Skip to content

Fixup labels on reversed axes when ticklabelmode is set to period - #5060

Merged
archmoj merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
ticklabel-period-reversed
Aug 12, 2020
Merged

Fixup labels on reversed axes when ticklabelmode is set to period#5060
archmoj merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
ticklabel-period-reversed

Conversation

@archmoj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow up of implementing #4911 by #4993.
Fixes the labels on reversed axes the bug introduced in 83f5cdd.

@plotly/plotly_js

@alexcjohnson

alexcjohnson commented Aug 11, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Nice, good catch!
testing this out this seems to introduce a (much more minor) bug with regular non-reversed axes when the tick corresponding to the first tick label is just out-of-range, we get the full 2-line label twice:

Screen Shot 2020-08-11 at 5 56 06 PM

It'd be nice to include jasmine tests for ^^ both forward and reversed, with the original range shifted in something like 6-hour increments - so ranges:

['2019-12-29', '2020-01-04']
['2019-12-29 06', '2020-01-04 06']
['2019-12-29 12', '2020-01-04 12']
['2019-12-29 18', '2020-01-04 18']
['2020-01-04 18', '2019-12-29 18']
['2020-01-04 12', '2019-12-29 12']
['2020-01-04 06', '2019-12-29 06']
['2020-01-04', '2019-12-29']

And just check that the tick text we get in each case is as expected. Something like that should cover all the related cases, I'd think.

@archmoj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@alexcjohnson in order not to intersect with #5065, I need to merge this PR and work on the fix for #5065 (comment).
I could address your comment above afterwards.
So merging...

@archmoj
archmoj merged commit 29b456e into masterAug 12, 2020
@archmoj
archmoj deleted the ticklabel-period-reversed branch August 12, 2020 13:49
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bugsomething broken

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@archmoj@alexcjohnson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Fixup labels on reversed axes when ticklabelmode is set to period by archmoj · Pull Request #5060 · plotly/plotly.js · GitHub
Skip to content

Fixup labels on reversed axes when ticklabelmode is set to period - #5060

Merged
archmoj merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
ticklabel-period-reversed
Aug 12, 2020
Merged

Fixup labels on reversed axes when ticklabelmode is set to period#5060
archmoj merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
ticklabel-period-reversed

Conversation

@archmoj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow up of implementing #4911 by #4993.
Fixes the labels on reversed axes the bug introduced in 83f5cdd.

@plotly/plotly_js

@alexcjohnson

alexcjohnson commented Aug 11, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Nice, good catch!
testing this out this seems to introduce a (much more minor) bug with regular non-reversed axes when the tick corresponding to the first tick label is just out-of-range, we get the full 2-line label twice:

Screen Shot 2020-08-11 at 5 56 06 PM

It'd be nice to include jasmine tests for ^^ both forward and reversed, with the original range shifted in something like 6-hour increments - so ranges:

['2019-12-29', '2020-01-04']
['2019-12-29 06', '2020-01-04 06']
['2019-12-29 12', '2020-01-04 12']
['2019-12-29 18', '2020-01-04 18']
['2020-01-04 18', '2019-12-29 18']
['2020-01-04 12', '2019-12-29 12']
['2020-01-04 06', '2019-12-29 06']
['2020-01-04', '2019-12-29']

And just check that the tick text we get in each case is as expected. Something like that should cover all the related cases, I'd think.

@archmoj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@alexcjohnson in order not to intersect with #5065, I need to merge this PR and work on the fix for #5065 (comment).
I could address your comment above afterwards.
So merging...

@archmoj
archmoj merged commit 29b456e into masterAug 12, 2020
@archmoj
archmoj deleted the ticklabel-period-reversed branch August 12, 2020 13:49
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bugsomething broken

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@archmoj@alexcjohnson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Fixup labels on reversed axes when ticklabelmode is set to period by archmoj · Pull Request #5060 · plotly/plotly.js · GitHub
Skip to content

Fixup labels on reversed axes when ticklabelmode is set to period - #5060

Merged
archmoj merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
ticklabel-period-reversed
Aug 12, 2020
Merged

Fixup labels on reversed axes when ticklabelmode is set to period#5060
archmoj merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
ticklabel-period-reversed

Conversation

@archmoj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow up of implementing #4911 by #4993.
Fixes the labels on reversed axes the bug introduced in 83f5cdd.

@plotly/plotly_js

@alexcjohnson

alexcjohnson commented Aug 11, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Nice, good catch!
testing this out this seems to introduce a (much more minor) bug with regular non-reversed axes when the tick corresponding to the first tick label is just out-of-range, we get the full 2-line label twice:

Screen Shot 2020-08-11 at 5 56 06 PM

It'd be nice to include jasmine tests for ^^ both forward and reversed, with the original range shifted in something like 6-hour increments - so ranges:

['2019-12-29', '2020-01-04']
['2019-12-29 06', '2020-01-04 06']
['2019-12-29 12', '2020-01-04 12']
['2019-12-29 18', '2020-01-04 18']
['2020-01-04 18', '2019-12-29 18']
['2020-01-04 12', '2019-12-29 12']
['2020-01-04 06', '2019-12-29 06']
['2020-01-04', '2019-12-29']

And just check that the tick text we get in each case is as expected. Something like that should cover all the related cases, I'd think.

@archmoj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@alexcjohnson in order not to intersect with #5065, I need to merge this PR and work on the fix for #5065 (comment).
I could address your comment above afterwards.
So merging...

@archmoj
archmoj merged commit 29b456e into masterAug 12, 2020
@archmoj
archmoj deleted the ticklabel-period-reversed branch August 12, 2020 13:49
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bugsomething broken

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@archmoj@alexcjohnson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Fixup labels on reversed axes when ticklabelmode is set to period by archmoj · Pull Request #5060 · plotly/plotly.js · GitHub
Skip to content

Fixup labels on reversed axes when ticklabelmode is set to period - #5060

Merged
archmoj merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
ticklabel-period-reversed
Aug 12, 2020
Merged

Fixup labels on reversed axes when ticklabelmode is set to period#5060
archmoj merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
ticklabel-period-reversed

Conversation

@archmoj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow up of implementing #4911 by #4993.
Fixes the labels on reversed axes the bug introduced in 83f5cdd.

@plotly/plotly_js

@alexcjohnson

alexcjohnson commented Aug 11, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Nice, good catch!
testing this out this seems to introduce a (much more minor) bug with regular non-reversed axes when the tick corresponding to the first tick label is just out-of-range, we get the full 2-line label twice:

Screen Shot 2020-08-11 at 5 56 06 PM

It'd be nice to include jasmine tests for ^^ both forward and reversed, with the original range shifted in something like 6-hour increments - so ranges:

['2019-12-29', '2020-01-04']
['2019-12-29 06', '2020-01-04 06']
['2019-12-29 12', '2020-01-04 12']
['2019-12-29 18', '2020-01-04 18']
['2020-01-04 18', '2019-12-29 18']
['2020-01-04 12', '2019-12-29 12']
['2020-01-04 06', '2019-12-29 06']
['2020-01-04', '2019-12-29']

And just check that the tick text we get in each case is as expected. Something like that should cover all the related cases, I'd think.

@archmoj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@alexcjohnson in order not to intersect with #5065, I need to merge this PR and work on the fix for #5065 (comment).
I could address your comment above afterwards.
So merging...

@archmoj
archmoj merged commit 29b456e into masterAug 12, 2020
@archmoj
archmoj deleted the ticklabel-period-reversed branch August 12, 2020 13:49
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bugsomething broken

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@archmoj@alexcjohnson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Fixup labels on reversed axes when ticklabelmode is set to period by archmoj · Pull Request #5060 · plotly/plotly.js · GitHub
Skip to content

Fixup labels on reversed axes when ticklabelmode is set to period - #5060

Merged
archmoj merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
ticklabel-period-reversed
Aug 12, 2020
Merged

Fixup labels on reversed axes when ticklabelmode is set to period#5060
archmoj merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
ticklabel-period-reversed

Conversation

@archmoj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow up of implementing #4911 by #4993.
Fixes the labels on reversed axes the bug introduced in 83f5cdd.

@plotly/plotly_js

@alexcjohnson

alexcjohnson commented Aug 11, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Nice, good catch!
testing this out this seems to introduce a (much more minor) bug with regular non-reversed axes when the tick corresponding to the first tick label is just out-of-range, we get the full 2-line label twice:

Screen Shot 2020-08-11 at 5 56 06 PM

It'd be nice to include jasmine tests for ^^ both forward and reversed, with the original range shifted in something like 6-hour increments - so ranges:

['2019-12-29', '2020-01-04']
['2019-12-29 06', '2020-01-04 06']
['2019-12-29 12', '2020-01-04 12']
['2019-12-29 18', '2020-01-04 18']
['2020-01-04 18', '2019-12-29 18']
['2020-01-04 12', '2019-12-29 12']
['2020-01-04 06', '2019-12-29 06']
['2020-01-04', '2019-12-29']

And just check that the tick text we get in each case is as expected. Something like that should cover all the related cases, I'd think.

@archmoj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@alexcjohnson in order not to intersect with #5065, I need to merge this PR and work on the fix for #5065 (comment).
I could address your comment above afterwards.
So merging...

@archmoj
archmoj merged commit 29b456e into masterAug 12, 2020
@archmoj
archmoj deleted the ticklabel-period-reversed branch August 12, 2020 13:49
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bugsomething broken

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@archmoj@alexcjohnson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Fixup labels on reversed axes when ticklabelmode is set to period by archmoj · Pull Request #5060 · plotly/plotly.js · GitHub
Skip to content

Fixup labels on reversed axes when ticklabelmode is set to period - #5060

Merged
archmoj merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
ticklabel-period-reversed
Aug 12, 2020
Merged

Fixup labels on reversed axes when ticklabelmode is set to period#5060
archmoj merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
ticklabel-period-reversed

Conversation

@archmoj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow up of implementing #4911 by #4993.
Fixes the labels on reversed axes the bug introduced in 83f5cdd.

@plotly/plotly_js

@alexcjohnson

alexcjohnson commented Aug 11, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Nice, good catch!
testing this out this seems to introduce a (much more minor) bug with regular non-reversed axes when the tick corresponding to the first tick label is just out-of-range, we get the full 2-line label twice:

Screen Shot 2020-08-11 at 5 56 06 PM

It'd be nice to include jasmine tests for ^^ both forward and reversed, with the original range shifted in something like 6-hour increments - so ranges:

['2019-12-29', '2020-01-04']
['2019-12-29 06', '2020-01-04 06']
['2019-12-29 12', '2020-01-04 12']
['2019-12-29 18', '2020-01-04 18']
['2020-01-04 18', '2019-12-29 18']
['2020-01-04 12', '2019-12-29 12']
['2020-01-04 06', '2019-12-29 06']
['2020-01-04', '2019-12-29']

And just check that the tick text we get in each case is as expected. Something like that should cover all the related cases, I'd think.

@archmoj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@alexcjohnson in order not to intersect with #5065, I need to merge this PR and work on the fix for #5065 (comment).
I could address your comment above afterwards.
So merging...

@archmoj
archmoj merged commit 29b456e into masterAug 12, 2020
@archmoj
archmoj deleted the ticklabel-period-reversed branch August 12, 2020 13:49
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bugsomething broken

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@archmoj@alexcjohnson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Fixup labels on reversed axes when ticklabelmode is set to period by archmoj · Pull Request #5060 · plotly/plotly.js · GitHub
Skip to content

Fixup labels on reversed axes when ticklabelmode is set to period - #5060

Merged
archmoj merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
ticklabel-period-reversed
Aug 12, 2020
Merged

Fixup labels on reversed axes when ticklabelmode is set to period#5060
archmoj merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
ticklabel-period-reversed

Conversation

@archmoj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow up of implementing #4911 by #4993.
Fixes the labels on reversed axes the bug introduced in 83f5cdd.

@plotly/plotly_js

@alexcjohnson

alexcjohnson commented Aug 11, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Nice, good catch!
testing this out this seems to introduce a (much more minor) bug with regular non-reversed axes when the tick corresponding to the first tick label is just out-of-range, we get the full 2-line label twice:

Screen Shot 2020-08-11 at 5 56 06 PM

It'd be nice to include jasmine tests for ^^ both forward and reversed, with the original range shifted in something like 6-hour increments - so ranges:

['2019-12-29', '2020-01-04']
['2019-12-29 06', '2020-01-04 06']
['2019-12-29 12', '2020-01-04 12']
['2019-12-29 18', '2020-01-04 18']
['2020-01-04 18', '2019-12-29 18']
['2020-01-04 12', '2019-12-29 12']
['2020-01-04 06', '2019-12-29 06']
['2020-01-04', '2019-12-29']

And just check that the tick text we get in each case is as expected. Something like that should cover all the related cases, I'd think.

@archmoj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@alexcjohnson in order not to intersect with #5065, I need to merge this PR and work on the fix for #5065 (comment).
I could address your comment above afterwards.
So merging...

@archmoj
archmoj merged commit 29b456e into masterAug 12, 2020
@archmoj
archmoj deleted the ticklabel-period-reversed branch August 12, 2020 13:49
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bugsomething broken

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@archmoj@alexcjohnson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Fixup labels on reversed axes when ticklabelmode is set to period by archmoj · Pull Request #5060 · plotly/plotly.js · GitHub
Skip to content

Fixup labels on reversed axes when ticklabelmode is set to period - #5060

Merged
archmoj merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
ticklabel-period-reversed
Aug 12, 2020
Merged

Fixup labels on reversed axes when ticklabelmode is set to period#5060
archmoj merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
ticklabel-period-reversed

Conversation

@archmoj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow up of implementing #4911 by #4993.
Fixes the labels on reversed axes the bug introduced in 83f5cdd.

@plotly/plotly_js

@alexcjohnson

alexcjohnson commented Aug 11, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Nice, good catch!
testing this out this seems to introduce a (much more minor) bug with regular non-reversed axes when the tick corresponding to the first tick label is just out-of-range, we get the full 2-line label twice:

Screen Shot 2020-08-11 at 5 56 06 PM

It'd be nice to include jasmine tests for ^^ both forward and reversed, with the original range shifted in something like 6-hour increments - so ranges:

['2019-12-29', '2020-01-04']
['2019-12-29 06', '2020-01-04 06']
['2019-12-29 12', '2020-01-04 12']
['2019-12-29 18', '2020-01-04 18']
['2020-01-04 18', '2019-12-29 18']
['2020-01-04 12', '2019-12-29 12']
['2020-01-04 06', '2019-12-29 06']
['2020-01-04', '2019-12-29']

And just check that the tick text we get in each case is as expected. Something like that should cover all the related cases, I'd think.

@archmoj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@alexcjohnson in order not to intersect with #5065, I need to merge this PR and work on the fix for #5065 (comment).
I could address your comment above afterwards.
So merging...

@archmoj
archmoj merged commit 29b456e into masterAug 12, 2020
@archmoj
archmoj deleted the ticklabel-period-reversed branch August 12, 2020 13:49
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bugsomething broken

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@archmoj@alexcjohnson