Parcoords: Use paper background color for text shadow for better dark mode

[jonmmease]

Extracted from #5500.

Overview

Simple change to parcoords to use the figure's paper_bgcolor as the text shadow color and the axis brush border color. Before, these colors were hard-coded to white. This makes parcoords usable with a dark background.

Before

After

[jonmmease]

Thanks for the feedback @archmoj, it all makes good sense! I'll try to make the updates this evening.

[jonmmease]

@archmoj, I believe all of your suggestions are implemented now. Thanks!

[archmoj]

Discussing this PR with @alexcjohnson, we thought we need a layout attribute to control the color of (text) shadows depending on light/dark backgrounds.
@alexcjohnson could you please spec that out?

[archmoj]

Interesting to see that parcats uses different "2" for blur-radius instead of 1.
@alexcjohnson do you think we should declare and unify this in a new layout container?

[alexcjohnson]

Good 👁️
To me the 1 vs 2 doesn't make much visible difference, I'd probably standardize on 1. Also given that the purpose here is really outlining rather than a 3D-like shadow I'd combine offsetX and offsetY into a single offset.

[jonmmease]

I'm fine switching to 1 and regenerating the parcats baselines. And fine with combining the offsets.

[alexcjohnson]

what's this space for?

[jonmmease]

Nothing, will 🔪

[jonmmease]

Done in #9871117

[alexcjohnson]

Discussing this PR with @alexcjohnson, we thought we need a layout attribute to control the color of (text) shadows depending on light/dark backgrounds.
@alexcjohnson could you please spec that out?

I was thinking a trace attribute actually, named to correspond with whatever trace attribute sets the color of the text we're outlining. I wonder actually whether we could put this attribute into that font container, or if that would cause problems given that font containers have a standardized structure?

Anyway, the logic for the default outline color, as @archmoj and I discussed:

• If the font color is light and the paper color is dark or vice versa, default to the paper color.
• If both are light, default to black
• If both are dark, default to white
  Looks to me as though this can be implemented using just Color.contrast (which gives #444 rather than #000 for dark but I think that may be what we want?):

varfontContrast=Color.contrast(fontColor);varpaperContrast=Color.contrast(paperColor);vardfltOutlineColor=(fontContrast===paperContrast) ? fontContrast : paperColor;

[alexcjohnson]

For now we could probably just use that logic without adding a new outline color attribute.

[jonmmease]

A potential issue choosing the shadow automatically is that, for parcats and sankey, it's not the background color you would want to consider to determine contrast, it's the path color that the text is on top of.

[alexcjohnson]

it's not the background color you would want to consider to determine contrast, it's the path color that the text is on top of.

The point is just to create contrast with the text color. If it looks like the paper color will do that we would use it because we know this will fit with the overall style of the plot, otherwise use black or white. There can be lots of path colors, and your labels can bleed off the paths and onto the background, so I don't think we should involve path color at all.

[jonmmease]

Ok, here's what the auto cases look like for parcats:

These make it pretty obvious that we don't currently use a shadow for the dimension labels, so it's not really usable this way in current form unless we add dimension label shadows as well.

My perspective on this is that currently, if a user changes to a dark paper color they already need to change the font color to something light for basically any of our traces to look good. By having the shadow always match the paper color, the internal parcats/parcoords/sankey labels have the same color contrast characteristics as any other text that ends up being drawn on the paper (titles, tick labels, etc.).

It doesn't really feel helpful to me for these labels to be special cases in terms of their contrast behavior. Unless our long-term goals is to go all in here and add shadows to all text when we determine there is poor contrast.

[alexcjohnson]

By having the shadow always match the paper color, the internal parcats/parcoords/sankey labels have the same color contrast characteristics as any other text that ends up being drawn on the paper (titles, tick labels, etc.).

Sold. Those examples with similar text & paper colors look hideous using my proposed logic.

Unless our long-term goals is to go all in here and add shadows to all text when we determine there is poor contrast.

Probably not automatically, but I am starting to think we should add shadow support to all fonts at some point, and then this can just be used as the default shadow for the relevant fonts.

[archmoj]

Now that offset is always 1, let's simplify this function:

exports.makeTextShadow=function(color){return('1px 1px 1px'+color+', '+'-1px -1px 1px'+color+', '+'1px -1px 1px'+color+', '+'-1px 1px 1px'+color);};

But wait why do we need these four corners?

[alexcjohnson]

See discussion in https://www.codesdope.com/blog/article/adding-outline-to-text-using-css/

[archmoj]

Nicely done.
💃

[jonmmease]

Thanks @archmoj !