Skip to content

docs(prediction): define event cohort architecture - #144

Merged
proerror77 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/polymarket-event-cohort-docs
Jul 19, 2026
Merged

proerror77 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/polymarket-event-cohort-docs

Conversation

@proerror77

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Change contract

Document the Polymarket event-root, symbol-by-horizon mission, shared Chainlink cohort, and settlement-versus-token-execution boundaries introduced by #143, without changing runtime behavior.

Out of scope

  • Rust behavior, schemas, collectors, evaluators, or mission templates
  • UP/DOWN token execution heads
  • Full-update-tick collection
  • Governed 15-minute or one-hour implementation
  • ECS, deployment, Paper/Shadow, or live-trading changes

Dependency or merge order

Stacked on #143 (codex/polymarket-event-settlement-contract). Merge #143 first, retarget this PR to main, rerun current-head checks, then merge this documentation layer.

Focused validation

Rollout / rollback impact

Documentation-only. No runtime or artifact behavior changes. Roll back by reverting this PR after #143; no data, collector, ECS, execution, or live state is mutated.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@proerror77, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 15 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 86bf22e2-1ecb-4eb4-a603-c42a4d814a22

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ecbc49a and f8cff04.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • docs/architecture/PREDICTION_MARKETS.md
  • rust_hft/prediction-markets/docs/ALPHA_FACTOR_SEARCH_CICD.md
  • rust_hft/prediction-markets/docs/CRYPTO_LOB_ML_DEPLOY_CHECKLIST.md
  • rust_hft/prediction-markets/tasks/todo.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/polymarket-event-cohort-docs

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@proerror77
proerror77 force-pushed the codex/polymarket-event-cohort-docs branch from cc34074 to f8cff04 Compare July 19, 2026 02:36
@proerror77
proerror77 changed the base branch from codex/polymarket-event-settlement-contract to main July 19, 2026 02:43
@proerror77
proerror77 marked this pull request as ready for review July 19, 2026 02:43
@proerror77
proerror77 merged commit 7e6c455 into main Jul 19, 2026
2 checks passed
@proerror77
proerror77 deleted the codex/polymarket-event-cohort-docs branch July 19, 2026 02:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant