Skip to content

Bindings #1002

Description

@rreusser

As controls get more capable in plotly, two-way binding becomes necessary. That is, a slider can change the frame, but the slider should also reflect the current frame when something else (e.g. a play button) changes it. This could also be the case for a marker size, a size ref, or a transform parameter. My current slider PR does this in sort of an ad hoc manner, but I really think it should be more general.

Proposal: bindings

Option 1:

Bindings are defined in the layout. For example:

"layout": {
"bindings": [{
"bind": "layout.updatemenus[0].active",
"to": "data[0].marker.color",
"lookup": {
"red": 0,
"green": 1,
"blue": 2
}
}]
}

In this example, bind is the data that gets changed, to is the item that's observed for changes, and lookup is an optional translation table that maps one to the other. Whenever a plotly event is emitted or when a relayout/restyle/update occurs, we quickly look through the bindings to see what's changed (which shouldn't be expensive enough that it's a problem). If an item has changed, that item is written to the state of the plot. A plotly_bindingchange event is emitted. All components (that's the best I can do right now) must then look through their data to see if anything has changed and update accordingly.

Pros:

  • Bindings link two parts of the plotly state, which accurately represents what's actually happening

Cons:

  • Updates take just a bit of thought and bookkeeping to do efficiently since this isn't react
  • requires a separate specification of bindings in addition to just the slider
  • refers to other parts of the plotly json by integer index within the plotly json, which seems probably okay but 10% fragile

Option 2:

Bindings are defined in the component that needs them, e.g. a slider. The slider has:

"bindto": "data[0].marker.color"

Most of the logic is the same. (I've omitted the lookup table since, though it could be added, we should probably go to great lengths to generally avoid needing.) When a component binds to a variable, we register it as needing a lookup. We scan through those liberally since it's fast, and when one changes, we emit an event. This case is a little simpler since we can emit plotly_bindingchange with data {binding: 'data[0].marker.color', value: 'red'}. The component sees its binding has changed and updates accordingly.

Pros:

  • Requires less typing
  • Collocates binding with the thing that uses the binding
  • Avoids extra reference to updatemenus[0].active
  • The update pattern is maybe a bit more straightforward since the component directly knows about the binding.

Cons:

  • Less general since it specifies a way of hooking up a component to a json item instead of hooking up a json item to a json item

cc: @etpinard@chriddyp@alexcjohnson

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
       blocks
      (function() {
      function addCopyButtons() {
      document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
      if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
      codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
      var btn = document.createElement('button');
      btn.textContent = 'Copy';
      btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
      btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
      btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
      btn.onclick = function() {
      navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
      btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
      setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
      });
      };
      codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
      codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
      });
      }
      addCopyButtons();
      // Re-run on dynamic content
      var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
      observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
      })();
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      Bindings · Issue #1002 · plotly/plotly.js · GitHub
      Skip to content

      Bindings #1002

      Description

      @rreusser

      As controls get more capable in plotly, two-way binding becomes necessary. That is, a slider can change the frame, but the slider should also reflect the current frame when something else (e.g. a play button) changes it. This could also be the case for a marker size, a size ref, or a transform parameter. My current slider PR does this in sort of an ad hoc manner, but I really think it should be more general.

      Proposal: bindings

      Option 1:

      Bindings are defined in the layout. For example:

      "layout": {
      "bindings": [{
      "bind": "layout.updatemenus[0].active",
      "to": "data[0].marker.color",
      "lookup": {
      "red": 0,
      "green": 1,
      "blue": 2
      }
      }]
      }

      In this example, bind is the data that gets changed, to is the item that's observed for changes, and lookup is an optional translation table that maps one to the other. Whenever a plotly event is emitted or when a relayout/restyle/update occurs, we quickly look through the bindings to see what's changed (which shouldn't be expensive enough that it's a problem). If an item has changed, that item is written to the state of the plot. A plotly_bindingchange event is emitted. All components (that's the best I can do right now) must then look through their data to see if anything has changed and update accordingly.

