Reuse signed Paper and Shadow intake for CEX bundles - #906
Conversation
|
Important Review available on request
Reviews should be triggered manually for repositories with fewer than 10 stars. Select Trigger review above or comment ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 8121e4f0ba
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: f87612971c
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 291b8989e1
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
Self-review found and fixed one sparse-market edge case on the current head: pending target retries are now anchored to the actual emission bucket, while the decision still uses the last point-in-time book. Added a focused gap regression. Local evidence: @codex review the exact current head |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: b43db3a4d7
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
Addressed the newly surfaced USD-M partial-depth P1 on exact head Local evidence: default and @codex review the exact current head |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Hooray! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
|
@codex review Please review exact head |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 6d3eaeb4a4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review Please review exact head This head closes the latest review findings with an epoch-aligned strategy clock that continues through quiet buckets, waits for market-input backlog to drain, filters mixed strategy cadences, and pauses on missed boundaries. It also rejects unsupported USD-M depth frequencies before reconnect, preserves USD-M fill attribution, and rejects cross-spread four-stage admission until clock-driven arrival-book binding exists. Local evidence: Formula 22/22; hft-live 20 + 1 + 8 + 12; hft-runtime 63/63; alpha-harness 147/147; live hotpath 16/16; Binance adapter 41 passed / 3 ignored in default and json-simd modes; strict scoped Clippy and diff checks pass. The full hft-engine package still has one unrelated duplicate-order test failure, reproduced unchanged on parent |
|
@codex review Please review exact current head |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 83b562513e
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review Please review exact current head This head addresses only the two latest P1 findings: the signed four-stage CEX contract now carries its sealed cost model into runtime attribution, cost-required activations cannot become Paper/Shadow healthy without complete modeled fee/execution-cost coverage, unsupported funding and cross-spread stay fail-closed, and capacity-enabled candidates cap all runtime notional paths at the sealed Local evidence: alpha-domain 62/62; alpha-harness 147/147; hft-live with Binance + Formula 22 lib + 1 main + 8 artifact + 12 envelope tests; strict scoped Clippy, rustfmt, and diff checks pass. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 1738ff3eb9
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review Please review exact current head This head addresses only the two latest P1 findings: the effective post-cap CEX notional is carried into runtime attribution, and canonical L2 is restricted to the existing positive-cadence bucketed/target-position contract while ordinary Formula strategies retain the published BBO overlay. No new strategy API or compatibility path was added. Local evidence: alpha-harness 147/147; hft-live with Binance + Formula 22 lib + 1 main + 8 artifact + 12 envelope; Formula 22/22; Engine live-hotpath 16/16; focused clock test; strict scoped Clippy; rustfmt and diff checks. The all-target Engine Clippy command also reports five unchanged lint findings already present on |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Swish! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
Change
Issue relationship
Closes #605
Validation
Runtime impact and rollback
No external Paper, Shadow, or LiveSmall activation was performed. LiveSmall remains rejected. Roll back commit 8121e4f if this intake path must be removed.