https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/user/permissions/repositories?q=repository.full_name="..."
404 {"type": "error", "error": {"message": "Resource not found", "detail": "There is no API hosted at this URL. ..."}}

Cloud answers 404 for the removed endpoint now, not 410. This change also fixes commenting, not just merge.

@t3dotgg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Note

🤖 GPT-5.6 Sol responding on behalf of Theo

We're closing this PR as we clean up the T3 Code backlog. Thank you for taking the time to put this together.

We are keeping the Bitbucket permission fix in the open PR #9035 instead of maintaining two implementations. It removes the request to the retired endpoint and uses the workspace permission endpoint, covering the same HTTP 404 failure before merges and comments while preserving real permission checks. The fix is not on main yet.

If you believe we closed this in error, please reopen the PR and leave a comment explaining what we missed.

@t3dotggt3dotgg closed this Sep 1, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:S10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions).vouch:unvouchedPR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Bitbucket merge still fails — removed /user/permissions/repositories endpoint returns 404, not 410

3 participants

@iamshadmantaqi@MichaelCharles@t3dotgg
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix(server): treat Bitbucket permissions 404 as a removed endpoint - #8557

Closed
iamshadmantaqi wants to merge 2 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
iamshadmantaqi:fix/bitbucket-permissions-404
Closed

fix(server): treat Bitbucket permissions 404 as a removed endpoint#8557
iamshadmantaqi wants to merge 2 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
iamshadmantaqi:fix/bitbucket-permissions-404

Conversation

@iamshadmantaqi

@iamshadmantaqiiamshadmantaqi commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

What Changed

isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError now treats HTTP 404 the same as HTTP 410 on GET /user/permissions/repositories. Merge no longer dies in the permission gate when Bitbucket Cloud answers 404 for the removed endpoint.

401 and other real failures still fail.

Why

#6525 already treats CHANGE-2770's 410 as "endpoint gone, do not block, let the merge call decide." Cloud now returns 404 for the same URL. The catch never fires, so merge fails with Bitbucket returned HTTP 404.

Closes#8328

Blast Radius

Bitbucket permission reads only. GitHub and GitLab are untouched. A 404 on this one retired endpoint is treated as unknown permission, same as 410 already was. A bad token still fails.

Verification

Failing-then-passing regression in apps/server/src/pullRequest/BitbucketPullRequestApi.test.ts.

  • Before the fix, the new 404 case failed with Bitbucket returned HTTP 404.
  • After the fix, that file is 44/44 passing. The existing 410 and 401 cases still pass.
  • vp lint on the two changed files: 0 errors.
  • vp run --filter t3 typecheck: no errors in the changed file.

No UI chrome changed, so no screenshots.

Checklist

  • This PR is small and focused
  • I explained what changed and why
  • No UI change (screenshots not applicable)
  • No motion change (video not applicable)

Note

Low Risk
Scoped to Bitbucket repository permission reads; only widens the “removed endpoint” catch to 404, matching existing 410 semantics without relaxing real auth failures.

Overview
Bitbucket Cloud now returns HTTP 404 (not only 410) for the retired GET /user/permissions/repositories endpoint. isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError treats 404 like 410, so getRepositoryPermission still resolves to granted when the endpoint is gone instead of surfacing Bitbucket returned HTTP 404 and blocking merge.

Comments document the Cloud vs original CHANGE-2770 behavior. A regression test asserts a 404 on that URL yields true; 401 and other failures are unchanged.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 8662e6f. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Note

Treat Bitbucket permissions endpoint 404 as removed in isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError

Bitbucket Cloud now returns 404 (in addition to the original 410) for the removed repository-permissions endpoint. isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError in BitbucketPullRequestApi.ts is broadened to classify both statuses as the removed-endpoint signal, so getRepositoryPermission still resolves true instead of failing the merge.

  • Risk: any unrelated 404 from this Bitbucket endpoint will now be silently treated as "permission granted" rather than surfacing as an error.

Macroscope summarized 8662e6f.

CHANGE-2770 already treats HTTP 410 as gone. Cloud now answers 404, and
getRepositoryPermission still fails the merge on that status.
The 410 fallback from CHANGE-2770 never fires on Cloud, which returns
404 for /user/permissions/repositories. Grant on 404 the same way as
410. Real auth failures still fail.
Closespingdotgg#8328
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: d27b99fe-de0d-4b40-8422-82e4672439ae

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added vouch:unvouched PR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list. size:S 10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions). labels Aug 28, 2026
@macroscopeapp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approvability

Verdict: Approved at 8662e6f

Macroscope's review found this PR approvable — This is a small, well-scoped Bitbucket compatibility fix that broadens the existing retired-endpoint handling from HTTP 410 to HTTP 404. Regression coverage verifies the new case while preserving authentication and other failure behavior.

