Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
geom_smooth() - #183
Conversation
cpsievert
commented
Mar 10, 2015
The test table looks good to me -- Note the new tests -- http://ropensci.github.io/plotly-test-table/tables/9b5bbf306ada7d25d2f7d778f2cb11f69fc437d/smooth.html Perhaps I should add the cookbook scatterplot tests as well @tdhock@chriddyp@mkcor? On a related note, it might be worth having another checklist on #161 that tracks which of these testing files have been ported |
chriddyp
commented
Mar 10, 2015
@cpsievert nice! yes, let's add the scatter plots cookbook file to this PR, as it contains a bunch of really good examples |
tdhock
commented
Mar 10, 2015
great, @cpsievert can you add your name to the table in the comment I just made on #161 ? |
chriddyp
commented
Mar 10, 2015
cpsievert
commented
Mar 11, 2015
chriddyp
commented
Mar 11, 2015
cool, looks good! we don't have the notion of merged legend items. for this case, we could "hide" the other legend items use the trace property "showlegend" |
cpsievert
commented
Mar 12, 2015
chriddyp
commented
Mar 12, 2015
looks good 👍 ! @tdhock - will you do a code review too? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it is confusing to use lapply with an anonymous function here where you could have used a for loop.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@tdhock What?! I would say that, in R, you want to use *ply functions (in order to avoid for loops) as much as possible!!
cpsievert
commented
Mar 12, 2015
I managed to avoid geom specific code in ggplotly.R via a recursive call to |
tdhock
commented
Mar 12, 2015
+1 thanks for making that change! Everything looks good to me, in the code and on the test table. |


This will close#179.