chore(pricing): record 0.39.54 publish snapshot - #196
Merged
Conversation
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Goal (one sentence)
Record the LiteLLM pricing-seed snapshot regenerated by the
0.39.54npm publish, matching the established pattern (#186, #190).Scope
src/)dashboard/)Checklist
npm run ci:localpasses0.39.54published and verified —npm view @ipv9/tokentracker-cli version→0.39.54;node scripts/verify-registry-package.cjs 0.39.54→ ok, dashboardAssets=16, cliHelp=okWhy
Same as #190:
npm publishprepublishOnlyrefreshed the pricing seed as a side effect of the0.39.54publish (kept_modelsunchanged at 2633,generated_at-> 2026-08-22T15:32:55.137Z). Recorded so a fresh checkout matches the published artifact.Re-verified the #187/#193 fixes against this fresh seed:
Regression Test Gate
Verification method
npm run ci:localfull pass on the exact tree that produced this diff, plus a manual pricing-matcher smoke check against the new seed covering both the original Claude auto-pilot/canary model ids (fable/mythos) bill $0 — fuzzy pricing match misses non-contiguous substrings #187 fix and the Pricing matcher has no general normalizer for vendor-renamed auto-pilot/canary model ids (#187 was patched per-name) #193 collision-risk regression.Uncovered scope