      Pros:

      • Bindings link two parts of the plotly state, which accurately represents what's actually happening

      Cons:

      • Updates take just a bit of thought and bookkeeping to do efficiently since this isn't react
      • requires a separate specification of bindings in addition to just the slider
      • refers to other parts of the plotly json by integer index within the plotly json, which seems probably okay but 10% fragile

      Option 2:

      Bindings are defined in the component that needs them, e.g. a slider. The slider has:

      "bindto": "data[0].marker.color"

      Most of the logic is the same. (I've omitted the lookup table since, though it could be added, we should probably go to great lengths to generally avoid needing.) When a component binds to a variable, we register it as needing a lookup. We scan through those liberally since it's fast, and when one changes, we emit an event. This case is a little simpler since we can emit plotly_bindingchange with data {binding: 'data[0].marker.color', value: 'red'}. The component sees its binding has changed and updates accordingly.

      Pros:

      • Requires less typing
      • Collocates binding with the thing that uses the binding
      • Avoids extra reference to updatemenus[0].active
      • The update pattern is maybe a bit more straightforward since the component directly knows about the binding.

      Cons:

      • Less general since it specifies a way of hooking up a component to a json item instead of hooking up a json item to a json item

      cc: @etpinard@chriddyp@alexcjohnson

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Bindings · Issue #1002 · plotly/plotly.js · GitHub
          Skip to content

          Bindings #1002

          Description

          @rreusser

          As controls get more capable in plotly, two-way binding becomes necessary. That is, a slider can change the frame, but the slider should also reflect the current frame when something else (e.g. a play button) changes it. This could also be the case for a marker size, a size ref, or a transform parameter. My current slider PR does this in sort of an ad hoc manner, but I really think it should be more general.

          Proposal: bindings

          Option 1:

          Bindings are defined in the layout. For example:

          "layout": {
          "bindings": [{
          "bind": "layout.updatemenus[0].active",
          "to": "data[0].marker.color",
          "lookup": {
          "red": 0,
          "green": 1,
          "blue": 2
          }
          }]
          }

          In this example, bind is the data that gets changed, to is the item that's observed for changes, and lookup is an optional translation table that maps one to the other. Whenever a plotly event is emitted or when a relayout/restyle/update occurs, we quickly look through the bindings to see what's changed (which shouldn't be expensive enough that it's a problem). If an item has changed, that item is written to the state of the plot. A plotly_bindingchange event is emitted. All components (that's the best I can do right now) must then look through their data to see if anything has changed and update accordingly.

          Pros:

          • Bindings link two parts of the plotly state, which accurately represents what's actually happening

          Cons:

          • Updates take just a bit of thought and bookkeeping to do efficiently since this isn't react
          • requires a separate specification of bindings in addition to just the slider
          • refers to other parts of the plotly json by integer index within the plotly json, which seems probably okay but 10% fragile

          Option 2:

          Bindings are defined in the component that needs them, e.g. a slider. The slider has:

          "bindto": "data[0].marker.color"

          Most of the logic is the same. (I've omitted the lookup table since, though it could be added, we should probably go to great lengths to generally avoid needing.) When a component binds to a variable, we register it as needing a lookup. We scan through those liberally since it's fast, and when one changes, we emit an event. This case is a little simpler since we can emit plotly_bindingchange with data {binding: 'data[0].marker.color', value: 'red'}. The component sees its binding has changed and updates accordingly.

          Pros:

          • Requires less typing
          • Collocates binding with the thing that uses the binding
          • Avoids extra reference to updatemenus[0].active
          • The update pattern is maybe a bit more straightforward since the component directly knows about the binding.

          Cons:

          • Less general since it specifies a way of hooking up a component to a json item instead of hooking up a json item to a json item

          cc: @etpinard@chriddyp@alexcjohnson

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Bindings · Issue #1002 · plotly/plotly.js · GitHub
              Skip to content

              Bindings #1002

              Description

              @rreusser

              As controls get more capable in plotly, two-way binding becomes necessary. That is, a slider can change the frame, but the slider should also reflect the current frame when something else (e.g. a play button) changes it. This could also be the case for a marker size, a size ref, or a transform parameter. My current slider PR does this in sort of an ad hoc manner, but I really think it should be more general.

