This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 29, 2025. It is now read-only.

prop type check - #108

Closed
byronz wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
107-prop-type-check
Closed

prop type check#108
byronz wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
107-prop-type-check

Conversation

@byronz

@byronzbyronz commented Apr 2, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@alexcjohnson@chriddyp I have a concern about the current state of our defined PropTypes,

one example is draggable: PropTypes.string, but per HTML reference it's an enumerated attribute with {true, false, auto}.

we don't have another useful attribute inputmode, which is also an enumerated list, and it's a good demo case for <textarea> and

this fixes#107

@byronzbyronz changed the title WIP - 107 prop type check#107 prop type checkApr 2, 2019
@byronz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@plotly/dash-core a quick glimpse of generate-component.js and extract-attributes.js, and also found a closed issue create by ryan, I think it makes sense to revisit the accuracy of the prop types definition for global attributes.

@chriddyp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think it makes sense to revisit the accuracy of the prop types definition for global attributes.

👍 . I just found this data in a structured format here: https://github.com/iandevlin/html-attributes, seems like we could use that in our component generation script.

@chriddyp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

also might need to evaluate how we deal with booleans too. I think we should accept them and coerce to "true".

not sure what to do about False - do we compile to "false" or do we omit? in the html spec, for a value to be false, it needs to be omitted rather than set to "false"

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Attributes#Boolean_Attributes:

Some content attributes (e.g. required, readonly, disabled) are called boolean attributes. If a boolean attribute is present, its value is true, and if it’s absent, its value is false.

However, I believe React will just ignore it now: https://reactjs.org/blog/2017/09/08/dom-attributes-in-react-16.html & https://reactjs.org/docs/jsx-in-depth.html#props-default-to-true
image

@byronz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

the draggable example itself is also tricky, if you don't set, it's auto, when you set it, must be true and false, so a simple enum list might not be ideal

@byronzbyronz changed the title #107 prop type checkprop type checkApr 2, 2019
@alexcjohnson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@byronz can we close this PR (and issue #107), since plotly/dash-renderer#100 does this for all components?

@byronzbyronz closed this May 11, 2019
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

add props type check for html components

3 participants

@byronz@chriddyp@alexcjohnson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 29, 2025. It is now read-only.

prop type check - #108

Closed
byronz wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
107-prop-type-check
Closed

prop type check#108
byronz wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
107-prop-type-check

Conversation

@byronz

@byronzbyronz commented Apr 2, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@alexcjohnson@chriddyp I have a concern about the current state of our defined PropTypes,

one example is draggable: PropTypes.string, but per HTML reference it's an enumerated attribute with {true, false, auto}.

we don't have another useful attribute inputmode, which is also an enumerated list, and it's a good demo case for <textarea> and

this fixes#107

@byronzbyronz changed the title WIP - 107 prop type check#107 prop type checkApr 2, 2019
@byronz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@plotly/dash-core a quick glimpse of generate-component.js and extract-attributes.js, and also found a closed issue create by ryan, I think it makes sense to revisit the accuracy of the prop types definition for global attributes.

@chriddyp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think it makes sense to revisit the accuracy of the prop types definition for global attributes.

👍 . I just found this data in a structured format here: https://github.com/iandevlin/html-attributes, seems like we could use that in our component generation script.

@chriddyp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

also might need to evaluate how we deal with booleans too. I think we should accept them and coerce to "true".

not sure what to do about False - do we compile to "false" or do we omit? in the html spec, for a value to be false, it needs to be omitted rather than set to "false"

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Attributes#Boolean_Attributes:

Some content attributes (e.g. required, readonly, disabled) are called boolean attributes. If a boolean attribute is present, its value is true, and if it’s absent, its value is false.

However, I believe React will just ignore it now: https://reactjs.org/blog/2017/09/08/dom-attributes-in-react-16.html & https://reactjs.org/docs/jsx-in-depth.html#props-default-to-true
image

@byronz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

the draggable example itself is also tricky, if you don't set, it's auto, when you set it, must be true and false, so a simple enum list might not be ideal

@byronzbyronz changed the title #107 prop type checkprop type checkApr 2, 2019
@alexcjohnson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@byronz can we close this PR (and issue #107), since plotly/dash-renderer#100 does this for all components?

@byronzbyronz closed this May 11, 2019
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

add props type check for html components

3 participants

@byronz@chriddyp@alexcjohnson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 29, 2025. It is now read-only.

prop type check - #108

Closed
byronz wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
107-prop-type-check
Closed

prop type check#108
byronz wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
107-prop-type-check

Conversation

@byronz

@byronzbyronz commented Apr 2, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@alexcjohnson@chriddyp I have a concern about the current state of our defined PropTypes,

one example is draggable: PropTypes.string, but per HTML reference it's an enumerated attribute with {true, false, auto}.

we don't have another useful attribute inputmode, which is also an enumerated list, and it's a good demo case for <textarea> and

this fixes#107

@byronzbyronz changed the title WIP - 107 prop type check#107 prop type checkApr 2, 2019
@byronz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@plotly/dash-core a quick glimpse of generate-component.js and extract-attributes.js, and also found a closed issue create by ryan, I think it makes sense to revisit the accuracy of the prop types definition for global attributes.

@chriddyp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think it makes sense to revisit the accuracy of the prop types definition for global attributes.

👍 . I just found this data in a structured format here: https://github.com/iandevlin/html-attributes, seems like we could use that in our component generation script.

@chriddyp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

also might need to evaluate how we deal with booleans too. I think we should accept them and coerce to "true".

not sure what to do about False - do we compile to "false" or do we omit? in the html spec, for a value to be false, it needs to be omitted rather than set to "false"

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Attributes#Boolean_Attributes:

Some content attributes (e.g. required, readonly, disabled) are called boolean attributes. If a boolean attribute is present, its value is true, and if it’s absent, its value is false.

However, I believe React will just ignore it now: https://reactjs.org/blog/2017/09/08/dom-attributes-in-react-16.html & https://reactjs.org/docs/jsx-in-depth.html#props-default-to-true
image

@byronz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

the draggable example itself is also tricky, if you don't set, it's auto, when you set it, must be true and false, so a simple enum list might not be ideal

@byronzbyronz changed the title #107 prop type checkprop type checkApr 2, 2019
@alexcjohnson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@byronz can we close this PR (and issue #107), since plotly/dash-renderer#100 does this for all components?

@byronzbyronz closed this May 11, 2019
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

add props type check for html components

3 participants

@byronz@chriddyp@alexcjohnson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 29, 2025. It is now read-only.

prop type check - #108

Closed
byronz wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
107-prop-type-check
Closed

prop type check#108
byronz wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
107-prop-type-check

Conversation

@byronz

@byronzbyronz commented Apr 2, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@alexcjohnson@chriddyp I have a concern about the current state of our defined PropTypes,

one example is draggable: PropTypes.string, but per HTML reference it's an enumerated attribute with {true, false, auto}.

we don't have another useful attribute inputmode, which is also an enumerated list, and it's a good demo case for <textarea> and

this fixes#107

@byronzbyronz changed the title WIP - 107 prop type check#107 prop type checkApr 2, 2019
@byronz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@plotly/dash-core a quick glimpse of generate-component.js and extract-attributes.js, and also found a closed issue create by ryan, I think it makes sense to revisit the accuracy of the prop types definition for global attributes.

@chriddyp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think it makes sense to revisit the accuracy of the prop types definition for global attributes.

👍 . I just found this data in a structured format here: https://github.com/iandevlin/html-attributes, seems like we could use that in our component generation script.

@chriddyp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

also might need to evaluate how we deal with booleans too. I think we should accept them and coerce to "true".

not sure what to do about False - do we compile to "false" or do we omit? in the html spec, for a value to be false, it needs to be omitted rather than set to "false"

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Attributes#Boolean_Attributes:

Some content attributes (e.g. required, readonly, disabled) are called boolean attributes. If a boolean attribute is present, its value is true, and if it’s absent, its value is false.

However, I believe React will just ignore it now: https://reactjs.org/blog/2017/09/08/dom-attributes-in-react-16.html & https://reactjs.org/docs/jsx-in-depth.html#props-default-to-true
image

@byronz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

the draggable example itself is also tricky, if you don't set, it's auto, when you set it, must be true and false, so a simple enum list might not be ideal

@byronzbyronz changed the title #107 prop type checkprop type checkApr 2, 2019
@alexcjohnson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@byronz can we close this PR (and issue #107), since plotly/dash-renderer#100 does this for all components?