You can add or adjust custom eligibility rules. Learn more.

@MichaelCharles

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hit this today on 0.0.37 (macOS), but on comment posting rather than merge. pullRequests.comment goes through the same getViewerPermissions gate, so it fails identically: bitbucket failed in getViewerPermissions: Bitbucket returned HTTP 404.

Checked the endpoint directly today (2026-09-01), using a scoped API token with write:pullrequest:

GET https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/user/permissions/repositories?q=repository.full_name="..."
404 {"type": "error", "error": {"message": "Resource not found", "detail": "There is no API hosted at this URL. ..."}}

Cloud answers 404 for the removed endpoint now, not 410. This change also fixes commenting, not just merge.

@t3dotgg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Note

🤖 GPT-5.6 Sol responding on behalf of Theo

We're closing this PR as we clean up the T3 Code backlog. Thank you for taking the time to put this together.

We are keeping the Bitbucket permission fix in the open PR #9035 instead of maintaining two implementations. It removes the request to the retired endpoint and uses the workspace permission endpoint, covering the same HTTP 404 failure before merges and comments while preserving real permission checks. The fix is not on main yet.

If you believe we closed this in error, please reopen the PR and leave a comment explaining what we missed.

@t3dotggt3dotgg closed this Sep 1, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:S10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions).vouch:unvouchedPR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Bitbucket merge still fails — removed /user/permissions/repositories endpoint returns 404, not 410

3 participants

@iamshadmantaqi@MichaelCharles@t3dotgg
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(server): treat Bitbucket permissions 404 as a removed endpoint - #8557

Closed
iamshadmantaqi wants to merge 2 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
iamshadmantaqi:fix/bitbucket-permissions-404
Closed

fix(server): treat Bitbucket permissions 404 as a removed endpoint#8557
iamshadmantaqi wants to merge 2 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
iamshadmantaqi:fix/bitbucket-permissions-404

Conversation

@iamshadmantaqi

@iamshadmantaqiiamshadmantaqi commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

What Changed

isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError now treats HTTP 404 the same as HTTP 410 on GET /user/permissions/repositories. Merge no longer dies in the permission gate when Bitbucket Cloud answers 404 for the removed endpoint.

401 and other real failures still fail.

Why

#6525 already treats CHANGE-2770's 410 as "endpoint gone, do not block, let the merge call decide." Cloud now returns 404 for the same URL. The catch never fires, so merge fails with Bitbucket returned HTTP 404.

Closes#8328

Blast Radius

Bitbucket permission reads only. GitHub and GitLab are untouched. A 404 on this one retired endpoint is treated as unknown permission, same as 410 already was. A bad token still fails.

Verification

Failing-then-passing regression in apps/server/src/pullRequest/BitbucketPullRequestApi.test.ts.

  • Before the fix, the new 404 case failed with Bitbucket returned HTTP 404.
  • After the fix, that file is 44/44 passing. The existing 410 and 401 cases still pass.
  • vp lint on the two changed files: 0 errors.
  • vp run --filter t3 typecheck: no errors in the changed file.

No UI chrome changed, so no screenshots.

Checklist

  • This PR is small and focused
  • I explained what changed and why
  • No UI change (screenshots not applicable)
  • No motion change (video not applicable)

Note

Low Risk
Scoped to Bitbucket repository permission reads; only widens the “removed endpoint” catch to 404, matching existing 410 semantics without relaxing real auth failures.

Overview
Bitbucket Cloud now returns HTTP 404 (not only 410) for the retired GET /user/permissions/repositories endpoint. isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError treats 404 like 410, so getRepositoryPermission still resolves to granted when the endpoint is gone instead of surfacing Bitbucket returned HTTP 404 and blocking merge.

Comments document the Cloud vs original CHANGE-2770 behavior. A regression test asserts a 404 on that URL yields true; 401 and other failures are unchanged.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 8662e6f. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Note

Treat Bitbucket permissions endpoint 404 as removed in isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError

Bitbucket Cloud now returns 404 (in addition to the original 410) for the removed repository-permissions endpoint. isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError in BitbucketPullRequestApi.ts is broadened to classify both statuses as the removed-endpoint signal, so getRepositoryPermission still resolves true instead of failing the merge.