              Proposal: bindings

              Option 1:

              Bindings are defined in the layout. For example:

              "layout": {
              "bindings": [{
              "bind": "layout.updatemenus[0].active",
              "to": "data[0].marker.color",
              "lookup": {
              "red": 0,
              "green": 1,
              "blue": 2
              }
              }]
              }

              In this example, bind is the data that gets changed, to is the item that's observed for changes, and lookup is an optional translation table that maps one to the other. Whenever a plotly event is emitted or when a relayout/restyle/update occurs, we quickly look through the bindings to see what's changed (which shouldn't be expensive enough that it's a problem). If an item has changed, that item is written to the state of the plot. A plotly_bindingchange event is emitted. All components (that's the best I can do right now) must then look through their data to see if anything has changed and update accordingly.

              Pros:

              • Bindings link two parts of the plotly state, which accurately represents what's actually happening

              Cons:

              • Updates take just a bit of thought and bookkeeping to do efficiently since this isn't react
              • requires a separate specification of bindings in addition to just the slider
              • refers to other parts of the plotly json by integer index within the plotly json, which seems probably okay but 10% fragile

              Option 2:

              Bindings are defined in the component that needs them, e.g. a slider. The slider has:

              "bindto": "data[0].marker.color"

              Most of the logic is the same. (I've omitted the lookup table since, though it could be added, we should probably go to great lengths to generally avoid needing.) When a component binds to a variable, we register it as needing a lookup. We scan through those liberally since it's fast, and when one changes, we emit an event. This case is a little simpler since we can emit plotly_bindingchange with data {binding: 'data[0].marker.color', value: 'red'}. The component sees its binding has changed and updates accordingly.

              Pros:

              • Requires less typing
              • Collocates binding with the thing that uses the binding
              • Avoids extra reference to updatemenus[0].active
              • The update pattern is maybe a bit more straightforward since the component directly knows about the binding.

              Cons:

              • Less general since it specifies a way of hooking up a component to a json item instead of hooking up a json item to a json item

              cc: @etpinard@chriddyp@alexcjohnson

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Bindings · Issue #1002 · plotly/plotly.js · GitHub
                  Skip to content

                  Bindings #1002

                  Description

                  @rreusser

                  As controls get more capable in plotly, two-way binding becomes necessary. That is, a slider can change the frame, but the slider should also reflect the current frame when something else (e.g. a play button) changes it. This could also be the case for a marker size, a size ref, or a transform parameter. My current slider PR does this in sort of an ad hoc manner, but I really think it should be more general.

                  Proposal: bindings

                  Option 1:

                  Bindings are defined in the layout. For example:

                  "layout": {
                  "bindings": [{
                  "bind": "layout.updatemenus[0].active",
                  "to": "data[0].marker.color",
                  "lookup": {
                  "red": 0,
                  "green": 1,
                  "blue": 2
                  }
                  }]
                  }

                  In this example, bind is the data that gets changed, to is the item that's observed for changes, and lookup is an optional translation table that maps one to the other. Whenever a plotly event is emitted or when a relayout/restyle/update occurs, we quickly look through the bindings to see what's changed (which shouldn't be expensive enough that it's a problem). If an item has changed, that item is written to the state of the plot. A plotly_bindingchange event is emitted. All components (that's the best I can do right now) must then look through their data to see if anything has changed and update accordingly.

                  Pros:

                  • Bindings link two parts of the plotly state, which accurately represents what's actually happening

                  Cons:

                  • Updates take just a bit of thought and bookkeeping to do efficiently since this isn't react
                  • requires a separate specification of bindings in addition to just the slider
                  • refers to other parts of the plotly json by integer index within the plotly json, which seems probably okay but 10% fragile

                  Option 2:

                  Bindings are defined in the component that needs them, e.g. a slider. The slider has:

                  "bindto": "data[0].marker.color"

                  Most of the logic is the same. (I've omitted the lookup table since, though it could be added, we should probably go to great lengths to generally avoid needing.) When a component binds to a variable, we register it as needing a lookup. We scan through those liberally since it's fast, and when one changes, we emit an event. This case is a little simpler since we can emit plotly_bindingchange with data {binding: 'data[0].marker.color', value: 'red'}. The component sees its binding has changed and updates accordingly.