@byronzbyronz closed this May 11, 2019
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

add props type check for html components

3 participants

@byronz@chriddyp@alexcjohnson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 29, 2025. It is now read-only.

prop type check - #108

Closed
byronz wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
107-prop-type-check
Closed

prop type check#108
byronz wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
107-prop-type-check

Conversation

@byronz

@byronzbyronz commented Apr 2, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@alexcjohnson@chriddyp I have a concern about the current state of our defined PropTypes,

one example is draggable: PropTypes.string, but per HTML reference it's an enumerated attribute with {true, false, auto}.

we don't have another useful attribute inputmode, which is also an enumerated list, and it's a good demo case for <textarea> and

this fixes#107

@byronzbyronz changed the title WIP - 107 prop type check#107 prop type checkApr 2, 2019
@byronz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@plotly/dash-core a quick glimpse of generate-component.js and extract-attributes.js, and also found a closed issue create by ryan, I think it makes sense to revisit the accuracy of the prop types definition for global attributes.

@chriddyp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think it makes sense to revisit the accuracy of the prop types definition for global attributes.

👍 . I just found this data in a structured format here: https://github.com/iandevlin/html-attributes, seems like we could use that in our component generation script.

@chriddyp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

also might need to evaluate how we deal with booleans too. I think we should accept them and coerce to "true".

not sure what to do about False - do we compile to "false" or do we omit? in the html spec, for a value to be false, it needs to be omitted rather than set to "false"

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Attributes#Boolean_Attributes:

Some content attributes (e.g. required, readonly, disabled) are called boolean attributes. If a boolean attribute is present, its value is true, and if it’s absent, its value is false.

However, I believe React will just ignore it now: https://reactjs.org/blog/2017/09/08/dom-attributes-in-react-16.html & https://reactjs.org/docs/jsx-in-depth.html#props-default-to-true
image

@byronz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

the draggable example itself is also tricky, if you don't set, it's auto, when you set it, must be true and false, so a simple enum list might not be ideal

@byronzbyronz changed the title #107 prop type checkprop type checkApr 2, 2019
@alexcjohnson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@byronz can we close this PR (and issue #107), since plotly/dash-renderer#100 does this for all components?

@byronzbyronz closed this May 11, 2019
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

add props type check for html components

3 participants

@byronz@chriddyp@alexcjohnson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 29, 2025. It is now read-only.

prop type check - #108

Closed
byronz wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
107-prop-type-check
Closed

prop type check#108
byronz wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
107-prop-type-check

Conversation

@byronz

@byronzbyronz commented Apr 2, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@alexcjohnson@chriddyp I have a concern about the current state of our defined PropTypes,

one example is draggable: PropTypes.string, but per HTML reference it's an enumerated attribute with {true, false, auto}.

we don't have another useful attribute inputmode, which is also an enumerated list, and it's a good demo case for <textarea> and

this fixes#107

@byronzbyronz changed the title WIP - 107 prop type check#107 prop type checkApr 2, 2019
@byronz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@plotly/dash-core a quick glimpse of generate-component.js and extract-attributes.js, and also found a closed issue create by ryan, I think it makes sense to revisit the accuracy of the prop types definition for global attributes.

@chriddyp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think it makes sense to revisit the accuracy of the prop types definition for global attributes.

👍 . I just found this data in a structured format here: https://github.com/iandevlin/html-attributes, seems like we could use that in our component generation script.

@chriddyp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

also might need to evaluate how we deal with booleans too. I think we should accept them and coerce to "true".

not sure what to do about False - do we compile to "false" or do we omit? in the html spec, for a value to be false, it needs to be omitted rather than set to "false"

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Attributes#Boolean_Attributes:

Some content attributes (e.g. required, readonly, disabled) are called boolean attributes. If a boolean attribute is present, its value is true, and if it’s absent, its value is false.

However, I believe React will just ignore it now: https://reactjs.org/blog/2017/09/08/dom-attributes-in-react-16.html & https://reactjs.org/docs/jsx-in-depth.html#props-default-to-true
image

@byronz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

the draggable example itself is also tricky, if you don't set, it's auto, when you set it, must be true and false, so a simple enum list might not be ideal

@byronzbyronz changed the title #107 prop type checkprop type checkApr 2, 2019
@alexcjohnson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@byronz can we close this PR (and issue #107), since plotly/dash-renderer#100 does this for all components?