  • Risk: any unrelated 404 from this Bitbucket endpoint will now be silently treated as "permission granted" rather than surfacing as an error.

Macroscope summarized 8662e6f.

CHANGE-2770 already treats HTTP 410 as gone. Cloud now answers 404, and
getRepositoryPermission still fails the merge on that status.
The 410 fallback from CHANGE-2770 never fires on Cloud, which returns
404 for /user/permissions/repositories. Grant on 404 the same way as
410. Real auth failures still fail.
Closespingdotgg#8328
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: d27b99fe-de0d-4b40-8422-82e4672439ae

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added vouch:unvouched PR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list. size:S 10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions). labels Aug 28, 2026
@macroscopeapp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approvability

Verdict: Approved at 8662e6f

Macroscope's review found this PR approvable — This is a small, well-scoped Bitbucket compatibility fix that broadens the existing retired-endpoint handling from HTTP 410 to HTTP 404. Regression coverage verifies the new case while preserving authentication and other failure behavior.

You can add or adjust custom eligibility rules. Learn more.

@MichaelCharles

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hit this today on 0.0.37 (macOS), but on comment posting rather than merge. pullRequests.comment goes through the same getViewerPermissions gate, so it fails identically: bitbucket failed in getViewerPermissions: Bitbucket returned HTTP 404.

Checked the endpoint directly today (2026-09-01), using a scoped API token with write:pullrequest:

GET https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/user/permissions/repositories?q=repository.full_name="..."
404 {"type": "error", "error": {"message": "Resource not found", "detail": "There is no API hosted at this URL. ..."}}

Cloud answers 404 for the removed endpoint now, not 410. This change also fixes commenting, not just merge.

@t3dotgg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Note

🤖 GPT-5.6 Sol responding on behalf of Theo

We're closing this PR as we clean up the T3 Code backlog. Thank you for taking the time to put this together.

We are keeping the Bitbucket permission fix in the open PR #9035 instead of maintaining two implementations. It removes the request to the retired endpoint and uses the workspace permission endpoint, covering the same HTTP 404 failure before merges and comments while preserving real permission checks. The fix is not on main yet.

If you believe we closed this in error, please reopen the PR and leave a comment explaining what we missed.

@t3dotggt3dotgg closed this Sep 1, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:S10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions).vouch:unvouchedPR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Bitbucket merge still fails — removed /user/permissions/repositories endpoint returns 404, not 410

3 participants

@iamshadmantaqi@MichaelCharles@t3dotgg
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(server): treat Bitbucket permissions 404 as a removed endpoint - #8557

Closed
iamshadmantaqi wants to merge 2 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
iamshadmantaqi:fix/bitbucket-permissions-404
Closed

fix(server): treat Bitbucket permissions 404 as a removed endpoint#8557
iamshadmantaqi wants to merge 2 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
iamshadmantaqi:fix/bitbucket-permissions-404

Conversation

@iamshadmantaqi

@iamshadmantaqiiamshadmantaqi commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

What Changed

isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError now treats HTTP 404 the same as HTTP 410 on GET /user/permissions/repositories. Merge no longer dies in the permission gate when Bitbucket Cloud answers 404 for the removed endpoint.

401 and other real failures still fail.

Why

#6525 already treats CHANGE-2770's 410 as "endpoint gone, do not block, let the merge call decide." Cloud now returns 404 for the same URL. The catch never fires, so merge fails with Bitbucket returned HTTP 404.

Closes#8328

Blast Radius

Bitbucket permission reads only. GitHub and GitLab are untouched. A 404 on this one retired endpoint is treated as unknown permission, same as 410 already was. A bad token still fails.

Verification

Failing-then-passing regression in apps/server/src/pullRequest/BitbucketPullRequestApi.test.ts.

  • Before the fix, the new 404 case failed with Bitbucket returned HTTP 404.
  • After the fix, that file is 44/44 passing. The existing 410 and 401 cases still pass.
  • vp lint on the two changed files: 0 errors.
  • vp run --filter t3 typecheck: no errors in the changed file.

No UI chrome changed, so no screenshots.

Checklist

  • This PR is small and focused
  • I explained what changed and why
  • No UI change (screenshots not applicable)
  • No motion change (video not applicable)

Note

Low Risk
Scoped to Bitbucket repository permission reads; only widens the “removed endpoint” catch to 404, matching existing 410 semantics without relaxing real auth failures.

Overview
Bitbucket Cloud now returns HTTP 404 (not only 410) for the retired GET /user/permissions/repositories endpoint. isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError treats 404 like 410, so getRepositoryPermission still resolves to granted when the endpoint is gone instead of surfacing Bitbucket returned HTTP 404 and blocking merge.

Comments document the Cloud vs original CHANGE-2770 behavior. A regression test asserts a 404 on that URL yields true; 401 and other failures are unchanged.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 8662e6f. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Note

Treat Bitbucket permissions endpoint 404 as removed in isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError

Bitbucket Cloud now returns 404 (in addition to the original 410) for the removed repository-permissions endpoint. isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError in BitbucketPullRequestApi.ts is broadened to classify both statuses as the removed-endpoint signal, so getRepositoryPermission still resolves true instead of failing the merge.

  • Risk: any unrelated 404 from this Bitbucket endpoint will now be silently treated as "permission granted" rather than surfacing as an error.

Macroscope summarized 8662e6f.

CHANGE-2770 already treats HTTP 410 as gone. Cloud now answers 404, and
getRepositoryPermission still fails the merge on that status.
The 410 fallback from CHANGE-2770 never fires on Cloud, which returns
404 for /user/permissions/repositories. Grant on 404 the same way as
410. Real auth failures still fail.
Closespingdotgg#8328
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: d27b99fe-de0d-4b40-8422-82e4672439ae

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added vouch:unvouched PR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list. size:S 10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions). labels Aug 28, 2026
@macroscopeapp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approvability

Verdict: Approved at 8662e6f

Macroscope's review found this PR approvable — This is a small, well-scoped Bitbucket compatibility fix that broadens the existing retired-endpoint handling from HTTP 410 to HTTP 404. Regression coverage verifies the new case while preserving authentication and other failure behavior.

You can add or adjust custom eligibility rules. Learn more.

@MichaelCharles

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hit this today on 0.0.37 (macOS), but on comment posting rather than merge. pullRequests.comment goes through the same getViewerPermissions gate, so it fails identically: bitbucket failed in getViewerPermissions: Bitbucket returned HTTP 404.

Checked the endpoint directly today (2026-09-01), using a scoped API token with write:pullrequest:

GET https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/user/permissions/repositories?q=repository.full_name="..."
404 {"type": "error", "error": {"message": "Resource not found", "detail": "There is no API hosted at this URL. ..."}}

Cloud answers 404 for the removed endpoint now, not 410. This change also fixes commenting, not just merge.

@t3dotgg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Note

🤖 GPT-5.6 Sol responding on behalf of Theo

We're closing this PR as we clean up the T3 Code backlog. Thank you for taking the time to put this together.

We are keeping the Bitbucket permission fix in the open PR #9035 instead of maintaining two implementations. It removes the request to the retired endpoint and uses the workspace permission endpoint, covering the same HTTP 404 failure before merges and comments while preserving real permission checks. The fix is not on main yet.

If you believe we closed this in error, please reopen the PR and leave a comment explaining what we missed.

@t3dotggt3dotgg closed this Sep 1, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:S10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions).vouch:unvouchedPR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Bitbucket merge still fails — removed /user/permissions/repositories endpoint returns 404, not 410

3 participants

@iamshadmantaqi@MichaelCharles@t3dotgg
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

fix(server): treat Bitbucket permissions 404 as a removed endpoint - #8557

Closed
iamshadmantaqi wants to merge 2 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
iamshadmantaqi:fix/bitbucket-permissions-404
Closed

fix(server): treat Bitbucket permissions 404 as a removed endpoint#8557
iamshadmantaqi wants to merge 2 commits into
pingdotgg:mainfrom
iamshadmantaqi:fix/bitbucket-permissions-404

Conversation

@iamshadmantaqi

@iamshadmantaqiiamshadmantaqi commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

What Changed

isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError now treats HTTP 404 the same as HTTP 410 on GET /user/permissions/repositories. Merge no longer dies in the permission gate when Bitbucket Cloud answers 404 for the removed endpoint.

401 and other real failures still fail.

Why

#6525 already treats CHANGE-2770's 410 as "endpoint gone, do not block, let the merge call decide." Cloud now returns 404 for the same URL. The catch never fires, so merge fails with Bitbucket returned HTTP 404.

Closes#8328

Blast Radius

Bitbucket permission reads only. GitHub and GitLab are untouched. A 404 on this one retired endpoint is treated as unknown permission, same as 410 already was. A bad token still fails.

Verification

Failing-then-passing regression in apps/server/src/pullRequest/BitbucketPullRequestApi.test.ts.

  • Before the fix, the new 404 case failed with Bitbucket returned HTTP 404.
  • After the fix, that file is 44/44 passing. The existing 410 and 401 cases still pass.
  • vp lint on the two changed files: 0 errors.
  • vp run --filter t3 typecheck: no errors in the changed file.

No UI chrome changed, so no screenshots.

Checklist

  • This PR is small and focused
  • I explained what changed and why
  • No UI change (screenshots not applicable)
  • No motion change (video not applicable)

Note

Low Risk
Scoped to Bitbucket repository permission reads; only widens the “removed endpoint” catch to 404, matching existing 410 semantics without relaxing real auth failures.

Overview
Bitbucket Cloud now returns HTTP 404 (not only 410) for the retired GET /user/permissions/repositories endpoint. isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError treats 404 like 410, so getRepositoryPermission still resolves to granted when the endpoint is gone instead of surfacing Bitbucket returned HTTP 404 and blocking merge.

Comments document the Cloud vs original CHANGE-2770 behavior. A regression test asserts a 404 on that URL yields true; 401 and other failures are unchanged.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 8662e6f. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Note

Treat Bitbucket permissions endpoint 404 as removed in isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError

Bitbucket Cloud now returns 404 (in addition to the original 410) for the removed repository-permissions endpoint. isRepositoryPermissionRemovedError in BitbucketPullRequestApi.ts is broadened to classify both statuses as the removed-endpoint signal, so getRepositoryPermission still resolves true instead of failing the merge.

  • Risk: any unrelated 404 from this Bitbucket endpoint will now be silently treated as "permission granted" rather than surfacing as an error.

Macroscope summarized 8662e6f.

CHANGE-2770 already treats HTTP 410 as gone. Cloud now answers 404, and
getRepositoryPermission still fails the merge on that status.
The 410 fallback from CHANGE-2770 never fires on Cloud, which returns
404 for /user/permissions/repositories. Grant on 404 the same way as
410. Real auth failures still fail.
Closespingdotgg#8328
@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: d27b99fe-de0d-4b40-8422-82e4672439ae

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added vouch:unvouched PR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list. size:S 10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions). labels Aug 28, 2026
@macroscopeapp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approvability

Verdict: Approved at 8662e6f

Macroscope's review found this PR approvable — This is a small, well-scoped Bitbucket compatibility fix that broadens the existing retired-endpoint handling from HTTP 410 to HTTP 404. Regression coverage verifies the new case while preserving authentication and other failure behavior.

You can add or adjust custom eligibility rules. Learn more.

@MichaelCharles

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hit this today on 0.0.37 (macOS), but on comment posting rather than merge. pullRequests.comment goes through the same getViewerPermissions gate, so it fails identically: bitbucket failed in getViewerPermissions: Bitbucket returned HTTP 404.

Checked the endpoint directly today (2026-09-01), using a scoped API token with write:pullrequest:

GET https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/user/permissions/repositories?q=repository.full_name="..."
404 {"type": "error", "error": {"message": "Resource not found", "detail": "There is no API hosted at this URL. ..."}}

Cloud answers 404 for the removed endpoint now, not 410. This change also fixes commenting, not just merge.

@t3dotgg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Note

🤖 GPT-5.6 Sol responding on behalf of Theo

We're closing this PR as we clean up the T3 Code backlog. Thank you for taking the time to put this together.

We are keeping the Bitbucket permission fix in the open PR #9035 instead of maintaining two implementations. It removes the request to the retired endpoint and uses the workspace permission endpoint, covering the same HTTP 404 failure before merges and comments while preserving real permission checks. The fix is not on main yet.

If you believe we closed this in error, please reopen the PR and leave a comment explaining what we missed.

@t3dotggt3dotgg closed this Sep 1, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:S10-29 changed lines (additions + deletions).vouch:unvouchedPR author is not yet trusted in the VOUCHED list.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Bitbucket merge still fails — removed /user/permissions/repositories endpoint returns 404, not 410

3 participants

@iamshadmantaqi@MichaelCharles@t3dotgg