                  Pros:

                  • Requires less typing
                  • Collocates binding with the thing that uses the binding
                  • Avoids extra reference to updatemenus[0].active
                  • The update pattern is maybe a bit more straightforward since the component directly knows about the binding.

                  Cons:

                  • Less general since it specifies a way of hooking up a component to a json item instead of hooking up a json item to a json item

                  cc: @etpinard@chriddyp@alexcjohnson

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Labels

                    Type

                    No type

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Bindings · Issue #1002 · plotly/plotly.js · GitHub
                      Skip to content

                      Bindings #1002

                      Description

                      @rreusser

                      As controls get more capable in plotly, two-way binding becomes necessary. That is, a slider can change the frame, but the slider should also reflect the current frame when something else (e.g. a play button) changes it. This could also be the case for a marker size, a size ref, or a transform parameter. My current slider PR does this in sort of an ad hoc manner, but I really think it should be more general.

                      Proposal: bindings

                      Option 1:

                      Bindings are defined in the layout. For example:

                      "layout": {
                      "bindings": [{
                      "bind": "layout.updatemenus[0].active",
                      "to": "data[0].marker.color",
                      "lookup": {
                      "red": 0,
                      "green": 1,
                      "blue": 2
                      }
                      }]
                      }

                      In this example, bind is the data that gets changed, to is the item that's observed for changes, and lookup is an optional translation table that maps one to the other. Whenever a plotly event is emitted or when a relayout/restyle/update occurs, we quickly look through the bindings to see what's changed (which shouldn't be expensive enough that it's a problem). If an item has changed, that item is written to the state of the plot. A plotly_bindingchange event is emitted. All components (that's the best I can do right now) must then look through their data to see if anything has changed and update accordingly.

                      Pros:

                      • Bindings link two parts of the plotly state, which accurately represents what's actually happening

                      Cons:

                      • Updates take just a bit of thought and bookkeeping to do efficiently since this isn't react
                      • requires a separate specification of bindings in addition to just the slider
                      • refers to other parts of the plotly json by integer index within the plotly json, which seems probably okay but 10% fragile

                      Option 2:

                      Bindings are defined in the component that needs them, e.g. a slider. The slider has:

                      "bindto": "data[0].marker.color"

                      Most of the logic is the same. (I've omitted the lookup table since, though it could be added, we should probably go to great lengths to generally avoid needing.) When a component binds to a variable, we register it as needing a lookup. We scan through those liberally since it's fast, and when one changes, we emit an event. This case is a little simpler since we can emit plotly_bindingchange with data {binding: 'data[0].marker.color', value: 'red'}. The component sees its binding has changed and updates accordingly.

                      Pros:

                      • Requires less typing
                      • Collocates binding with the thing that uses the binding
                      • Avoids extra reference to updatemenus[0].active
                      • The update pattern is maybe a bit more straightforward since the component directly knows about the binding.

                      Cons:

                      • Less general since it specifies a way of hooking up a component to a json item instead of hooking up a json item to a json item

                      cc: @etpinard@chriddyp@alexcjohnson

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Labels

                        Type

                        No type

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Bindings · Issue #1002 · plotly/plotly.js · GitHub
                          Skip to content

                          Bindings #1002

                          Description

                          @rreusser

                          As controls get more capable in plotly, two-way binding becomes necessary. That is, a slider can change the frame, but the slider should also reflect the current frame when something else (e.g. a play button) changes it. This could also be the case for a marker size, a size ref, or a transform parameter. My current slider PR does this in sort of an ad hoc manner, but I really think it should be more general.

                          Proposal: bindings

                          Option 1:

                          Bindings are defined in the layout. For example:

                          "layout": {
                          "bindings": [{
                          "bind": "layout.updatemenus[0].active",
                          "to": "data[0].marker.color",
                          "lookup": {
                          "red": 0,
                          "green": 1,
                          "blue": 2
                          }
                          }]
                          }

                          In this example, bind is the data that gets changed, to is the item that's observed for changes, and lookup is an optional translation table that maps one to the other. Whenever a plotly event is emitted or when a relayout/restyle/update occurs, we quickly look through the bindings to see what's changed (which shouldn't be expensive enough that it's a problem). If an item has changed, that item is written to the state of the plot. A plotly_bindingchange event is emitted. All components (that's the best I can do right now) must then look through their data to see if anything has changed and update accordingly.