@byronzbyronz closed this May 11, 2019
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

add props type check for html components

3 participants

@byronz@chriddyp@alexcjohnson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 29, 2025. It is now read-only.

prop type check - #108

Closed
byronz wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
107-prop-type-check
Closed

prop type check#108
byronz wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
107-prop-type-check

Conversation

@byronz

@byronzbyronz commented Apr 2, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@alexcjohnson@chriddyp I have a concern about the current state of our defined PropTypes,

one example is draggable: PropTypes.string, but per HTML reference it's an enumerated attribute with {true, false, auto}.

we don't have another useful attribute inputmode, which is also an enumerated list, and it's a good demo case for <textarea> and

this fixes#107

@byronzbyronz changed the title WIP - 107 prop type check#107 prop type checkApr 2, 2019
@byronz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@plotly/dash-core a quick glimpse of generate-component.js and extract-attributes.js, and also found a closed issue create by ryan, I think it makes sense to revisit the accuracy of the prop types definition for global attributes.

@chriddyp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think it makes sense to revisit the accuracy of the prop types definition for global attributes.

👍 . I just found this data in a structured format here: https://github.com/iandevlin/html-attributes, seems like we could use that in our component generation script.

@chriddyp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

also might need to evaluate how we deal with booleans too. I think we should accept them and coerce to "true".

not sure what to do about False - do we compile to "false" or do we omit? in the html spec, for a value to be false, it needs to be omitted rather than set to "false"

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Attributes#Boolean_Attributes:

Some content attributes (e.g. required, readonly, disabled) are called boolean attributes. If a boolean attribute is present, its value is true, and if it’s absent, its value is false.

However, I believe React will just ignore it now: https://reactjs.org/blog/2017/09/08/dom-attributes-in-react-16.html & https://reactjs.org/docs/jsx-in-depth.html#props-default-to-true
image

@byronz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

the draggable example itself is also tricky, if you don't set, it's auto, when you set it, must be true and false, so a simple enum list might not be ideal

@byronzbyronz changed the title #107 prop type checkprop type checkApr 2, 2019
@alexcjohnson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@byronz can we close this PR (and issue #107), since plotly/dash-renderer#100 does this for all components?

@byronzbyronz closed this May 11, 2019
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

add props type check for html components

3 participants

@byronz@chriddyp@alexcjohnson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 29, 2025. It is now read-only.

prop type check - #108

Closed
byronz wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
107-prop-type-check
Closed

prop type check#108
byronz wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
107-prop-type-check

Conversation

@byronz

@byronzbyronz commented Apr 2, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@alexcjohnson@chriddyp I have a concern about the current state of our defined PropTypes,

one example is draggable: PropTypes.string, but per HTML reference it's an enumerated attribute with {true, false, auto}.

we don't have another useful attribute inputmode, which is also an enumerated list, and it's a good demo case for <textarea> and

this fixes#107

@byronzbyronz changed the title WIP - 107 prop type check#107 prop type checkApr 2, 2019
@byronz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@plotly/dash-core a quick glimpse of generate-component.js and extract-attributes.js, and also found a closed issue create by ryan, I think it makes sense to revisit the accuracy of the prop types definition for global attributes.

@chriddyp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think it makes sense to revisit the accuracy of the prop types definition for global attributes.

👍 . I just found this data in a structured format here: https://github.com/iandevlin/html-attributes, seems like we could use that in our component generation script.

@chriddyp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

also might need to evaluate how we deal with booleans too. I think we should accept them and coerce to "true".

not sure what to do about False - do we compile to "false" or do we omit? in the html spec, for a value to be false, it needs to be omitted rather than set to "false"

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Attributes#Boolean_Attributes:

Some content attributes (e.g. required, readonly, disabled) are called boolean attributes. If a boolean attribute is present, its value is true, and if it’s absent, its value is false.

However, I believe React will just ignore it now: https://reactjs.org/blog/2017/09/08/dom-attributes-in-react-16.html & https://reactjs.org/docs/jsx-in-depth.html#props-default-to-true
image

@byronz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

the draggable example itself is also tricky, if you don't set, it's auto, when you set it, must be true and false, so a simple enum list might not be ideal

@byronzbyronz changed the title #107 prop type checkprop type checkApr 2, 2019
@alexcjohnson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@byronz can we close this PR (and issue #107), since plotly/dash-renderer#100 does this for all components?

@byronzbyronz closed this May 11, 2019
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

add props type check for html components

3 participants

@byronz@chriddyp@alexcjohnson