                          Pros:

                          • Bindings link two parts of the plotly state, which accurately represents what's actually happening

                          Cons:

                          • Updates take just a bit of thought and bookkeeping to do efficiently since this isn't react
                          • requires a separate specification of bindings in addition to just the slider
                          • refers to other parts of the plotly json by integer index within the plotly json, which seems probably okay but 10% fragile

                          Option 2:

                          Bindings are defined in the component that needs them, e.g. a slider. The slider has:

                          "bindto": "data[0].marker.color"

                          Most of the logic is the same. (I've omitted the lookup table since, though it could be added, we should probably go to great lengths to generally avoid needing.) When a component binds to a variable, we register it as needing a lookup. We scan through those liberally since it's fast, and when one changes, we emit an event. This case is a little simpler since we can emit plotly_bindingchange with data {binding: 'data[0].marker.color', value: 'red'}. The component sees its binding has changed and updates accordingly.

                          Pros:

                          • Requires less typing
                          • Collocates binding with the thing that uses the binding
                          • Avoids extra reference to updatemenus[0].active
                          • The update pattern is maybe a bit more straightforward since the component directly knows about the binding.

                          Cons:

                          • Less general since it specifies a way of hooking up a component to a json item instead of hooking up a json item to a json item

                          cc: @etpinard@chriddyp@alexcjohnson

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Labels

                            Type

                            No type

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Bindings · Issue #1002 · plotly/plotly.js · GitHub
                              Skip to content

                              Bindings #1002

                              Description

                              @rreusser

                              As controls get more capable in plotly, two-way binding becomes necessary. That is, a slider can change the frame, but the slider should also reflect the current frame when something else (e.g. a play button) changes it. This could also be the case for a marker size, a size ref, or a transform parameter. My current slider PR does this in sort of an ad hoc manner, but I really think it should be more general.

                              Proposal: bindings

                              Option 1:

                              Bindings are defined in the layout. For example:

                              "layout": {
                              "bindings": [{
                              "bind": "layout.updatemenus[0].active",
                              "to": "data[0].marker.color",
                              "lookup": {
                              "red": 0,
                              "green": 1,
                              "blue": 2
                              }
                              }]
                              }

                              In this example, bind is the data that gets changed, to is the item that's observed for changes, and lookup is an optional translation table that maps one to the other. Whenever a plotly event is emitted or when a relayout/restyle/update occurs, we quickly look through the bindings to see what's changed (which shouldn't be expensive enough that it's a problem). If an item has changed, that item is written to the state of the plot. A plotly_bindingchange event is emitted. All components (that's the best I can do right now) must then look through their data to see if anything has changed and update accordingly.

                              Pros:

                              • Bindings link two parts of the plotly state, which accurately represents what's actually happening

                              Cons:

                              • Updates take just a bit of thought and bookkeeping to do efficiently since this isn't react
                              • requires a separate specification of bindings in addition to just the slider
                              • refers to other parts of the plotly json by integer index within the plotly json, which seems probably okay but 10% fragile

                              Option 2:

                              Bindings are defined in the component that needs them, e.g. a slider. The slider has:

                              "bindto": "data[0].marker.color"

                              Most of the logic is the same. (I've omitted the lookup table since, though it could be added, we should probably go to great lengths to generally avoid needing.) When a component binds to a variable, we register it as needing a lookup. We scan through those liberally since it's fast, and when one changes, we emit an event. This case is a little simpler since we can emit plotly_bindingchange with data {binding: 'data[0].marker.color', value: 'red'}. The component sees its binding has changed and updates accordingly.

                              Pros:

                              • Requires less typing
                              • Collocates binding with the thing that uses the binding
                              • Avoids extra reference to updatemenus[0].active
                              • The update pattern is maybe a bit more straightforward since the component directly knows about the binding.

                              Cons:

                              • Less general since it specifies a way of hooking up a component to a json item instead of hooking up a json item to a json item

                              cc: @etpinard@chriddyp@alexcjohnson

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Labels

                                Type

                                No type

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions